Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Turing the Man
- PART ONE
- PART TWO
- Introduction to Part Two
- 7 The 2008 Reading University Turing Tests
- 8 2012 Tests – Bletchley Park
- 9 Interviews with Elite Machine Developers
- 10 Turing2014: Tests at The Royal Society, June 2014
- 11 The Reaction to Turing2014
- Index
- References
11 - The Reaction to Turing2014
from PART TWO
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 October 2016
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Introduction
- 1 Turing the Man
- PART ONE
- PART TWO
- Introduction to Part Two
- 7 The 2008 Reading University Turing Tests
- 8 2012 Tests – Bletchley Park
- 9 Interviews with Elite Machine Developers
- 10 Turing2014: Tests at The Royal Society, June 2014
- 11 The Reaction to Turing2014
- Index
- References
Summary
We presented in this book Alan Turing the man before taking the reader on a journey through the prescient beliefs of this mathematical genius, WWII code-breaker and all-round polymath. From his earliest works, and notions about thinking machines, to implementations of his thought experiment about a machine's ability to answer any questions put to it by a human interrogator, you can see how Turing's ideas are as relevant today as when he originally described them.
Consider the World Economic Forum (WEF) annual gathering of world leaders in Davos, in 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution was one of the eight themes of the conference with technology at the forefront of discussions. These included ‘The Transformation of Tomorrow’, ‘What if robots go to war?’ and the ‘State of artificial intelligence’. Nearly 70 years before this, in his 1948 report, Intelligent Machinery, Turing first proposed his test.
As we have seen, machines can now converse improving on the Eliza program's technique to transform an input message into an output question, thereby getting human interlocutors to talk about themselves (see Chapter 9). Of course there remain sophistications in human language that need mastering in machine talk; for example, creating metaphors and analogies to explain unexpected or unusual occurrences through similar or common experiences. This will take time to develop, especially to understand more fully how humans do it.
Do we feel then that the three practical Turing test experiments, especially the 2014 event, realised the kind of thinking machine Turing might have envisaged in 1948? Of course not, … yet. A stronger test would last for longer than five minutes and a machine would need to convince more than half a panel of interrogator–judges that it was human, as Turing felt in 1952, two years after his prediction in the Mind paper.
The three experiments, 2008, 2012 and in 2014 were a start in seriously examining Turing's ideas for a thinking machine. An unpredicted backlash followed the announcement of machine Eugene Goostman's performance in the 2014 Turing test experiment.
Just as Turing had predicted more than half a century before, academics like Stevan Harnad were unimpressed. Harnad tweeted his doubt that the test had actually been passed. Criticism also came from the psychologist and linguist Gary Markus.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Turing's Imitation GameConversations with the Unknown, pp. 187 - 193Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
, , and (1952). Can automatic calculating machines be said to think? Transcript of BBC radio broadcast reproduced in Cooper and van Leeuwen (2103), pp. 667–676.
and (eds). Alan Turing: His Work and Impact, Elsevier.
(2007). If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck… The Turing test, intelligence and consciousness. In Oxford Companion to Consciousness, , and (eds). Oxford University Press.
and (2010a). Testing Turing's five-minutes parallel-paired imitation game. Kybernetes
39 (3), 449–465.Google Scholar
and (2010b). From the buzzing in Turing's head to machine intelligence contests. In Towards a Comprehensive Intelligence Test (TCIT): Reconsidering the Turing Test for the 21st Century, Proc. of the AISB 2010 Symposium.
, and (2010c). Hidden interlocutor misidentification in practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines
20 (3), 441–454.Google Scholar
and Assumption of knowledge and the Chinese Room in Turing test interrogation. AI Communications
27 (3), 275–283.
, and (2013). Some implications of a sample of practical Turing tests. Minds and Machines
23, 163–177.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.