Racial comparisons, relational racisms: some thoughts on method

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139015431.019

14 - Racial comparisons, relational racisms: some thoughts on method

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 December 2014

David Theo Goldberg

Edited by

Karim Murji and

John Solomos

Show author details

David Theo Goldberg: Affiliation:
University of California
Karim Murji: Affiliation:
The Open University, Milton Keynes
John Solomos: Affiliation:
University of Warwick

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The prevailing academic paradigm in analyzing race and racism, ethnic and racial relations, has been comparative. Analysts contrast and compare different societies, historically or contemporarily, to reveal similarities and differences regarding popular ethnoracial expression as well as state formulations, structures and responses. In this chapter, I suggest that this dominant paradigm overlooks a more compelling mode of critical analysis regarding race and racism, namely, the influencing and reinforcing relations between different national expressions of racial and ethnic commitment. Noting the relative methodological strengths of comparativism and relationalities, I map out what a relational critical countermethod looks like, arguing that it incorporates comparative considerations, where they arise, within its scope.

Much of the work on race and racism has been indexed to local national contexts. This mode of analysis has ranged across historical, sociological, political, legal, cultural and, indeed, critical contributions. It marks a great deal of what goes under the designation of critical race studies. Racial conception and racist social arrangements, at least on first blush, seem indelibly tied to specific national sociopolitical, economic, legal and cultural conditions. Racial arrangements and their implications are overwhelmingly considered a response to and a product of local arrangements, relations of power and historical legacies. They seem to acquire meaning and take on significance only as a function of the specific contexts contained and constrained by the fabric of life, meaning making and administrative arrangements indexed to a specific society, a state configuration, at a given place and time. In this, racial studies, in the broad, follow the dominant strand of ethnic studies quite faithfully.

Type: Chapter
Information: Theories of Race and Ethnicity
Contemporary Debates and Perspectives
, pp. 251 - 262

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139015431.019 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agamben, G. (2002). Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books/MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carter, J. (2006). Palestine, Peace Not Apartheid. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Cell, J. (1982). The Highest Stage of White Supremacy: The Origins of Segregation in South Africa and the American South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohn, B. (1996). Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, U. (2004). Apartheid Israel: Possibilities for the Struggle Within. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Degler, C. (1971). Neither Black nor White: Slavery and Race Relations in the United States and Brazil. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. (1637). The Discourse on Method. .

Dikötter, F. (2008). The racialization of the globe: an interactive interpretation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(8), 1478–96.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gilroy, P. (1997). Diaspora and the detours of identity. In Woodward, K., ed., Identity and Difference. London: Sage, pp. 299–346.Google Scholar

Gilroy, P. (2000). Against Race: Imagining Political Culture beyond the Colour Line. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Glaser, D. (2003). Zionism and apartheid: a moral comparison. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26(3), 403–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goldberg, D. T. (1993). Racist Culture: Philosophy and the Politics of Meaning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goldberg, D. T. (2009). The Threat of Race: Reflections on Racial Neoliberalism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Marx, A. (1998). Making Race and Nation: A Comparison of the United States, South Africa and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Massey, D. and Denton, N. (1998). American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Simone, A. (2008). Emergency democracy and the ‘governing composite’. Social Text, 26(2), 13–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Spivak, G. C. (2003). Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Stoler, A. (2002). Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Stoler, A. (2006). Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Empire in North American History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Twine, F. W. and Gallagher, C. A., eds. (2008). Special issue on whiteness and white identities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(1).

Van Den Berghe, P. (1967). Race and Racism: A Comparative Perspective. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar