Book contents
- Transitional Justice and Forced Migration
- Transitional Justice and Forced Migration
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- In Lieu of an Introduction
- Part I The Past as the Memory of the Future
- Part II Law, Justice, and Hope
- 4 Transitional Justice, Displacement, and the Rights of the Young
- 5 Beyond Agreements
- 6 State-Based Truth Commissions
- 7 The Right of Return in Iraq
- Part III Ethics of Witnessing
- Index
- References
5 - Beyond Agreements
Management Tools to Support Peace Agreements in the Case of Displaced Populations in Colombia
from Part II - Law, Justice, and Hope
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Transitional Justice and Forced Migration
- Transitional Justice and Forced Migration
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- In Lieu of an Introduction
- Part I The Past as the Memory of the Future
- Part II Law, Justice, and Hope
- 4 Transitional Justice, Displacement, and the Rights of the Young
- 5 Beyond Agreements
- 6 State-Based Truth Commissions
- 7 The Right of Return in Iraq
- Part III Ethics of Witnessing
- Index
- References
Summary
In this chapter, I demonstrate that simulation models, and in particular system dynamics models, could be a cheap and efficient way of examining policies that could allow public servants and service providers to learn and evaluate the different scenarios they are facing in delivering transitional justice remedies. In particular, I concentrate on the simulation and resultant evaluation of possible alternatives to be considered in relation to the reparation and restitution of land rights for the victims of forced displacement in Colombia. To this end, this chapter first presents a brief description of the phenomenon of forced displacement in Colombia and its impact on the society as a whole, thus highlighting the nature of the challenge for government institutions in tackling the results of decades-long conflict in the country.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transitional Justice and Forced MigrationCritical Perspectives from the Global South, pp. 108 - 134Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Amnesty International. Colombia: The Victims and Land Restitution Law. London: Amnesty International Publications, 2012.Google Scholar
Banco de la Republica de Colombia. “El campo y la ciudad: Colombia, de país rural a país urbano.” 1999. www.banrepcultural.org/node/32860Google Scholar
Centro Nacional de memoria Histórica, 2015. “Una Nación Desplazada: Informe nacional del Desplazamiento forzado en Colombia.” 2015. www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/informes2015/nacion-desplazada/una-nacion-desplazada.pdfGoogle Scholar
Comisión Colombiana de Juristas. Revertir el destierro forzado: protección y restitución de los territorios usurpados. Bogotá: Estrategias MCP ltda., 2006.Google Scholar
Congreso de la Republica de Colombia. “Ley 1448 de 2011.” 2011. www.unidadvictimas.gov.co/es/ley-1448-de-2011/13653Google Scholar
Contraloría General de La República. II Informe de seguimiento al proceso de restitución de tierras. Bogotá, 2013.Google Scholar
Deng, F.M. “Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement.” International Migration Review (1999): 484–93.Google Scholar
Forrester, J.W. “System Dynamices, Systems Thinking, and soft OR.” System Dynamics Review 10, no. 2 (1994): 245–56.Google Scholar
Garay, L.J. “Tragedia humanitaria del Desplazamiento Forzado en Colombia.” Estudios Politicos (2009): 153–77.Google Scholar
Ghaffazedegan, N., Lyneis, J., and Richardson, G.P.. “How Small System Dynamics Models Can Help the Public Policy Process.” System Dynamics Review 27, no. 1 (2010): 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Colombia, Gobierno & FARC-EP. “Acuerdo final para la terminación del conflicto y la construcción de una paz estable y duradera.” 2016. www.altocomisionadoparalapaz.gov.co/procesos-y-conversaciones/Documentos%20compartidos/24–11-2016NuevoAcuerdoFinal.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gutiérrez Sanín, F. Un trancón fenomenal. Un analisis de las demoras en el proceso de restitución. Bogotá: Observatorio de restitución y regulación de derechos y de Propiedad Agraria, 2013.Google Scholar
Huertas Díaz, O. “Restitución de tierras, en el marco del conflicto armado en Colombia: Propuesta legislativa de reparación para las víctimas.” Verba Juris (2012): 33–45.Google Scholar
Vacía, La Silla. “Van 27 alertas de la Defensoría y aún nadie detiene el avance de los paras en Chocó.” 2017. http://lasillavacia.com/historia/van-27-alertas-de-la-defensoria-y-aun-nadie-detiene-el-avance-de-los-paras-en-choco-60570Google Scholar
López, C. “Aprender de nuestra experiencia para que la paz sí le cumpla esta vez a los colombianos.” Revista de Ingeniería 44 (2016): 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza Pineros, A.M. and Gonzales Borrero, J.I.. El desplazamiento forzado en Colombia y la intervención del estado: una mirada desde el goce efectivo de derechos y los factores asociados a su realización. Bogotá: Documentos CEDE, 2010.Google Scholar
Norwegian Refugee Council. “Colombia: Government ‘Peace Process’ Cements Injustice for IDPs.” Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, 2006.Google Scholar
Norwegian Refugee Council. Colombia El desplazamiento Continua a pesar de las esperanzas de paz. Bogotá: Centro de Monitoreo de Desplazamiento Interno, 2014.Google Scholar
Olaya, C. “Model-Based Lawmaking and the Curious Case of the Colombian Criminal Justice System.” Kybernetes 9, no. 39 (2010): 1678–1700.Google Scholar
Olaya, C. “Cows, Agency, and the Significance of Operational Thinking.” System Dynamics Review 31, no. 4 (2015): 183–219.Google Scholar
Olaya, C., Diaz, G., and Ramos, A.M.. “The Power of the Stock: Accumulations in the Clombian Accusatory System Reform,” Proceedings of the 26th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, University of Patras, Athens, 2008.Google Scholar
Palacios, M. Entre la legitimidad y la violencia: Colombia 1875–1994. Bogota: Editorial Norma, 2003.Google Scholar
Pardo, R. Fin Del Paramilitarismo: ¿Es Posible Su Desmonte? Bogotá: Ediciones B., 2007.Google Scholar
Procuraduría General de la Nación. “Persiste el incumplimiento en la implementación de la ley y los decretos leyes de víctimas y restitución de tierras.” 2017. www.procuraduria.gov.co/portal/incumplimiento-restitucion-victimas.newsGoogle Scholar
Procuraduría General de la Republica de Colombia. Observatorio sobre la gestión de la restitución de Tierras Un proyecto de todos. Bogotá: Procuraduría General de la Nación, 2013.Google Scholar
República de Colombia. “Ley de Victimas y Restitución de Tierras – Ley 1448 de 2011.” Bogotá(Cundinamarca): Diario Oficial 48096. 10 June 2011.Google Scholar
Sánchez, N.C. “¿Sera Santos el Salvador de la Resituación de Tierras?” La Silla Vacia, 11 April 2014.Google Scholar
Sato, J.B. and Stansen, B.J.. “A System Dynamics Approach to Analyzing Violence, Death and Displacement in Darfur.” Conference Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston, July 29–August 2, 2007.Google Scholar
Sterman, J.D. “Learning in and about Complex Systems.” System Dynamics Review 2, no. 10 (1994): 291–330.Google Scholar
Sterman, J.D.. “System Dynamics Modelling: Tools for Learning in a Complex World.” California Management Review 43, no. 4 (2001): 8–25.Google Scholar
The New York Times Editorial Board. “The Man Blocking Peace in Colombia.” The New York Times. October 14, 2016. www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/opinion/the-man-blocking-peace-in-colombia.html?_r=0Google Scholar
Unidad para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas. “Víctimas por tipo de hecho victimizante.” 2017. http://rni.unidadvictimas.gov.co/RUVGoogle Scholar
Uprimi-Yepes, R., and Sanchez, N.C.. “Los dilemas de la restitución de tierras en Colombia.” Estudios Socio Jurídicos (2010): 305–42.Google Scholar
Vargas Reina, J. “Análisis comparativo de los diseños institucionales que regulan la participación de las víctimas en Colombia: antes y después de la Ley 1448 de 2012.” Estudios Socio-Jurídicos (2014): 167–207.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.