Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:15:26.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

26 - Bounds incorporating three-point correlation functions†

Graeme W. Milton
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

If cross-sectional photographs of a material are available and the microstructure is isotropic, then one can determine the two- and three-point statistics of the material, in addition to the volume fractions of the phases. This section shows how to utilize this information to obtain improved bounds on the effective properties.

A brief history of bounds incorporating correlation functions

Beran (1965) first recognized that conductivity bounds incorporating three-point correlation functions could be obtained by substituting appropriate trial fields into the classical variational principles. Beran and Molyneux (1966) obtained similar bounds on the effective bulk modulus. For statistically isotropic two-phase cell materials Miller (1969a, 1969b) considered these bounds and found that they reduced to expressions involving the cell shape parameter G given by (15.44). McCoy (1970) used the same approach to obtain bounds on the effective shear modulus. The conductivity, bulk modulus, and shear modulus bounds were tightened and extended to multiphase three- and two-dimensional cell materials by Pham (1996, 1997).

Silnutzer (1972) extended the Beran conductivity bounds to fiber-reinforced materials, that is, to two-dimensional composites. Beran and Silnutzer (1971) found simplified expressions for these bounds for two-phase cell materials.

Schulgasser (1976) recognized that the two-dimensional bounds of Silnutzer (1972) could be simplified for any two-phase composite, and not just cell materials, and found that they only depended on a single geometric parameter. A similar simplification was found for the three-dimensional Beran conductivity bounds (Torquato 1980; Milton 1981b; Torquato and Stell 1985), for the Beran-Molyneux bulk modulus bounds, and for the McCoy shear modulus bounds (Milton 1981a).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×