Alcock, S. E. 1997. “The Heroic Past in a Hellenistic Present.” In Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography. Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P., and Gruen, E., eds. Berkeley: 20–34.Google Scholar

Alexiou, M. 2002. The Ritual Lament in Greek Tradition. Revised by D. Yatromanolakis and P. Roilos. 2nd edition. Lanham.

Allan, W. 2000. The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.

Anderson, W. S. 1969. The Art of the Aeneid. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. 1955. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.

Austin, R. G. 1964. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Secundus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.

Austin, R. G. 1977. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Sextus. Edited with a Commentary. Oxford.

Bailey, C. 1935. Religion in Virgil. Oxford.

Bailey, C. 1947. Titi Lucreti Cari De Rerum Natura. Libri Sex. Edited with Prolegomena, Critical Apparatus, Translation and Commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.

Bandera, C. 1981. “Sacrificial Levels in Virgil's Aeneid.” Arethusa 14: 217–39.

Bandera, C. 1990. “From Virgil to Cervantes: Literature Desacralized.” Helios 17: 109–20.

Barchiesi, A. 1978. “Il lamento di Giuturna.” MD 1: 99–121.

Barchiesi, A. 1994. “Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell' Eneide.” A&A 40: 109–24.

Barton, C. A. 1993. The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans: The Gladiator and the Monster. Princeton.

Beard, M. 1980. “The Sexual Status of Vestal Virgins.” JRS 70: 12–27.

Beard, M. 1994. “The Roman and the Foreign: The Cult of the ‘Great Mother’ in Imperial Rome.” In Shamanism, History, and the State. Thomas, N., and Humphrey, C., eds. Ann Arbor: 164–90.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 1995. “Re-reading (Vestal) Virginity.” In Women in Antiquity: New Assessments.Hawley, R., and Levick, B., eds. London: 166–77.Google Scholar

Beard, M., et al. 1998. Religions of Rome. 2 vols. Cambridge.

Bell, C. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. New York.

Bierl, A. 1994. “Apollo in Greek Tragedy: Orestes and the God of Initiation.” In Apollo: Origins and Influences. Solomon, J., ed. Tuscon: 81–96.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. 1977. “Symbolic Power.” In Identity and Structure: Issues in the Sociology of Education. Gleeson, D., ed. Driffield: 112–19.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. 1993. “Religion and Politics in Aeschylus' Oresteia.” CQ 43: 10–31.CrossRef

Boyle, A. J. 2006. An Introduction to Roman Tragedy. London.

Bradshaw, D. J. 1991. “The Ajax Myth and the Polis: Old Values and New.” In Myth and the Polis. Pozzi, D. C., and Wickersham, J. M., eds. Ithaca: 99–125.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. New York.

Brown, A. L. 1984. “Eumenides in Greek Tragedy.” CQ 34: 260–81.CrossRef

Bruhl, A. 1953. Liber Pater. Origine et expansion du culte dionysiaque à Rome et dans le monde romain. Paris.

Burke, P. F., Jr. 1974a. “The Role of Mezentius in the Aeneid.” CJ 69: 202–209.

Burke, P. F., Jr. 1974b. “Mezentius and the First-Fruits.” Vergilius 20: 28–29.

Burkert, W. 1966. “Greek Tragedy and Sacrificial Ritual.” GRBS 7: 87–121.

Burkert, W. 1979. Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley.

Burkert, W. 1983. Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by P. Bing. Berkeley. First published as Homo Necans. Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen. Berlin, 1972.

Burkert, W. 1985. Greek Religion. Translated by J. Raffan. Cambridge, MA. First published as Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche. Stuttgart, 1977.

Clausen, W. 1987. Virgil's Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry.Sather Classical Lectures, vol. 51. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Cole, S. G. 2004. Landscapes, Gender, and Ritual Space: The Ancient Greek Experience. Berkeley.

Conacher, D. J. 1987. Aeschylus' Oresteia: A Literary Commentary. Toronto.

Conington, J. 1884. P. Vergili Maronis Opera. The Works of Virgil, with a Commentary by John Conington. Fourth edition, revised, with corrected orthography and additional notes by H. Nettleship. 3 vols. London.

Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Translated by C. Segal. Cornell Studies in Classical Philology 44. Ithaca. First published as Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario: Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin, 1974 and as Il genere e i suoi confini: cinque studi sulla poesia di Virgilio. Turin, 1980.

Day Lewis, C. 1952. The Aeneid of Virgil. Oxford.

Jong, I. J. F. 2004. Narrators and Focalizers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad. 2nd edition. Bristol.

Des Bouvrie, S. 1997. “Euripides' Bakkhai and Maenadism.” Classica et Mediaevalia 48: 75–114.

Dodds, E. R. 1960. Euripides Bacchae. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.

Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London.

Duckworth, G. E. 1940. “Turnus as a Tragic Character.” Vergilius 4: 5–17.

Duckworth, G. E. 1957. “The Aeneid as a Trilogy.” TAPA 88: 1–10.

Dymézil, G. 1970. Archaic Roman Religion. Translated by P. Krapp. 2 vols. Chicago. First published as La Religion romaine archaïque suivi d' un appendice sur la religion des Etrusques. Paris, 1966.

Dyson, J. T. 2001. King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil's Aeneid. Norman.

Eagleton, T. 1991. Ideology: An Introduction. London.

Edgeworth, R. J. 1986. “The Dirae of Aeneid XII.” Eranos 84: 133–43.

Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.

Edwards, M. W. 1991. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume V: Books 17–20. Cambridge.

Eitrem, S. 1933. “Das Ende Didos in Vergils Aeneis.” In Festskrift til Halvdan Koht. Oslo: 29–41.

Erasmo, M. 2004. Roman Tragedy: Theatre to Theatricality. Austin.

Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York.

Fedeli, P. 1983. Catullus' Carmen 61. Amsterdam.

Feeney, D. C. 1984. “The Reconciliations of Juno.” CQ 34: 179–94. Reprinted with corrections in Harrison 1990: 339–62.CrossRef

Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.

Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.

Feldherr, A. 1997. “Livy's Revolution: Civic Identity and the Creation of the Res Publica.” In Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 136–57.

Feldherr, A. 1998. Spectacle and Society in Livy's History. Berkeley.

Feldherr, A. 1999. “Putting Dido on the Map: Genre and Geography in Vergil's Underworld.” Arethusa 32: 85–122.CrossRef

Feldherr, A. 2002. “Stepping Out of the Ring: Repetition and Sacrifice in the Boxing Match in Aeneid 5.” In Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography.Levene, D. S., and Nelis, D. P., eds. Leiden: 61–79.Google Scholar

Fenik, B. C. 1960. The Influence of Euripides on Vergil's Aeneid. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University.

Fernandelli, M. 1996a. “Invenzione mitologica e tecnica del racconto nell'episodio virgiliano di Polidoro (Aen. 3.1–68).” Prometheus 22: 247–73.

Fernandelli, M. 1996b. “Presenze tragiche nell'Ilioupersis virgiliana: su Aen. 2, 768–794 e Eur. Andr. 1231–1283.” MD 36: 187–96.

Fernandelli, M. 2002. “Come sulle scene: Eneide IV e la tragedia.” Quaderni del Dipartimento di filologia, linguistica e tradizione classica A. Rostagni. 19: 141–211.

Finley, M. I. 1978. The World of Odysseus. New York.

Foley, H. P., ed. 1981. Reflections of Women in Antiquity.New York.

Foley, H. P., 1985. Ritual Irony: Poetry and Sacrifice in Euripides. Ithaca.

Foley, H. P., 2001. Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.

Fordyce, C. J. 1977. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Libri VII–VIII. With a Commentary. Oxford.

Fowler, D. 1987. “Vergil on Killing Virgins.” In Whitby et al. 1987: 185–98.

Fowler, D. 1989. “First Thoughts on Closure: Problems and Prospects.” MD 22: 75–122.

Fowler, D. 1997. “Second Thoughts on Closure.” In Roberts et al. 1997: 3–22.

Fowler, W. W. 1919. The Death of Turnus: Observations on the Twelfth Book of the Aeneid. Oxford.

Fraenkel, E. 1950. Aeschylus Agamemnon. Edited with a Commentary. 3 vols. Oxford.

Fries, J. 1985. Der Zweikampf. Historische und literarische Aspekte seiner Darstellung bei T. Livius. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 169. Königstein / Ts.

Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.

Gillis, D. 1983. Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Centro Ricerche e Documentazione sull' Antichita' Classica Monografie 9. Rome.

Girard, R. 1977. Violence and the Sacred. Translated by P. Gregory. Baltimore. First published as La violence et le sacré. Paris, 1972.

Goff, B. 1990. The Noose of Words: Readings of Desire, Violence and Language in Euripides' Hippolytos. Cambridge.

Goff, B. 2004. Citizen Bacchae: Women's Ritual Practice in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.

Goldhill, S. 1984. Language, Sexuality, Narrative: The Oresteia. Cambridge.

Goldhill, S. 1986. Reading Greek Tragedy. Cambridge.

Gotoff, H. C. 1984. “The Transformation of Mezentius.” TAPA 114: 191–218.

Gould, J. 1973. “Hiketeia.” JHS 93: 74–103.CrossRef

Graf, F. 1997. Magic in the Ancient World. Translated by F. Philip. Cambridge, MA. First published as Idéologie et pratique de la magie dans l' antiquité Gréco-Romaine. Paris, 1994.

Gransden, K. W. 1976. Virgil. Aeneid. Book VIII. Cambridge.

Griffith, R. D. 1995. “Catullus' Coma Berenices and Aeneas' Farewell to Dido.” TAPA 125: 47–59.

Griffiths, F. T. 1979. “Girard on the Greeks / The Greeks on Girard.” Berkshire Review 14: 20–36.

Grimm, R. E. 1967. “Aeneas and Andromache in Aeneid III.” AJP 88: 151–62.

Gruen, E. S. 1990. Studies in Greek Culture and Roman Policy. Berkeley.

Gurval, R. A. 1995. Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor.

Habinek, T., and Schiesaro, A. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.

Hardie, P. R. 1984. “The Sacrifice of Iphigeneia: An Example of ‘Distribution’ of a Lucretian Theme in Virgil.” CQ 34: 406–12.CrossRef

Hardie, P. R. 1986. Virgil's Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.

Hardie, P. R. 1991. “The Aeneid and the Oresteia.” PVS 20: 29–45.

Hardie, P. R. 1993. The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.

Hardie, P. R. 1994. Virgil. Aeneid. Book IX. Cambridge.

Hardie, P. R. 1997a. “Closure in Latin Epic.” In Roberts et al. 1997: 139–62.

Hardie, P. R. 1997b. “Virgil and Tragedy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Martindale, C., ed. Cambridge: 312–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, E. L. 1972–73. “Why Did Venus Wear Boots?” PVS 12: 10–25.

Harrison, E. L. 1989. “The Tragedy of Dido.” EMC 33: 1–21.

Harrison, S. J. 1990. Oxford Readings in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford and New York.

Harrison, S. J. 1991. Vergil. Aeneid 10. With Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.

Heinze, R. 1915. Vergils epische Technik. Leipzig. Translated into English as Virgil's Epic Technique by H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Berkeley, 1993.

Henrichs, A. 1979. “Greek and Roman Glimpses of Dionysus.” In Dionysus and His Circle: Ancient through Modern. Houser, C., ed. Cambridge, MA: 1–11.Google Scholar

Henry, E. 1989. The Vigour of Prophecy: A Study of Virgil's Aeneid. Carbondale.

Highet, G. 1972. The Speeches in Vergil's Aeneid. Princeton.

Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.

Horsfall, N. 2000. Virgil, Aeneid 7. A Commentary. Leiden.

Hübner, W. 1970. Dirae im römischen Epos. Über das Verhältnis von Vogeldämonen und Prodigien. Hildesheim.

Jacobson, H. 1987. “Vergil's Dido and Euripides' Helen.” AJP 108: 167–68.

Jal, P. 1961. “Pax Civilis-Concordia.” REL 39: 210–31.

Janko, R. 1992. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume IV: Books 13–16. Cambridge.

Jebb, R. C. 1907. Sophocles. The Plays and Fragments. With Critical Notes, Commentary and Translation in English Prose. Part VII. The Ajax. Cambridge.

Jocelyn, H. D. 1965. “Ancient Scholarship and Virgil's Use of Republican Latin Poetry II.” CQ 15: 126–44.CrossRef

Johnson, W. R. 1976. Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil's Aeneid. Berkeley.

Jones, J. 1962. On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy. London.

Kamerbeek, J. C. 1963. The Plays of Sophocles. Commentaries. Part I. The Ajax. Leiden.

Kane, R. L. 1996. “Ajax and the Sword of Hector. Sophocles, ‘Ajax’ 815–822.” Hermes 124: 17–28.

Keith, A. 2000. Engendering Rome: Women in Latin Epic. Cambridge.

Kennedy, D. 1992. “ ‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference.” In Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. Powell, A., ed. Bristol: 26–58.Google Scholar

Kirkwood, G. 1965. “Homer and Sophocles' Ajax.” In Classical Drama and Its Influence: Essays Presented to H. D. F. Kitto. Anderson, M. J., ed. London: 53–70.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. 1964. Die Aeneis und Homer. Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis. Hypomnemata 7. Göttingen.

Knox, B. M. W. 1961. “The Ajax of Sophocles.” HSPh 65: 1–37.

Knox, P. E. 1997. “Savagery in the Aeneid and Virgil's Ancient Commentators.” CJ 92: 225–33.

K#x00F6;nig, A. 1970. Die Aeneis und die Griechische Tragödie. Studien zur imitatio-Technik Vergils. Ph.D. dissertation, Freien Universität Berlin.

Krummen, E. 1998. “Ritual und Katastrophe: Rituelle Handlung und Bildersprache bei Sophokles und Euripides.” In Ansichten griechischer Rituale. Geburtstags-Symposium für Walter Burkert. Castelen bei Basel 15. bis 18. März 1996. Graf, F., ed. Stuttgart: 296–325.Google Scholar

Kyriakou, P. 1997. “All in the Family: Present and Past in Euripides' Andromache.” Mnemosyne 50: 7–26.CrossRef

LaPenna, A. 1967. “Amata e Didone.” Maia 19: 309–18.

Leach, E. W. 1971. “The Blindness of Mezentius (Aeneid 10.762–768).” Arethusa 4: 83–89.

Lebeck, A. 1971. The Oresteia: A Study in Language and Structure. Washington, DC.

Lee, M. O. 1979. Fathers and Sons in Virgil's Aeneid: Tum Genitor Natum. Albany.

Lefèvre, E. 1978. Dido und Aias. Ein Beitrag zur römischen Tragödie. Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur. Mainz.

Leigh, M. 1993. “Hopelessly Devoted to You: Traces of the Decii in Virgil's Aeneid.” PVS 21: 89–110.

Levene, D. S. 1993. Religion in Livy. Leiden.

Lloyd, R. B. 1954. “On Aeneid III, 270–80.” AJP 75: 288–99.

Lloyd-Jones, H., and Wilson, N. G., eds. 1990. Sophoclis Fabulae. Oxford.

Loraux, N. 1987. Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman. Translated by A. Foster. Cambridge, MA. First published as Façons tragiques de tuer une femme. Paris, 1985.

Loraux, N. 1998. Mothers in Mourning. With the Essay Of Amnesty and Its Opposite. Translated by C. Pache. Ithaca. First published as Les mères en deuil. Paris, 1990.

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1983. “Vergil and the Politics of War.” CQ 33: 188–203.CrossRef

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1987. Further Voices in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1989. Words and the Poet: Characteristic Techniques of Style in Vergil's Aeneid. Oxford.

Mackie, C. J. 1992. “Vergil's Dirae, South Italy, and Etruria.” Phoenix 46: 352–61.CrossRef

Manuwald, B. 1985. “Improvisi aderunt. Zur Sinon-Szene in Vergils Aeneis.” Hermes 113: 183–208.

Merquior, J. G. 1979. The Veil and the Mask: Essays on Culture and Ideology. London.

Miles, G. B. 1995. Livy: Reconstructing Early Rome. Ithaca.

Miller, J. F. 2000. “Triumphus in Palatio.” AJP 121: 409–22.

Mitchell, R. N. 1991. “The Violence of Virginity in the Aeneid.” Arethusa 24: 219–37.

Mitchell-Boyask, R.N. 1993. “Sacrifice and Revenge in Euripides' Hecuba.” Ramus 22: 116–34.CrossRef

Mitchell-Boyask, R.N. 1996. “Sine Fine: Vergil's Masterplot.” AJP 117: 289–307.

Moles, J. 1984. “Aristotle and Dido's Hamartia.” G&R 31: 48–54.

Moles, J. 1987. “The Tragedy and Guilt of Dido.” In Whitby et al. 1987: 153–61.

Monti, R. C. 1981. The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Mnemosyne Supplement 66. Leiden.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. 1983. “Foreshadowing and Dramatic Irony in the Story of Dido.” AJP 104: 134–55.

Nagy, G. 1999. The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Revised edition. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil's Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. ARCA 39. Leeds.Google Scholar

Norden, E. 1926. P. Vergilius Maro Aeneis Buch VI. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Nugent, S.G. 1992. “Vergil's ‘Voice of the Women’ in Aeneid V.” Arethusa 25: 255–92.

Nugent, S.G. 1999. “The Women of the Aeneid: Vanishing Bodies, Lingering Voices.” In Perkell 1999: 251–70.

Oakley, S.P. 1985. “Single Combat in the Roman Republic.” CQ 35: 392–410.CrossRef

Oakley, S.P. 1998. A Commentary on Livy. Books VI–X.Oxford.Google Scholar

O'Hara, J.J. 1993. “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ at Aeneid 4.56–66.” Arethusa 26: 99–114.

Oliensis, E. 2001. “Freud's Aeneid.” Vergilius 47: 39–63.

Orlin, E. 2007. “Augustan Religion and the Reshaping of Roman Memory.” Arethusa 40: 73–92.CrossRef

Ormand, K. 1999. Exchange and the Maiden: Marriage in Sophoclean Tragedy. Austin.Google Scholar

Padel, R. 1995. Whom Gods Destroy: Elements of Greek and Tragic Madness. Princeton.Google Scholar

Palmer, R.E. A. 1974. Roman Religion and Roman Empire: Five Essays.Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Panoussi, V. 1998. Epic Transfigured: Tragic Allusiveness in Vergil's Aeneid. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar

Parker, R. 1983. Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pascal, C.B. 1990. “The Dubious Devotion of Turnus.” TAPA 120: 251–68.

Paschalis, M. 1997. Virgil's Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pavlock, B. 1990. Eros, Imitation, and the Epic Tradition. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Pease, A.S. 1935. Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. 1981. “On Creusa, Dido, and the Quality of Victory in Virgil's Aeneid.” In Foley 1981: 355–77.

Perkell, C. 1997. “The Lament of Juturna: Pathos and Interpretation in the Aeneid.” TAPA 127: 257–86.

Perkell, C. 1999. Reading Vergil's Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. 2001. “Purity and Closure in Aeneid 12.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Philosophical Association.

Pichon, R. 1913. “L' épisode d' Amata dans l' Enéide.” REA 15: 161–66.CrossRef

Poe, J.P. 1987. Genre and Meaning in Sophocles' Ajax. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 172. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Pöschl, V. 1962. The Art of Vergil: Image and Symbol in the Aeneid. Translated by Seligson, G.. Ann Arbor. First published as Die Dichtkunst Vergils: Bild und Symbol in der Aeneis. Innsbruck / Wien, 1950.Google Scholar

Pucci, J.M. 1998. The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition.New Haven.Google Scholar

Putnam, M.C. J. 1965. The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design.Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Putnam, M.C. J. 1994. “Virgil's Danaid Ekphrasis.” ICS 19: 171–89.

Putnam, M.C. J. 1995. Virgil's Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Putnam, M.C. J. 1998. Virgil's Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid.New Haven.Google Scholar

Putnam, M.C. J. 1999. “Aeneid 12: Unity in Closure.” In Perkell 1999: 210–30.

Quinn, K. 1968. Virgil's Aeneid: A Critical Description. London.Google Scholar

Quint, D. 1993. Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar

Raval, S. 1998. Pudibunda Ora: Gender, Sexuality, and Voice in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University.Google Scholar

Reckford, K.J. 1961. “Latent Tragedy in Aeneid VII, 1–285.” AJP 82: 252–69.

Reckford, K.J. 1981. “Helen in Aeneid 2 and 6.” Arethusa 14: 85–99.

Redfield, J. 1975. Nature and Culture in the Iliad: The Tragedy of Hector. Chicago. Expanded edition. Durham, 1994.Google Scholar

Renger, C. 1985. Aeneas und Turnus. Analyse einer Feindschaft. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 11. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Richardson, N. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume VI: Books 21–24. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. 1992. “Reading Ovid's Rapes.” In Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. Richlin, A., ed. Oxford: 158–79.Google Scholar

Roberts, D., et al. 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton.Google Scholar

Rose, P.W. 1995. “Historicizing Sophocles' Ajax.” In History, Tragedy, Theory: Dialogues on Athenian Drama. Goff, B., ed. Austin: 59–90.Google Scholar

Rowland, R.J., Jr. 1992. “Ductor Rhoeteius: Vergil, Aeneid 12.456.” In Wilhelm and Jones 1992: 237–43.

Rudd, N. 1990. “Dido's Culpa.” In Harrison 1990: 145–66.

Saylor, C.F. 1970. “Toy Troy: The New Perspective of the Backward Glance.” Vergilius 16: 26–28.

Schadewaldt, W. 1966. Iliasstudien. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Scheid, J. 1992. “The Religious Roles of Roman Women.” In A History of Women: From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints. Pantel, P. S., ed. Cambridge, MA: 377–408.Google Scholar

Schein, S.L. 1984. The Mortal Hero: An Introduction to Homer's Iliad. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Schenk, P. 1984. Die Gestalt des Turnus in Vergils Aeneis. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 164. Königstein / Ts.

Schlesier, R. 1993. “Mixtures of Masks: Maenads as Tragic Models.” In Masks of Dionysus. Carpenter, T. H. and Faraone, C. A., eds. Ithaca: 89–114.

Schultz, C.E. 2006. Women's Religious Activity in the Roman Republic. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Schwenn, F. 1915. Die Menschenopfer bei der Griechen und Römern. Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und Vorarbeiten 15, 3. Giessen. Reprinted Berlin, 1966.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. 1998. “The Captive's Dilemma: Sexual Acquiescence in Euripides Hecuba and Troades.” HSPh 98: 137–54.

Seaford, R. 1989. “Homeric and Tragic Sacrifice.” TAPA 119: 87–95.

Seaford, R. 1994. Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City State. Oxford.Google Scholar

Segal, C.P. 1966. “Aeternum per saecula nomen, The Golden Bough and the Tragedy of History: Part II.” Arion 5: 34–72.

Segal, C.P. 1971. The Theme of the Mutilation of the Corpse in the Iliad. Mnemosyne Supplement 17. Leiden.Google Scholar

Segal, C.P. 1978–79. “Pentheus and Hippolytus on the Couch and on the Grid: Psychoanalytic and Structuralist Readings of Greek Tragedy.” CW 72: 129–48.

Segal, C.P. 1990. “Violence and the Other: Greek, Female, and Barbarian in Euripides' Hecuba.” TAPA 120: 109–31.

Segal, C.P. 1997. Dionysiac Poetics and Euripides' Bacchae. Expanded edition with a new afterword by the author. Princeton.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. 2000. “Intratextuality: Texts, Parts, and (W)holes in Theory.” In Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Sharrock, A. and Morales, H., eds. Oxford: 1–39.

Sicherl, M. 1977. “The Tragic Issue in Sophocles' Ajax.” In Greek Tragedy. Gould, T. F. and Herrington, C. J., eds. Yale Classical Studies 25. Cambridge: 67–98.Google Scholar

Sommerstein, A.H. 1989. Aeschylus Eumenides. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Sorum, C.E. 1995. “Euripides' Judgment: Literary Creation in Andromache.” AJP 116: 371–88.

Spaeth, B.S. 1996. The Roman Goddess Ceres. Austin.Google Scholar

Spence, S. 1991. “Cinching the Text: The Danaids and the End of the Aeneid.” Vergilius 37: 11–19.

Spence, S. 1999. “The Polyvalence of Pallas in the Aeneid.” Arethusa 32.2: 149–63.CrossRef

Stevens, P.T. 1971. Euripides Andromache. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Storey, I.C. 1989. “Domestic Disharmony in Euripides' Andromache.” G&R 36: 16–27.

Stübler, G. 1941. Die Religiosität des Livius. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Suzuki, M. 1989. Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, Difference, and the Epic. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Swanepoel, J. 1995. “Infelix Dido: Vergil and the Notion of the Tragic.” Akroterion 40: 30–46.

Tatum, J. 1984. “Allusion and Interpretation in Aeneid 6.440–76.” AJP 105: 434–52.

Thomas, R.F. 1986. “Virgil's Georgics and the Art of Reference.” HSPh 90: 171–98.

Thomas, R.F. 1988. “Tree Violation and Ambivalence in Vergil.” TAPA 118: 261–73.

Thomas, R.F. 1998. “The Isolation of Turnus.” In Vergil's Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. Stahl, H.-P., ed. London: 271–302.

Thompson, J.B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Thornton, A. 1984. Homer's Iliad: Its Composition and the Theme of Supplication. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Toynbee, J.M. C. 1971. Death and Burial in the Roman World. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tupet, A.-M. 1970. “Didon Magicienne.” REL 48: 229–58.

Tzanetou, A. forthcoming. City of Suppliants: Tragedy and the Athenian Empire. Austin.

Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Translated by Vizedom, M. B. and Caffee, G. L.. Chicago. First published as Les rites de passage. Paris, 1909.

Wees, H. 1992. Status Warriors: War, Violence and Society in Homer and History. Dutch Monographs on Ancient History and Archaeology, vol. 9. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Vance, E. 1981. “Sylvia's Pet Stag: Wildness and Domesticity in Virgil's Aeneid.” Arethusa 14: 127–37.

Vernant, J.-P. 1988a. “Tensions and Ambiguities in Greek Tragedy.” In Vernant and Vidal-Naquet 1988: 29–48.

Vernant, J.-P. 1988b. “Imitations of the Will in Greek Tragedy.” In Vernant and Vidal-Naquet 1988: 49–84.

Vernant, J.-P. 1988c. “The Masked Dionysus of Euripides' Bacchae.” In Vernant and Vidal-Naquet 1988: 381–412.

Vernant, J.-P. 1989. “Food in the Countries of the Sun.” In The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks. Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P., eds. Translated by P. Wissing. Chicago: 164–69. First published as La cuisine du sacrifice en pays grec. Paris, 1979.

Vernant, J.-P., and Vidal-Naquet, P. 1988. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. Translated by Lloyd, J.. New York. First published as Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne. Paris, 1972 and as Mythe et tragédie en Grèce ancienne. Deux. Paris, 1986.

Versnel, H.S. 1976. “Two Types of Roman Devotio.” Mnemosyne 29: 365–410.CrossRef

Versnel, H.S. 1981. “Self-Sacrifice, Compensation, and the Anonymous Gods.” In Le sacrifice dans l'antiquité. Entretiens Fondation Hardt 27: 135–85.

Albrecht, M. 1970. “Zur Tragik von Vergils Turnusgestalt: Aristotelisches in der Schlußszene der Aeneis.” In Silvae. Festschrift für Ernst Zinn zum 60. Geburtstag. Dargebracht von Kollegen, Schülern und Mitarbeitern. Albrecht und, M.Heck, E., eds. Tübingen: 1–5.

Wagenvoort, H. 1947. Roman Dynamism: Studies in Ancient Roman Thought, Language and Custom. Oxford.Google Scholar

Watson, L. 1991. Arae, the Curse Poetry of Antiquity. Leeds.

Weber, C. 2002. “The Dionysus in Aeneas.” CP 97: 322–43.

West, D. 1969. “Multiple Correspondence Similes in the Aeneid.” JRS 59: 40–49.

West, G.S. 1980. “Caeneus and Dido.” TAPA 110: 315–24.

West, G.S. 1983. “Andromache and Dido.” AJP 104: 257–67.

West, M.L. 1990. Aeschyli Tragoediae cum incerti poetae Prometheo. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Whitby, M. et al. 1987. Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol.Google Scholar

Whitman, C. H. 1958. Homer and the Heroic Tradition. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wigodsky, M. 1972. Vergil and Early Latin Poetry. Hermes Einzelschriften 24. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Wilhelm, M.P. 1992. “Minerva in the Aeneid.” In Wilhelm and Jones 1992: 74–81.

Wilhelm, R.M., and Jones, H. 1992. The Two Worlds of the Poet: New Perspectives on Vergil. Detroit.Google Scholar

Williams, G. 1962. “Poetry in the Moral Climate of Augustan Rome.” JRS 52: 28–46.

Williams, G. 1968. Tradition and Originality in Roman Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, R.D. 1960. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quintus. Edited with a commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Williams, R.D. 1962. P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Tertius. Edited with a commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Willink, C.W. 1986. Euripides Orestes. With introduction and commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wiltshire, S.F. 1989. Public and Private in Vergil's Aeneid. Amherst.Google Scholar

Winkler, J.J., and Zeitlin, F.I. 1990. Nothing to Do with Dionysos? Athenian Drama in Its Social Context. Princeton.Google Scholar

Winnington-Ingram, R.P. 1980. Sophocles: An Interpretation. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wissowa, G. 1912. Religion und Kultus der Römer. Handbuch der klassischen Altertums-wissenschaft. München.Google Scholar

Wlosok, A. 1976. “Vergils Didotragödie. Ein Beitrag zum Problem des Tragischen in der Aeneis.” In Studien zum antiken Epos. H. Görgemanns and Schmidt, E., eds. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 72. Meisenheim am Glan: 228–50.

Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Translated by Shapiro, A.. Ann Arbor. First published as Augustus und die Macht der Bilder. Munich, 1987.Google Scholar

Zarker, J.W. 1969. “Amata: Vergil's Other Tragic Queen.” Vergilius 15: 2–24.

Zeitlin, F.I. 1965. “The Motif of the Corrupted Sacrifice in Aeschylus' Oresteia.” TAPA 96: 463–508.

Zeitlin, F.I. 1984. “The Dynamics of Misogyny: Myth and Mythmaking in the Oresteia.” In Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers. Peradotto, J. and Sullivan, J. P., eds. Albany: 159–94.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F.I. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J.E. G. 1997. “Rome and Its Traditions.” In The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Martindale, C., ed. Cambridge: 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar