Skip to main content
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

Chapter 2 - Understanding the mechanisms underlying recovery after stroke

from Section 1 - Technology of neurorehabilitation: outcome measurement and diagnostic technology
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511995590
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *


1. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, et al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2011; 42: 1482–8.
2. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2005a; 352: 1677–84.
3. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181–6.
4. Heuschmann PU, Wiedmann S, Wellwood I, et al. Three-month stroke outcome: the European Registers of Stroke (EROS) investigators. Neurology 2011; 76: 159–65.
5. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 823–30.
6. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693–702.
7. Ng YS, Stein J, Ning M, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and functional outcomes of ischemic stroke in different vascular territories. Stroke 2007; 38: 2309–14.
8. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) 2001. Available from: [Accessed April 30, 2010.]
9. Kwakkel G. Towards integrative neurorehabilitation science. Physiother Res Int 2009; 14: 137–46.
10. Levin MF, Kleim JA, Wolf SL. What do motor “recovery” and “compensation” mean in patients following stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 313–19.
11. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 2000; 123: 940–53.
12. Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R, Levin MF. Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2006; 37: 186–92.
13. Buurke JH, Nene AV, Kwakkel G, et al. Recovery of gait after stroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 676–83.
14. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC. Effect of duration of upper- and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 432–48.
15. Roby-Brami A, Jacobs S, Bennis N, et al. Hand orientation for grasping and arm joint rotation patterns in healthy subjects and hemiparetic stroke patients. Brain Res 2003; 969: 217–29.
16. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004a; 22: 281–99.
17. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 861–72.
18. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. Early prediction of functional outcome after stroke (EPOS) investigators. Diagnostic accuracy of the Barthel index for measuring activities of daily living outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: does early poststroke timing of assessment matter? Stroke 2011; 42: 342–6.
19. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002; 33: 179–85.
20. Dobkin BH. Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-orinted training: lesons of designs of EXCITE and SCILT multicentre trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 3–13.
21. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, et al. Predicting disability in stroke–a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479–89.
22. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714–19.
23. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 406–12.
24. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994; 25: 808–13.
25. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 5–8.
26. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177–82.
27. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992; 23: 1084–9.
28. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, et al. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994; 25: 1181–8.
29. Gresham GE. Stroke outcome research. Stroke 1986; 17: 358–60.
30. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients. ScientificWorld Journal 2007; 7: 2031–45.
31. French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD006073.
32. French B, Thomas L, Leathley M, et al. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 9–14.
33. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 191–6.
34. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529–39.
35. Veerbeek JM, Van Wegen EE, Harmeling-Van der Wel BC, et al. Is accurate prediction of gait in nonambulatory stroke patients possible within 72 hours poststroke? The EPOS study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 268–74.
36. French B, Thomas LH, Leathley MJ, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD006073.
37. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long-term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 473–9.
38. English C, Hillier SL. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 7: CD007513.
39. van de Port IG, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lindeman E, et al. Effects of exercise training programs on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 86: 935–51.
40. Wevers L, van de Port I, Vermue M, et al. Effects of task-oriented circuit class training on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2009; 40: 2450–9.
41. Mehrholz J, Werner C, Kugler J, et al. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD006185.
42. Legg L, Drummond A, Leonardi-Bee J, et al. Occupational therapy for patients with problems in personal activities of daily living after stroke: systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ 2007; 335: 922.
43. Logan PA, Gladman JR, Avery A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke. BMJ 2004; 329: 1372–5.
44. Walker MF, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P, et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 2226–32.
45. Hakkennes S, Keating JL. Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Aust J Physiother 2005; 51: 221–31.
46. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremities in patients with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 4: CD004433.
47. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095–104.
48. Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation. J Neural Sci 1997; 151: 207–12.
49. Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 292: 1853–61.
50. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 111–21.
51. Pomeroy VM, Clark CA, Miller JS, et al. The potential for utilizing the “mirror neurone system” to enhance recovery of the severely affected upper limb early after stroke: a review and hypothesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 4–13.
52. Donkervoort M, Dekker J, Deelman B. The course of apraxia and ADL functioning in left hemisphere stroke patients treated in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 1085–93.
53. Van Peppen RP, Kortsmit M, Lindeman E, et al. Effects of visual feedback therapy on postural control in bilateral standing after stroke: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 3–9.
54. Woodford H, Price C. EMG biofeedback for the recovery of motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 2: CD004585.
55. Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, et al. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 4: CD002840.
56. Kollen BJ, Rietberg MB, Kwakkel G, et al. Effects of overloading of the lower hemiparetic extremity on walking speed in chronic stroke patients: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation 2000; 14: 159–64.
57. Zhang SH, Liu M, Asplund K, et al. Acupuncture for acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2: CD003317.
58. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Armesto A, et al. Physiotherapy coupled with dextroamphetamine for rehabilitation after hemiparetic stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 2006; 37: 179–85.
59. Martinsson L, Hårdemark H, Eksborg S. Amphetamines for improving recovery after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 1: CD002090.
60. Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B, et al. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke 2009; 40: e89–97.
61. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 833–62.
62. Heddings AA, Friel KM, Plautz EJ, et al. Factors contributing to motor impairment and recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 301–10.
63. Furlan M, Marchal G, Viader F, et al. Spontaneous neurological recovery after stroke and the fate of the ischemic penumbra. Ann Neurol 1996; 40: 216–26.
64. Marchal G, Benali K, Iglesias S, et al. Voxel-based mapping of irreversible ischaemic damage with PET in acute stroke. Brain 1999; 122: 2387–400.
65. Touzani O, Roussel S, MacKenzie ET. The ischaemic penumbra. Curr Opin Neurol 2001; 14: 83–8.
66. Witte OW, Bidmon HJ, Schiene K, et al. Functional differentiation of multiple perilesional zones after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000; 20: 1149–65.
67. Kakuda W, Lansberg MG, Thijs VN, et al. Optimal definition for PWI/DWI mismatch in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008; 28: 887–91.
68. Schlaug G, Benfield A, Baird AE, et al. The ischemic penumbra: operationally defined by diffusion and perfusion MRI. Neurology 1999; 53: 1528–37.
69. Minematsu K, Li L, Sotak CH, et al. Reversible focal ischemic injury demonstrated by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in rats. Stroke 1992; 23: 1304–10; discussion 1310–11.
70. Giza CC, Prins ML. Is being plastic fantastic? Mechanisms of altered plasticity after developmental traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurosci 2006; 28: 364–79.
71. Calabresi P, Centonze D, Pisani A, et al. Synaptic plasticity in the ischaemic brain. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 622–9.
72. Fujioka H, Kaneko H, Suzuki SS, et al. Hyperexcitability-associated rapid plasticity after a focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2004; 35: e346–8.
73. Que M, Witte OW, Neumann-Haefelin T, et al. Changes in GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptor binding following cortical photothrombosis: a quantitative receptor autoradiographic study. Neuroscience 1999; 93: 1233–40.
74. Reinecke S, Lutzenburg M, Hagemann G, et al. Electrophysiological transcortical diaschisis after middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats. Neurosci Lett 1999; 261: 85–8.
75. Giza CC, Griesbach GS, Hovda DA. Experience-dependent behavioral plasticity is disturbed following traumatic injury to the immature brain. Behav Brain Res 2005; 157: 11–22.
76. Baron JC. How healthy is the acutely reperfused ischemic penumbra? Cerebrovasc Dis 2005; 20: 25–31.
77. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, et al. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 785–807.
78. Feeney DM, Baron JC. Diaschisis. Stroke 1986 Sep-Oct; 17: 817 30.
79. Carmichael ST, Tatsukawa K, Katsman D, et al. Evolution of diaschisis in a focal stroke model. Stroke 2004; 35: 758–63.
80. Chu WJ, Mason GF, Pan JW, et al. Regional cerebral blood flow and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging findings in diaschisis from stroke. Stroke 2002; 33: 1243–8.
81. Kim J, Lee SK, Lee JD, et al. Decreased fractional anisotropy of middle cerebellar peduncle in crossed cerebellar diaschisis: diffusion-tensor imaging-positron-emission tomography correlation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 2224–8.
82. Arasaki K, Igarashi O, Ichikawa Y, et al. Reduction in the motor unit number estimate (MUNE) after cerebral infarction. J Clin Neurol Sci 2006; 250: 27–32.
83. Chang CW. Evident trans-synaptic degeneration of motor neurons after stroke: a study of neuromuscular jitter by axonal microstimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998; 109: 199–202.
84. Hara Y, Masakado Y, Chino N. The physiological functional loss of single thenar motor units in stroke patients: when does it occur? Does it progress. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 97–103.
85. Lukács M. Electrophysiological signs of changes in motor units after ischaemic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 116: 1566–70.
86. Komaba Y, Mishina M, Utsumi K, et al. Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in patients with cortical infarction: logistic regression analysis to control for confounding effects. Stroke 2004; 35: 472–6.
87. Seitz RJ, Azari NP, Knorr U, et al. The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. Stroke 1999; 30: 1844–50.
88. Takasawa M, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, et al. Prognostic value of subacute crossed cerebellar diaschisis: single-photon emission CT study in patients with middle cerebral artery territory infarct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 189–93.
89. Gold L, Lauritzen M. Neuronal deactivation explains decreased cerebellar blood flow in response to focal cerebral ischemia or suppressed neocortical function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99: 7699–704.
90. Hallett M. Plasticity of the human motor cortex and recovery from stroke. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2001; 36: 169–74.
91. Johansson BB. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke 2000; 31: 223–30.
92. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 1000–19.
93. Trachtenberg JT, Chen BE, Knott GW, et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 2002; 420: 788–94.
94. Boroojerdi B, Ziemann U, Chen R, et al. Mechanisms underlying human motor system plasticity. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 602–13.
95. Feldman DE, Brecht M. Map plasticity in somatosensory cortex. Science 2005; 310: 810–15.
96. Cooke SF, Bliss TV. Plasticity in the human central nervous system. Brain 2006; 129: 1659–73.
97. Dan Y, Poo MM. Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron 2004; 44: 23–30.
98. Sasaki Y, Araki T, Milbrandt J. Stimulation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide biosynthetic pathways delays axonal degeneration after axotomy. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 8484–91.
99. Dobkin BH. Rehabilitation and functional neuroimaging dose-response trajectories for clinical trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 276–82.
100. Ploughman M, Granter-Button S, Chernenko G, et al. Exercise intensity influences the temporal profile of growth factors involved in neuronal plasticity following focal ischemia. Brain Res 2007; 1150: 207–16.
101. Cramer SC, Chopp M. Recovery recapitulates ontogeny. Trends Neurosci 2000; 23: 265–71.
102. Lu A, Tang Y, Ran R, et al. Genomics of the periinfarction cortex after focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23: 786–810.
103. Carmichael ST. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves. Ann Neurol 2006; 59: 735–42.
104. Nudo RJ. Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006; 16: 638–44.
105. Ploughman M, Granter-Button S, Chernenko G, et al. Endurance exercise regimens induce differential effects on brain-derived neurotrophic factor, synapsin-I and insulin-like growth factor I after focal ischemia. Neuroscience 2005; 136: 991–1001.
106. Ploughman M, Windle V, MacLellan CL, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor contributes to recovery of skilled reaching after focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 2009; 40: 1490–5.
107. Van Praag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000; 1: 191–8.
108. Van Praag H, Schinder AF, Christie BR, et al. Functional neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Nature 2002; 415: 1030–4.
109. Jessberger S, Clark RE, Broadbent NJ, et al. Dentate gyrus-specific knockdown of adult neurogenesis impairs spatial and object recognition memory in adult rats. Learn Mem 2009; 16: 147–54.
110. Urban NN, Barrionuevo G. Induction of Hebbian and non-Hebbian mossy fiber long-term potentiation by distinct patterns of high-frequency stimulation. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 4293–9.
111. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003; 34: 1553–66.
112. Dijkhuizen RM, Singhal AB, Mandeville JB, et al. Correlation between brain reorganization, ischemic damage, and neurologic status after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 510–7.
113. Dong Y, Winstein CJ, Albistegui-DuBois R, et al. Evolution of fMRI activation in the perilesional primary motor cortex and cerebellum with rehabilitation training-related motor gains after stroke: a pilot study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 412–28.
114. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33: 1610–17.
115. Nelles G, Spiekramann G, Jueptner M, et al. Evolution of functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke: a serial positron emission tomographic activation study. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 901–9.
116. Nelles G, Spiekermann G, Jueptner M, et al. Reorganization of sensory and motor systems in hemiplegic stroke patients. A positron emission tomography study. Stroke 1999; 30: 1510–16.
117. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, et al. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 1430–48.
118. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, et al. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 2476–96.
119. Ward NS. Plasticity and the functional reorganization of the human brain. Int J Psychophysiol 2005; 58: 158–61.
120. Ward NS. Neural plasticity and recovery of function. Prog Brain Res 2005; 150: 527–35.
121. Zemke AC, Heagerty PJ, Lee C, et al. Motor cortex organization after stroke is related to side of stroke and level of recovery. Stroke 2003; 34: e23–8.
122. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Egan GF, et al. Motor impairment and recovery in the upper limb after stroke: behavioral and neuroanatomical correlates. Stroke 2005; 36: 625–9.
123. Carey LM, Abbott DF, Egan GF, et al. Evolution of brain activation with good and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 24–41.
124. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998; 250: –8.
125. Nelles G. Cortical reorganization–effects of intensive therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 239–44.
126. Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M, et al. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 1146–54.
127. Calautti C, Leroy F, Guincestre JY, et al. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 2001; 32: 2534–42.
128. Small SL, Hlustik P, Noll DC, et al. Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke. Brain 2002; 125: 1544–57.
129. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007; 130: 170–80.
130. Newton JM, Ward NS, Parker GJ, et al. Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas–relevance to stroke recovery. Brain 2006; 129: 1844–58.
131. Buma FE, Lindeman E, Ramsey NF, et al. Functional neuroimaging studies of early upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 589–608.
132. Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H, Guy C, et al. Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain 2002; 125: 2731–42.
133. Michelon P, Vettel JM, Zacks JM. Lateral somatotopic organization during imagined and prepared movements. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95: 811–22.
134. Schwerin S, Dewald JP, Haztl M, et al. Ipsilateral versus contralateral cortical motor projections to a shoulder adductor in chronic hemiparetic stroke: implications for the expression of arm synergies. Exp Brain Res 2008; 185: 509–19.
135. Kim YH, Jang SH, Chang Y, et al. Bilateral primary sensori-motor cortex activation of post-stroke mirror movements: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 1329–32.
136. Dobkin BH. Functional MRI: a potential physiologic indicator for stroke rehabilitation interventions. Stroke 2003; 34: e23–8.
137. Liu Z, Li Y, Zhang RL, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells promote skilled motor recovery and enhance contralesional axonal connections after ischemic stroke in adult mice. Stroke 2011; 42: 740–4.
138. Auriat AM, Grams JD, Yan RH, et al. Forced exercise does not improve recovery after hemorrhagic stroke in rats. Brain Res 2006; 1109: 183–91.
139. Plate KH. Mechanism of angiogenesis in the brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999; 58: 313–20.
140. Black JE, Isaacs KR, Anderson BJ, et al. Learning causes synaptogenesis, whereas motor activity causes angiogenesis, in cerebellar cortex of adult rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 5568–72.
141. Ding Y, Li J, Luan X, et al. Exercise pre-conditioning reduces brain damage in ischemic rats that may be associated with regional angiogenesis and cellular overexpression of neurotrophin. Neuroscience 2004; 124: 583–91.
142. Kleim JA, Cooper NR, VandenBerg PM. Exercise induces angiogenesis but does not alter movement representations within rat motor cortex. Brain Res 2002; 934: 1–6.
143. Swain RA, Harris AB, Wiener EC, et al. Prolonged exercise induces angiogenesis and increases cerebral blood volume in primary motor cortex of the rat. Neuroscience 2003; 117: 1037–46.
144. Endres M, Gertz K, Lindauer U, et al. Mechanisms of stroke protection by physical activity. Ann Neurol 2003; 54: 582–90.
145. Chen HI, Jen CJ, Chang WC. Effects of exercise training on the biosynthesis of prostacyclin and thromboxane in rats. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 147: 109–15.
146. Chopp M, Zhang ZG, Jiang Q. Neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and MRI indices of functional recovery from stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 827–31.
147. Krupinski J, Kaluza J, Kumar P, et al. Role of angiogenesis in patients with cerebral ischemic stroke. Stroke 1994; 25: 1794–8.
148. Jiang Q, Zhang ZG, Chopp M. MRI of stroke recovery. Stroke 2010; 41: 410–14.
149. Sunderland A, Tuke A. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2005; 15: 81–96.
150. Wolf SL, Butler AJ, Alberts JL, et al. Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005; 15: 229–39.
151. Veneman JF, Kruidhof R, Hekman EE, et al. Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007; 15: 379–86.
152. Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007; 25: 453–60.
153. Latash ML, Anson JG. What are “normal movements” in atypical populations? Behav Brain Sci 1996; 19: 55–106.
154. Goodwin N, Sunderland A. Intensive, time-series measurement of upper limb recovery in the subacute phase following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 69–82.
155. Wagner JM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, et al. Upper extremity muscle activation during recovery of reaching in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 164–76.
156. Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, et al. Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 2005; 36: 2676–80.
157. Kwakkel G, Meskers CG, van Wegen EE, et al. Impact of early applied upper limb stimulation: The EXPLICIT stroke programme design. BMC Neurol 2008; 8: 49.
158. Garland SJ, Willems DA, Ivanova TD, et al. Recovery of standing balance and functional mobility after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 1753–9.
159. de Haart M, Geurts AC, Huidekoper SC, et al. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 886–95.
160. Roerdink M, De Haart M, Daffertshofer A, et al. Dynamical structure of center-of-pressure trajectories in patients recovering from stroke. Exp Brain Res 2006; 174: 256–69.
161. van Asseldonk EH, Buurke JH, Bloem BR, et al. Disentangling the contribution of the paretic and non-paretic ankle to balance control in stroke patients. Exp Neurol 2006; 201: 441–51.
162. Den Otter AR, Geurts AC, Mulder T, et al. Gait recovery is not associated with changes in the temporal patterning of muscle activity during treadmill walking in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 4–15.
163. Kautz SA, Duncan PW, Perera S, et al. Coordination of hemiparetic locomotion after stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 250–8.
164. Bowden MG, Balasubramanian CK, Neptune RR, et al. Anterior-posterior ground reaction forces as a measure of paretic leg contribution in hemiparetic walking. Stroke 2006; 37: 872–6.
165. Balasubramanian CK, Bowden MG, Neptune RR, et al. Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 43–9.
166. Ellis MD, Holubar BG, Acosta AM, et al. Modifiability of abnormal isometric elbow and shoulder joint torque coupling after stroke. Muscle Nerve 2005; 32: 170–8.
167. Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JP. Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res 2007; 183: 215–23.
168. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, et al. Recovery of grasp versus reach in people with hemiparesis poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 444–54.
169. Michaelsen SM, Jacobs S, Roby-Brami A, et al. Compensation for distal impairments of grasping in adults with hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 2004; 157: 162–73.
170. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210–16.
171. Bernstein N. The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. New York, NY: Pergamon, 1967.
172. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmier RL, et al. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS). Neurology 2009; 73: 195–201.
173. Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, James DC, et al. Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Res 1998; 783: 286–92.
174. Kozlowski DA, James DC, Schallert T: Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 4776–86.
175. Risedal A, Zeng J, Johansson BB. Early training may exacerbate brain damage after focal brain ischemia in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999; 19: 997–1003.
176. Schallert T, Kozlowski DA, Humm JL, et al. Use-dependent structural events in recovery of function. Adv Neurol 1997; 73: 229–38.
177. Yang YR, Wang RY, Wang PS. Early and late treadmill training after focal brain ischemia in rats. Neurosci Lett 2003; 339: 91–4.
178. Grotta JC, Noser EA, Ro T, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 2004; 35: 2699–701.
179. Bland ST, Schallert T, Strong R, et al. Early exclusive use of the affected forelimb after moderate transient focal ischemia in rats : functional and anatomic outcome. Stroke 2000; 31: 1144–52.
180. Bland ST, Pillai RN, Aronowski J, et al. Early overuse and disuse of the affected forelimb after moderately severe intraluminal suture occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in rats. Behav Brain Res 2001; 126: 33–41.
181. Cramer SC. The!VECTORS study: When too much of a good thing is harmful. Neurology 2009; 73: 170–1.
182. Nijland R, Kwakkel G, Bakers J, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy for the upper paretic limb in acute or subacute stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke 2011; 6: 425–33.
183. Biernaskie J, Chernenko G, Corbett D. Efficacy of rehabilitative experience declines with time after focal ischemic brain injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 1245–54.
184. Marin R, Williams A, Hale S, et al. The effect of voluntary exercise exposure on histological and neurobehavioral outcomes after ischemic brain injury in the rat. Physiol Behav 2003; 80: 167–75.
185. Newman M. The process of recovery after hemiplegia. Stroke 1972; 3: 702–10.
186. Robertson IH, Murre JM. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 544–75.
187. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G. Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Motor Control 2007; 11: 276–308.
188. Dewald JP, Sheshadri V, Dawson ML, et al. Upper-limb discoordination in hemiparetic stroke: implications for neurorehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2001; 8: 1–12.
189. Mirbagheri MM, Tsao C, Settle K, et al. Time course of changes in neuromuscular properties following stroke. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 1: 5097–100.
190. Mirbagheri MM, Tsao CC, Rymer WZ. Natural history of neuromuscular properties after stroke: a longitudinal study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 1212–17.
191. Alibiglou L, Rymer WZ, Harvey RL, et al. The relation between Ashworth scores and neuromechanical measurements of spasticity following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2008; 5: 18.