Ackerman, B., “Political Liberalisms,” Journal of Philosophy 91 (1994) 364–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ackerman, B., Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Ackerman, B., “What Is Neutral about Neutrality?” Ethics 93 (1983) 372–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T., Metaphysics: Concept and Problems (Stanford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Alexander, S., “Social Evaluation through Notional Choice,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974) 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alstott, L., No Exit: What Parents Owe Their Children and What Society Owes Parents (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Anderson, E., “Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy: Comments on Schwartzman's Challenging Liberalism,” Hypatia 24 (2009) 130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, H., The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1979).Google Scholar

Arneson, R., “Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is Not Good Enough” in Kaufman, A. (ed.) Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems (London: Routledge, 2005), pp. 17–43.Google Scholar

Arneson, R., “Justice Is Not Equality” in Feltham, B. (ed.) Justice, Equality and Constructivism: Essays on G. A. Cohen's Rescuing Justice and Equality (Oxford and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).Google Scholar

Attas, D., “Fragmenting Property,” Law and Philosophy 25 (2006)119–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audard, C., “Cultural Imperialism and ‘Democratic Peace’” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 59–75.Google Scholar

Aumann, R., “Nash Equilibria Are Not Self-Enforcing” in Aumann, , Collected Papers: Volume I. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), pp. 615–20.Google Scholar

Baehr, A. R., “Liberal Feminism” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/feminism-liberal/.

Baehr, A. R., “Liberal Feminism: Comprehensive and Political” in Abbey, R. (ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Rawls (College Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2013), pp. 150–66.Google Scholar

Barry, B., Theories of Justice (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Beitz, C., Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar

Bhandary, A., “Dependency in Justice: Can Rawlsian Liberalism Accommodate Kittay's Dependency Critique?” Hypatia 25 (2010) 140–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhandary, A., “Liberal Dependency Care,” Journal of Philosophical Research, forthcoming (2016).

Binmore, K., Game Theory: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, K., Natural Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Binmore, K., Rational Decisions (Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Blake, M. and Smith, P. T., “International Distributive Justice” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/international-justice/.

Brake, E., Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, D. O., “The Separateness of Persons, Distributive Norms, and Moral Theory” in Morris, C. and Frey, R. (eds.) Value, Welfare, and Morality (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 252–389.Google Scholar

Brock, G., Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account (Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, G.“Human Rights” in Mandle, J. and Reidy, D. (eds.) A Companion to Rawls (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014), pp. 346–60.Google Scholar

Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (eds.), The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casal, P., “Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough,” Ethics 117 (2007) 296–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christman, J., The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Clark, B. and Gintis, H., “Rawlsian Justice and Economic Systems,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 7 (1978) 302–25.Google Scholar

Clayton, M., “Liberal Equality: Political not Erinaceous,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, forthcoming 2015.

Clayton, M., “The Resources of Liberal Equality,” Imprints 9 (2000) 63–84.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, ed. Otsuka, M. (Princeton University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, G. A., “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice,” Ethics 99 (1989) 906–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, G. A., “Expensive Taste Rides Again” in Burley, J. (ed.) Dworkin and His Critics (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp, 3–29.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., “Incentives, Inequality, and Community,” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 13 (1992).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., Lectures on the History of Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Wolff, J. (Princeton University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., “Robert Nozick and Wilt Chamberlain: How Patterns Preserve Liberty,” Erkenntnis 11 (1977) 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, G. A., Rescuing Justice and Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, G. A., Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, G. A., “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom” in Cohen, , History, Labour and Freedom: Themes from Marx (Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 255–85.Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A., “Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1997) 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J., “Democratic Equality,” Ethics 99 (1989) 727–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisp, R., “Equality, Priority, and Compassion,” Ethics 113 (2003) 745–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cudd, A. E., Analyzing Oppression (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Justice for Hedgehogs (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., “The Original Position” in Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 16–52.Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., “The Original Position,” The University of Chicago Law Review 40 (1973) 500–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dworkin, R., “Rawls and the Law” in Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar

Dworkin, R., Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Eaton, A. W., “A Sensible Anti-Porn Feminism,” Ethics 117 (2007) 674–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Estlund, D., “Human Nature and the Limits (if any) of Political Philosophy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 39 (2011) 207–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisk, M. “History and Reason in Rawls’ Moral Theory” in Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 53–80.Google Scholar

Forst, R., “Towards a Critical Theory of Transnational Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001)160–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frankfurt, H., “Equality as a Moral Ideal,” Ethics 98 (1987) 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, S., “Introduction: John Rawls – An Overview” in Freeman, S. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 1–61.Google Scholar

Freeman, S., “The Law of Peoples, Social Cooperation, Human Rights, and Distributive Justice,” Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2006) 29–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, S., “The Original Position” in Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 edition) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/original%20position/.

Freeman, S., Rawls (London and New York: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Freeman, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Gauthier, D., Morals by Agreement (Oxford University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibbard, A., “Natural Property Rights,” Nous 10 (1976) 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gorr, M., “Rawls on Natural Inequality” in Corlett, J. A. (ed.) Equality and Liberty: Analyzing Rawls and Nozick (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1991), pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Hampton, J., “Feminist Contractarianism” in Antony, L. and Witt, C. (eds.) A Mind of One's Own (Oxford: Westview, 1993), pp. 227–56.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J., “Bayesian Decision Theory, Subjective and Objective Probabilities, and Acceptance of Empirical Hypotheses,” Synthese 57 (1983) 341–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harsanyi, J., “Bayesian Decision Theory and Utilitarian Ethics,” The American Economic Review 68 (1978) 223–8.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J., “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory,” The American Political Science Review 69 (1975) 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harsanyi, J., “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking,” The Journal of Political Economy (1953) 434–5.

Harsanyi, J., “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility,” The Journal of Political Economy August (1955) 309–21.

Harsanyi, J., “A General Theory of Rational Behavior in Game Situations,” Econometrica 34 (1966) 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harsanyi, J., “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 39–62.Google Scholar

Harsanyi, J., Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations (Cambridge University Press, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, (Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, H.L.A., “Rawls on Liberty and Its Priority,” reprinted in Daniels, N. (ed.) Reading Rawls (Oxford: Blackwell, 1974), pp. 230–52.Google Scholar

Hart, H. M. and Sacks, A. M., The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, ed. Eskridge, W. and Frickey, Philip (Westbury, NY: Foundation Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Hartley, C. and Watson, L., “Is a Feminist Political Liberalism Possible?” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (2010) 1–21.Google Scholar

Heath, J., “Rawls on Global Distributive Justice: A Defence,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supp. Vol. 31 (2005) 193–226.Google Scholar

Herman, B., The Practice of Moral Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Hill, T., Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant's Moral Theory (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Hill, T.Respect, Pluralism, and Justice: Kantian Perspectives (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinsch, W., “Global Distributive Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinsch, W. and Stepanians, M., “Human Rights as Moral Claims” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 117–33.Google Scholar

Hinton, T., “Equality, Self-Ownership and Individual Sovereignty,” Philosophical Forum 44 (2013) 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, T. “Liberalism, Feminism and Social Tyranny,” inPublic Affairs Quarterly 21 (2007) 235–53.Google Scholar

Hume, D., A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Hurrell, A., “Global Inequality and International Institutions,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, A., “Constructing Justice for Existing Practice: Rawls and the Status Quo,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2005) 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I., Critique of Practical Reason in Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Abbreviated as KpV, citations to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.Google Scholar

Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals in Kant: Practical Philosophy, trans. and ed. Gregor, Mary J. (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Abbreviated as G, citations to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.Google Scholar

Kant, I., Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason, trans. Giovanni, George di, in Kant: Religion and Rational Theology, trans. and ed. Wood, Allen W. and Giovanni, George di (Cambridge University Press, 1996). Citations are to volume and page number in the Berlin Academy edition of Kant's Gesammelte Schriften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kittay, E., Love's Labor (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L., The Philosophy of Moral Development (New York: Harper and Row, 1981).Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C., Creating the Kingdom of Ends (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Korsgaard, C.The Sources of Nonnativity (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kukathas, C. and Pettit, P., Rawls: A Theory of Justice and Its Critics (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Kuper, A., “Rawlsian Global Justice: Beyond the Law of Peoples to a Cosmopolitan Law of Persons,” Political Theory 28 (2000) 640–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lichtenstein, A., “The Past and Present of Marxist Historiography in South Africa: An Interview with Martin Legassick,” Radical History Review 82 (2002) 111–30.Google Scholar

Lloyd, S. A., “Toward a Liberal Theory of Sexual Equality,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 9 (1998) 203–24.Google Scholar

Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H., Games and Decisions (New York: Wiley and Sons, 1957).Google Scholar

Mandle, J., “Tolerating Injustice” in Brock, G. and Brighouse, H. (eds.) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 219–33.Google Scholar

Martin, R., “Rawls on International Distributive Justice” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McClennen, E. F., Rationality and Dynamic Choice (Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meadowcroft, J., “Nozick's Critique of Rawls: Distribution, Entitlement and the Assumptive World of A Theory of Justice” in Bader, R. M. and Meadowcroft, J. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Nozick's Anarchy, State and Utopia (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 168–96.Google Scholar

Metz, T., “Arbitrariness, Justice, and Respect,” Social Theory and Practice 26 (2000) 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, R., “Rawls and Marxism,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 3 (1974) 167–9, reprinted in N. Daniels (ed.) Reading Rawls (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 206–30.Google Scholar

Mills, C., The Racial Contract (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Mills, C. “Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls,” in The Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2009) 161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moellendorf, D., Cosmopolitan Justice (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Moehler, M., “Contractarian Ethics and Harsanyi's Two Justifications of Utilitarianism,” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 12 (2013) 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murphy, L. and Nagel, T., The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice (Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, T., “Rawls on Justice,” The Philosophical Review 82 (1973) 220–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Narveson, J., The Libertarian Idea (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Narveson, J. and Sterba, J., “Are Liberty and Equality Compatible?” Special Issue, Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2011) 403–15.Google Scholar

Neufeld, B. and van Schoelandt, C., “Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality,” Law and Philosophy 33 (2014) 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M., Sex and Social Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Okin, S., Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar

Okin, S., “Political Liberalism, Justice, and Gender,” Ethics 105 (1994) 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O'Neill, M. and Williamson, T. (eds.), Property-Owning Democracy (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014).Google Scholar

O'Neill, O., Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Otsuka, M., “Self-Ownership and Equality: A Lockean Reconciliation,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (2006) 65–92.Google Scholar

Pateman, C., The Sexual Contract (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Paul, J., (ed.), Reading Nozick: Essays on Anarchy, State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell, 1981).Google Scholar

Plato, , Euthyphro in Plato: Complete Works, ed. Cooper, J. M. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997).Google Scholar

Pogge, T., “Cohen to the Rescue!” Ratio (new series) 21 (2008) 454–75.Google Scholar

Pogge, T., “An Egalitarian Law of Peoples,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1994) 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pogge, T., John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pogge, T., “Priorities of Global Justice,” Metaphilosophy 32 (2001) 6–24.Google Scholar

Pogge, T., Realizing Rawls (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Pogge, T., World Poverty and Human Rights (Cambridge: Polity, 2002).Google Scholar

Pogge, T., World Poverty and Human Rights, (Cambridge: Polity, 2008).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., Collected Papers, ed. Freeman, S. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Distributive Justice” in Laslett, P. and Runciman, W. G. (eds.) Philosophy, Politics, and Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1967), pp. 58–82, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 130–53.Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Distributive Justice: Some Addenda,” Natural Law Forum 13 (1968), reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 154–75.Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited,” University of Chicago Law Review 64 (1997) 765–807, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 573–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J., “Justice as Fairness,” Journal of Philosophy 54 (1957) 653–62, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 47–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J., Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. Kelly, Erin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985) 223–51, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 388–414.Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory,” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980) 515–72, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 303–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples: With the Idea of Public Reason Revisited (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. Herman, Barbara (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, ed. Freeman, Samuel (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics,” Philosophical Review 60 (1951), reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J., Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., Political Liberalism, paperback edition (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Reply to Alexander and Musgrave,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88 (1974) 633–55, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 232–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rawls, J., “Social Unity and Primary Goods” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1982), pp. 159–86, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 359–87.Google Scholar

Rawls, J., “Some Reasons for the Maximin Criterion,” American Economic Review 64 (1974) 141–6, reprinted in Collected Papers, pp. 225–31.Google Scholar

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, rev. edn (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Reath, A., Agency and Autonomy in Kant's Moral Theory (Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reath, A., “Kant's Conception of Autonomy of the Will” in Sensen, Oliver (ed.) Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 32–52.Google Scholar

Reidy, D., “Political Authority and Human Rights” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 169–88.Google Scholar

Reidy, D., “Rawls on International Justice: A Defense,” Political Theory 32 (2004) 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reidy, D., “Three Human Rights Agendas,” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19 (2006) 237–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robeyns, I., “Gender, Care and Property-owning Democracy” in O'Neill, M. and Williamson, T. (eds.) Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), pp. 163–79.Google Scholar

Rousseau, J. J., Basic Political Writings, ed. Cress, D. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987).Google Scholar

Ryan, C. C., “Yours, Mine, and Ours: Property Rights and Individual Liberty,” Ethics 87 (1977) 126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, L. J., “The Theory of Statistical Decision,” Journal of the American Statistical Association 46 (1951) 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scanlon, T. M., “Contractualism and Utilitarianism” in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 103–28.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M., “Rawls on Justification” in Freeman, S. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 139–67.Google Scholar

Scanlon, T.M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Scheffler, S., “Is the Basic Structure Basic?” in Sypnowich, C. (ed.) The Egalitarian Conscience: Essays in Honour of G. A. Cohen (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 102–29.Google Scholar

Sen, A., Development as Freedom (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Shields, L., “The Prospects for Sufficientarianism,” Utilitas 24 (2012) 101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stark, C., “How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice,” Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (2007) 127–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterba, J., “In Defense of Rawls against Arrow and Nozick,” Philosophia 7 (1978) 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Street, S., “What is Constructivism in Ethics and Metaethics?” Philosophy Compass 5 (2010) 363–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tasioulas, J., “From Utopia to Kazanistan: John Rawls and the Law of Peoples,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (2002) 367–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tan, K. C., Tolerance, Diversity, and Global Justice (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Thompson, J., “What Do Women Want? Rewriting the Social Contract,” International Journal of Moral and Social Studies 8 (1993) 257–72.Google Scholar

Valentini, L. and Ronzoni, M., “On the Meta-Ethical Status of Constructivism: Reflections on G. A. Cohen's ‘Facts and Principles,’” Politics Philosophy Economics 7 (2008) 403–22.Google Scholar

Vallentyne, P. and Steiner, H. (eds.), Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate (London: St. Martins Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Von Mises, L., Socialism (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1951).Google Scholar

Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O., Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, (Princeton University Press, 1953).Google Scholar

Waldron, J., “How Law Protects Dignity,” Cambridge Law Journal 71 (2012) 200–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J., “John Rawls and the Social Minimum,” Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1986) 21–33, reprinted in Waldron, Liberal Rights, pp. 250–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waldron, J., Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991 (Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Waldron, J., “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,” Philosophical Quarterly 37 (1987) 127–50, reprinted in Waldron, Liberal Rights, pp. 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weithman, P., Why Political Liberalism? (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Wenar, L., “Why Rawls Is not a Cosmopolitan Egalitarian” in Martin, R. and Reidy, D. (eds.) Rawls's Law of Peoples (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2006), pp. 95–113.Google Scholar

Williams, A., “Equality for the Ambitious,” The Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002) 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolff, R. P., Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of a Theory of Justice (Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Wolpe, H., “Capitalism and Cheap Labour-Power in South Africa: From Segregation to Apartheid,” Economy and Society 1 (1972) 425–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, A., Karl Marx, (London and New York: Routledge, 2004).Google Scholar