Tales of terror: lessons for lawyers from the “war on terrorism”

David Luban

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107279698.014

9 - Tales of terror: lessons for lawyers from the “war on terrorism”

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014

David Luban

Show author details

David Luban: Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC

Book contents

Get access

Summary

An astonishing feature of the “global war on terrorism” (GWOT) waged by the United States and its allies against Al Qaeda is the prominent role played by lawyers, civilian and military, representing both the US government and the people it has captured. The conduct of these lawyers has been a topic of surpassing interest to many both in and out of the legal profession since the first “torture memos” were released in 2004. It is a subject of international, not merely parochial, interest. I will discuss the “torture lawyers,” but also lawyers who represent the prisoners. Although most of these are Americans, not all of them are. Some of the leading Guantánamo defense lawyers come from the London-based organization Reprieve. One lawyer I want to discuss, Major Dan Mori, of the US Marines, became a minor celebrity in Australia through his representation of David Hicks. The laws at issue in these cases are by and large international law; and, of course, Guantánamo has become an international symbol of the rule of law and its absence, a point central to the debate.

Lawyers and the torture team

In 1975, Richard Wasserstrom published a paper that arguably inaugurated the modern philosophical discussion of legal ethics. The paper was titled “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues,” and it began with the striking assertion that “at best the lawyer’s world is a simplified moral world; often it is an amoral one; and more than occasionally, perhaps an overtly immoral one.”

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Torture, Power, and Law , pp. 254 - 270

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279698.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Wasserstrom, Richard, “Lawyers as Professionals: Some Moral Issues,” Human Rights, 5 (1975), 1–24.Google Scholar

Goldman, Alan, The Moral Foundations of Professional Ethics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1980);Google Scholar

Postema, Gerald J., “Moral Responsibility in Professional Ethics,” New York University Law Review, 55 (1980), 63–89;Google Scholar

Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice: An Ethical Study (Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Sands, Philippe, Torture Team: Rumsfeld’s Memo and the Betrayal of American Values (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).Google Scholar

Mayer, Jane published a magnificent book about US torture, The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals (New York: Doubleday, 2008)Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration (New York: Norton, 2007), pp. 22–3.Google Scholar

Dunlap, Jr. Charles J., “Law and Military Interventions: Preserving Humanitarian Values in 21st Century Conflicts” (2001) ().

Greenberg, Karen J. and Dratel, Joshua L., Eds., The Torture Papers: The Road to Abu Ghraib (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Brooks, Peter, “The Plain Meaning of Torture?”, Slate, Feb. 9, 2005 ().

Greenberg, J., Ed., The Torture Debate in America (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 361–76Google Scholar

Yoo, John, War by Other Means: An Insider’s Account of the War on Terror (New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 2006), pp. 182–3.Google Scholar

Greenburg, Jan Crawford and Vogue, Ariane, “Bush Administration Blocked Waterboarding Critic,” ABC News, Nov. 2, 2007 ().

Lederman, Marty, “Yes, It’s a No-Brainer: Waterboarding Is Torture,” Balkinization blog, Oct. 28, 2006 ().

Wendel, W. Bradley, “Professionalism as Interpretation,” Northwestern University Law Review, 99 (2005), 1167–1233.Google Scholar

Holmes, Jr. Oliver Wendell, “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review, 10 (1897), 460–1.Google Scholar

Llewellyn, Karl N., “A Realistic Jurisprudence—The Next Step,” Columbia Law Review, 30 (1930), 431–65, at 450, n.16;CrossRef Google Scholar

Cook, Walter Wheeler, “‘Substance’ and ‘Procedure’ in the Conflict of Laws,” Yale Law Journal, 42 (1933), 333–58, at 348.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fuller, Lon L., The Law in Quest of Itself (Chicago: Foundation Press, 1940), pp. 94–5;Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964), p. 10;Google Scholar

Cohen, Felix S., “The Problems of a Functional Jurisprudence,” Modern Law Review, 1 (1937), 5–26, at 17.CrossRef Google Scholar

Summers, Robert, Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982), pp. 101–15;Google Scholar

Rogat, Yosal, “The Judge as Spectator,” University of Chicago Law Review, 31 (1964), 213–56, at 248–9;CrossRef Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, “Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch,” in Reiss, Hans, Ed., Kant’s Political Writings (Cambridge University Press, 1970), p. 126.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E., Ed., Theories of Institutional Design (Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 154–98.Google Scholar

Glaberson, William, “An Unlikely Antagonist in Detainee’s Corner,” New York Times, June 19, 2008.

Nightingale, J., Ed., The Trial of Queen Caroline (London: J. Robins & Co., Albion Press, 1820–1), vol. ii, p. 8.Google Scholar

Dunlap, Jr. Charles J., and Letendre, Linell A., “Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban,” Stanford Law Review, 61 (2008), 417–41, at 438–40.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.