Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T22:56:25.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The analogy between γ-rays and x-rays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Bruce R. Wheaton
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

The γ-rays are very penetrating Röntgen rays [produced by] the expulsion of the β … particle.

The discovery of x-rays reduced much natural reluctance on the part of physicists to report other discoveries. The most significant new claim, one recognized within weeks of Röntgen's announcement, was the discovery of radioactivity by Henri Becquerel. Certain minerals were found to emit rays spontaneously. Not even the electrical potential difference necessary for the production of cathode rays and x-rays was required. No human artifice or intervention was needed to produce the Becquerel rays; this was always their most significant and unique property. For this reason, it was soon widely believed that the rays were the residue of spontaneously disintegrating atoms.

However distinct the physical origin of Becquerel rays was from that of x-rays, telling similarities between the two new emanations were quickly recognized. Both could penetrate opaque paper to expose a photographic plate. Like x-rays, Becquerel rays were first discovered in this way. They seemed to be another invisible radiation, rendered perceivable only through the superhuman sensitivity of photographic plates. It was soon shown that x-rays and Becquerel rays both induce electrical conductivity in gases through which they pass. In fact, as we have seen, Becquerel's rays were first thought to fill the gap that separated x-rays from ordinary light. Becquerel claimed that they could be refracted and polarized; although soon disproven, these claims served to solidify the view that Becquerel rays resembled light more closely than did x-rays. For these reasons, Becquerel rays were early on identified as a form of radiation in the aether.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Tiger and the Shark
Empirical Roots of Wave-Particle Dualism
, pp. 49 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×