Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T04:43:52.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 70 - Paradoxical Embolisms and Strokes

from Section 7 - Non-Inflammatory Disorders of the Arterial Wall

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2018

Louis Caplan
Affiliation:
Beth Israel-Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
José Biller
Affiliation:
Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, H., Bendixen, B., Kappelle, L., et al., 1993. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke, 24, 3541.10.1161/01.STR.24.1.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aggarwal, K., Jayam, V. K., Meyer, M. A., Nayak, A. K., and Nathan, S. 2002. Thrombus-in-transit and paradoxical embolism. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 15, 1021–2.10.1067/mje.2002.121279CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albers, G., Amarenco, P., Easton, J., Sacco, R., and Teal, P. 2001. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke. Chest, 119, S300–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsheikh-Ali, A., Thaler, D., and Kent, D. 2009. Patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke: incidental or pathogenic? Stroke, 40, 2349–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Au, V., Walsh, G., and Fon, G. 2001. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography with pelvic venography in the evaluation of thrombo-embolic disease. Australas Radiol, 45, 141–5.10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00869.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ay, H., Buonanno, F., Abraham, S., Kistler, J., and Koroshetz, W. 1998. An electrocardiographic criterion for diagnosis of patent foramen ovale associated with ischemic stroke. Stroke, 29, 1393–7.10.1161/01.STR.29.7.1393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendixen, B., Posner, J., and Lango, R. 2001. Stroke in young adults and children. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 1, 5466.10.1007/s11910-001-0077-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergqvist, D. and Bergentz, S. E. 1990. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. World J Surg, 14, 679–87.10.1007/BF01658825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthet, K., Lavergne, T., Cohen, A., et al. 2000. Significant association of atrial vulnerability with atrial septal abnormalities in young patients with ischemic stroke of unknown cause. Stroke, 31, 398403.10.1161/01.STR.31.2.398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabanes, L., Mas, J., Cohen, A., et al. 1993. Atrial septal aneurysm and patent foramen ovale as risk factors for CS in patients less than 55 years of age. A study using transesophageal echocardiography. Stroke, 24, 1865–73.10.1161/01.STR.24.12.1865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cakmak, S., Nighoghossian, N., Desestret, V., et al. 2005. Pulmonary embolism: An unusual complication of cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurology, 65, 1136–7.10.1212/01.wnl.0000178987.06734.54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calabro, R., La Spina, P., Serra, S., et al. 2009. Prevalence of prothrombotic polymorphisms in a selected cohort of cryptogenic and noncryptogenic ischemic stroke patients. Neurol India, 57, 636–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J., Saver, J., Thaler, D., et al. 2013. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med, 368, 10921100.10.1056/NEJMoa1301440CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chant, H. and McCollum, C. 2001. Stroke in young adults: The role of paradoxical embolism. Thromb Haemost, 85, 22–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chaturvedi, S. 1998. Coagulation abnormalities in adults with CS and patent foramen ovale. J Neurol Sci, 160, 158–60.10.1016/S0022-510X(98)00243-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohnheim, J. 1877. Thrombose und Embolie, Vorlesungen über Allgemeine Pathologie; ein Handbuch für Aertze und Studierende. Berlin: Hirschwald.Google Scholar
Corrin, B. 1964. Paradoxical embolism. Br Heart J, 26, 549–53.10.1136/hrt.26.4.549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramer, S., Rordorf, G., Kaufman, J., et al. 1998. Clinically occult pelvic-vein thrombosis in CS. Lancet, 351, 1927–8.10.1016/S0140-6736(05)78611-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, S., Maki, J., Waitches, G., et al. 2003. Paradoxical emboli from calf and pelvic veins in CS. J Neuroimaging, 13, 218–23.10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00181.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, S., Rordorf, G., Maki, J., et al. 2004. Increased pelvic vein thrombi in CS: results of the Paradoxical Emboli from Large Veins in Ischemic Stroke (PELVIS) study. Stroke, 35, 4650.10.1161/01.STR.0000106137.42649.ABCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahabreh, I. and Kent, D. 2011. Index event bias as an explanation for the paradoxes of recurrence risk research. JAMA, 305, 822–3.10.1001/jama.2011.163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Belder, M., Tourikis, L., Leech, G., and Camm, A. 1992. Risk of patent foramen ovale for thromboembolic events in all age groups. Am J Cardiol, 69, 1316–20.10.1016/0002-9149(92)91228-VCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Castro, S., Cartoni, D., Fiorelli, M., et al. 2000. Morphological and functional characteristics of patent foramen ovale and their embolic implications. Stroke, 31, 2407–13.10.1161/01.STR.31.10.2407CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R., Gopal, A., Mohr, J., and Homma, S. 1992. Patent foramen ovale as a risk factor for CS. Ann Intern Med, 117, 461–5.10.7326/0003-4819-117-6-461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tullio, M., Jin, Z., Russo, C., et al. 2013. Patent foramen ovale, subclinical cerebrovascular disease, and ischemic stroke in a population-based cohort. J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 62, 3541.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, S. M., Hassell, K., Anderson, C. A., et al. 2004. Antiphospholipid antibodies are common in patients referred for percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 61, 123–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Droste, D., Lakemeier, S., Wichter, T., et al. 2002. Optimizing the technique of contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the detection of right-to-left shunts. Stroke, 33, 2211–6.10.1161/01.STR.0000027884.03365.ACCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubourg, O., Rigaud, M., and Bardet, J. 1984. Contrast echocardiographic visualization of cough-induced right-to-left shunt through a patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol, 4, 587–94.10.1016/S0735-1097(84)80106-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedullo, P. F. and Tapson, V. F. 2003. Clinical practice. The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med, 349, 1247–56.10.1056/NEJMcp035442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foster, P. P., Boriek, A. M., Butler, B. D., Gernhardt, M. L., and Bove, A. A. 2003. Patent foramen ovale and paradoxical systemic embolism: A bibliographic review. Aviat Space Environ Med, 74, B164.Google ScholarPubMed
Foulkes, M., Wolf, P., Price, T., et al., 1988. The Stroke Data Bank: Design, methods, and baseline characteristics. Stroke, 19, 547–54.10.1161/01.STR.19.5.547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D., Moody, A., Morgan, P., Martel, A., and Davidson, I. 2002. Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: A prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging. Ann Intern Med, 136, 8998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, D., Moody, A., Davidson, I., Martel, A., and Morgan, P. 2003. Deep venous thrombosis: Diagnosis by using venous enhanced subtracted peak arterial MR venography versus conventional venography. Radiology, 226, 812–20.10.1148/radiol.2263012205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furlan, A., Reisman, M., Massaro, J., et al. 2012. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med, 366, 991–9.10.1056/NEJMoa1009639CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gautier, J., Durr, A., Koussa, S., Lasault, G., and Grosgogeat, T. 1991. Paradoxical cerebral embolism with a patent foramen ovale. Cerebrovasc Dis, 1, 193202.10.1159/000108842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgopoulos, S., Chronopoulos, A., Dervisis, K., and Arvanitis, D. 2001. Paradoxical embolism. An old but, paradoxically, under-estimated problem. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 42, 675–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Gin, K., Huckell, V., and Pollick, C. 1993. Femoral vein delivery of contrast medium enhances transthoracic echocardiographic detection of patent foramen ovale. J Am Coll Cardiol, 22, 19942000.10.1016/0735-1097(93)90789-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greer, D. and Buonanno, F. 2001. Cerebral infarction in conjunction with patent foramen ovale and May–Thurner syndrome. J Neuroimaging, 11, 432–4.10.1111/j.1552-6569.2001.tb00074.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ha, J., Shin, M., Kang, S., et al. 2001. Enhanced detection of right-to-left shunt through patent foramen ovale by transthoracic contrast echocardiography using harmonic imaging. Am J Cardiol, 87, 669–71, A11.10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01455-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haeusler, K., Herm, J., Hoppe, B., et al. 2012. Thrombophilia screening in young patients with cryptogenic stroke. Prevalence of gene polymorphisms compared to healthy blood donors and impact on secondary stroke prevention. Hamostaseologie 32, 147152.Google Scholar
Hagen, P., Scholz, D., and Edwards, W. 1984. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: An autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc, 59, 1720.10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60336-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamann, G., Schatzer-Klotz, D., Frohlig, G., et al. 1998. Femoral injection of echo contrast medium may increase the sensitivity of testing for a patent foramen ovale. Neurology, 50, 1423–8.10.1212/WNL.50.5.1423CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, R., Diener, H., Coutts, S., et al. 2014. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: The case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol, 13, 429–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Hausmann, D., Mugge, A., Becht, I., and Daniel, W. 1992. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and association with cerebral and peripheral embolic events. Am J Cardiol, 70, 668–72.10.1016/0002-9149(92)90210-PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausmann, D., Mugge, A., and Daniel, W. 1995. Identification of patent foramen ovale permitting paradoxic embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol, 26, 1030–8.10.1016/0735-1097(95)00288-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Havig, O. 1977a. Deep vein thrombosis. Acta Chir Scand, 478, S411.Google ScholarPubMed
Havig, O. 1977b. Source of pulmonary emboli. Acta Chir Scand, 478, S42–7.Google Scholar
Hirsh, J. and Hoak, J. 1996. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association. Circulation, 93, 2212–45.10.1161/01.CIR.93.12.2212CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homma, S., Di Tullio, M., Sacco, R., et al. 1994. Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with CS. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study. Stroke, 25, 582–6.10.1161/01.STR.25.3.582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homma, S., Sacco, R., Di Tullio, M., et al. 2002. Effect of medical treatment in stroke patients with patent foramen ovale: patent foramen ovale in the CS Study. Circulation, 105, 2625–31.10.1161/01.CIR.0000017498.88393.44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, P. E. 2002. Fat embolism. Anaesthesia, 57, 830–1.10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02752_17.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, B., Boden-Albala, B., Lin, I., and Sacco, R. 2002. Stroke in the young in the northern Manhattan stroke study. Stroke, 33, 2789–93.10.1161/01.STR.0000038988.64376.3ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeanrenaud, X., Bogousslavsky, J., Payot, M., Regli, F., and Kappenberger, L. 1990. Patent foramen ovale and cerebral infarct in young patients. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 120, 823–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Job, F., Ringelstein, E., Grafen, Y., et al. 1994. Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Am J Cardiol, 74, 381–4.10.1016/0002-9149(94)90407-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, B. 1951. Paradoxical emboli. J Clin Pathol, 4, 316–32.10.1136/jcp.4.3.316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E., Calafiore, P., Donnan, G., and Tonkin, A. 1994. Evidence that patent foramen ovale is not a risk factor for cerebral ischemia in the elderly. Am J Cardiol, 74, 596–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearon, C. and Hirsh, J. 1994. Factors influencing the reported sensitivity and specificity of impedance plethysmography for proximal deep vein thrombosis. Thrombosis Haemost, 72, 652–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Kearon, C., Akl, E., Comerota, A., et al. 2012. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th edn: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest, 141(2 Suppl): e419S-494S.10.1378/chest.11-2301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, J., Rudd, A., Lewis, R., and Hunt, B. 2001. Venous thromboembolism after acute stroke. Stroke, 32, 262–7.10.1161/01.STR.32.1.262CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, D., Ruthazer, R., Weimer, C., et al. 2013. An index to identify stroke-related vs incidental patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology, 81, 619–25.10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a08d59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, D., Dahabreh, I., Ruthazer, R., et al. 2015. Anticoagulant vs. antiplatelet therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Eur Heart J, 36, 2381–9.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, D. M., Dahabreh, I. J., Ruthazer, R., et al. 2016. Device closure of patent foramen ovale after stroke: Pooled analysis of completed randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol, 67, 907–17.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.023CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerut, E., Norfleet, W., Plotnick, G., and Giles, T. 2001. Patent foramen ovale: A review of associated conditions and the impact of physiological size. J Am Coll Cardiol, 38, 613–23.10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01427-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiernan, T., Yan, B., Cubeddu, R., et al. 2009. May–Thurner syndrome in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: An important clinical association. Stroke, 40, 1502–4.10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.527366CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitsios, G., Dahabreh, I., Abu, D., et al. 2012. Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: A systematic review of observational and randomized evidence. Stroke, 43, 422–31.10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.631648CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kitsios, G. D., Thaler, D. E., and Kent, D. M. 2013. Potentially large yet uncertain benefits: A meta-analysis of patent foramen ovale closure trials. Stroke, 44, 2640–3.10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klotzsch, C., Janssen, G., and Berlit, P. 1994. Transesophageal echocardiography and contrast-TCD in the detection of a patent foramen ovale. Neurology, 44, 1603–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koessler, M. J. and Pitto, R. P. 2002. Fat embolism and cerebral function in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop, 26, 259–62.Google ScholarPubMed
Konstantinides, S., Geibel, A., Kasper, W., et al. 1998. Patent foramen ovale is an important predictor of adverse outcome in patients with major pulmonary embolism. Circulation, 97, 1946–51.10.1161/01.CIR.97.19.1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunitz, S., Gross, C., Heyman, A., et al., 1984. The pilot Stroke Data Bank: Definition, design, and data. Stroke, 15, 740.10.1161/01.STR.15.4.740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, C., Giannesini, C., Zuber, M., et al. 2002. Clinical and imaging findings in CS patients with and without patent foramen ovale: The PFO–ASA Study. Atrial septal aneurysm. Stroke, 33, 706–11.10.1161/hs0302.104543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landi, G., D’Angelo, A., Boccardi, E., et al. 1992. Venous thromboembolism in acute stroke: Prognostic importance of hypercoagulability. Arch Neurol, 49, 279–83.10.1001/archneur.1992.00530270093024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapergue, B., Decroix, J., Evrard, S., et al. 2015. Diagnostic yield of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism by combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Eur Neurol, 74, 6972.10.1159/000437261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lechat, P., Mas, J., and Lascault, G. 1988. Prevalence of patent foramen ovale in patients with stroke. N Engl J Med, 318, 1148–52.10.1056/NEJM198805053181802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leon, L., Giannoukas, A. D., Dodd, D., Chan, P., and Labropoulos, N. 2005. Clinical significance of superficial vein thrombosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 29, 10–7.10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lethen, H., Flachskampf, F., Schneider, R., et al. 1997. Frequency of deep vein thrombosis in patients with patent foramen ovale and ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am J Cardiol, 80, 1066–9.10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00604-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liberman, A., Daruwalla, V., Collins, J., et al. 2014. Diagnostic yield of pelvic magnetic resonance venography in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Stroke, 45, 2324–9.10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lip, P. and Lip, G. 2014. Patent foramen ovale and migraine attacks: A systematic review. Am J Med, 127, 411–20.10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lohr, J., James, K., Deshmukh, R., et al. 1995. Karmody Award. Calf vein thrombi are not a benign finding. Am J Surg, 170, 8690.10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80261-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loscalzo, J. 1986. Paradoxical embolism: Clinical presentation, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic options. Am Heart J, 112, 141–5.10.1016/0002-8703(86)90692-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loud, P., Katz, D., Bruce, D., Klippenstein, D., and Grossman, Z. 2001. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: Detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology, 219, 498502.10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma26498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maldjian, P. D., Anis, A., and Saric, M. 2006. Radiological reasoning: Pulmonary embolism – thinking beyond the clots. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 186, S21923.10.2214/AJR.05.1622CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas, J.-L., Arquizan, C., Lamy, C., et al. 2001. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med, 345, 1740–6.10.1056/NEJMoa011503CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mas, J. L, Derumeaux, G., Guillon, B., et al. 2017. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med, 377, 1011–21.10.1056/NEJMoa1705915CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, B., Kalesan, B., Heinrich, M., et al. 2013. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med, 368, 1083–91.10.1056/NEJMoa1211716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meissner, I., Khandheria, B. K., Heit, J. A., et al. 2006. Patent foramen ovale: Innocent or guilty? Evidence from a prospective population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol, 47, 440–5.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messe, S., Silverman, I., Kizer, J., et al. 2004. Practice parameter: Recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm. Neurology, 62, 1042–50.10.1212/01.WNL.0000119173.15878.F3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R. L., Das, S., Anandarangam, T., et al. 1997. Relation between patent foramen ovale and perfusion abnormalities in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol, 80, 377–8.10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00372-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modan, B., Sharon, E., and Jelin, N. 1972. Factors contributing to the incorrect diagnosis of pulmonary embolic disease. Chest, 62, 388–93.10.1378/chest.62.4.388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, J. 1988. CS. N Engl J Med, 318, 1197–8.Google Scholar
Mohr, J., Caplan, L., Melski, J., et al. 1978. The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: A prospective registry of patients hospitalized with stroke. Neurology, 28, 754–62.10.1212/WNL.28.8.754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, J., Thompson, J., Lazar, R., et al. 2001. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 345, 1444–51.10.1056/NEJMoa011258CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ning, M., Lo, E., Ning, P., et al. 2013. The brain’s heart: Therapeutic opportunities for patent foramen ovale (PFO) and neurovascular disease. Pharmacol Ther, 139, 111123.10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.03.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noser, E., Felberg, R., and Alexandrov, A. 2001. Thrombolytic therapy in an adolescent ischemic stroke. J Child Neurol, 16, 286–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obernosterer, A., Aschauer, M., Schnedl, W., and Lipp, R. 2002. Anomalies of the inferior vena cava in patients with iliac venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med, 136, 3741.10.7326/0003-4819-136-1-200201010-00009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Offelli, P., Zanchetta, M., Pedon, L., et al. 2007. Thrombophilia in young patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO). Thromb Haemost, 98, 906–7.10.1160/TH07-04-0243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, M., Budman, E., Carandang, R., Goddeau, R. P. Jr., and Henninger, N. 2015. Prevalence of pelvic vein pathology in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale undergoing MRV pelvis. Cerebrovasc Dis, 39, 216223.10.1159/000376613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overell, J., Bone, I., and Lees, K. 2000. Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: A meta-analysis of case–control studies. Neurology, 55, 1172–9.10.1212/WNL.55.8.1172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parisi, D. M., Koval, K., and Egol, K. 2002. Fat embolism syndrome. Am J Orthop, 31, 507–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Petty, G., Khandheria, B., Chu, C.-P., Sicks, J., and Whisnant, J. 1997. Patent foramen ovale in patients with cerebral infarction. Arch Neurol, 54, 819–22.10.1001/archneur.1997.00550190013008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pezzini, A., Del Zotto, E., Magoni, M., et al. 2003. Inherited thrombophilic disorders in young adults with ischemic stroke and patent foramen ovale. Stroke, 34, 2833.10.1161/01.STR.0000046457.54037.CCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philbrick, J. and Becker, D. 1988. Calf deep venous thrombosis. A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Arch Intern Med, 148, 2131–8.10.1001/archinte.1988.00380100029007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puls, R., Hosten, N., Bock, J., et al. 1999. Signal-enhanced color Doppler sonography of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis. J Ultrasound Med, 18, 185–90.10.7863/jum.1999.18.3.185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ranoux, D., Cohen, A., Cabanes, L., et al. 1993. Patent foramen ovale: Is stroke due to paradoxical embolism? Stroke, 24, 31–4.10.1161/01.STR.24.1.31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, C. and Alli, O. (2015) Role of occlusive devices to prevent thromboembolism among persons with a patent foramen ovale and prior stroke. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17, 337.10.1007/s11940-014-0337-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacco, R., Ellenberg, J., Mohr, J., et al. 1989. Infarcts of undetermined cause: The NINCDS Stroke Data Bank. Ann Neurol, 25, 382–90.10.1002/ana.410250410CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salem, D. and Thaler, D. 2013. Patent foramen ovale science: Keeping the horse in front of the cart. J Am Coll Cardiol Img, 62, 4243.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salzman, E. 1986. Venous thrombosis made easy. N Engl J Med, 314, 847–8.10.1056/NEJM198603273141309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saver, J. L., Carroll, J. D., Thaler, D. E., et al. 2017. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med, 377, 1022–32.10.1056/NEJMoa1610057CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B., Hofmann, T., Justen, M. H., and Meinertz, T. 1995. Chiari’s network: normal anatomic variant or risk factor for arterial embolic events? J Am Coll Cardiol, 26, 203–10.10.1016/0735-1097(95)00144-OCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuchlenz, H., Weihs, W., Horner, S., and Quehenberger, F. 2000. The association between the diameter of a patent foramen ovale and the risk of embolic cerebrovascular events. Am J Med, 109, 456–62.10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00530-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuchlenz, H., Saurer, G., and Weihs, W. 2002a. Patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, and recurrent stroke. N Engl J Med, 346, 1331–2; author reply 1331–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Schuchlenz, H., Weihs, W., Beitzke, A., et al. 2002b. Transesophageal echocardiography for quantifying size of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic cerebrovascular events. Stroke, 33, 293–6.10.1161/hs0102.100883CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sondergaard, L., Kasner, S. E., Rhodes, J. F., et al. 2017. Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med, 377, 1033–42.10.1056/NEJMoa1707404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spritzer, C., Arata, M., and Freed, K. 2001. Isolated pelvic deep venous thrombosis: Relative frequency as detected with MR imaging. Radiology, 219, 521–5.10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma25521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steiner, M., Di Tullio, M., Rundek, T., et al. 1998. Patent foramen ovale size and embolic brain imaging findings among patients with ischemic stroke. Stroke, 29, 944–8.10.1161/01.STR.29.5.944CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stendel, R., Gramm, H., Schroder, K., Lober, C., and Brock, M. 2000. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography as a screening technique for detection of a patent foramen ovale before surgery in the sitting position. Anesthesiology, 93, 971–5.10.1097/00000542-200010000-00016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, J., Abehsera, M., Grenet, D., et al. 2002. Detection of pelvic vein thrombosis by magnetic resonance angiography in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and normal lower limb compression ultrasonography. Chest, 122, 115–21.10.1378/chest.122.1.115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stollberger, C., Slany, J., Schuster, I., et al. 1993. The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism. Ann Intern Med, 119, 461–5.10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tatlisumak, T. and Fisher, M. 1996. Hematologic disorders associated with ischemic stroke. J Neurol Sci, 140, 111.10.1016/0022-510X(96)00051-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, D., Di Angelantonio, D., Di Tullio, M., et al. 2013a. The Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) Study: Initial description of the completed database. Int J Stroke, 8, 612–9.10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00843.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., Di Angelantonio, E., et al. 2013b. Neuroimaging findings in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without patent foramen ovale. Stroke, 44, 675–80.10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.677039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., Weimer, C., et al. 2014a. Recurrent stroke predictors differ in medically treated patients with pathogenic vs. other PFOs. Neurology, 83, 221–6.10.1212/WNL.0000000000000589CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., Weimer, C., et al. 2014b. Determinants of antithrombotic choice for patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke. Neurology, 83, 1954–7.10.1212/WNL.0000000000001007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. 1995. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 333, 1581–7.Google Scholar
The Publications Committee for the Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) Investigators. 1998. Low molecular weight heparinoid, ORG 10172 (Danaparoid), and outcome after acute ischemic stroke. JAMA, 279, 1265–72.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. and Evans, W. 1930. Paradoxical embolism. Q J Med, 23, 135–52.Google Scholar
Unno, N., Mitsuoka, H., Uchiyama, T., et al. 2002. Superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limbs in patients with varicose veins. Surg Today, 32, 397401.10.1007/s005950200061CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaidya, V., DeSimone, C., Asirvatham, S., et al. 2014. Implanted endocardial lead characteristics and risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 41, 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verlato, F., Zucchetta, P., Prandoni, P., et al. 1999. An unexpectedly high rate of pulmonary embolism in patients with superficial thrombophlebitis of the thigh. J Vasc Surg, 30, 1113–5.10.1016/S0741-5214(99)70051-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, R., Jones, D., and Haponik, E. 1995. Paradoxical embolism. Chest, 108, 549–58.10.1378/chest.108.2.549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warlow, C., Ogston, D., and Douglas, A. 1976. Deep venous thrombosis of the legs after strokes. Br Med J, 1, 1178–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Webster, M., Chancellor, A., Smith, H., et al. 1988. Patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients. Lancet, 2, 11–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Wessler, B., Thaler, D., Ruthazer, R., et al. 2014. Transesophageal echocardiography in cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale: Analysis of putative high-risk features from the risk of paradoxical embolism database. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 7, 125–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Wheeler, H. and Anderson, F. 1995. Diagnostic methods for deep vein thrombosis. Haemostasis, 25, 626.Google ScholarPubMed

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×