Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 23
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
August 2010
Print publication year:
2009
Online ISBN:
9780511757426

Book description

This book is a systematic study of the importance of Greek tragedy as a fundamental 'intertext' for Vergil's Aeneid. Vassiliki Panoussi argues that the epic's representation of ritual acts, especially sacrifice, mourning, marriage, and maenadic rites, mobilizes a connection to tragedy. The tragic-ritual model offers a fresh look into the political and cultural function of the Aeneid, expanding our awareness of the poem's scope, particularly in relation to gender, and presenting new readings of celebrated episodes, such as Anchises' games, Amata's maenadic rites, Dido's suicide, and the killing of Turnus. She interprets the Aeneid as a work that reflects the dynamic nature of Augustan ideology, contributing to the redefinition of civic discourse and national identity. In her rich study, readers will find a unique exploration of the complex relationship between Greek tragedy and Vergil's Aeneid and a stimulating discussion of problems of gender, power, and ideology in ancient Rome.

Reviews

'… merits much praise because it will serve as a starting point for many more discussions of the role of tragedy in the Aeneid and undoubtedly has initiated a new phase of the debate.'

Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

'This book, thought-provoking and pleasurable to read, will likely open up dialogue on Vergil and tragedy for a new generation.'

Timothy Wutrich - Case Western Reserve University

'… the argument that Greek tragedy is a key to understanding the Aeneid's portrayals of rites and ritual action is impressively examined …'

Source: De novis libris iudicia

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Alcock, S. E. 1997. “The Heroic Past in a Hellenistic Present.” In Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography. Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P., and Gruen, E., eds. Berkeley: 20–34.
Alexiou, M. 2002. The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Revised by D. Yatromanolakis and P. Roilos. 2nd edition. Lanham.
Allan, W. 2000. The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.
Anderson, W. S. 1969. The Art of the Aeneid. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Austin, R. G. 1955. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.
Austin, R. G. 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.
Austin, R. G. 1977. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.
Bailey, C. 1935. Religion in Virgil. Oxford.
Bailey, C. 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura. Libri Sex. Edited with Prolegomena, Critical Apparatus, Translation and Commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.
Bandera, C. 1981. “Sacrificial Levels in Virgil's Aeneid.” Arethusa 14: 217–39.
Bandera, C. 1990. “From Virgil to Cervantes: Literature Desacralized.” Helios 17: 109–20.
Barchiesi, A. 1978. “Il lamento di Giuturna.” MD 1: 99–121.
Barchiesi, A. 1994. “Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell' Eneide.” A&A 40: 109–24.
Barton, C. A. 1993. The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster. Princeton.
Beard, M. 1980. “The Sexual Status of Vestal Virgins.” JRS 70: 12–27.
Beard, M. 1994. “The Roman and the Foreign: The Cult of the ‘Great Mother’ in Imperial Rome.” In Shamanism, History, and the State. Thomas, N., and Humphrey, C., eds. Ann Arbor: 164–90.
Beard, M. 1995. “Re-reading (Vestal) Virginity.” In Women in Antiquity: New Assessments.Hawley, R., and Levick, B., eds. London: 166–77.
Beard, M., et al. 1998. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.
Bell, C. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York.
Bierl, A. 1994. “Apollo in Greek Tragedy: Orestes and the God of Initiation.” In Apollo: Origins and Influences. Solomon, J., ed. Tuscon: 81–96.
Bourdieu, P. 1977. “Symbolic Power.” In Identity and Structure: Issues in the Sociology of Education. Gleeson, D., ed. Driffield: 112–19.
Bowie, A. M. 1993. “Religion and Politics in Aeschylus' Oresteia.” CQ 43: 10–31.
Boyle, A. J. 2006. An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London.
Bradshaw, D. J. 1991. “The Ajax Myth and the Polis: Old Values and New.” In Myth and the Polis. Pozzi, D. C., and Wickersham, J. M., eds. Ithaca: 99–125.
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York.
Brown, A. L. 1984. “Eumenides in Greek Tragedy.” CQ 34: 260–81.
Bruhl, A. 1953. Liber Pater. Origine et expansion du culte dionysiaque à Rome et dans le monde romain. Paris.
Burke, P. F., Jr. 1974a. “The Role of Mezentius in the Aeneid.” CJ 69: 202–209.
Burke, P. F., Jr. 1974b. “Mezentius and the First-Fruits.” Vergilius 20: 28–29.
Burkert, W. 1966. “Greek Tragedy and Sacrificial Ritual.” GRBS 7: 87–121.
Burkert, W. 1979. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley.
Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by P. Bing. Berkeley. First published as Homo Necans. Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen. Berlin, 1972.
Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion. Translated by J. Raffan. Cambridge, MA. First published as Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche. Stuttgart, 1977.
Clausen, W. 1987. Virgil's Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry.Sather Classical Lectures, vol. 51. Berkeley.
Cole, S. G. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley.
Conacher, D. J. 1987. Aeschylus' Oresteia: A Literary Commentary. Toronto.
Conington, J. 1884. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. The Works of Virgil, with a Commentary by John Conington. Fourth edition, revised, with corrected orthography and additional notes by H. Nettleship. 3 vols. London.
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Translated by C. Segal. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 44. Ithaca. First published as Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario: Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin, 1974 and as Il genere e i suoi confini: cinque studi sulla poesia di Virgilio. Turin, 1980.
Day Lewis, C. 1952. The Aeneid of Virgil. Oxford.
Jong, I. J. F. 2004. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. 2nd edition. Bristol.
Des Bouvrie, S. 1997. “Euripides' Bakkhai and Maenadism.” Classica et Mediaevalia 48: 75–114.
Dodds, E. R. 1960. Euripides Bacchae. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.
Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London.
Duckworth, G. E. 1940. “Turnus as a Tragic Character.” Vergilius 4: 5–17.
Duckworth, G. E. 1957. “The Aeneid as a Trilogy.” TAPA 88: 1–10.
Dymézil, G. 1970. Archaic Roman Religion. Translated by P. Krapp. 2 vols. Chicago. First published as La Religion romaine archaïque suivi d' un appendice sur la religion des Etrusques. Paris, 1966.
Dyson, J. T. 2001. King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil's Aeneid. Norman.
Eagleton, T. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London.
Edgeworth, R. J. 1986. “The Dirae of Aeneid XII.” Eranos 84: 133–43.
Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.
Edwards, M. W. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume V: Books 17–20. Cambridge.
Eitrem, S. 1933. “Das Ende Didos in Vergils Aeneis.” In Festskrift til Halvdan Koht. Oslo: 29–41.
Erasmo, M. 2004. Roman Tragedy: Theatre to Theatricality. Austin.
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York.
Fedeli, P. 1983. Catullus' Carmen 61. Amsterdam.
Feeney, D. C. 1984. “The Reconciliations of Juno.” CQ 34: 179–94. Reprinted with corrections in Harrison 1990: 339–62.
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.
Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.
Feldherr, A. 1997. “Livy's Revolution: Civic Identity and the Creation of the Res Publica.” In Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 136–57.
Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley.
Feldherr, A. 1999. “Putting Dido on the Map: Genre and Geography in Vergil's Underworld.” Arethusa 32: 85–122.
Feldherr, A. 2002. “Stepping Out of the Ring: Repetition and Sacrifice in the Boxing Match in Aeneid 5.” In Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography.Levene, D. S., and Nelis, D. P., eds. Leiden: 61–79.
Fenik, B. C. 1960. The Influence of Euripides on Vergil's Aeneid. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.
Fernandelli, M. 1996a. “Invenzione mitologica e tecnica del racconto nell'episodio virgiliano di Polidoro (Aen. 3.1–68).” Prometheus 22: 247–73.
Fernandelli, M. 1996b. “Presenze tragiche nell'Ilioupersis virgiliana: su Aen. 2, 768–794 e Eur. Andr. 1231–1283.” MD 36: 187–96.
Fernandelli, M. 2002. “Come sulle scene: Eneide IV e la tragedia.” Quaderni del Dipartimento di filologia, linguistica e tradizione classica A. Rostagni. 19: 141–211.
Finley, M. I. 1978. The World of Odysseus. New York.
Foley, H. P., ed. 1981. Reflections of Women in Antiquity.New York.
Foley, H. P., 1985. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca.
Foley, H. P., 2001. Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.
Fordyce, C. J. 1977. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri VII–VIII. With a Commentary. Oxford.
Fowler, D. 1987. “Vergil on Killing Virgins.” In Whitby et al. 1987: 185–98.
Fowler, D. 1989. “First Thoughts on Closure: Problems and Prospects.” MD 22: 75–122.
Fowler, D. 1997. “Second Thoughts on Closure.” In Roberts et al. 1997: 3–22.
Fowler, W. W. 1919. The Death of Turnus: Observations on the Twelfth Book of the Aeneid. Oxford.
Fraenkel, E. 1950. Aeschylus Agamemnon. Edited with a Commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.
Fries, J. 1985. Der Zweikampf. Historische und literarische Aspekte seiner Darstellung bei T. Livius. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 169. Königstein / Ts.
Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.
Gillis, D. 1983. Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Centro Ricerche e Documentazione sull' Antichita' Classica Monografie 9. Rome.
Girard, R. 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Translated by P. Gregory. Baltimore. First published as La violence et le sacré. Paris, 1972.
Goff, B. 1990. The Noose of Words: Readings of Desire, Violence and Language in Euripides' Hippolytos. Cambridge.
Goff, B. 2004. Citizen Bacchae: Women's Ritual Practice in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.
Goldhill, S. 1984. Language, Sexuality, Narrative: The Oresteia. Cambridge.
Goldhill, S. 1986. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge.
Gotoff, H. C. 1984. “The Transformation of Mezentius.” TAPA 114: 191–218.
Gould, J. 1973. “Hiketeia.” JHS 93: 74–103.
Graf, F. 1997. Magic in the Ancient World. Translated by F. Philip. Cambridge, MA. First published as Idéologie et pratique de la magie dans l' antiquité Gréco-Romaine. Paris, 1994.
Gransden, K. W. 1976. Virgil. Aeneid. Book VIII. Cambridge.
Griffith, R. D. 1995. “Catullus' Coma Berenices and Aeneas' Farewell to Dido.” TAPA 125: 47–59.
Griffiths, F. T. 1979. “Girard on the Greeks / The Greeks on Girard.” Berkshire Review 14: 20–36.
Grimm, R. E. 1967. “Aeneas and Andromache in Aeneid III.” AJP 88: 151–62.
Gruen, E. S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley.
Gurval, R. A. 1995. Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor.
Habinek, T., and Schiesaro, A. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.
Hardie, P. R. 1984. “The Sacrifice of Iphigeneia: An Example of ‘Distribution’ of a Lucretian Theme in Virgil.” CQ 34: 406–12.
Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.
Hardie, P. R. 1991. “The Aeneid and the Oresteia.” PVS 20: 29–45.
Hardie, P. R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.
Hardie, P. R. 1994. Virgil. Aeneid. Book IX. Cambridge.
Hardie, P. R. 1997a. “Closure in Latin Epic.” In Roberts et al. 1997: 139–62.
Hardie, P. R. 1997b. “Virgil and Tragedy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Martindale, C., ed. Cambridge: 312–26.
Harrison, E. L. 1972–73. “Why Did Venus Wear Boots?” PVS 12: 10–25.
Harrison, E. L. 1989. “The Tragedy of Dido.” EMC 33: 1–21.
Harrison, S. J. 1990. Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford and New York.
Harrison, S. J. 1991. Vergil. Aeneid 10. With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.
Heinze, R. 1915. Vergils epische Technik. Leipzig. Translated into English as Virgil's Epic Technique by H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Berkeley, 1993.
Henrichs, A. 1979. “Greek and Roman Glimpses of Dionysus.” In Dionysus and His Circle: Ancient through Modern. Houser, C., ed. Cambridge, MA: 1–11.
Henry, E. 1989. The Vigour of Prophecy: A Study of Virgil's Aeneid. Carbondale.
Highet, G. 1972. The Speeches in Vergil's Aeneid. Princeton.
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.
Horsfall, N. 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7. A Commentary. Leiden.
Hübner, W. 1970. Dirae im römischen Epos. Über das Verhältnis von Vogeldämonen und Prodigien. Hildesheim.
Jacobson, H. 1987. “Vergil's Dido and Euripides' Helen.” AJP 108: 167–68.
Jal, P. 1961. “Pax Civilis-Concordia.” REL 39: 210–31.
Janko, R. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume IV: Books 13–16. Cambridge.
Jebb, R. C. 1907. Sophocles. The Plays and Fragments. With Critical Notes, Commentary and Translation in English Prose. Part VII. The Ajax. Cambridge.
Jocelyn, H. D. 1965. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil's Use of Republican Latin Poetry II.” CQ 15: 126–44.
Johnson, W. R. 1976. Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley.
Jones, J. 1962. On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy. London.
Kamerbeek, J. C. 1963. The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part I. The Ajax. Leiden.
Kane, R. L. 1996. “Ajax and the Sword of Hector. Sophocles, ‘Ajax’ 815–822.” Hermes 124: 17–28.
Keith, A. 2000. Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.
Kennedy, D. 1992. “ ‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference.” In Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. Powell, A., ed. Bristol: 26–58.
Kirkwood, G. 1965. “Homer and Sophocles' Ajax.” In Classical Drama and Its Influence: Essays Presented to H. D. F. Kitto. Anderson, M. J., ed. London: 53–70.
Knauer, G. N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer. Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Hypomnemata 7. Göttingen.
Knox, B. M. W. 1961. “The Ajax of Sophocles.” HSPh 65: 1–37.
Knox, P. E. 1997. “Savagery in the Aeneid and Virgil's Ancient Commentators.” CJ 92: 225–33.
K#x00F6;nig, A. 1970. Die Aeneis und die Griechische Tragödie. Studien zur imitatio-Technik Vergils. Ph.D. dissertation, Freien Universität Berlin.
Krummen, E. 1998. “Ritual und Katastrophe: Rituelle Handlung und Bildersprache bei Sophokles und Euripides.” In Ansichten griechischer Rituale. Geburtstags-Symposium für Walter Burkert. Castelen bei Basel 15. bis 18. März 1996. Graf, F., ed. Stuttgart: 296–325.
Kyriakou, P. 1997. “All in the Family: Present and Past in Euripides' Andromache.” Mnemosyne 50: 7–26.
LaPenna, A. 1967. “Amata e Didone.” Maia 19: 309–18.
Leach, E. W. 1971. “The Blindness of Mezentius (Aeneid 10.762–768).” Arethusa 4: 83–89.
Lebeck, A. 1971. The Oresteia: A Study in Language and Structure. Washington, DC.
Lee, M. O. 1979. Fathers and Sons in Virgil's Aeneid: Tum Genitor Natum. Albany.
Lefèvre, E. 1978. Dido und Aias. Ein Beitrag zur römischen Tragödie. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Mainz.
Leigh, M. 1993. “Hopelessly Devoted to You: Traces of the Decii in Virgil's Aeneid.” PVS 21: 89–110.
Levene, D. S. 1993. Religion in Livy. Leiden.
Lloyd, R. B. 1954. “On Aeneid III, 270–80.” AJP 75: 288–99.
Lloyd-Jones, H., and Wilson, N. G., eds. 1990. Sophoclis Fabulae. Oxford.
Loraux, N. 1987. Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman. Translated by A. Foster. Cambridge, MA. First published as Façons tragiques de tuer une femme. Paris, 1985.
Loraux, N. 1998. Mothers in Mourning. With the Essay Of Amnesty and Its Opposite. Translated by C. Pache. Ithaca. First published as Les mères en deuil. Paris, 1990.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1983. “Vergil and the Politics of War.” CQ 33: 188–203.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1987. Further Voices in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.
Mackie, C. J. 1992. “Vergil's Dirae, South Italy, and Etruria.” Phoenix 46: 352–61.
Manuwald, B. 1985. “Improvisi aderunt. Zur Sinon-Szene in Vergils Aeneis.” Hermes 113: 183–208.
Merquior, J. G. 1979. The Veil and the Mask: Essays on Culture and Ideology. London.
Miles, G. B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca.
Miller, J. F. 2000. “Triumphus in Palatio.” AJP 121: 409–22.
Mitchell, R. N. 1991. “The Violence of Virginity in the Aeneid.” Arethusa 24: 219–37.
Mitchell-Boyask, R.N. 1993. “Sacrifice and Revenge in Euripides' Hecuba.” Ramus 22: 116–34.
Mitchell-Boyask, R.N. 1996. “Sine Fine: Vergil's Masterplot.” AJP 117: 289–307.
Moles, J. 1984. “Aristotle and Dido's Hamartia.” G&R 31: 48–54.
Moles, J. 1987. “The Tragedy and Guilt of Dido.” In Whitby et al. 1987: 153–61.
Monti, R. C. 1981. The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Mnemosyne Supplement 66. Leiden.
Muecke, F. 1983. “Foreshadowing and Dramatic Irony in the Story of Dido.” AJP 104: 134–55.
Nagy, G. 1999. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Revised edition. Baltimore.
Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. ARCA 39. Leeds.
Norden, E. 1926. P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI. Leipzig.
Nugent, S.G. 1992. “Vergil's ‘Voice of the Women’ in Aeneid V.” Arethusa 25: 255–92.
Nugent, S.G. 1999. “The Women of the Aeneid: Vanishing Bodies, Lingering Voices.” In Perkell 1999: 251–70.
Oakley, S.P. 1985. “Single Combat in the Roman Republic.” CQ 35: 392–410.
Oakley, S.P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy. Books VI–X.Oxford.
O'Hara, J.J. 1993. “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ at Aeneid 4.56–66.” Arethusa 26: 99–114.
Oliensis, E. 2001. “Freud's Aeneid.” Vergilius 47: 39–63.
Orlin, E. 2007. “Augustan Religion and the Reshaping of Roman Memory.” Arethusa 40: 73–92.
Ormand, K. 1999. Exchange and the Maiden: Marriage in Sophoclean Tragedy. Austin.
Padel, R. 1995. Whom Gods Destroy: Elements of Greek and Tragic Madness. Princeton.
Palmer, R.E. A. 1974. Roman Religion and Roman Empire: Five Essays.Philadelphia.
Panoussi, V. 1998. Epic Transfigured: Tragic Allusiveness in Vergil's Aeneid. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.
Parker, R. 1983. Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford.
Pascal, C.B. 1990. “The Dubious Devotion of Turnus.” TAPA 120: 251–68.
Paschalis, M. 1997. Virgil's Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford.
Pavlock, B. 1990. Eros, Imitation, and the Epic Tradition. Ithaca.
Pease, A.S. 1935. Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MA.
Perkell, C. 1981. “On Creusa, Dido, and the Quality of Victory in Virgil's Aeneid.” In Foley 1981: 355–77.
Perkell, C. 1997. “The Lament of Juturna: Pathos and Interpretation in the Aeneid.” TAPA 127: 257–86.
Perkell, C. 1999. Reading Vergil's Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman.
Perkell, C. 2001. “Purity and Closure in Aeneid 12.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Philosophical Association.
Pichon, R. 1913. “L' épisode d' Amata dans l' Enéide.” REA 15: 161–66.
Poe, J.P. 1987. Genre and Meaning in Sophocles' Ajax. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 172. Frankfurt.
Pöschl, V. 1962. The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid. Translated by Seligson, G.. Ann Arbor. First published as Die Dichtkunst Vergils: Bild und Symbol in der Aeneis. Innsbruck / Wien, 1950.
Pucci, J.M. 1998. The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition.New Haven.
Putnam, M.C. J. 1965. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design.Cambridge, MA.
Putnam, M.C. J. 1994. “Virgil's Danaid Ekphrasis.” ICS 19: 171–89.
Putnam, M.C. J. 1995. Virgil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill.
Putnam, M.C. J. 1998. Virgil's Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid.New Haven.
Putnam, M.C. J. 1999. “Aeneid 12: Unity in Closure.” In Perkell 1999: 210–30.
Quinn, K. 1968. Virgil's Aeneid: A Critical Description. London.
Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.
Raval, S. 1998. Pudibunda Ora: Gender, Sexuality, and Voice in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.
Reckford, K.J. 1961. “Latent Tragedy in Aeneid VII, 1–285.” AJP 82: 252–69.
Reckford, K.J. 1981. “Helen in Aeneid 2 and 6.” Arethusa 14: 85–99.
Redfield, J. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago. Expanded edition. Durham, 1994.
Renger, C. 1985. Aeneas und Turnus. Analyse einer Feindschaft. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 11. Frankfurt.
Richardson, N. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume VI: Books 21–24. Cambridge.
Richlin, A. 1992. “Reading Ovid's Rapes.” In Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. Richlin, A., ed. Oxford: 158–79.
Roberts, D., et al. 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton.
Rose, P.W. 1995. “Historicizing Sophocles' Ajax.” In History, Tragedy, Theory: Dialogues on Athenian Drama. Goff, B., ed. Austin: 59–90.
Rowland, R.J., Jr. 1992. “Ductor Rhoeteius: Vergil, Aeneid 12.456.” In Wilhelm and Jones 1992: 237–43.
Rudd, N. 1990. “Dido's Culpa.” In Harrison 1990: 145–66.
Saylor, C.F. 1970. “Toy Troy: The New Perspective of the Backward Glance.” Vergilius 16: 26–28.
Schadewaldt, W. 1966. Iliasstudien. Darmstadt.
Scheid, J. 1992. “The Religious Roles of Roman Women.” In A History of Women: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints. Pantel, P. S., ed. Cambridge, MA: 377–408.
Schein, S.L. 1984. The Mortal Hero: An Introduction to Homer's Iliad. Berkeley.
Schenk, P. 1984. Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 164. Königstein / Ts.
Schlesier, R. 1993. “Mixtures of Masks: Maenads as Tragic Models.” In Masks of Dionysus. Carpenter, T. H. and Faraone, C. A., eds. Ithaca: 89–114.
Schultz, C.E. 2006. Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic. Chapel Hill.
Schwenn, F. 1915. Die Menschenopfer bei der Griechen und Römern. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 15, 3. Giessen. Reprinted Berlin, 1966.
Scodel, R. 1998. “The Captive's Dilemma: Sexual Acquiescence in Euripides Hecuba and Troades.” HSPh 98: 137–54.
Seaford, R. 1989. “Homeric and Tragic Sacrifice.” TAPA 119: 87–95.
Seaford, R. 1994. Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City State. Oxford.
Segal, C.P. 1966. “Aeternum per saecula nomen, The Golden Bough and the Tragedy of History: Part II.” Arion 5: 34–72.
Segal, C.P. 1971. The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad. Mnemosyne Supplement 17. Leiden.
Segal, C.P. 1978–79. “Pentheus and Hippolytus on the Couch and on the Grid: Psychoanalytic and Structuralist Readings of Greek Tragedy.” CW 72: 129–48.
Segal, C.P. 1990. “Violence and the Other: Greek, Female, and Barbarian in Euripides' Hecuba.” TAPA 120: 109–31.
Segal, C.P. 1997. Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides' Bacchae. Expanded edition with a new afterword by the author. Princeton.
Sharrock, A. 2000. “Intratextuality: Texts, Parts, and (W)holes in Theory.” In Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Sharrock, A. and Morales, H., eds. Oxford: 1–39.
Sicherl, M. 1977. “The Tragic Issue in Sophocles' Ajax.” In Greek Tragedy. Gould, T. F. and Herrington, C. J., eds. Yale Classical Studies 25. Cambridge: 67–98.
Sommerstein, A.H. 1989. Aeschylus Eumenides. Cambridge.
Sorum, C.E. 1995. “Euripides' Judgment: Literary Creation in Andromache.” AJP 116: 371–88.
Spaeth, B.S. 1996. The Roman Goddess Ceres. Austin.
Spence, S. 1991. “Cinching the Text: The Danaids and the End of the Aeneid.” Vergilius 37: 11–19.
Spence, S. 1999. “The Polyvalence of Pallas in the Aeneid.” Arethusa 32.2: 149–63.
Stevens, P.T. 1971. Euripides Andromache. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.
Storey, I.C. 1989. “Domestic Disharmony in Euripides' Andromache.” G&R 36: 16–27.
Stübler, G. 1941. Die Religiosität des Livius. Amsterdam.
Suzuki, M. 1989. Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, Difference, and the Epic. Ithaca.
Swanepoel, J. 1995. “Infelix Dido: Vergil and the Notion of the Tragic.” Akroterion 40: 30–46.
Tatum, J. 1984. “Allusion and Interpretation in Aeneid 6.440–76.” AJP 105: 434–52.
Thomas, R.F. 1986. “Virgil's Georgics and the Art of Reference.” HSPh 90: 171–98.
Thomas, R.F. 1988. “Tree Violation and Ambivalence in Vergil.” TAPA 118: 261–73.
Thomas, R.F. 1998. “The Isolation of Turnus.” In Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Stahl, H.-P., ed. London: 271–302.
Thompson, J.B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Berkeley.
Thornton, A. 1984. Homer's Iliad: Its Composition and the Theme of Supplication. Göttingen.
Toynbee, J.M. C. 1971. Death and Burial in the Roman World. Ithaca.
Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.
Tupet, A.-M. 1970. “Didon Magicienne.” REL 48: 229–58.
Tzanetou, A. forthcoming. City of Suppliants: Tragedy and the Athenian Empire. Austin.
Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Translated by Vizedom, M. B. and Caffee, G. L.. Chicago. First published as Les rites de passage. Paris, 1909.
Wees, H. 1992. Status Warriors: War, Violence and Society in Homer and History. Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology, vol. 9. Amsterdam.
Vance, E. 1981. “Sylvia's Pet Stag: Wildness and Domesticity in Virgil's Aeneid.” Arethusa 14: 127–37.
Vernant, J.-P. 1988a. “Tensions and Ambiguities in Greek Tragedy.” In Vernant and Vidal-Naquet 1988: 29–48.
Vernant, J.-P. 1988b. “Imitations of the Will in Greek Tragedy.” In Vernant and Vidal-Naquet 1988: 49–84.
Vernant, J.-P. 1988c. “The Masked Dionysus of Euripides' Bacchae.” In Vernant and Vidal-Naquet 1988: 381–412.
Vernant, J.-P. 1989. “Food in the Countries of the Sun.” In The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks. Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P., eds. Translated by P. Wissing. Chicago: 164–69. First published as La cuisine du sacrifice en pays grec. Paris, 1979.
Vernant, J.-P., and Vidal-Naquet, P. 1988. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. Translated by Lloyd, J.. New York. First published as Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne. Paris, 1972 and as Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne. Deux. Paris, 1986.
Versnel, H.S. 1976. “Two Types of Roman Devotio.” Mnemosyne 29: 365–410.
Versnel, H.S. 1981. “Self-Sacrifice, Compensation, and the Anonymous Gods.” In Le sacrifice dans l'antiquité. Entretiens Fondation Hardt 27: 135–85.
Albrecht, M. 1970. “Zur Tragik von Vergils Turnusgestalt: Aristotelisches in der Schlußszene der Aeneis.” In Silvae. Festschrift für Ernst Zinn zum 60. Geburtstag. Dargebracht von Kollegen, Schülern und Mitarbeitern. Albrecht und, M.Heck, E., eds. Tübingen: 1–5.
Wagenvoort, H. 1947. Roman Dynamism: Studies in Ancient Roman Thought, Language and Custom. Oxford.
Watson, L. 1991. Arae, the Curse Poetry of Antiquity. Leeds.
Weber, C. 2002. “The Dionysus in Aeneas.” CP 97: 322–43.
West, D. 1969. “Multiple Correspondence Similes in the Aeneid.” JRS 59: 40–49.
West, G.S. 1980. “Caeneus and Dido.” TAPA 110: 315–24.
West, G.S. 1983. “Andromache and Dido.” AJP 104: 257–67.
West, M.L. 1990. Aeschyli Tragoediae cum incerti poetae Prometheo. Stuttgart.
Whitby, M. et al. 1987. Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol.
Whitman, C. H. 1958. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MA.
Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Hermes Einzelschriften 24. Wiesbaden.
Wilhelm, M.P. 1992. “Minerva in the Aeneid.” In Wilhelm and Jones 1992: 74–81.
Wilhelm, R.M., and Jones, H. 1992. The Two Worlds of the Poet: New Perspectives on Vergil. Detroit.
Williams, G. 1962. “Poetry in the Moral Climate of Augustan Rome.” JRS 52: 28–46.
Williams, G. 1968. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.
Williams, R.D. 1960. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quintus. Edited with a commentary. Oxford.
Williams, R.D. 1962. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Tertius. Edited with a commentary. Oxford.
Willink, C.W. 1986. Euripides Orestes. With introduction and commentary. Oxford.
Wiltshire, S.F. 1989. Public and Private in Vergil's Aeneid. Amherst.
Winkler, J.J., and Zeitlin, F.I. 1990. Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton.
Winnington-Ingram, R.P. 1980. Sophocles: An Interpretation. Cambridge.
Wissowa, G. 1912. Religion und Kultus der Römer. Handbuch der klassischen Altertums-wissenschaft. München.
Wlosok, A. 1976. “Vergils Didotragödie. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Tragischen in der Aeneis.” In Studien zum antiken Epos. H. Görgemanns and Schmidt, E., eds. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 72. Meisenheim am Glan: 228–50.
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Translated by Shapiro, A.. Ann Arbor. First published as Augustus und die Macht der Bilder. Munich, 1987.
Zarker, J.W. 1969. “Amata: Vergil's Other Tragic Queen.” Vergilius 15: 2–24.
Zeitlin, F.I. 1965. “The Motif of the Corrupted Sacrifice in Aeschylus' Oresteia.” TAPA 96: 463–508.
Zeitlin, F.I. 1984. “The Dynamics of Misogyny: Myth and Mythmaking in the Oresteia.” In Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers. Peradotto, J. and Sullivan, J. P., eds. Albany: 159–94.
Zeitlin, F.I. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago.
Zetzel, J.E. G. 1997. “Rome and Its Traditions.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Martindale, C., ed. Cambridge: 188–203.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.