Skip to main content
The Original Position
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Original Position
    • Online ISBN: 9781107375321
    • Book DOI:
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
  • Buy the print book

Book description

At the centre of John Rawls's political philosophy is one of the most influential thought experiments of the twentieth century: which principles of justice would a group of individuals choose to regulate their society if they were deprived of any information about themselves that might bias their choice? In this collection of new essays, leading political philosophers examine the ramifications and continued relevance of Rawls's idea. Their chapters explore topics including the place of the original position in rational choice theory, the similarities between Rawls's original position and Kant's categorical imperative, the differences between Rawls's model and Scanlon's contractualism, and the role of the original position in the argument between Rawls and other views in political philosophy, including utilitarianism, feminism, and radicalism. This accessible volume will be a valuable resource for undergraduates, as well as advanced students and scholars of philosophy, game theory, economics, and the social and political sciences.


'… this is an impressive collection of essays on one of the most influential ideas in modern moral and political philosophy … Taken together, these twelve discussions are about as comprehensive and relevant as any volume on the original position of this length could be.'

Samuel Freeman - University of Pennsylvania

'Although the original position argument became famous over forty years ago, it's testimony to John Rawls's immense creativity is that an accurate assessment of its strengths and weaknesses is still emerging. Tim Hinton's collection of lucid and thought-provoking essays will play an invaluable role in this welcome process, and also casts new light on work by several of the leading philosophers who have engaged with the argument, including G. A. Cohen, Ronald Dworkin, and T. M. Scanlon. The volume could be read with profit by specialists and students alike.'

Andrew Williams - Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies and Universitat Pompeu Fabra

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B.Ackerman, , “Political Liberalisms,” Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994) 364–86.

B.Ackerman, , “What Is Neutral about Neutrality?Ethics 93 (1983) 372–90.

S.Alexander, , “Social Evaluation through Notional Choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974) 597–624.

E.Anderson, , “Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism,” Hypatia 24 (2009) 130–45.

D.Attas, , “Fragmenting Property,” Law and Philosophy 25 (2006)119–49.

C.Audard, , “Cultural Imperialism and ‘Democratic Peace’” in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 59–75.

A.Bhandary, , “Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay's Dependency Critique?Hypatia 25 (2010) 140–56.

K.Binmore, , Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2007).

K.Binmore, , Natural Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).

E.Brake, , Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).

D. O.Brink, , “The Separateness of Persons, Distributive Norms, and Moral Theory” in C. Morris and R. Frey (eds.) Value, Welfare, and Morality (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 252–389.

G.Brock, , Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account (Oxford University Press, 2009).

G.Brock, Human Rights” in J. Mandle and D. Reidy (eds.) A Companion to Rawls (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), pp. 346–60.

G.Brock, and H. Brighouse (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

P.Casal, , “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough,” Ethics 117 (2007) 296–326.

G. A.Cohen, , On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, ed. M. Otsuka (Princeton University Press, 2011).

G. A.Cohen, , “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics 99 (1989) 906–44.

G. A.Cohen, , “Expensive Taste Rides Again” in J. Burley (ed.) Dworkin and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp, 3–29.

G. A.Cohen, , “Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: How Patterns Preserve Liberty,” Erkenntnis 11 (1977) 5–23.

G. A.Cohen, , Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).

G. A.Cohen, , Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995).

G. A.Cohen, , “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1997) 3–30.

J.Cohen, , “Democratic Equality,” Ethics 99 (1989) 727–51.

R.Crisp, , “Equality, Priority, and Compassion,” Ethics 113 (2003) 745–63.

R.Dworkin, , “The Original Position,” The University of Chicago Law Review 40 (1973) 500–33.

A. W.Eaton, , “A Sensible Anti-Porn Feminism,” Ethics 117 (2007) 674–715.

D.Estlund, , “Human Nature and the Limits (if any) of Political Philosophy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2011) 207–37

R.Forst, , “Towards a Critical Theory of Transnational Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001)160–79.

H.Frankfurt, , “Equality as a Moral Ideal,” Ethics 98 (1987) 21–43.

S.Freeman, , “The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice,” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2006) 29–68.

D.Gauthier, , Morals by Agreement (Oxford University Press, 1987).

A.Gibbard, , “Natural Property Rights,” Nous 10 (1976) 77–86.

M.Gorr, , “Rawls on Natural Inequality” in J. A. Corlett (ed.) Equality and Liberty: Analyzing Rawls and Nozick (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991), pp. 19–36.

J.Harsanyi, , “Bayesian Decision Theory, Subjective and Objective Probabilities, and Acceptance of Empirical Hypotheses,” Synthese 57 (1983) 341–65.

J.Harsanyi, , “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory,” The American Political Science Review 69 (1975) 594–606.

J.Harsanyi, , “A General Theory of Rational Behavior in Game Situations,” Econometrica 34 (1966) 613–34.

J.Harsanyi, , Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations (Cambridge University Press, 1977).

T.Hill, Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).

W.Hinsch, , “Global Distributive Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 58–78.

W.Hinsch, and M. Stepanians, “Human Rights as Moral Claims” in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 117–33.

T.Hinton, , “Equality, Self-Ownership and Individual Sovereignty,” Philosophical Forum 44 (2013) 165–78.

A.Hurrell, , “Global Inequality and International Institutions,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 34–57.

A.James, , “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2005) 281–316.

I.Kant, , Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. George di Giovanni, in Kant: Religion and Rational Theology, trans. and ed. Allen W. Wood and George di Giovanni (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Citations are to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.

C.Korsgaard, , Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

C.Korsgaard, The Sources of Nonnativity (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

A.Kuper, , “Rawlsian Global Justice: Beyond the Law of Peoples to a Cosmopolitan Law of Persons,” Political Theory 28 (2000) 640–74.

J.Mandle, , “Tolerating Injustice” in G. Brock and H. Brighouse (eds.) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 219–33.

R.Martin, and D. Reidy (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006).

E. F.McClennen, , Rationality and Dynamic Choice (Cambridge University Press, 1990).

J.Meadowcroft, , “Nozick's Critique of Rawls: Distribution, Entitlement and the Assumptive World of A Theory of Justice” in R. M. Bader and J. Meadowcroft (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 168–96.

T.Metz, , “Arbitrariness, Justice, and Respect,” Social Theory and Practice 26 (2000) 25–45.

C.Mills, Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls,” in The Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2009) 161–84.

M.Moehler, , “Contractarian Ethics and Harsanyi's Two Justifications of Utilitarianism,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 12 (2013) 24–47.

L.Murphy, and T. Nagel, The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice (Oxford University Press, 2002).

T.Nagel, , “Rawls on Justice,” The Philosophical Review 82 (1973) 220–34.

B.Neufeld, and C. van Schoelandt, “Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality,” Law and Philosophy 33 (2014) 75–104.

S.Okin, , “Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender,” Ethics 105 (1994) 23–43.

O.O'Neill, , Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

T.Pogge, , “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1994) 195–224.

T.Pogge, , John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007).

T.Pogge, , “Priorities of Global Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 6–24.

J.Rawls, , “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997) 765–807, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 573–615.

J.Rawls, , “Justice as Fairness,” Journal of Philosophy 54 (1957) 653–62, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 47–72.

J.Rawls, , “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980) 515–72, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 303–58.

J.Rawls, , “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics,” Philosophical Review 60 (1951), reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 1–19.

J.Rawls, , “Reply to Alexander and Musgrave,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974) 633–55, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 232–53.

J.Rawls, , “Social Unity and Primary Goods” in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 159–86, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 359–87.

A.Reath, , Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory (Oxford University Press, 2006).

D.Reidy, , “Political Authority and Human Rights” in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 169–88.

D.Reidy, , “Rawls on International Justice: A Defense,” Political Theory 32 (2004) 291–319.

D.Reidy, , “Three Human Rights Agendas,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2006) 237–54.

I.Robeyns, , “Gender, Care and Property-owning Democracy” in M. O'Neill and T. Williamson (eds.) Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), pp. 163–79.

C. C.Ryan, , “Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty,” Ethics 87 (1977) 126–41.

L. J.Savage, , “The Theory of Statistical Decision,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 46 (1951) 55–67.

T. M.Scanlon, , “Contractualism and Utilitarianism” in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 103–28.

S.Scheffler, , “Is the Basic Structure Basic?” in C. Sypnowich (ed.) The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 102–29.

L.Shields, , “The Prospects for Sufficientarianism,” Utilitas 24 (2012) 101–17.

C.Stark, , “How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice,” Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (2007) 127–45.

J.Sterba, , “In Defense of Rawls against Arrow and Nozick,” Philosophia 7 (1978) 293–303.

S.Street, , “What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?Philosophy Compass 5 (2010) 363–84.

J.Tasioulas, , “From Utopia to Kazanistan: John Rawls and the Law of Peoples,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2002) 367–93.

J.Waldron, , “How Law Protects Dignity,” Cambridge Law Journal 71 (2012) 200–22.

J.Waldron, , “John Rawls and the Social Minimum,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1986) 21–33, reprinted in Waldron, Liberal Rights, pp. 250–70.

J.Waldron, , “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,” Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1987) 127–50, reprinted in Waldron, Liberal Rights, pp. 35–62.

L.Wenar, , “Why Rawls Is not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian” in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 95–113.

A.Williams, , “Equality for the Ambitious,” The Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002) 377–89.

H.Wolpe, , “Capitalism and Cheap Labour-Power in South Africa: From Segregation to Apartheid,” Economy and Society 1 (1972) 425–56.