Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:31:39.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Color-blind egalitarianism as the new racial norm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2014

Charles A. Gallagher
Affiliation:
La Salle University in Philadelphia
Karim Murji
Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
John Solomos
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access

Summary

Profound changes are currently taking place in the United States in terms of how race, race relations and perceptions of social mobility are defined, perceived and understood. It is now the case that a majority of white Americans subscribe to a color-blind narrative of society where institutional racism has been eliminated and the American Creed of ‘racial equality for all’ has been achieved. The perception held by a majority of whites is that skin color is no longer the basis for discriminatory treatment, nor does race play a role in shaping socioeconomic mobility. White Americans can now point to President Barack Obama, the first black president of the United States, as proof that the goals of the civil rights movement of the 1960s have been achieved (Ludwig 2004). As many whites now see it, the United States has shifted from a country where race was the means by which all socioeconomic resources were allocated to a meritocractic country. This perspective, which I define as color-blind egalitarianism, is the tendency to claim that racial equality is now the norm, while simultaneously ignoring or discounting the real and ongoing ways in which institutional racism continues to disadvantage racial minorities. Color-blind egalitarianism reflects the fact that most whites, as expressed in national polling data, now view race as a benign social marker that has little or no bearing on an individual’s or group’s educational, economic or occupational mobility. This ‘leveled playing field’ perspective of society held by most whites is now the commonsense understanding of race relations, even though an extensive body of research documents how and in what ways institutional racism and racial discrimination continue to shape the life chances of racial minorities. In this chapter, I examine how color-blind racial egalitarianism came to dominate the narrative of race in the United States and the implications which this perspective holds for both race relations and the challenges which scholars face when they attempt to examine race-based social inequalities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Theories of Race and Ethnicity
Contemporary Debates and Perspectives
, pp. 40 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABC News. (2009). How big a problem is racism in our society today? .
Baker, A. (2010). Minorities frisked more but arrested as same rate. New York Times, 13 May, A1.
Blow, C. (2010). Let’s rescue the race debate. New York Times, 19 November, A19.
Bobo, L. (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In Smelser, N., Wilson, W. J. and Mitchell, F., eds, America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 262–99.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2003). Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(6), 931–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsma, D., ed. (2006). Mixed Messages: Multiracial Identities in the ‘Colour-Blind’ Era. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Canellos, P. (2008). Shift in tone will bring a watershed for the nation. Boston Globe, 5 November, A1.
Cohen, R. (2008). The election that LBJ won. Washington Post, 4 November, A16.
Connelly, M. (2010). Poll finds tea party backers wealthier and more educated. New York Times, 15 April, A1.
Dalmage, H. (2000). Tripping the Color Line: Black–White Multiracial Families in a Racially Divided World. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
D’Souza, D. (1995). The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C. A. (2006). Color blindness: an obstacle to racial justice? In Brunsma, D., ed., Mixed Messages: Multiracial Identities in the ‘Colour-Blind’ Era. pp. 103–16.
Gallagher, C. A. (2010). In-between racial status, mobility and the promise of assimilation: Irish, Italians yesterday, Latinos and Asians today. In Korgen, K., ed., Multiracial Americans and Social Class: The Influence of Social Class on Racial Identity. New York: Routledge, pp. 10–21.Google Scholar
Gans, H. (1999). The possibility of a new racial hierarchy in the twenty-first-century United States. In Lamont, M., ed., The Cultural Territories of Race: Black and White Boundaries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 371–90.Google Scholar
Hollinger, D. (2008). Obama, the instability of color lines, and the promise of a post-ethnic future. Callaloo, 31(4), 1033–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. (2007). Only 4 in 10 Americans satisfied with treatment of immigrants. Gallup, 15 August, 1–14.
Jones, J. (2008). Majority of Americans say racism against blacks widespread. Gallup, 4 August, 1–6.
Jones, J. (2009). Clinton edges Palin out as most admired woman. Gallup, 30 December, 1–7.
Jones, J. (2012). A Generation in Transition: Findings from the 2012 Millennial Values Survey. Washington, DC: Public Religion Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ludwig, J. (2004). Has the Civil Rights Movement overcome? Gallup, 8 June, 1–4.
Nagourney, A. (2009). A year after dousing, Republicans hope rekindled. New York Times, 4 November, A1.
Orfield, G. (2009). Reviving the Goal of an Integrated Society: A 21st Century Challenge. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles, The Civil Rights Project.Google Scholar
Parker, C. (2010). Multi-State Survey on Race Politics. Washington, DC: University of Washington, WISER Institute. .Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2005). The black and white of public opinion. 31 October, 1–8.
Pew Research Center. (2011). Wealth gap rises to record highs between whites, black and Hispanics. 26 July, 1–37.
Scott, J. (2008). What politicians say when they talk about race. New York Times, 23 March. .
Shapiro, T. (2010). The Racial Wealth Gap Increases Fourfold. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University, Institute on Assets and Social Policy.Google Scholar
Spillius, A. (2010). Whites in the US minority by 2050, study finds. Phoenix Star, 13 March, A16.
Taylor, M. A., Ross, S. L., Galster, G. and Yinger, J. (2002). Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, A. and Thernstrom, S. (2008). Racial gerrymandering is unnecessary. Wall Street Journal, 11 November, A15.
Turner, M. (2002). Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Hispanic population in the U.S. .
Wall Street Journal. (2008). Editorial. November 5, A22.
Webb, J. (2010). Diversity and the myth of white privilege. Wall Street Journal, 22 July.
Wellman, D. (1993). Portraits of White Racism, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1978). The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yancey, G. (2003). Who Is White? Latinos, Asians, and the New Black/Nonblack Divide. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×