Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-s2gkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-27T10:08:44.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2017

David M. Dorsen
David M. Dorsen
Affiliation:
Sedgwick LLP, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
The Unexpected Scalia
A Conservative Justice's Liberal Opinions
 , pp. 243 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Books

“A Matter of Interpretation; Federal Courts and the Law” (1997)Google Scholar
“Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts” (2012) (with Garner, Bryan A.)Google Scholar

Articles and Book Chapters

“Sovereign Immunity and Nonstatutory Review of Federal Administrative Action: Some Conclusions from the Public-Lands Cases,” 68 Michigan Law Review 867 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Appellate Justice: A Crisis in Virginia,” 57 Virginia Law Review 3 (1971) (with Lilly, Graham C.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Hearing Examiner Program,” 1971 Duke Law Journal 319 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Procedural Aspects of the Consumer Product Safety Act,” 20 U.C.L.A. Law Review 899 (1973) (with Goodman, Frank)Google Scholar
“Don't Go Near the Water,” 25 Federal Communications. Bar Journal 111 (1972–73)Google Scholar
“Introductory Remarks,” 28 Food Drug Cosmetic Law Journal 661 (1973) (with Burditt, George)Google Scholar
“Oversight and Review of Agency Decisionmaking – the Legislative Veto,” 28 Administrative Law Review 569, 684 (1976)Google Scholar
“The Judicialization of Standardless Rulemaking: Two Wrongs Make a Right,” Regulation (July/August 1977)Google Scholar
“Guadalajara! Regulation by Munificence,” Regulation (March/April 1978)Google Scholar
“Vermont Yankee: The APA, the D.C. Circuit, and the Supreme Court,” 1978 Supreme Court Review 345 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The ALJ Fiasco – A Reprise,” 47 University of Chicago Law Review 57 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Disease as Cure: ‘In Order to Get beyond Racism, We Must First Take Account of Race,’” 1979 Wash. U.L.Q. 147 (1979)Google Scholar
“The Legislative Veto: A False Remedy for System Overload,” Regulation (November/December 1979)Google Scholar
“A Note on the Benzene Case,” Regulation (July/August 1980)Google Scholar
“The Judges Are Coming,” Panhandle, Spring 1980, reprinted at 126 Cong. Rec. E3456 (July 21, 1980)Google Scholar
“Regulatory Reform – The Game Has Changed,” Regulation (January/February 1981)Google Scholar
“Back to Basics: Making Law without Making Rules,” Regulation (July/August 1981)Google Scholar
“On Making It Look Easy by Doing It Wrong: A Critical View of the Justice Department,” in Private Schools and the Public Good (Gaffney, E.M., ed.) (1981)Google Scholar
“Separation of Functions: Obscurity Preserved,” 34 Administrative Law Review v (1982)Google Scholar
“The Freedom of Information Act Has No Clothes,” Regulation (March/April 1982)Google Scholar
“The Two Faces of Federalism,” 6 Harvard Journal Law & Public Policy 19 (1982)Google Scholar
“The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers,” 17 Suffolk Law Review 881 (1983)Google Scholar
“Historical Anomalies in Administrative Law,” 1985 Supreme Court Historical Society Year Book 103 (1985)Google Scholar
“The Role of the Judiciary in Deregulation,” 55 Antitrust Law Journal 191 (1986)Google Scholar
“Morality, Pragmatism and the Legal Order,” 9 Harvard Journal Law & Public Policy 123 (1986)Google Scholar
“Specialized Courts: Answer to Backlog? “ Pennsylvania Lawyer (April 1987)Google Scholar
“Economic Affairs as Human Affairs,” in Economic Liberty and the Judiciary 31–32 (Dorn, J.A. ed. 1987)Google Scholar
“Responsibilities of Regulatory Agencies under Environmental Laws,” 24 Houston Law Review 97 (1987)Google Scholar
“Fulfilling the American Dream,” ADL Bulletin (May 1987)Google Scholar
“Is There an Unwritten Constitution?” 12 Harvard Journal Law & Public Policy 1 (1988)Google Scholar
“Originalism: The Lesser Evil,” 57 University of Cincinnati Law Review 849 (1989)Google Scholar
“Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law,” 1989 Duke Law Journal 511 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules,” 56 University of Chicago Law Review 1175 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Assorted Canards of Contemporary Legal Analysis,” 40 Case Western Reserve Law Review 581 (1990)Google Scholar
“Tribute to Emerson G. Spies,” 77 Virginia Law Review 427 (1990)Google Scholar
“Foreword: Symposium Issue on Separation of Powers,” 18 Pepperdine Law Review xvii (1990)Google Scholar
“The Dissenting Opinion,” Journal of Supreme Court Historical Society, 1994 Yearbook 33Google Scholar
“The Role of a Constitutional Court in a Democratic Society,” The Judicial Review, Journal of the Judicial Commission of New South Wales, vol. 2, no. 2 (March 1995)Google Scholar
“Commentary,” 40 St. Louis University Law Journal 1119 (1996)Google Scholar
“Federal Constitutional Guarantees of Individual Rights in the United States of America,” in Human Right and Judicial Review – A Comparative Perspective (Beatty, David M. ed.)Google Scholar
“God's Justice and Ours,” First Things, May 2002, p. 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Keynote Address: Foreign Legal Authority in the Federal Courts,” 98 American Society of International Law Procedure 305 (2004)Google Scholar
“Review of Steven D. Smith's Law's Quandary,” 55 Catholic Law Review 687 (2006)Google Scholar
“Foreword: The Importance of Structure in Constitutional Interpretation,” 83 Notre Dame Law Review 1417 (2008)Google Scholar
Foreword, 31 Harvard Journal Law & Public Policy 871 (2008)Google Scholar
“A Dialogue with John F. Manning on Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation,” 80 George Washington Law Review 1610 (2012 )Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×