Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6b88cc9666-c4hrb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-16T00:41:35.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Lucia Motolinia
Lucia Motolinia
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Unity through Particularism
How Electoral Reforms Influence Parties and Legislative Behavior
 , pp. 207 - 227
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2026

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2008. “Persistence of Power, Elites, and Institutions.” American Economic Review 98(1):267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adida, Claire, Gottlieb, Jessica, Kramon, Eric, and McClendon, Gwyneth. 2020. “When Does Information Influence Voters? The Joint Importance of Salience and Coordination.” Comparative Political Studies 53(6):851–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ainsley, Caitlin, Carrubba, Clifford J., Crisp, Brian F., Demirkaya, Betul, Gabel, Matthew J., and Hadzic, Dino. 2020. “Roll-Call Vote Selection: Implications for the Study of Legislative Politics.” American Political Science Review 114(3):691–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcántara, Manuel (dir.). 2021. “Proyecto élites latinoamericanas (PELA-USAL).” Universidad de Salamanca (1994–2021).Google Scholar
Sáez, Alcántara, Manuel, Mercedes García Montero, and Sánchez López, Francisco. 2005. El poder legislativo en América Latina a través de sus normas. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo. 2006. “Policy Gatekeepers in Latin American Legislatures.” Latin American Politics and Society 48(1):125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, Ponce, Aldo F., and Sagarzazu, Iñaki. 2011. “Legislative Parties in Volatile, Nonprogrammatic Party Systems: The Peruvian Case in Comparative Perspective.” Latin American Politics and Society 53(3):57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, Micozzi, Juan Pablo, Pinto, Pablo M., and Saiegh, Sebastian M.. 2018. “Disentangling the Role of Ideology and Partisanship in Legislative Voting: Evidence from Argentina.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 43(2): 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, Micozzi, Juan Pablo, and Vera, Sebastián Vallejo. 2023. “Congressional Committees, Electoral Connections, and Legislative Speech.” Political Research Quarterly 76(2):994–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, Ramírez, Margarita M., and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2017. “Party Strategies, Constituency Links, and Legislative Speech.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(4):637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Navia, Patricio. 2009. “Institutions and the Legislative Success of ‘Strong’ Presidents: An Analysis of Government Bills in Chile.” Journal of Legislative Studies 15(4):401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, Barnes, Tiffany D., Micozzi, Juan Pablo, and Vera, Sebastián Vallejo. 2025. “Gender, Institutions, and Legislative Speech.” Comparative Politics 57(2):219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès. 2016. “The ‘Open Garden of Politics’: The Impact of Open Primaries for Candidate Selection in the British Conservative Party.” British Journal of Political Science and International Relations 18(3): 706–723.Google Scholar
Alles, Santiago, Barnes, Tiffany D., and Tchintian, Carolina. 2023. The Representational Consequences of Electronic Voting Reform: Evidence from Argentina. Elements in Campaigns and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1970. “Bases of Support for Mexico’s Dominant Party.” American Political Science Review 64(1):153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1995 a. “Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress.” Journal of Politics 57(2): 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1995 b. “Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2):406–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anaya Merchant, Luis. 2004. “Experiencias políticas e imaginarios sociales sobre la reelección en México, 1928-1964. La transformación de un derecho ciudadano en un principio político y en un tabú social.” Historia Mexicana 54(2):365–403.Google Scholar
André, Audrey, Depauw, Sam, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2014. “The Effect of Electoral Institutions on Legislative Behavior.” In Oxford Handbook for Legislative Behavior, ed. Martin, Shane, Saalfeld, Thomas, and Strøm, Kaare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–249.Google Scholar
André, Audrey, Depauw, Sam, and Martin, Shane. 2015. “Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort: The Mediating Effect of Electoral Vulnerability.” Comparative Political Studies 48(4):464–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aroche Aguilar, Ernesto. 2018. “Rafael Moreno Valle Rosas (Puebla. PAN, 2011- 2017): El nieto del General.” In Los gobernadores. Caciques del pasado y del presente, ed. Paxman, Andrew. Mexico: Grijalbo, pp. 169–215.Google Scholar
Ascencio, Sergio, and Kerevel, Yann. 2021. “Party Strategy, Candidate Selection and Legislative Behavior in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 46(3):713–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, and Mesquita, Ethan Bueno de. 2006. “Delivering the Goods: Legislative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings.” Journal of Politics 68(1):168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, Edward, Weiss, Meredith L., Hicken, Allen, and Hutchcroft, Paul D.. 2022. Mobilizing for Elections. Patronage and Political Machines in Southeast Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34(1):124–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Fernandes, Jorge, eds. 2021. The Politics of Legislative Debates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagashka, Tanya, and Clark, Jennifer Hayes. 2016. “Electoral Rules and Legislative Particularism: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 110(3):441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Tiffany D., Tchintian, Carolina, and Alles, Santiago. 2017. “Assessing Ballot Structure and Split Ticket Voting: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment.” Journal of Politics 79(2):439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, and Thies, Michael F.. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized Under PR, Plurality and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Reynal-Querol, Marta. 2011. “Do Democracies Select More Educated Leaders?” American Political Science Review 105(3):552–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, David M. 2012. “Probabilistic Topic Models.” Communications of the ACM 55(4):77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, David M., and Lafferty, John D.. 2007. “A Correlated Topic Model of Science.” Annals of Applied Statistics 1(1):17–35.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S.. 1999. “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Katz, Richard S.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen. 1996. “Social Spending and Political Support: The Lessons of theNational Solidarity Program in Mexico.” Comparative Politics 28(2):151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Kathleen, and Wuhs, Steven. 2016. “Competition Decentralization and Candidate Selection in Mexico.” American Behavioral Scientist 60(7): 819–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buisseret, Peter, and Prato, Carlo. 2020. “Competing Principals? Legislative Representation in List Proportional Representation Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 66(1):156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luisa, Béjar Algazi. 2014. “Cuando el ejecutivo es débil ¿Quién legisla en México?” Política y Gobierno 21(2):325–347.Google Scholar
Luisa, Béjar Algazi, ed. 2009. ¿Qué hacen los legisladores en México?: el trabajo en comisiones. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1984. “The Constituency Service Basis for the Personal Vote for US Representatives and British Members of Parliament.” American Political Science Review 78:110–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calise, Mauro. 2010. Il partito personale: I due corpi del leader. Rome: Editori Laterza.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2014. Legislator Success in Fragmented Congresses in Argentina: Plurality Cartels, Minority Presidents, and Lawmaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and López Lara, Alvaro. 2022. “Más vale escaño en mano: aversión al riesgo, fragmentación partidaria y reformas electorales en los estados mexicanos.” In Las Reformas Electorales en América Latina: Una Evaluación de los Procesos de Cambio de Reglas de Juego, ed. Freidenberg, Flavia. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico and Instituto de Investigaciones Juridicas and Instituto Electoral de la Ciudad de Mexico, pp. 197–230.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Micozzi, Juan Pablo. 2005. “The Governor’ Backyard: A Seat-Vote Model of Electoral Reform for Subnational Multiparty Races.” Journal of Politics 67(4):1050–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colin, Cameron, A., and Gelbach, Jonah B.. 2008. “Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference with Clustered Errors.” Review of Economics and Statistics 90(3):414–427.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1982. Mexican Leaders, Their Education and Recruitment. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Camp, Roderic Ai. 1990. “Camarillas in Mexican Politics: The Case of the Salinas Cabinet.” Mexican Studies 61(1):85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cann, Damon, and Sidman, Andrew. 2011. “Exchange Theory, Political Parties, and the Allocation of Federal Distributive Benefits in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 73(4):1128–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantú, Francisco. 2019. “Groceries for Votes: The Electoral Returns of Vote Buying.” Journal of Politics 81(3):790–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John. 1996. Term Limits and Legislative Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John. 2007. “Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1):92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John. 2008. Legislative Voting and Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, Niemi, Richard, and Powell, Linda. 1998. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(2): 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrión, Lydiette. 2018. “Eruviel Avila (Estado de Mexico. PRI, 2011-2017): El Amigo Eruviel, Entre Ecatepec y Atlacomulco.” In Los gobernadores. Caciques del pasado y del presente, ed. Paxman, Andrew. Mexico: Grijalbo, pp. 60–103.Google Scholar
Carroll, Royce, and Kim, Henry A.. 2010. “Party Government and the ‘Cohesive Power of Public Plunder.’” American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce, and Kubo, Hiroki. 2019. “Measuring and Comparing Party Ideology and Heterogeneity.” Party Politics 25(2):245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce, and Nalepa, Monika. 2020. “The Personal Vote and Party Cohesion: Modeling the Effects of Electoral Rules on Intraparty Politics.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 30(1):36–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Royce, and Nalepa, Monika. 2021. “When Does the Personal Vote Matter for Party Loyalty? The Conditional Effects of Candidate-Centred Electoral Systems.” Parliamentary Affairs 74(1):102–120.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford, Gabel, Matthew, and Hug, Simon. 2008. “Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen: A Theory of Roll-Call Vote Selection.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(4):543–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casar, Maria Amparo. 2002. “Executive-Legislative Relations: The Case of Mexico (1946–1997).” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2016 a. Electoral Reform and National Security in Japan: From Pork to Foreign Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2016 b. “From Pork to Policy: The Rise of Programmatic Campaigning in Japanese Elections.” Journal of Politics 78(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2018. “Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems: Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos.” American Political Science Review 112(1):31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy, and Motolinia, Lucia. 2021. “Geographically-Targeted Spending in Mixed-Member Majoritarian Electoral Systems.” World Politics 73(4): 668–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. “Rehabilitating Duverger’s Theory: Testing the Mechanical and Strategic Modifying Effects of Electoral Laws.” Comparative Political Studies 39(6):679–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98(2):355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep M. 2011. Personal Representation The Neglected Dimension of Electoral System. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Coman, Emanuel Emil. 2015. “Institutions and Vote Unity in Parliaments: Evidence from 33 National Chambers.” Journal of Legislative Studies 21(3):360–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Congreso de la Unión. 2014. “Ley General de Instituciones y Procedimientos Electorales.” www.dof.gob.mx/avisos/2358/SG_230514_01/SG_230514_01.html.Google Scholar
Cordero, Guillermo, and Coller, Xavier. 2015. “Cohesion and Candidate Selection in Parliamentary Groups.” Parliamentary Affairs 68(3):592–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan, eds. 1994. Transforming State- Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla, CA: US-Mexico Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Fiva, Jon H., and Smith, Daniel M.. 2019. “Parties, Legislators, and the Origins of Proportional Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 52(1):102–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2001. “The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes.” In Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy, ed. Haggard, Stephan and McCubbins, Mathew D. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266–290.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Thies, Michael F.. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontransferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 31(3):267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespin, Michael H., and Finocchiaro, Chars J.. 2013. “Elections and the Politics of Pork in the U.S. Senate.” Social Science Quarterly 94(2):507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F. 2007. “Incentives in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: General Election Laws, Candidate Selection Procedures, and Cameral Rules.” Comparative Political Studies 40(12):1460–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Demirkaya, Betul, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie, and Millian, Courtney. 2018. “The Role of Rules in Representation: Group Membership and Electoral Incentives.” British Journal of Political Science 48(1):47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Escobar-Lemmon Maria, C., Jones Bradford, S., Jones Mark, P., and Taylor-Robinson Michelle, M.. 2004. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” Journal of Politics 66(3):823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., Jones, Bradford S., Jones, Mark P., and Taylor-Robinson, Muchelle M.. 2009. “The Electoral Connection and Legislative Committees.” Journal of Legislative Studies 15(1):35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., and Ingall, Rachael E.. 2002. “Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):733–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Olivella, Santiago, Malecki, Michael, and Sher, Mindy. 2013. “Vote-Earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity.” Electoral Studies 32(4):658–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., and Desposato, Scott W.. 2004. “Constituency Building in Multimember Districts: Collusion or Conflict?” Journal of Politics 66(1):136–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian, Silva, Patrick Cunha, Olivella, Santiago, and Rosas, Guillermo. 2025. Representation and Electoral Systems: Interparty and Intraparty Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crosson, Jesse, and Kaslovsky, Jaclyn. 2023. “Do Local Roots Impact Washington Behaviors? District Connections and Representation in the U.S. Congress.” American Political Science Review 119(2):887–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curto-Grau, Marta, and Zudenkova, Galina. 2018. “Party Discipline and Government Spending: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Public Economics 164:139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bó, Dal, Ernesto, Federico Finan, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2017. “Who Becomes a Politician?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4):1877–1914.Google Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto, and Rossi, Martin A.. 2011. “Term Length and the Effort of Politicians.” Review of Economic Studies 78(4):1237–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bó, Ernesto, Dal Bó, Pedro, and Snyder, Jason. 2009. “Political Dynasties.” Review of Economic Studies 76(1):115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denny, Matthew J., and Spirling, Arthur. 2018. “Text Preprocessing for Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, and What To Do about It.” Political Analysis 26(2):168–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depauw, Sam, and Martin, Shane. 2008. “Legislative Party Discipline and Cohesion in Comparative Perspective.” In Intra-party Politics and Coalition Governments, ed. Giannneti, D. and Benoit, K.. London: Routledge, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2003. “Comparing Group and Subgroup Cohesion Scores: A Nonparametric Method with an Application to Brazil.” Political Analysis 11(3):275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “The Impact of Electoral Rules on Legislative Parties: Lessons from the Brazilian Senate and Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Politics 68(4):1018–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2007. How Does Vote Buying Shape the Legislative Arena? In Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying, ed. Charles Schaffer, Frederic. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 101–122.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Estévez, Federico, and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2016. The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. Cambridge Studies in Compar ative Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diwakar, Rekha. 2007. “Duverger’s Law and the Size of Indian Party System: A DistrictLevel Analysis.” Party Politics 13(5):539–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Andy, and Spirling, Arthur. 2016. “Party Cohesion in Westminster Systems: Inducements, Replacement and Discipline in the House of Commons, 1836-1910.” British Journal of Political Science 46(3):567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter. 2000. “How Members of Parliament Define Their Task.” In Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience, ed. Esaiasson, Peter and Heidar, Knut. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 51–82.Google Scholar
Fagen, Richard, and Tuohy, William. 1972. Politics and Privilege in a Mexican City. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, David M. 2001. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian. 2006. “Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centred Systems Make a Difference?” European Journal of Political Research 45:723–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ferree, Karen E., Bingham Powell, G., and Scheiner, Ethan. 2014. “Context, Electoral Rules,and Party Systems.” Annual Review of Political Science 17:421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2):151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. Congress, Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiva, John H., and Nedregård, Oda. 2023. “How Does Party Discipline Affect Legislative Behavior Evidence from Within-Term Variation in Lame-Duck Status.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 19(2):191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiva, John H., Nedregård, Oda, and Øien, Henning. 2023. “Group Identities and Parliamentary Debates.” Journal of Politics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Fleming, Thomas G. 2020. “Partisan Dealignment and Personal Vote-Seeking in Parliamentary Behaviour.” Political Studies: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, Olle, and Rickne, Johanna. 2020. “Who Wins Preference Votes? An Analysis of Party Loyalty, Ideology, and Accountability to Voters.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 32(1):11–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidenberg, Flavia. 2013. “Dedazos, Elecciones y Encuestas: Proceso de Selección de Candidatos a los Diputados Mexicanos en Perspectiva Comparada.” In Selección de Candidatos y Elaboración de Programas en los Partidos Políticos Latinoamericanos, ed. Alcántara Sáez, Manuel and María Cabezas Rincón, Lina. Mexico: Tirant Lo Blanch, pp. 159–224.Google Scholar
Freidenberg, Flavia. 2022. “Introducción: El Déficit de Representación, los Dilemas Democráticos y la Respuesta de Cambio Normativo.” In Las Reformas Electorales en América Latina: Una Evaluación de los Procesos de Cambio de Reglas de Juego, ed. Freidenberg, Flavia. Ciudad de México: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico and Instituto de Investigaciones Juridicas and Instituto Electoral de la Ciudad de Mexico, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Naofumi. 2012. “Electoral Incentives, Party Discipline, and Legislative Organization: Manipulating Legislative Committees to Win Elections and Maintain Party Unity.” European Political Science Review 4(2):147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, Naofumi. 2016. “Re-election Isn’t Everything: Legislators’ Goal- Seeking and Committee Activity in Japan.” Journal of Legislative Studies 22(2):153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galasso, Vincenzo, and Nannicini, Tommaso. 2015. “So Closed: Political Selection in Proportional Systems.” European Journal of Political Economy 40:260–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, Ricardo, and Toro, Sergio Y.. 2018. “The Electoral Connection in Presidential Systems: Non-legislative Actions inside the Chilean Congress.” Journal of Legislative Studies 24(3):249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Kousser, Thad. 2010. “Broad Bills or Particularistic Policy? Historical Patterns in American State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 104(1):151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrido, Luis Javier. 1982. El partido de la revolución institucionalizada: La formación del nuevo Estado en México (1928-1945). Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
George, Tsebelis, and Alemán, Eduardo. 2016. Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam. 2003. “The Effects of the Personal Vote on Political Patronage, Bureaucracy and Legislation in Postwar Italy.” American Political Science Review 33(2):189–212.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy.” World Politics 53(1):588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Raúl C. 2010. “The Legislative Politics of Party Competition: An Analysis of Internal Organization in Eight Mexican State Congresses, 2001–2008. PhD thesis, Rice University.Google Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. 2016. “The Niche Party.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, ed. Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, Van Dyck, Brandon, and Domínguez, Jorge I.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F., and Sánchez-Talanquer, Mariano. 2018. “Authoritarian Legacies and Party System Stability in Mexico.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse, ed. Mainwaring, Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Zachary, and Haber, Matthias. 2016. “Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses.” British Journal of Political Science 46(3):611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2010. “A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for PoliticalTexts.” Political Analysis 8(1):1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2013 a. “Appropriators Not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 57(3):627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2013 b. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin, and Stewart, Brandon M.. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21(3):267–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindle, Merilee S. 1977. “Patrons and Clients in the Bureaucracy: Career Networks in Mexico.” Latin American Research Review 12:44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grofman, Bernard, Bowler, Shaun, and Blais, Andre. 2009. “Introduction: Evidence for Duverger’s Law in Four Countries.” In Duverger’ss Law of Plurality Elections: The Logic of Party Competition in Canada, India, the United Kingdom, and the United States, ed. Grofman, Bernard, Bowler, Shaun, and Blais, Andre. New York: Springer, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark, and Marier, Patrik. 2004. “Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3):571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbers, Imke. 2014. “States and Strategy in New Federal Democracies: Competitiveness and Intra-party Resource Allocation in Mexico.” Party Politics 20(6):823–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2006. “Candidate Selection: Methods and Consequences.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William. London: SAGE Publications, pp. 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, Hernández, Aide, Ma., and Díaz Pérez, Fernando. 2014. “Decepción partidista o alternancia política. Análisis de proceso electoral para gobernador en Guanajuato 2012.” Noésis. Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 23(45):52–110.Google Scholar
Hernández, Rogelio. 2008. El centro dividido. La nueva autonomía de los gobernadores. Mexico: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Herron, Erik S., Nemoto, Kuniaki, and Nishikawa, Misa. 2018. “Reconciling Approaches in the Study of Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” In Oxford Handbook for Electoral Systems, ed. Herron, Erik S, Pekkanen, Robert, and Shugart, Matthew. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 445–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Michael, and Shotts, Kenneth. 2006. “Term Limits and Pork.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(3):383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Simmons, Joel W.. 2008. “The Personal Vote and the Efficacy of Education Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Nathan, Noah L.. 2020. “Clientelism’s Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 23:277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilgers, Tina. 2008. “Causes and Consequences of Political Clientelism: Mexico’s PRD in Comparative Perspective.” Latin American Politics and Society 50(4):123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, and Jr.Snyder, James M. 2014. “Primary Elections and the Quality of Elected Officials.” Quarterly Journal of Political Sicence 9(4): 473–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56(2): 194–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Noury, Abdul. 2016. “Government-Opposition or Left-Right? The Institutional Determinants of Voting in Legislatures.” Political Science Research and Methods 4(2):249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2005. “Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979-2001.” British Journal of Political Science 39:209–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2010. “Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes.” British Journal of Political Science 40(1):225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ignazi, Piero, Bardi, Luciano, and Massari, Oreste. 2014. “Party Organisational Change in Italy (1991–2006).” Modern Italy 15(2):197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishima, Hideo. 2020. “How Electoral Reform Alters Legislative Speech: Evidence from the Parliament of Victoria, Australia 1992–2017.” Electoral Studies 67:102192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 2008. “The Recruitment and Selection of Legislative Candidates in Argentina.” In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, ed. Siavelis, Peter and Morgenstern, Scott. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 41–75.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P., Hwang, Wonjae, and Micozzi, Juan P.. 2009. “Government and Opposition in the Argentine Congress, 1989-2007: Understanding Inter- Party Dynamics through Roll Call Vote Analysis.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1(1):67–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaslovsky, Jaclyn. 2022. “Senators at Home: Local Attentiveness and Policy Representation in Congress.” American Political Science Review 116(2): 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jonathan, and Sala, Brian. 1996. “Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection.” American Political Science Review 90(1):21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard. 2005. “Why Are There So Many (or So Few) Electoral Reforms?” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, ed. Gallagher, Michael and Mitchell, Paul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Yann. 2013. “A ‘Snakes and Ladders’ Theory of Political Ambition: The Implications of Pursuing a Political Career without Reelection.” Paper presented at APSA 2013 Annual Meeting, American Political Science Association. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2300267.Google Scholar
Kerevel, Yann. 2015. “Pork-Barreling without Reelection? Evidence from the Mexican Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(1):137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Yann, Matthews, Austin S., and Seki, Katsunori. 2019. “Mixed-Member Electoral Systems, Best Loser Rules, and the Descriptive Representation of Women.” Electoral Studies 57:153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Yann, and Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2013. “Explaining the Marginalization of Women in Legislative Institutions.” Journal of Politics 75(4):980–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerevel, Yann P., and Knott, Cassie M.. 2018. “La disciplina partidista en el congreso local del Estado de México, 2012-2015.” In Los congresos locales en México: la representación politica en el contexto de las reformas electorales, ed. A, Sergio. Juárez, Bárcena, López Montiel, Gustavo A., and María Mirón Lince, Rosa. Mexico City: ITESM, UNAM, Senado de la República y Instituto Belisario Domínguez, n.pag.Google Scholar
Kerevel, Yann and Bárcena Juárez, Sergio A.. 2022. “Legislative Effectiveness in Multiparty Presidential Systems: Evidence from Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Politics 84(4):2216–229.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Smyth, Regina. 2002. “Programmatic Party Cohesion in Emerging Postcommunist Democracies: Russia in Comparative Context.” Comparative Political Studies 35(10):1228–1256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. “Citizen–Politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klesner, Joseph L. 2005. “Electoral Competition and the New Party System in Mexico.” Latin American Politics & Society 47(2):103–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, Dean, Lucas, Christopher, and Tam Cho, Wendy K.. 2022. “Testing Causal Theories with Learned Proxies.” Annual Review of Political Science 25: 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where’s the Party?” British Journal of Political Science 23(2):235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, Joy. 2006. “The Changing Party of the Institutional Revolution: Electoral Competition and Decentralized Candidate Selection.” Party Politics 12(3):395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, Joy, and Aparicio, Francisco Javier. 2008. “La competencia electoral y la descentralización partidista en México.” Documentos de Trabajo del CIDE (207).Google Scholar
Langston, Joy, and Aparicio, Francisco Javier. 2009. “Committee Leadership Selection without Seniority: The Mexican Case.” Documentos de Trabajo del CIDE (217).Google Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Montiel Olea, Cesar E., and Querubin, Pablo. 2017. “Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents? Evidence from the Mexican Teachers’ Union.” American Journal of Political Science 61(4):877–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Marshall, John, and Querubin, Pablo. 2016. “Parties, Brokers and Voter Mobilization: How Turnout Buying Depends Upon the Party’s Capacity to Monitor Brokers.” American Political Science Review 110(1):160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauderdale, Benjamin E., and Herzog, Alexander. 2016. “Measuring Political Positions from Legislative Speech.” Political Analysis 24(3):374–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth R., and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Textsusing Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97(2):311–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loaeza, Soledad. 2003. “The National Action Party (PAN): From the Fringes of the Political System to the Heart of Change.” In Christian Democracy in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Regime Conflicts, ed. Mainwaring, Scott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 196–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo Toledano, Vicente. 1965. “La reeleción, tempestad en un dedal de agua.” Siempre!: 24–25.Google Scholar
Lott, John R. 1990. “Attendance Rates, Political Shirking, and the Effect of Post- Elective Office Employment.” Economic Inquiry 28(1):133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Will. 2016. “Putting It All on the Line: Some Unified Theory for Text Scaling.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2013.Google Scholar
Loza, Nicolás, and Méndez, Irma. 2014. “Encuesta a expertos en política estatal en México, 2001-2012.” https://podesualflacso.wordpress.com.Google Scholar
Lujambio, Alonso. 2004. “Los congresos locales: la precaria institucionalidad.” In El Poder Legislativo Estatal en Mexico: Analisis y diagnostico, ed. Balkin, Robert. Mexico: Universidad Estatal de Nueva York, pp. 169–187.Google Scholar
Lundell, Krister. 2004. “Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization inComparative Perspective.” Party Politics 10(1):25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lara, López, Alvaro, F. 2012. “Comparando el mapa espacial de las legislaturas estatales de México.” Cadernos da Escola do Legislativo 13(21): 11–56.Google Scholar
López Lara, Alvaro F. 2013. “Ideología y coaliciones en la Asamblea Legislativa del Distrito Federal.” In ¿Quién, cómo y qué se legisla en México?, ed. Nicolás, Loza Otero and de Hoyos Irma, Méndez. Ciudad de Mexico: UNAM, pp. 217–264.Google Scholar
López Lara, Alvaro F. 2021. “Ideología y coaliciones en los congresos estatales de México.” In Los Congresos Locales en Mexico: Un Estudio Comparado de Representación Política, ed. Martínez, Khemvirg Puente and Méndez, Erika García. Ciudad de México: UNAM-INE, pp. 282–319.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Estévez, Federico. 2007. “Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico. In Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Moreno, Alejandro. 2003. “Catching-All-Souls: The PAN and the Politics of Catholicism in Mexico.” In Christian Democracy in Latin America, ed. Scully, Timothy and Scott Mainwaring. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magar, Eric. 2017. “La Partición de un Cartel: Votaciones Nominales y Guerra Faccional en la Asamble Legislativa del Distrito Federal.” Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 26(1):35–58.Google Scholar
Magar, Eric. 2021. “Mexico: Parties and Floor Access in the Cámara de Diputados.” In The Politics of Legislative Debates, ed. Back, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Fernandes, Jorge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 572–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magdaleno, Gabriela. 2021. “Proceso de conformación de comisiones: análisis de la proporcionalidad en las comisiones legislativas en los congresos locales en México (2010-2013).” In Los Congresos Locales en Mexico: Un Estudio Comparado de Representación Política, ed. Puente Martínez, Khemvirg and García Méndez, Erika. Ciudad de México: UNAM-INE, pp. 504–543.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination.” Comparative Political Studies 26(2):198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2005. “Latin American Democratization since 1978: Democratic Transitions, Breakdowns, and Erosions.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 14–60.Google Scholar
Malloy, James. 1977. Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pitts-burgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Melgarejo, Manteca, Esteban, J.. 2020. “Métodos de selección de candidatos en México, 1994-2018.” In Elecciones, justicia y democracia en México. Fortalezas y debilidades del sistema electoral, 1990-2020, ed. Ugalde, Luis Carlos and Quintana, Said Hernández. Ciudad de Mexico: Editorial Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federación, pp. 201–242.Google Scholar
Martin, Shane. 2011. “Electoral Institutions, the Personal Vote, and Legislative Organization.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(3):339–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Shane. 2014. “Committees.” In Oxford Handbook for Legislative Behavior, ed. Martin, Shane, Saalfeld, Thomas, and Strøm, Kaare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 352–368.Google Scholar
Martin, Shane, and Strøm, Kaare. 2023. Legislative Assemblies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mejía-Acosta, Andrés, Liñán, Anibal Pérez, and Saiegh, Sebastian M.. 2009. “Las Bases Partidarias de la Legislación Particularista en Ecuador y Paraguay.” In Selección de candidatos, política partidista y rendimiento democrático, ed. Freidenberg, Flavia and Alcántara Sáez, Manuel. Mexico: Tribunal Electoral del Distrito Federal, pp. 269–298.Google Scholar
Mexico-Evalua. 2013. “Comunicado de Prensa de Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil – Propuesta de Reelección Municipal contenida en proyecto de dictamen legislativo es bienvenida pero notoriamente insuficiente.” https://imco.org.mx/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Posicionamiento_ReeleccionMunicipal_Boletin.pdf.Google Scholar
Meyer, Lorenzo, Segovia, Rafael, and Lajous, Alejandra. 1978. Historia de la Revolución Mexicana. Periodo 1928-1934. Los inicios de la institucionalización: La política del Maximato. Volume 12. México DF: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Micozzi, Juan Pablo. 2013. “Does Electoral Accountability Make a Difference? Direct Elections, Career Ambition, and Legislative Performance in the Argentine Senate.” Journal of Politics 75(1):137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Paul. 2000. “Voters and Their Representatives: Electoral Institutions and Delegation in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37:335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizrahi, Yemile. 2003. From Martyrdom to Power: The Partido Acción Nacional in Mexico. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Horcasitas, Juan, Molinar, and Weldon, Jeffrey. 1994. “Electoral Determinants and Consequences of National Solidarity.” In Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy, ed. Cornelius, Wayne, Craig, Ann, and Fox, Jonathan. La Jolla, CA: US-Mexico Studies, UCSD, pp. 123–141.Google Scholar
Moser, Robert G., and Scheiner, Ethan. 2012. Electoral Systems and Political Context: How the Effects of Rules Vary Across New and Established Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motolinia, Lucia. 2021. “Electoral Accountability and Particularistic Legislation: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Mexico.” American Political Science Review 115(1):97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motolinia, Lucia. 2022. “Trading Pork for Unity: How Parties Respond to Electoral Reforms in Party-Centered Systems,” PhD thesis, New York University.Google Scholar
Motolinia, Lucia. 2025 a. “Party Considerations for Renomination in Pre-electoral Coalitions.” Legislative Studies Quarterly: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motolinia, Lucia. 2025 b. “When Reelection Increases Party Unity: Evidence from Parties in Mexico.” British Journal of Political Science 55(55e): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motolinia, Lucia, Klašnja, Marko, and Weschle, Simon. 2025. “The Super-Rich and the Rest: Campaign Finance Permissiveness and the Wealth of Politicians.” American Journal of Political Science: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murillo, María Victoria, and Pinto, Pablo M.. 2022. “Heeding to the Losers: Legislators’ Trade-Policy Preferences and Legislative Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47(3):539–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musella, Fortunato. 2015. “Personal Leaders and Party Change: Italy in Comparative Perspective.” Italian Political Science Review 45(3):227–247.Google Scholar
Mustapic, Ana Maria. 2000. “‘Oficialistas y diputados’: las relaciones Ejecutivo- Legislativo en la Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 39(156):571–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Strøm, Kaare. 1999. “Political Parties and Hard Choices.” In Policy, Office, Or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions, ed. Müller, Wolfgang C. and Strøm, Kaare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Sieberer, Ulrich. 2014. “Procedure and Rules in Legislatures.” In Oxford Handbook for Legislative Behavior, ed. Martin, Shane, Saalfeld, Thomas, and Strøm, Kaare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 311–331.Google Scholar
Nacif, Benito. 1997. La no reelección consecutiva y la persistencia del partido hegemónico en la Cámara de Diputados de México. CIDE, Division de Estudios Políticos.Google Scholar
Nathan, Noah L. 2016. “Local Ethnic Geography, Expectations of Favoritism, and Voting in Urban Ghana.” Comparative Political Studies 49(14):1896–1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2021. “Primaries: More Than One Way to Find a Party Nominee.” www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/primaries-more-than-one-way-to-find-a-party-nominee.aspx.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Mimica, Nicolás. 2021. “Determinants of Bicameral Conflict: The Formation of Conference Committees in Chile, 1990-2018.” Latin American Politics and Society 63(4):74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedregård, Oda. 2023. “Speech Is Silver, Silence Is Gold: Trade-offs between Local and Collective Representation.” Paper presented at the European Political Science Association, 2022.Google Scholar
Negretto, Gabriel L. 2010. “Introducción.” In Debatiendo la reforma política. Claves del cambio institucional en Méxicos, ed. Negretto, Gabriel L.. Ciudad de Mexico: CIDE, pp. 9–32.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1997. “The Puzzle of Constituency Service.” Journal of Legislative Studies 3(2):29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Michael P., and Rogowski, Jon C.. 2020. “Legislative Term Limits and Polarization.” Journal of Politics 82(2):572–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Primaries. 2022. “Primary Elections State by State.” www.openprimaries.org/.Google Scholar
Pachón, Mónica, and Johnson, Gregg B.. 2016. “When’s the Party (or Coalition)? Agenda-Setting in a Highly Fragmented, Decentralized Legislature.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 8(2):71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachón, Mónica, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2010. “Electoral Reform and the Mirror Image of Inter-party and Intra-party Competition: The Adoption of Party Lists in Colombia.” Electoral Studies 29(4):648–660. Special Symposium: The 2008 U.S. Presidential Election.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanza, Valeria, and Sin, Gisela. 2014. “Veto Bargaining and the Legislative Process in Multiparty Presidential Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 47(5):766–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanza, Valeria, Sin, Gisela, and Reynolds, Evangeline. 2024. “Line-item vetoes as a Coordination Mechanism.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 50(1):38–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrón Sánchez, Fernando, and Ofelia Camacho García, Ma., eds. 2018. La Profesionalizacion Legislative en Mexico. Ciudad de Mexico: Tirant lo Blanch.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Tine. 2023. Building States and Parties: The Logic of Local Electoral Reforms. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, and Mueller, Bernardo. 2004. “A Theory of Executive Dominance of Congressional Politics: The Committee System in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Legislative Studies 10(1):9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, Power, Timothy J., and Renno, Lucio R.. 2008. “Agenda Power, Executive Decree Authority, and the Mixed Results of Reform in the Brazilian Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33(1):5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. “The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 62(1):144–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo, David M., and Jr.Snyder, James M. 2010. “Party Strength, the Personal Vote and Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2):354–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2012. “Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3):520–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2014. The Politics of Parliamentary Debate: Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez Vega, Moises. 2009. “La debilidad institucional de los congresos locales. Límites de la democratización mexicana y de la transformación de las relaciones Ejecutivo-Legislativo.” Andamios. Revista de Investigación Social 5(10):253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Querubin, Pablo. 2016. “Family and Politics: Dynastic Persistence in the Philippines.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11(2):151–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Kevin M., Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, Crespin, Michael H., and Radev, Dragomir R.. 2010. “How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs.” American Journal of Political Science (1):209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Kenig, Ofer. 2018. From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Sheafer, Tamir. 2007. “The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003.” Political Communication 24(1):65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Christopher D., and Bárcena Juárez, Sergio. 2019. “Constituency Preferences and Committee Selection in the Mexican Cámara de Diputados.” Latin American Politics and Society 61(4):95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rendón Arias, Iliana. 2021. Los efectos de la reelección legislativa. Mexico City: Flacso México.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, Alan. 2010. The Politics of Electoral Reform: Changing the Rules of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, Alan. 2011. “Electoral Reform in Europe since 1945.” West European Politics 34(3):456–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renwick, Alan, and Pilet, Jean-Benoit. 2016. Faces on the Ballot: The Personalization of Electoral Systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynoso, Diego. 2015. “El espacio ideológico subnacionalmexicano según juicios de expertos.” Política y Gobierno XXII(2):317–346.Google Scholar
Rheault, Ludovic, and Cochrane, Christopher. 2020. “Word Embeddings for the Analysis of Ideological Placement in Parliamentary Corpora.” Political Analysis 28(1):112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, Stephanie. 2012. “Electoral Systems, Voters’ Interests and Geographic Dispersion.” British Journal of Political Science 42:855–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret, Stewart, Brandon, and Tingley, Dustin. 2016. “Navigating the Local Modes of Big Data: The Case of Topic Models.” In Computational Social Science: Discovery and Prediction, ed. Michael Alvare, R.. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–97.Google Scholar
Roberts, Margaret, Stewart, Brandon, and Tingley, Dustin. 2019. “R Package for Structural Topic Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 91(2):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Margaret E., Stewart, Brandon M., Tingley, Dustin, Lucas, Christopher, Leder-Luis, Jetson, Gadarian, Shana Kushner, Albertson, Bethany, and Rand, David G.. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science 58(4):1064–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 38(7):824–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo, and Langston, Joy. 2011. “Gubernatorial Effects on the Voting Behavior of National Legislators.” Journal of Politics 73(2):477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, Ruiz Esparza, Fermín, José. 2021. “La experiencia legislativa local como factor de éxito en la construcción de la carrera parlamentaria en México: 1997-2015.” In Los Congresos Locales en Mexico: Un Estudio Comparado de Representación Política, ed. Puente Martínez, Khemvirg and García Méndez, Erika. Ciudad de México: UNAM-INE, pp. 120–142.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian M. 2009. “Political Prowess or ‘Lady Luck’? Evaluating Chief Executives’ Legislative Success Rates.” Journal of Politics 71(4):1342–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian M. 2011. Ruling by Statute: How Uncertainty and Vote Buying Shape Lawmaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian M. 2015. “Using Joint Scaling Methods to Study Ideology and Representation: Evidence from Latin America.” Political Analysis 23(3):363–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 1999. “Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-centric Electoral Systems: Evidence from Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 32(4):487–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David J. 2002. “Pork Barreling Is Not Credit Claiming or Advertising: Campaign Finance and the Sources of the Personal Vote in Brazil.” Journal of Politics 64(3):845–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Larry. 1984. “Electoral Equilibria with Restricted Strategies.” Public Choice 43(3):307–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santucci, Jack. 2022. More Parties or No Parties: The Politics of Electoral Reform in America. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1997. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. Washington Square: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2005. Democracy without Competition in Japan: Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Harbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph. 2005. “The Primary Goals of Political Parties: A Clarification of Positive Theory.” American Political Science Review 99(3):840–849.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien A. 2008. “Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1):303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Karl. 1969. “Congressional Campaigning in Mexico: A View from the Provinces.” Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs 11:98.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. 2010. Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, George, and Moon, David. 1994. “Casework, Issue Positions, and Voting in Congressional Elections: A District Analysis.” Journal of Politics 56(1): 200–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shomer, Yael. 2017. “The Conditional Effect of Electoral Systems and Intraparty Candidate Selection Processes on Parties’ Behavior.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42(1):63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S. 2001. “Electoral ‘Efficiency’ and the Move to Mixed-Member Systems.” Electoral Studies 20:173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Martin. 2003. “Conclusion: Are Mixed- Member Systems the Best of Both Worlds.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: A Definition and Typology, ed. Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 571–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., Valdini, Melody Ellis, and Suominen, Kati. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2):437–449.Google Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. “Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12(2):150–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieberer, Ulrich, and Ohmura, Tamaki. 2021. “Mandate Type, Electoral Safety, and Defections from the Party Line: The Conditional Mandate Divide in the German Bundestag, 1949–2013.” Party Politics 27(4):704–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siefken, Sven, and Rommetvedt, Hilmar. 2021. “Investigating the Role of Parliamentary Committees in the Policy Process.” In Parliamentary Committees in the Policy Process, ed. Siefken, Sven and Rommetvedt, Hilmar. London: Routledge, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slapin, Jonathan B., and Proksch, Sven-Oliver. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Text.” American Journal of Political Science 52(3):705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel M. 2018. Dynasties and Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage in Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter. 1979. Labyrinths of Power: Political Recruitment in Twentieth- Century Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M., and Ting, Michael M.. 2003. “Roll Calls, Party Labels and Elections.” Political Analysis 11(4):419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirling, Arthur, and McLean, Iian. 2007. “UK OC OK? Interpreting Optimal Classification Scores for the UK House of Commons.” Political Analysis 15(1):85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Gomez, Amalia Pulido. 2017. “Unusual Bedfellows? PRI–PVEM Electoral Alliances in Mexican Legislative Elections.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 9(2):63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model ofMachine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3):315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas, and Baur, Martin. 2002. “Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 506–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundberg, Jan. 1997. “Compulsory Party Democracy. Finland as a Deviant Case in Scandinavia.” Party Politics 3(1):97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez de Dios, Manuel. 1999. “Parliamentary Party Discipline in Spain.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Bowler, Shaun, Farrell, David M., and Richard Katz. Columbus: Ohio University Press, pp. 141–166.Google Scholar
Sánchez Martínez, José Said. 2017. “La relación Ejecutivo-Legislativo en la aprobación del presupuesto: El caso de México a nivel subnacional.” Política y gobierno 25(2):371–408.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Shugart, Matthew S.. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M. 2009. “Selección de candidatos al Congreso Nacional de Honduras por los partidos tradicionales.” In Selección de candidatos, política partidista y rendimiento democrático, ed. Freidenberg, Flavia and Alcántara Sáez, Manuel. Mexico: Tribunal Electoral del Distrito Federal, pp. 325–359.Google Scholar
Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M., and David, J. Sky. 2002. “Who Participates and Who Is Seen and Not Heard? Evidence from the Honduran Congress.” Journal of Legislative Studies 8(1):10–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, Charles. 2001. “Representatives, Voluntary Retirement, and Shirking in the Last Term.” Public Choice 106(1/2):117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traber, Denise, Hug, Simon, and Sciarini, Pascal. 2014. “Party Unity in the Swiss Parliament: The Electoral Connection.” Journal of Legislative Studies 20(2):193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tromborg, Mathias Wessel, and Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A.. 2019. “Constituent Demand and District-Focused Legislative Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 44(1):35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tromborg, Mathias Wessel, and Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A.. 2022. “A Clarity Model of District Representation: District Magnitude and Pork Priorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47(1):37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Alemán, Eduardo. 2005. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America.” World Politics 57(3):396–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ugues, Antonio, Vidal Medina, Xavier D., and Bowler, Shaun. 2012. “Experience Counts: Mixed Member Elections and Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies.” Journal of Legislative Studies 18(1):98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valen, Henry, Narud, Hanne Marthe, and Skare, Audun. 2002. “Norway: Party Dominance and Decentralized Decision-Making.” In Party Sovereignty and Citizen Control: Selecting Candidates for Parliamentary Elections in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway, ed. Narud, Hanne Marthe, Pedersen, Mogens N., and Valen, Henry. Denmark: University Press of Southern Denmark, pp. 169–215.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 2002. “The Legal and Partisan Framework of the Legislative Delegation of the Budget in Mexico.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 2003. “El Congreso, las Maquinarias Políticas Locales y el Maximato: Las Reformas No-Reeleccionistas de 1933.” In El legislador a exámen. El debate sobre la reelección legislativa en México, ed. Dworak, Fernando. México: Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar
Weldon, Jeffrey. 2006. “Poder Legislativo, tiempos de cambio.” Este País. Tendencias y Opiniones 181(April):36–40.Google Scholar
Wuhs, Steven T. 2006. “Democratization and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection Rule Change in Mexico, 1991–2003.” Mexican Studies 22(1):33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yildirim, Tevfik Murat, Kocapınar, Gülnur, and Ecevit, Yüksel Alper. 2019. “Staying Active and Focused? The Effect of Parliamentary Performance on Candidate Renomination and Promotion.” Party Politics 25(6):794–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamitiz Gamboa, Héctor. 2012. “Encuentro y superposición de agendas: la reforma política aprobada por el Senado en 2011.” Estudios Politicos (25):55–88.Google Scholar
Zamitiz Gamboa, Héctor. 2017. “La reforma político-electoral 2014-2015: ¿híbrido institucional o avance gradual del sistema democrático en México?” Estudios Politicos (40):11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Lucia Motolinia, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Unity through Particularism
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009651547.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Lucia Motolinia, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Unity through Particularism
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009651547.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Lucia Motolinia, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Unity through Particularism
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009651547.011
Available formats
×