Anthropic reasoning and quantum cosmology

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107050990.020

18 - Anthropic reasoning and quantum cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2014

James B. Hartle

Edited by

Bernard Carr

Show author details

James B. Hartle: Affiliation:
University of California
Bernard Carr: Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

If the Universe is a quantum mechanical system, then it has a quantum state. This state provides the initial condition for cosmology. A theory of this state is an essential part of any final theory summarizing the regularities exhibited universally by all physical systems and is the objective of the subject of quantum cosmology. This chapter is concerned with the role that the state of the Universe plays in anthropic reasoning — the process of explaining features of the Universe from our existence in it [1]. The thesis will be that anthropic reasoning in a quantum mechanical context depends crucially on assumptions about the Universe's quantum state.

A model quantum universe

Every prediction in a quantum mechanical universe depends on its state, if only very weakly. Quantum mechanics predicts probabilities for alternative possibilities, most generally the probabilities for alternative histories of the Universe. The computation of these probabilities requires both a theory of the quantum state as well as the theory of the dynamics specifying its evolution.

To make this idea concrete while keeping the discussion manageable, we consider a model quantum universe. The details of this model are not essential to the subsequent discussion of anthropic reasoning but help to fix the notation for probabilities and provide a specific example of what they mean. Particles and fields move in a large — perhaps expanding — box, say, presently 20 000 Mpc on a side.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Universe or Multiverse? , pp. 275 - 284

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107050990.020 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] J., Barrow and F., Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

[2] J. B., Hartle. The quantum mechanics of closed systems. In Directions in General Relativity, Volume 1: A Symposium and Collection of Essays in Honor of Professor Charles W. Misner's 60th Birthday, eds. B.-L., Hu, M. P., Ryan and C. V., Vishveshwara (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993) [gr-qc/9210006].Google Scholar

[3] J. B., Hartle. Spacetime quantum mechanics and the quantum mechanics of spacetime. In Gravitation and Quantizations, Proceedings of 1992 Les Houches Summer School, eds. B, Julia and J., Zinn-Justin (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1995) [gr-qc/9508023].Google Scholar

[4] R. B., Griffiths. Consistent Quantum Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

[5] R., Omnès. The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

[6] M., Gell-Mann. The Quark and the Jaguar (San Francisco: W. Freeman, 1994).Google Scholar

[7] S. W., Hawking. The quantum state of the universe. Nucl. Phys. B 239 (1984), 257.Google Scholar

[8] J. B., Hartle. Scientific knowledge from the perspective of quantum cosmology. In Boundaries and Barriers, On the Limits to Scientific Knowledge, eds. J. L., Casti and A., Karlqvist (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1996) [gr-qc/9601046].Google Scholar

[9] J. B., Hartle. The state of the universe. In The Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology: Stephen Hawking 60th Birthday Symposium, eds. G. W., Gibbons, E. P. S., Shellard, and S. J., Ranken (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003) [gr-qc/0209046].Google Scholar

[10] J. B., Hartle. Quasi-classical domains in a quantum universe. In Proceedings of the Cornelius Lanczos International Centenary Conference, North Carolina State University, December 1992, eds. J. D., Brown, M. T., Chu, D. C., Ellison and R. J., Plemmons (Philadelphia: SIAM, 1994) [gr-qc/9404017].Google Scholar

[11] A., Strominger. Baby universes. In Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes, Proceedings of 1989 Jerusalem Winter School for Theoretical Physics, eds. S., Coleman, J. B., Hartle, T., Piran and S., Weinberg (Singapore: World Scientific, 1991).Google Scholar

[12] S. W., Hawking. The cosmological constant is probably zero. Phys. Lett. B 134, 403 (1984).Google Scholar

[13] S. W., Hawking and T., Hertog. Populating the landscape: A top down approach. Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006), 123527 [hep-th/0602091].Google Scholar

[14] S., Weinberg. The cosmological constant problems. In Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, ed. D., Cline (New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001) [astro-ph/0005265].Google Scholar

[15] A., Vilenkin. Cosmological constant problems and their solutions. In Astronomy, Cosmology and Fundamental Physics, Proceedings of ESO-CERN-ESA Symposium, Garching, 4–7 March, 2002, eds. P. A., Shaver, L., DiLella and A., Giménez (Berlin: Springer, 2003), p. 70 [hep-th/0106083].Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.