Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 18
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Shaw, Allison K. Jalasvuori, Matti and Kokko, Hanna 2014. Population-level consequences of risky dispersal. Oikos, Vol. 123, Issue. 8, p. 1003.

    Pine, William E. Healy, Brian Smith, Emily Omana Trammell, Melissa Speas, Dave Valdez, Rich Yard, Mike Walters, Carl Ahrens, Rob Vanhaverbeke, Randy Stone, Dennis and Wilson, Wade 2013. An Individual-Based Model for Population Viability Analysis of Humpback Chub in Grand Canyon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, Vol. 33, Issue. 3, p. 626.

    Earnhardt, Joanne M. Thompson, Steven D. and Faust, Lisa J. 2009. Extinction risk assessment for the species survival plan (SSP®) population of the Bali mynah (Leucopsar rothschildi). Zoo Biology, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 230.

    WILHERE, GEORGE F. 2008. The How-Much-Is-Enough Myth. Conservation Biology, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 514.

    Swindell, William R. and Bouzat, Juan L. 2006. Gene Flow and Adaptive Potential in Drosophila melanogaster. Conservation Genetics, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    Swindell, William R. and Bouzat, Juan L. 2006. Associations between environmental stress, selection history, and quantitative genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica, Vol. 127, Issue. 1-3, p. 311.

    Swindell, William R. and Bouzat, Juan L. 2005. MODELING THE ADAPTIVE POTENTIAL OF ISOLATED POPULATIONS: EXPERIMENTAL SIMULATIONS USING DROSOPHILA. Evolution, Vol. 59, Issue. 10, p. 2159.

    Reed, David H. and Hobbs, Gayla R. 2004. The relationship between population size and temporal variability in population size. Animal Conservation, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Burkhart, Stephanie M. and Slooten, Elisabeth 2003. Population viability analysis for Hector's dolphin (Cephalorhynchus hectori): A stochastic population model for local populations. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 553.

    Schlesser, Marianne Boulengé, Éric Le and Schtickzelle, Nicolas 2002. Can demographic parameters be estimated from capture-recapture data on small grids? A test with forest rodents. Acta Theriologica, Vol. 47, Issue. 3, p. 323.

    Potoçnik, Hubert Kljun, Franc Raçnik, Jožko Skrbinšek, Tomaž Adamiç, Miha and Kos, Ivan 2002. Experience obtained from box trapping and handling wildcats in Slovenia. Acta Theriologica, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 211.

    Franklin, I. R. and Frankham, R. 1998. How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential?. Animal Conservation, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 69.

    Komdeur, Jan Kappe, Anique and Zande, Louis 1998. Influence of population isolation on genetic variation and demography in Seychelles warblers: a field experiment. Animal Conservation, Vol. 1, Issue. 3, p. 203.

    Wikramanayake, Eric D. Dinerstein, Eric Robinson, John G. Karanth, Ullas Rabinowitz, Alan Olson, David Mathew, Thomas Hedao, Prashant Conner, Melissa Hemley, Ginette and Bolze, Dorene 1998. An Ecology-Based Method for Defining Priorities for Large Mammal Conservation: The Tiger as Case Study. Conservation Biology, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 865.

    Conway, William 1995. Wild and zoo animal interactive management and habitat conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 4, Issue. 6, p. 573.

    SAUNDERS, DENIS A. HOBBS, RICHARD J. and MARGULES, CHRIS R. 1991. Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review. Conservation Biology, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 18.

    ASHLEY, MARY V. MELNICK, DON J. and WESTERN, DAVID 1990. Conservation Genetics of the Black Rhinoceros (Diceros bicornis), I: Evidence from the Mitochondrial DNA of Three Populations. Conservation Biology, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 71.

    BERGER, JOEL 1990. Persistence of Different-sized Populations: An Empirical Assessment of Rapid Extinctions in Bighorn Sheep. Conservation Biology, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 91.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1987
  • Online publication date: January 2010

1 - Introduction

Summary

And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark.

Genesis

Definition: How much is enough?

Given biblical precedence, it is not surprising that for millennia, a pair (male and female) has been deemed sufficient to initiate, if not perpetuate, a population. In fact, there is more than scriptural authority behind this myth. With luck, two can indeed be a sufficient number of founders.

What is luck? Without going into theories of randomness and probability, luck implies a fortunate or unusual circumstance leading to a good result. The result of interest in this book is the survival of a population in a state that maintains its vigor and its potential for evolutionary adaptation. Such a population is a viable population. Legend does not question Noah's success with each of his multitudinous experiments. He must have been very lucky indeed. He also had some advantages over us, not the least of which was a fresh, well-watered planet.

The problem that we address in this book is ‘How much is enough?’. Put more concretely, it is: What are the minimum conditions for the long-term persistence and adaptation of a species or population in a given place? This is one of the most difficult and challenging intellectual problems in conservation biology.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Viable Populations for Conservation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511623400
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623400
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×