Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:49:42.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The Many Faces of Unity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2009

Margaret Morrison
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

Kepler: Unity as Mathematical Metaphysics

In the Mysterium cosmographicum Johannes Kepler claimed that it was his intention to show that the celestial “machine” was not a kind of divine living being,

but a kind of clockwork insofar as the multiplicity of motions depends on a single, quite simple magnetic and corporeal force, just as all the motions of a clock depend upon a simple weight. And I also show that this physical cause can be determined numerically and geometrically. (Kepler 1938, xv:232)

His research began with a specification of certain astronomical hypotheses based on observation; that was followed by a specification of geometrical hypotheses from which the astronomical ones would follow or could be calculated. Those geometrical hypotheses were grounded in the idea that God created the solar system according to a mathematical pattern. Given that assumption, Kepler attempted to correlate the distances of the planets from the sun with the radii of spherical shells that were inscribed within and circumscribed around a nest of solids. The goal was to find agreement between the observed ratios of the radii of the planets and the ratios calculated from the geometry of the nested solids. Although unsuccessful, Kepler remained convinced that there were underlying mathematical harmonies that could explain the discrepancies between his geometrical theory and ratios calculated from observations.

Part of Kepler's unfaltering reliance on mathematical harmonies or hypotheses was based on their direct relationship to physical bodies. He considered a mathematical hypothesis to be physically true when it corresponded directly to physically real bodies. What “corresponding directly” meant was that it described their motions in the simplest way possible.

Type
Chapter
Information
Unifying Scientific Theories
Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures
, pp. 7 - 34
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×