Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 18
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    BECH, KRISTIN 2016. Old ‘truths’, new corpora: revisiting the word order of conjunct clauses in Old English. English Language and Linguistics, p. 1.


    CICHOSZ, ANNA 2016. Old English verbs of saying and verb-initial order. English Language and Linguistics, p. 1.


    Estrada-Fernández, Zarina 2016. Finiteness and Nominalization.


    FONTEYN, LAUREN and VAN DE POL, NIKKI 2016. Divide and conquer: the formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 20, Issue. 02, p. 185.


    Lee, Jerry Won 2016. The Politics of Intentionality in Englishes: Provincializing Capitalization. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 46.


    D'Arcy, Alexandra and Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2015. Not always variable: Probing the vernacular grammar. Language Variation and Change, Vol. 27, Issue. 03, p. 255.


    Rusten, Kristian A. 2015. A quantitative study of empty referential subjects in Old English prose and poetry. Transactions of the Philological Society, Vol. 113, Issue. 1, p. 53.


    Fulk, Robert D. 2014. A historical phonology of English. By Donka Minkova. Diachronica, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 457.


    2013. The Classical Tradition.


    MOLINEAUX, BENJAMIN J. 2012. Prosodically conditioned morphological change: preservation vs loss in Early English prefixes. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 16, Issue. 03, p. 427.


    Thurber, Beverly A. 2011. Voicing of Initial Interdental Fricatives in Early Middle English Function Words. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, Vol. 23, Issue. 01, p. 65.


    HAUMANN, DAGMAR 2010. Adnominal adjectives in Old English. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 14, Issue. 01, p. 53.


    LODGE, KEN 2010. Th'interpretation of t'definite article in t'North of England. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 14, Issue. 01, p. 111.


    McWHORTER, J. H. 2009. What else happened to English? A brief for the Celtic hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 13, Issue. 02, p. 163.


    SUÁREZ-GÓMEZ, CRISTINA 2009. On the syntactic differences between OE dialects: evidence from the Gospels. English Language and Linguistics, Vol. 13, Issue. 01, p. 57.


    Díaz, Victorina González 2006. The origin of English periphrastic comparatives. English Studies, Vol. 87, Issue. 6, p. 707.


    MESTHRIE, RAJEND 2006. World Englishes and the multilingual history of English. World Englishes, Vol. 25, Issue. 3-4, p. 381.


    McArthur, Tom 2001. World English and world Englishes: Trends, tensions, varieties, and standards. Language Teaching, Vol. 34, Issue. 01, p. 1.


    ×
  • Volume 1: The Beginnings to 1066
  • Edited by Richard M. Hogg, University of Manchester

  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge History of the English Language
    • Online ISBN: 9781139055529
    • Book DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The Cambridge History of the English Language is the first multi-volume work to provide a full account of the history of English. Its authoritative coverage extends from areas of central linguistic interest and concern to more specialised topics such as personal and place names. The volumes dealing with earlier periods are chronologically based, whilst those dealing with more recent periods are geographically based, thus reflecting the spread of English over the last 300 years. Volume 1 deals with the history of English up to the Norman Conquest, and contains chapters on Indo-European and Germanic, phonology and morphology, syntax, semantics and vocabulary, dialectology, onomastics, and literary language. Each chapter, as well as giving a chronologically-oriented presentation of the data, surveys scholarship in the area and takes full account of the impact of developing and current linguistic theory on the interpretation of the data. The chapters have been written with both specialists and non-specialists in mind; they will be essential reading for all those interested in the history of English.

Reviews

‘... far and away the biggest and most ambitious history of the language ever published, and to judge from the quality of the two volumes that have appeared, it will be an achievement of which all concerned can be thoroughly proud.’ Randolph Quirk, London Review of Books

Elizabeth Closs Traugott - Stanford University

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    Your Kindle email address
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
  • 1 - INTRODUCTION
    pp 1-25
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.002
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter provides compares the history of Old English with the political history, ecclesiastical history and literary history of Britain. It begins with a story of the Anglo-Saxon invasions and settlements of Britain by Saint Bede. From the linguistic point of view the most remarkable feature of the Anglo-Saxon settlement must be the virtually complete elimination of the Celtic languages. In the first half of the ninth century Mercian linguistic influence on Kentish texts was considerable, whilst towards the end of the period West Saxon texts can sometimes be seen to have Kentish influence. This could be due the ecclesiastical influence of Kent was much stronger than its political influence. The Alfredian texts, on phonological and morphological grounds commonly called Early West Saxon texts, are of immense importance in the history of the language, as they represent the first attempts at a written literary prose style. For a present-day language, the nature of the evidence is wide and varied.
  • 2 - THE PLACE OF ENGLISH IN GERMANIC AND INDO-EUROPEAN
    pp 26-66
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.003
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, Germanic, Celtic and a few other languages stem from a common proto-language, which is usually termed 'Indo-European'. The main concepts which underlie historical linguistics are the regularity of sound change and the systematic character of diachronic change in general. This chapter, after first discussing language change and historical linguistics, gives some information about the documentation available for the various Germanic languages; then an attempt is made at characterising the linguistic structure of Germanic language. English is often grouped together with Frisian as Ingvaeonic on the assumption that both represent a special linguistic group within West Germanic. Since Latin and Greek are the two Indo-European languages most widely known in European tradition, the examples given in the chapter are often drawn from them. The sound system of Indo-European results from systematic comparison of cognate lexical items in the individual languages. The chapter establishes the relationship between Germanic phonemes and their Indo-European starting-points.
  • 3 - PHONOLOGY AND MORPHOLOGY
    pp 67-167
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.004
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Old English was closely related to the other contemporary Germanic languages. Thus, whatever structures we suppose for Old English should not be drastically out of line with the structures supposed for those languages. The principal difficulty in morphological reconstruction, as opposed to phonological reconstruction, is to decide which type of analysis should be preferred. Orthographic usage was reasonably stable during the Old English period. Nevertheless, certain alphabets, which represent the usage of the late tenth century, underwent modifications of two different kinds with the passage of time. The sound system changed drastically between the time of the first Anglo-Saxon settlements and the Norman Conquest. Just as today one finds different sound systems in different dialects, so in Old English there was considerable dialect variation. Compared with the present-day language, Old English was highly inflected. Nouns had four cases and three genders; verbs inflected for person and number and for the indicative and subjunctive moods.
  • 4 - SYNTAX
    pp 168-289
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.005
  • View abstract
    Summary
    To understand the syntax of a language fully, one needs to have access to grammaticality judgements. This chapter focuses on constructions that are of particular interest in the history of English, and which highlight differences between Old English (OE) and later stages of the language. It concentrates on the absence of a determiner to express indefiniteness and on the question of whether there is evidence for an indefinite article in OE. By 'verbal group' is meant both the finite verb, and verbal phrases consisting of a main verb and one or more auxiliary verbs. The chapter provides a discussion of the finite verb, with focus on subject-verb agreement, tense and mood, and then moves on to constructions with auxiliary verbs. Then, it offers some generalisations about case assignment, moves on to a discussion of impersonal constructions, and then addresses the issue of subject and object in OE, including passives and reflexive constructions.
  • 5 - SEMANTICS AND VOCABULARY
    pp 290-408
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.006
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Vocabulary is characterised by large morphologically related word-families, where the relationship is transparent not only formally but most often also semantically. This chapter provides an outline of the major Old English (OE) word-formation patterns, since there still does not exist a comprehensive treatment of OE word-formation. It looks at these morphological aspects of the OE vocabulary, after providing some detailed remarks on the etymological sources of the OE vocabulary, notably the loan-words forming part of it, and its diatopic and diaphasic stratification. The general contact situation responsible for the borrowing process and the events leading up to are discussed briefly, because this was established during the Danelaw period, and later during the period of Danish rule between 1016 and 1035, and consequently falls within the OE period. The chapter surveys OE word-formation, and provides a general assessment of its typological properties, which could also be used as a starting-point for tracing the subsequent developments in the Middle English period.
  • 6 - OLD ENGLISH DIALECTS
    pp 409-451
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Linguists interested in earlier varieties of English are fortunate that the English language has been written for over a thousand years. Those records attest several clearly distinct historical varieties. This chapter investigates the methods for extracting information from ancient written records. The speech patterns we acquire early include markers of regional and social dialect. The chapter explores the linguistic relations between the Vespasian Psalter (VPs), the charters, the glossaries and a number of other related texts, now generally regarded as representing Mercian or Mercian influenced varieties of Old English. It provides an over-simplification and over-generalization of a great deal of textual diversity. The chapter offers an alternative interpretation of the earliest non-Northumbrian data, an interpretation which demonstrates patterns of linguistically significant variation and takes into account what we can know of contexts in which the texts were produced. It provides a summary of synchronically variable data from Epinal, Erfurt, Corpus glossaries and the VPs helps illustrate the first point.
  • 7 - ONOMASTICS
    pp 452-489
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.008
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The sources for early name-forms, of people and of places alike, are, in terms of the conventional disciplines, ones more often associated with 'History' than with 'English Studies'. Onomastic sources for the Old English (OE) period include: chronicles, Latin and vernacular; libri vitae; inscriptions and coin-legends; charters, wills, writs and other business-records; and above all Domesday Book. Early Germanic custom required that each individual should have a single, distinctive name. The term 'personal name' favoured for this purpose by some scholars is over-general, because 'by-names' and family-names are no less 'personal'. For convenience, the terminology adopted in this chapter is knowingly inconsistent: simply to distinguish anthroponym from toponym, 'personal name' is used. Place-names begin as topographical and/or possessory descriptions of the sites concerned. Recurrent commonplace formations emphasise how uncertain distinction is between descriptive term and name.
  • 8 - LITERARY LANGUAGE
    pp 490-535
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264747.009
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Literary language is of particular importance to historical linguists because it shows the language being tested to the full, being used by individuals who think seriously about the right choice and use of language. There is a general similarity in the language of much of the poetry which distinguishes it sharply from most prose. This chapter attempts to describe the relatively homogeneous poetic language shared by most poems before going on to consider the variations from it. Anglo-Saxon poetry is remarkable for its use of a single metrical form sustained with only minor variations over the whole corpus, regardless of date or genre. Whereas Anglo-Saxon poetry and the specialised language associated with it have their origins deep in the pre-literate past, sustained discourse in prose began essentially in the late ninth century. Much of Old English prose writing was public and official, in a way that prose seldom was to be again after the Conquest until the late fourteenth century.

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


C. L. Allen 1986a. ‘Reconsidering the history of like’. Journal of Linguistics 22.375–409

C. L. Allen 1986b. ‘Dummy subjects and the verb-second “target” in Old English’. English Studies 67.465–70

W. S. Allen 1978. Vox Latina. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

H. Anderson 1972. ‘Diphthongization’. Language 48.11–50

J. M. Anderson 1986. ‘A note on Old English impersonals’. Journal of Linguistics 22.167–77

O. S. Arngart [Anderson] 1944. ‘The Calendar of St. Willibrord: a little-used source of Old English personal names’. Studia Neophilologica 16.128–34

O. S. Arngart [Anderson] 1947. ‘Some aspects of the relation between the English and the Danish element in the Danelaw’. Studia Neophilologica 20.73–87

O. S. Arngart [Anderson] 1972. ‘On the -ingtūn type of English place-name’. Studia Neophilologica 44.263–73

P. S. Baker 1980. ‘The Old English canon of Byrhtferth of Ramsey’. Speculum 55.22–37

N. F. Barley 1974. ‘Perspectives on Anglo-Saxon names’. Semiotica 11.1–31

C. E. Bazell 1939. ‘Four West Germanic verbal endings’. Neophilologus 24.62–6

W. H. Bennett 1955. ‘The southern English development of Germanic initial [fsp]’. Language 31.367–71

C. Brady 1979. ‘“Weapons” in Beowulf: an analysis of the nominal compounds and an evaluation of the poet's use of them’. Anglo-Saxon England 8.79–141

N. Brooks 1974. ‘Anglo-Saxon charters: the work of the last twenty years’. Anglo-Saxon England 3.211–31

W. H. Brown 1970. A Syntax of King Alfred's Pastoral Care. The Hague: Mouton

K. Brunner 1955. ‘The Old English vowel phonemes’. English Studies 34.247–51

K. Brunner 1965. Altenglische Grammatik (nach der angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers neubearbeitet). 3rd edition. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer

R. W. Burchfield 1956. ‘The language and orthography of the Ormulum ms’. Transactions of the Philological Society 1956.56–87

T. Bynon 1977. Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

J. J. Campbell 1952. ‘The Old English Bede: Book III, Chapters 16 to 20’. Modern Language Notes 67.381–6

C. R. Carlton 1970. Descriptive Syntax of the Old English Charters. The Hague: Mouton

S. Chatman 1958. ‘The a/æ opposition in Old English’. Word 14.244–36

C. Clark 1983. ‘On dating The Battle of Maldon: certain evidence reviewed’. Nottingham Medieval Studies 27.1–22

F. Coetsem van & H. L. Kufner, 1972. Toward a Grammar of Proto-Germanic. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer

F. Colman 1983b. ‘“Vocalisation” as nucleation’. Studia Linguistica 37.30–48

F. Colman 1985. ‘Old English ie: quid est?’. Lingua 67.1–23

W. Cowgill 1959. ‘The inflection of the Germanic ō presents’. Language 35.1–15

B. Cox 1980. ‘Aspects of place-name evidence for early medieval settlement in England’. Viator 11.35–50

B. Cox 1989. ‘Rutland and the Scandinavian settlements: the place-name evidence’. Anglo-Saxon England 18.135–48

D. Cronan 1986.‘Alliterative rank in Old English poetry’. Studia Neophilologica 58.145–58

J. P. Crowley 1986. ‘The study of Old English dialects’. English Studies 67.97–112

M. Daunt 1939. ‘Old English sound changes reconsidered in relation to scribal tradition and practice’. Transactions of the Philological Society 1939.108–37

M. Daunt 1946. ‘Old English verse and English speech rhythm’. Transactions of the Philological Society 1946.56–72

N. Davidsen-Nielsen & H. Ørum, 1978. ‘The feature “gravity” in Old English and Danish phonology’. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 16.201–13

R. H. C. Davis 1955. ‘East Anglia and the Danelaw’. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (5th series) 5.23–39

D. De Camp 1958. ‘The genesis of the Old English dialects: a new hypothesis’. Language 34.232–44; repr. Lass (1969:355–68)

D. Denison 1985. ‘Why Old English had no prepositional passive’. English Studies 66.189–204

R. Derolez 1974, ‘Cross-channel language ties’. Anglo-Saxon England 3.1–14

J. McN. Dodgson 1966. ‘The significance of the distribution of the English place-names in -ingas, -inga- in south-east England’. Medieval Archaeology 10.1–29

J. McN. Dodgson 1973. ‘Place names from -hām, distinguished from -hamm names, in relation to the settlement of Kent, Surrey and Sussex’. Anglo-Saxon England 2.1–50

W. Elmer 1981. Diachronic Grammar: The History of Old and Middle English Subjectless Constructions (Linguistische Arbeiten 97). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer

M. L. Faull 1974b. ‘Roman and Anglian settlement patterns in Yorkshire’. Northern History 9.1–25

O. von Feilitzen , 1968. ‘Some Old English uncompounded personal names and bynames’. Studia Neophilologica 40.5–16

G. Fellows-Jensen 1973. ‘Place-name research and northern history: a survey with a select bibliography of works published since 1945’. Northern History 8.1–23

G. Fellows-Jensen 1978b. ‘Place-names and settlement in the North Riding of Yorkshire’. Northern History 14.19–46

O. C. M. Fischer and F. C. Leekvan der, 1983. ‘The demise of the Old English impersonal construction’. Journal of Linguistics 19.337–68

O. Funke 1949. ‘On the use of the attributive adjective on Old English prose and early Middle English’. English Studies 30.151–6

G. Gazdar , G. K. Pullum & I. A. Sag, 1982. ‘Auxiliaries and related phenomena in a restrictive theory of grammar’. Language 58.591–638

M. Gelling 1967. ‘English place-names derived from the compound wīchām’. Medieval Archaeology 11.87–104

M. Gelling 1977. ‘Latin loanwords in Old English place-names’. Anglo-Saxon England 6.1–13

G. H. Gerould 1925. ‘Abbot Ælfeinc's rhythmic prose’. Modern Philology 22. 353–66

H. Gneuss 1972. ‘The origin of Standard Old English and Æthelwold's school at Winchester’. Anglo-Saxon England 1.63–83

H. Gneuss 1982. ‘Some problems and principles of the lexicography of Old English’. In Festschrift für Karl Schneider, ed. K. R. Jankowsky & E. S. Dick. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 153–68

M. Godden 1980. ‘Ælfric's changing vocabulary’. English Studies 61.206–23

L. Goossens A chronology for the falling together of Late Old English hr and rEnglish Studies 50.74–9

C. Hills 1979. ‘The archaeology of Anglo-Saxon England in the pagan period’. Anglo-Saxon England 8.297–329

R. Hinderling 1967. Studien zti den starken Verbalabstrakten des Germanischen (Quellen und Forschungen zur Sprach- und Kul turgeschichte der germanischen Völker, N.F. 24). Berlin: de Gruyter

C. F Hockett , 1959. ‘The stressed syllables of Old English’. Language 35.575–97, repr. Lass (1969: 108–32)

R. M. Hogg 1971, ‘Gemination, breaking and reordering in the synchronic phonology of Old English’. Lingua 28.48–69

R. M. Hogg 1976. ‘The status of rule reordering’. Journal of Linguistics 12.103–23

R. M. Hogg 1977. ‘Old English r-metathesis and generative phonology’. Journal of Linguistics 13.165–75

R. M. Hogg 1979a. ‘Analogy and phonology’. Journal of Linguistics 15.55–85

R. M. Hogg 1979b. ‘Old English palatalization’. Transactions of the Philological Society 1979.89–113

R. M. Hogg 1982a. ‘Two geminate consonants in Old English?’. In Language Form and Linguistic Variation, ed. J. M. Anderson. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 187–202

A. Janzén 1972. ‘The Viking colonization of England in the light of place-names’. Names 20.1–25

C. Jones 1967. ‘The grammatical category of gender in Early Middle English’. English Studies 48.289–305

R. Jordan 1903. Die altenglischen Säugetiernamen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter

D. Kastovsky 1985. ‘Deverbal nouns in Old and Modern English: from stem-formation to word-formation’. In Historical Semantics-Historical Word-formation, ed. J. Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton, 221–61

D. Kastovsky & A. Szwedek, eds. 1986. Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. In Honour of Jacek Fisiak (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 32). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

A. Kemenade van, 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris

J. Kerling 1982. ‘A case of “slipping”: direct and indirect speech in Old English prose’. Neophilologus 66.286–90

S. J. Keyser & W. O'Neil, 1985. Rule Generalization and Optionality in Language Change. Dordrecht: Foris

P. Kiparsky 1982. Explanation in Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris

F. Kluge 1967. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache, 20th rev. ed. by W. Mitzka. Berlin: de Gruyter

S. M. Kuhn & R. Quirk, 1953. ‘Some recent interpretations of Old English digraph spellings’. Language 29.143–56; repr. Quirk (1968: 38–54)

S. M. Kuhn 1939. ‘The dialect of the Corpus Glossary’. PMLA 60.631–69

S. M. Kuhn 1943. ‘The Vespasian Psalter and the Old English charter hands’. Speculum 18.458–83

S. M. Kuhn 1961. ‘On the syllabic phonemes of Old English’. Language 37.522–38

S. M. Kuhn 1986. ‘Old English macian, its origin and dissemination’. Journal of English Linguistics 19.49–93

H. Kurath 1956. ‘The loss of long consonants and the rise of voiced fricatives in Middle English’. Language 32.435–45

M. Lapidge 1975. ‘The hermeneutic style in tenth-century Anglo-Latin literature’. Anglo-Saxon England 4.67–111

R. Lass 1975. ‘Internal reconstruction and generative phonology’. Transactions of the Philological Society 1975.1–26

R. Lass 1978. ‘Mapping constraints in phonological reconstruction: on climbing down trees without falling out of them’. In Recent Developments in Historical Phonology, ed. J. Fisiak. The Hague: Mouton, 245–86

V. Law 1977. ‘The Latin and Old English glosses in the Ars Tatwini’. Anglo-Saxon England 6.77–90

W. P. Lehmann & L. Zgusta, 1979. ‘Schleicher's Tale after a century’. In Studies in Diachronic, Sjnchronic and Typological Linguistics; Festschrift for Oswald Szemerenyi on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday, ed. B. Brogyani, 2 parts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 455–66

A. Lutz 1984. ‘Spellings of the waldend-gtoup – again’. Anglo-Saxon England 13.51–63

J. Lyons 1977. Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

J. Mansion 1924. Oud-gentsche naamkunde. The Hague: M. Nijhoff

P. McClure 1979. ‘Patterns of migration in the late Middle Ages: the evidence of English place-name surnames’. Economic History Review 32.167–82

C. B. McCully & R. M. Hogg, 1990. ‘An account of Old English stress’. Journal of Linguistics 26.315–39

J. C. McLaughlin 1979. ‘The i-umlaut of old English West Saxon diphthongs’. Journal of Linguistics 15.289–94

J. C. McLaughlin 1983. Old English Syntax: A Handbook. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer

J. R. Menner 1947. ‘The vocabulary of the Old English poem on Judgment Day’. PMLA 62.583–97

J. R. Menner 1948. ‘Anglian and Saxon elements in Wulfstan's vocabulary’. Modern Language Notes 63.1–9

R. J. Menner 1930–1. ‘Troublesome relatives’. American Speech 6.341–6

B. Mitchell 1985. Old English Syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press

W. G. Moulton 1954. ‘The stops and spirants of early Germanic’. Language 30.1–42

J. Niles 1981. ‘Compound diction and the style of Beowulf’. English Studies 62.489–503

D. Pelteret 1986. ‘Two Old English lists of serfs’. Medieval Studies 48.470–513

H. Penzl 1947. ‘The phonemic split of Germanic k in Old English’. Language 23.34–42; repr. Lass (1969: 97–107)

H. Pilch 1985. ‘The synchrony-diachrony division in word-formation’. In Historical Semantics-Historical Word-Formation, ed. J. Fisiak. Berlin: Mouton, 407–33

S. Pintzuk & A. S. Kroch, 1989. ‘The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf’. Language Variation and Change 1.115–43

E. Prokosch 1927. ‘Old English weak preterites without medial vowel’. PMLA 42.331–8

R. Quirk & C. L. Wrenn, 1957. An Old English Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Methuen

G. Richman 1986. ‘Artful slipping in Old English’. Neophilologus 70.279–91

R. H. Robins 1987. ‘The life and work of Sir William Jones’. Transactions of the Philological Society 1987.1–23

F. C. Robinson 1973. ‘Syntactical glosses in Latin manuscripts of Anglo-Saxon provenance’. Speculum 48.443–75

M. L. Samuels 1972. Linguistic Evolution (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

P. H. Sawyer 1982. Kings and Vikings: Scandinavia and Europe AD 700–1100. London: Methuen

E. Seebold 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton

G. W. Small 1930. ‘The syntax of the and OE þon ma þe’. PMLA 45.368–91

V. J. Smart 1987b. ‘Moneyers of the late Anglo-Saxon coinage; the Danish dynasty 1017–42’. Anglo-Saxon England 16.233–308

C. Sprockel 1973. The Language of the Parker Chronicle, II: Syntax. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff

G. R. Stewart 1962. ‘Lēah, woods and deforestation as an influence on place-names’. Names 10.11–20

R. P. Stockwell 1955. ‘The Old English short digraphs: some considerations’. Language 31.372–89

E. E. Sweetser 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

W. S. -Y. Wang 1969. ‘Competing changes as a cause of residue’. Language 45.9–45

R. Waterhouse 1976. ‘Æs use of discourse in some saints' lives’. Anglo-Saxon England 5.83–103

J. C. Wells 1982. Accents of English, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

W. Whallon 1961. ‘The diction of Beowulf’. PMLA 76.309–19

R. E. Zachrisson 1932. ‘English place-name puzzles’. Studia Neophilologica 5.1–69

R. E. Zachrisson 1933a. ‘The meaning of English place-names in the light of the terminal theory’. Studia Neophilologica 6.25–89

R. E. Zachrisson 1933b. ‘The meaning of the place-names of Dorset in the light of the terminal rule’. Studia Neophilologica 6.133–63

R. E. Zachrisson 1934. ‘Descriptive words or personal names in Old English place-name compounds: a survey of some Surrey place-names’. Studia Neophilologica 7.30–9

R. E. Zachrisson 1935. ‘Full-names and short-names in Old English place-names’. Studio Neophilologica 8.82–98

R. E. Zachrisson 1936. ‘Studies in the -ing suffix in Old English place-names with some etymological notes’. Studia Neophilologica 9.66–129