Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Pedersen, Viki M L and Midtgaard, Soren Flinch 2018. Is Anti-Paternalism Enough?. Political Studies, Vol. 66, Issue. 3, p. 771.

    Hausman, Daniel M. 2018. BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS AND PATERNALISM. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 34, Issue. 01, p. 53.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1988
  • Online publication date: June 2012

8 - Paternalism: some second thoughts

Summary

“I changed my mind.”

“Oh, yeah? Does it work any better?”

From a Mae West movie

As seems appropriate for second thoughts, I shall begin at the beginning—the definition of paternalism. Elsewhere, I defined the concept as “interference with a person's liberty of action justified by reasons referring exclusively to the welfare, good, happiness, needs, interests, or values of the person being coerced.”

A number of critics have objected that confining the concept to interference with liberty is too restrictive in scope. Given the problem I was interested in, that is, the proper limits of state coercion, this restriction was reasonable, although even here one ought to be aware that the state has other ways of influencing people's behavior. It may refuse to enforce contracts, give in-kind rather than cash aid, set up licensing boards, require manufacturers to install seat-belts as original equipment, and so forth.

If, however, one wishes to consider the issue of paternalism in other contexts, for example, in the professions, one will need a broader definition. Not all paternalistic acts are acts of the state. Not all paternalistic acts involve interference with liberty. The doctor who lies to her terminally ill patients, the parent who stipulates in her will that a child may not inherit an estate before the age of thirty, the psychiatrist who tells his adolescent patient that he must inform her parents of her drug use, the professor who refuses to recommend her Ph.D. student to a certain university because he will be “out of his league” – these are all cases of paternalism that do not involve the use of coercion or force and, therefore, on standard views of liberty do not involve restrictions on liberty.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Theory and Practice of Autonomy
  • Online ISBN: 9780511625206
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625206
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×