- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- Online publication date: December 2017
- Print publication year: 2018
- Online ISBN: 9781316222591
Communist forces in the Vietnam War lost most battles and suffered disproportionally higher casualties than the United States and its allies throughout the conflict. The ground war in South Vietnam and the air war in the North were certainly important in shaping the fates of the victors and losers, but they alone fail to explain why Hanoi bested Washington in the end. To make sense of the Vietnam War, we must look beyond the war itself. In his new work, Pierre Asselin explains the formative experiences and worldview of the men who devised communist strategies and tactics during the conflict, and analyzes their rationale and impact. Drawing on two decades of research in Vietnam's own archives, including classified policy statements and reports, Asselin expertly and straightforwardly relates the Vietnamese communist experience - and the reasons the war turned out the way it did.
George C. Herring - University of Kentucky
Christopher Goscha - Université du Québec à Montréal
Larry Berman - University of California, Davis
David L. Anderson - California State University, Monterey Bay
As indicated in the Introduction, a vast number of books have been written about the Vietnam War. Their quality fluctuates greatly. Featured below are some of the better titles, arranged by topic.
Surprisingly, few works have focused on the subject of this study: that is, the Vietnamese communist experience in the war. Ang Cheng Guan has produced first-rate works recounting that experience, and communist decision-making in particular, including The Vietnam War from the Other Side: The Vietnamese Communists’ Perspective (New York: Routledge, 2002); Ending the Vietnam War: The Vietnamese Communists’ Perspective (New York: Routledge, 2004); and Vietnamese Communists’ Relations with China and the Second Indochina Conflict, 1956–1962 (Jefferson: McFarland & Company, 1997). Equally prolific in relating the communist perspective, and a pioneer in that realm, has been Duiker William, whose The Communist Road to Power in Vietnam [2nd ed.] (Boulder: Westview Press, 1996) is the richest history of Vietnamese communism. Duiker’s biography of Minh Ho Chi, Ho Chi Minh: A Life (New York: Theia, 2000), offers fascinating insights on its most famous adherent, as does Quinn-Judge Sophie’s Ho Chi Minh: The Missing Years, 1919–1941 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003). Khanh Huynh Kim’s Vietnamese Communism, 1925–1945 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982) remains the best study of the origins of the communist movement in Vietnam.
Asselin Pierre’s Hanoi’s Road to the Vietnam War, 1954–1965 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013) and Nguyen Lien-Hang’s Hanoi’s War: An International History of the War for Peace in Vietnam (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2012) complement each other nicely, and together constitute the most comprehensive assessment of Vietnam’s American War based on Vietnamese archival sources. Vu Tuong’s Vietnam’s Communist Revolution: The Power and Limits of Ideology (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017) is an excellent recent study of the Vietnamese communist worldview. Post Ken’s five-volume Revolution, Socialism and Nationalism in Viet Nam (Brookfield: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1989–94) is a little more dated, but represents the most comprehensive study of the Vietnamese communist struggle for independence and national reunification written from a Marxist perspective. A more personal experience is related in Tin Bui, From Enemy to Friend: A North Vietnamese Perspective on the War (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 2002).
The history of North Vietnam’s armed forces, the People’s Army of Vietnam (PAVN), is addressed in Pike Douglas, PAVN: People’s Army of Vietnam (New York: Da Capo Press, 1991) and Lockhart Greg, Nation in Arms: The Origins of the People’s Army of Vietnam (Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1989). An indispensable, official military history of the American War is Military Institute of Vietnam (translated by Merle Pribbenow), Victory in Vietnam: The Official History of the People’s Army of Vietnam, 1954–1975 (Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 2002). Another insightful Vietnamese history of the conflict is Lich Le Kinh (ed.), The 30-Year War, 1945–1975 – Volume II: 1954–1975 (Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers, 2002). A richly detailed and engaging history of the Ho Chi Minh Trail is provided in Prados John, Blood Road: The Ho Chi Minh Trail and the Vietnam War (New York: Wiley & Sons, 1999).
On Vietnamese communist diplomacy, the “diplomatic struggle,” see Loi Luu Van, Fifty Years of Vietnamese Diplomacy, 1945–1995 – Volume 1: 1945–1975 (Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers, 2000); Nien Nguyen Dy, Ho Chi Minh Thought on Diplomacy (Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers, 2004); and Thien Ton That, The Foreign Politics of the Communist Party of Vietnam: A Study in Communist Tactics (New York: Crane Russak, 1989). Loi Luu Van and Anh Nguyen The, The Le Duc Tho-Kissinger Negotiations in Paris (Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers, 1995) offers riveting and invaluable insights on Hanoi and the secret Paris talks.
The Viet Cong – that is, Southern Vietnamese communist – experience is considered in Hunt David, Vietnam’s Southern Revolution: From Peasant Insurrection to Total War (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2008). Revolutionary strategies and tactics in the South are expertly related in Elliott David, The Vietnamese War: Revolution and Social Change in the Mekong Delta, 1930–1975 [concise ed.] (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 2007); Race Jeffrey, War Comes to Long An: Revolutionary Conflict in a Vietnamese Province (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972); Tanham George, Communist Revolutionary Warfare: From the Vietminh to the Viet Cong (Westport: Praeger, 2006); Andres William, The Village War: Vietnamese Communist Revolutionary Activity in Dinh Truong Province, 1960–64 (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1973); Thayer Carlyle, War by Other Means: National Liberation and Revolution in Viet-Nam, 1954–60 (Cambridge: Unwin Hyman Publishers, 1989); and Pike Douglas, Viet Cong: The Organization and Techniques of the National Liberation Front of South Vietnam (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966). Robert Brigham considers Viet Cong foreign relations in Guerrilla Diplomacy: The NLF’s Foreign Relations and the Viet Nam War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998). Tang Truong Nhu, A Viet Cong Memoir (New York: Vintage Books, 1985) and Dinh Nguyen Thi, No Other Road to Take: Memoirs of Mrs. Nguyen Thi Dinh (Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Data Paper no. 102, 1976) are both absorbing first-hand accounts.
Other useful studies of the Vietnamese communist experience include Fforbe Adam and Paine Susan, The Limits of National Liberation: Problems of Economic Management in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (London: Croom Helm, 1987); Gurtov Melvin, Hanoi on War and Peace (Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, 1967); Van Chi Hoang, From Colonialism to Communism: A Case History of North Vietnam (New York: Pall Mall Press, 1964); Honey P. J., Communism in North Vietnam: Its Role in the Sino-Soviet Dispute (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1973); Khang Ho, The Tet Mau Than 1968 Event in South Vietnam (Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers, 2001); Van Luong Hy, Revolution in the Village: Tradition and Transformation in North Vietnam, 1925–1988 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1992); Kerkvliet Benedict, The Power of Everyday Politics: How Vietnamese Peasants Transformed National Policy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2005); Moïse Edwin, Land Reform in China and North Vietnam: Consolidating the Revolution at the Village Level (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1983); Ninh Kim, A World Transformed: The Politics of Culture in Revolutionary Vietnam, 1945–1965 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002); Pelley Patricia, Postcolonial Vietnam: New Histories of the National Past (Durham: Duke University Press, 2002); Smyser W. R., The Independent Vietnamese: Vietnamese Communism between Russia and China, 1956–1969 (Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies, Southeast Asia Series no. 55, 1980); and Van Dyke Jon, North Vietnam’s Strategy for Survival (Palo Alto: Pacific Books, 1972), which addresses how the DRVN and its people coped with US bombings.
An outstanding, must-read general history of Vietnam is Goscha Christopher’s Vietnam: A New History (New York: Basic Books, 2016). Early Vietnamese history is the focus of Taylor Keith, The Birth of Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983). Taylor recently produced the more comprehensive A History of the Vietnamese (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013), which is quite detailed but not reader-friendly. SarDesai D. R.’s Vietnam: Past and Present [4th ed.] (Boulder: Westview Press, 2009) is respectable. Kiernan Ben’s Viet Nam: A History from Earliest Times to the Present (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017) is more meticulous and recent. Other interesting but more dated works are Buttinger Joseph, Vietnam: A Political History (Westport: Praeger, 1968); Jamieson Neil, Understanding Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993); and Vien Nguyen Khac, Vietnam: A Long History (Hanoi: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1987), which presents the official, Vietnamese communist interpretation of Vietnam’s own past. Woodside Alexander, Vietnam and the Chinese Model: A Comparative Study of Nguyen and Ch’ing Civil Government in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), offers intriguing glimpses into Vietnam’s last dynasty.
The best, most readily accessible history of the Vietnam War, that expertly addresses both sides, is Turley William’s The Second Indochina War: A Concise Political and Military History [2nd ed.] (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009). The most widely used text on the war is Herring George’s America’s Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975 [5th ed.] (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013). Other excellent and reader-friendly studies are Karnow Stanley, Vietnam: A History [2nd ed.] (New York: Penguin, 1997); Lawrence Mark Atwood, The Vietnam War: A Concise International History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008); and Prados John, Vietnam: The History of an Unwinnable War, 1945–1975 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2009).
Dated but classic works include Buzzanco Robert, Masters of War: Military Dissent and Politics in the Vietnam Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996); Davidson Phillip, Vietnam at War: The History 1946–1975 (Novato: Presidio Press, 1988); Fitzgerald Frances, Fire in the Lake: The Vietnamese and the Americans in Vietnam (New York: Random House, 1972); Harrison James, The Endless War: Vietnam’s Struggle for Independence (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983); Kahin George and Lewis John, The United States in Vietnam (New York: Dial, 1967); Kolko Gabriel, Anatomy of a War: Vietnam, the United States, and the Modern Historical Experience (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985), which presents a strong Marxist viewpoint; Lewy Guenter, America in Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978); Lomperis Timothy, The War Everyone Lost – and Won: America’s Intervention in Viet Nam’s Twin Struggles (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1984); Maclear Michael, The Ten Thousand Day War – Vietnam: 1945–1975 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1981); Sheehan Neil, A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam (New York: Random House, 1988); Smith Ralph’s three-volume history entitled An International History of the Vietnam War (London: Macmillan Press, 1983–1991); Summers Harry, On Strategy: The Vietnam War in Context (Novato: Presidio Press, 1982); Thayer Thomas, War Without Fronts: The American Experience in Vietnam (Boulder: Westview Press, 1985); Werner Jayne and Hunt David (eds.), The American War in Vietnam (Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program, 1993); and Werner Jayne and Huynh Luu Doan (eds.), The Vietnam War: Vietnamese and American Perspectives (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1993).
More recent and better-referenced general histories of the Vietnam War include Anderson David, The Vietnam War (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005); Bradley Mark Philip, Vietnam at War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009); Bradley Marc Philip and Young Marilyn (eds.), Making Sense of the Vietnam Wars: Local, National, and Transnational Perspectives (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008); Dommen Arthur, The Indochinese Experience of the French and the Americans: Nationalism and Communism in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001), an astoundingly detailed account of the war across the Indochinese Peninsula; Duiker William, Sacred War: Nationalism and Revolution in a Divided Vietnam (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995), which does great justice to the communist side; Gilbert Marc Jason (ed.), Why the North Won the Vietnam War (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002); Hess Gary, Vietnam and the United States: Origins and Legacy of War (Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1990); Lind Michael, Vietnam – The Necessary War: A Reinterpretation of America’s Most Disastrous Military Conflict (New York: The Free Press, 1999); Quinn-Judge Sophie, The Third Force in the Vietnam Wars: The Elusive Search for Peace, 1954–75 (Chicago: I. B. Tauris, 2017); Schulzinger Robert, A Time for War: The United States and Vietnam, 1941–1975 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997); Wiest Andrew, The Vietnam War, 1956–1975 (Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2002); and Young Marilyn, The Vietnam Wars, 1945–1990 (New York: Harper Collins, 1991), which remains a seminal work after all this time. McNamara Robert, Blight James and Brigham Robert, Argument without End: In Search of Answers to the Vietnam Tragedy (New York: Public Affairs, 1999) is an interesting read.
The literature on the French colonial period is much richer in French than it is in English. One of the best histories is Pierre Brocheux and Daniel Hémery’s work, translated from the French, Indochina: An Ambiguous Colonization, 1858–1954 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010). Other important studies are Jennings Eric, Vichy in the Tropics: Pétain’s National Revolution in Madagascar, Guadeloupe, and Indochina, 1940–1944 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001); Murray Martin, The Development of Capitalism in Colonial Indochina (1870–1940) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980); Long Ngo Vinh, Before the Revolution: The Vietnamese Peasants under the French (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991); and Osborne Milton, The French Presence in Cochinchina and Cambodia: Rule and Response (1859–1905) (Bangkok: White Lotus Press, 1997). One of the West’s most enduring legacies in Vietnam, Catholicism, is the object of Keith Charles’s Catholic Vietnam: A Church from Empire to Nation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012). A famous book relating the impact of colonialism on the Vietnamese peasantry is Scott James, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976). The United States and colonial Indochina is the focus of Bradley Mark Philip’s superb Imagining Vietnam and America: The Making of Postcolonial Vietnam, 1919–1950 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000).
The Vietnamese response to the French, and the emergence of Vietnamese nationalism and anti-colonialism, has been addressed in a number of excellent studies. The most notable are Duiker William, The Rise of Nationalism in Vietnam, 1900–1941 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976); Tai Hue-Tam Ho, Radicalism and the Origins of the Vietnamese Revolution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992); Marr David’s terrific two-volume study comprising Vietnamese Anticolonialism, 1885–1925 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971) and Vietnamese Tradition on Trial, 1920–1945 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981); and McHale Shawn, Print and Power: Confucianism, Communism, and Buddhism in the Making of Modern Vietnam, 1920–1945 (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008). Lam Truong Buu’s Patterns of Vietnamese Response to Foreign Intervention: 1858–1900 (New Haven: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, 1967) and his edited Colonialism Experienced: Vietnamese Writings on Colonialism, 1900–1931 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000) provide an assortment of Vietnamese primary sources in English translation. Zinoman Peter’s award-winning The Colonial Bastille: A History of Imprisonment in Vietnam, 1862–1940 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001) provides spellbinding insights on the role French prisons played in the radicalization of Vietnamese nationalists, and communists in particular.
World War II in Indochina, and the so-called August Revolution of 1945, are comprehensively explored in Marr David, Vietnam 1945: The Quest for Power (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995) and Tønnesson Stein, The Vietnamese Revolution of 1945: Roosevelt, Ho Chi Minh, and de Gaulle in a World at War (Newbury Park: Sage, 1991). See also Gunn Geoffrey, Rice Wars in Colonial Vietnam: The Great Famine and the Viet Minh Road to Power (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014). On America’s wartime collaboration with the Vietminh see the first-person narrative by Patti Archimedes, Why Vietnam?: Prelude to America’s Albatross (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980) and Bartholomew-Feis Dixee, The OSS and Ho Chi Minh: Unexpected Allies in the War against Japan (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006).
Again, the literature in English is not as exhaustive as that in French when it comes to the Indochina or Franco-Vietminh War of 1946–54, but there are some very good studies available. The lead-up to the war is skillfully addressed by Marr David in Vietnam: State, War, and Revolution (1945–1946) (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013) and Tønnesson Stein in Vietnam 1946: How the War Began (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2009).
Good studies of the war’s various dimensions include Lawrence Mark Atwood and Logevall Fredrik (eds.), The First Vietnam War: Colonial Conflict and Cold War Crisis (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007); Edwards Kathryn, Contesting Indochina: French Remembrance between Decolonization and Cold War (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2016); Fall Bernard, Street Without Joy: Indochina at War, 1946–54 (Harrisburg: Stackpole, 1961); and Hammer Ellen, The Struggle for Indochina, 1940–1955 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1966). The Battle of Dien Bien Phu is covered in Fall Bernard, Hell in a Very Small Place (Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1966); Roy Jules, The Battle of Dien Bien Phu (New York: Harper & Row, 1965); and Windrow Martin, The Last Valley: Dien Bien Phu and the French Defeat in Vietnam (Cambridge: Da Capo Press, 2004). The Geneva Conference that ended the Indochina War and split Vietnam into two halves is addressed in Cable James, The Geneva Conference of 1954 on Indochina (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1986); Randle Robert, Geneva 1954: The Settlement of the Indochinese War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969); and Waite James, The End of the First Indochina War: A Global History (New York: Routledge, 2012).
On the US role in the Indochina War see Arnold James, The First Domino: Eisenhower, the Military, and America’s Intervention in Vietnam (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1991); Billings-Yun Melanie, Decision Against War: Eisenhower and Dien Bien Phu, 1954 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988); Gardner Lloyd, Approaching Vietnam: From World War II through Dienbienphu (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1988); Hess Gary, The United States’ Emergence as a Southeast Asian Power, 1940–1950(New York: Columbia University Press, 1987); Kaplan Lawrence, Artaud Denise, and Rubin Mark (eds.), Dien Bien Phu and the Crisis of Franco-American Relations, 1954–1955 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997); Morgan Ted, Valley of Death: The Tragedy at Dien Bien Phu that Led America into the Vietnam War (New York: Random House, 2010); Prados John, The Sky Would Fall – Operation Vulture: The U.S. Bombing Mission in Indochina, 1954 (New York: Dial Books, 1983); Rotter Andrew, The Path to Vietnam: Origins of the American Commitment to Southeast Asia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987); Spector Ronald, Advice and Support: The Early Years of the U.S. Army in Vietnam, 1941–1960 (New York: The Free Press, 1985); and Statler Kathryn, Replacing France: The Origins of American Intervention in Vietnam (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2007). Logevall Fredrik’s Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America’s Vietnam (New York: Random House, 2012), is a brilliant, Pulitzer Prize-winning account that engagingly considers the Indochina War and the origins of the American commitment in Vietnam. Lawrence Mark Atwood’s Assuming the Burden: Europe and the American Commitment to War in Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005) is also excellent in explaining the roots of US involvement.
Fall Bernard’s The Two Viet-Nams (Westport: Praeger, 1963) and Viet-Nam Witness, 1953–66 (Westport: Praeger, 1966) as well as Lacouture Jean’s Vietnam: Between Two Truces (New York: Vintage Books, 1966) are dated but quite decent. Logevall Fredrik’s The Origins of the Vietnam War (New York: Longman, 2001) is a nice introductory text addressing the 1954–65 era. Moyar Mark, Triumph Forsaken: The Vietnam War, 1954–1965 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006) is a solid yet controversial history of the interwar period.
Recently, renewed interest in the presidency of Ngo Dinh Diem in Saigon has spawned a slew of studies. Those that stand out are Catton Philip, Diem’s Final Failure: Prelude to America’s War in Vietnam (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002); Chapman Jessica, Cauldron of Resistance: Ngo Dinh Diem, the United States, and 1950s Southern Vietnam (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013); Jacobs Seth, America’s Miracle Man in Vietnam: Ngo Dinh Diem, Religion, Race, and U.S. Intervention in Southeast Asia (Durham: Duke University Press, 2004) and Cold War Mandarin: Ngo Dinh Diem and the Origins of America’s War in Vietnam, 1950–1963 (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006); Miller Edward, Misalliance: Ngo Dinh Diem, the United States, and the Fate of South Vietnam (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013), arguably the best book on Diem; Shar Geoffrey, The Lost Mandate of Heaven: The American Betrayal of Ngo Dinh Diem, President of Vietnam (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2015); and Stewart Geoffrey, Vietnam’s Lost Revolution: Ngo Dinh Diem’s Failure to Build and Independent Nation, 1955–1963 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017), which is almost as good as Miller’s book. Demery Monique’s Finding the Dragon Lady: The Mystery of Vietnam’s Madame Nhu (New York: Public Affairs Books, 2013) is a mesmerizing account of Diem’s sister-in-law and South Vietnam’s First Lady. More dated but nonetheless valuable studies are Hammer Ellen, A Death in November: America in Vietnam, 1963 (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1987) and Scigliano Robert, South Vietnam: Nation Under Stress (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963).
On the US role in that period see Anderson David, Trapped by Success: The Eisenhower Administration and Vietnam, 1953–1961 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991); Carter James, Inventing Vietnam: The United States and State Building, 1954–1968 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008); Elkind Jessica, Aid Under Fire: Nation Building and the Vietnam War (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2016); Jamieson Neil, Inventing Vietnam: The United States and State Building, 1954–1968 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2008); Jones Howard, Death of a Generation: How the Assassinations of Diem and JFK Prolonged the Vietnam War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003); Kahin George, Intervention: How America Became Involved in Vietnam (New York: Knopf, 1986); Kaiser David, American Tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson, and the Origins of the Vietnam War (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000); Moïse Edwin, Tonkin Gulf and the Escalation of the Vietnam War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996); Newman John, JFK and Vietnam: Deception, Intrigue, and the Struggle for Power (New York: Warner Books, 1992); Porter Gareth, Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005); and Rust William, Kennedy in Vietnam (New York: Scribner, 1985). Two books by Halberstam David, The Making of a Quagmire: America and Vietnam during the Kennedy Era (New York: Knopf, 1988) and The Best and the Brightest (New York: Random House, 1972), are dated but important.
The American War in Vietnam has been the object of several respectable studies. On the Johnson administration and the war, see Berman Larry, Planning A Tragedy: The Americanization of the War in Vietnam (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1983) and Lyndon Johnson’s War: The Road to Stalemate in Vietnam (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1991); Gardner Lloyd, Pay Any Price: Lyndon Johnson and the Wars for Vietnam (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1995); Herring George, LBJ and Vietnam: A Different Kind of War (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1994); Hunt Michael, Lyndon Johnson’s War: America’s Cold War Crusade in Vietnam, 1945–1968 (New York: Hill & Wang, 1996); Logevall Fredrik, Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001); and McMaster H. R., Dereliction of Duty: Lyndon Johnson, Robert McNamara, the Joints Chief of Staff and the Lies that Led to Vietnam (New York: Harper Collins, 1997). On the Nixon period, consult Bundy William, A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency (New York: Hill & Wang, 1998); Kimball Jeffrey, Nixon’s Vietnam War (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1998); and Schmitz David, Richard Nixon and the Vietnam War (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2014).
The military dimensions of the US war are the focus of two excellent studies by Daddis Gregory, No Sure Victory: Measuring U.S. Army Effectiveness and Progress in the Vietnam War (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011) and Westmoreland’s War: Reassessing American Strategy in Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014). See also Cable Larry, Conflict of Myths: The Development of Counter-Insurgency Doctrine and the Vietnam War (New York: New York University Press, 1988); Gibson James, The Perfect War: Technowar in Vietnam (Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1986); Palmer Bruce, The 25-Year War: America’s Military Role in the Vietnam War (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1984); U.S. Grant Sharp, Strategy for Defeat: Vietnam in Retrospect (Novato: Presidio Press, 1982); Sorley Lewis, A Better War: The Unexamined Victories and the Final Tragedy of America’s Last Years in Vietnam (New York: Mariner Books, 2007); and Stanton Shelby, The Rise and Fall of an American Army: U.S. Ground Forces in Vietnam, 1965–1973 (Novato: Presidio Press, 1985). On the US bombing of North Vietnam see the topnotch study by Clodfelter Mark, The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of North Vietnam (New York: The Free Press, 1989).
On the Tet Offensive and its aftermath, see Allison William, The Tet Offensive: A Brief History with Documents (New York: Routledge, 2008); Arnold James, Tet Offensive 1968: Turning Point in Vietnam (Westport: Praeger, 2004); Gilbert Marc Jason and Head William (eds.), The Tet Offensive (Westport: Praeger, 1996); Oberdorfer Don, Tet!: The Turning Point in the Vietnam War (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001); Schmitz David, The Tet Offensive: Politics, War, and Public Opinion (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005); Spector Ronald, After Tet: The Bloodiest Year in Vietnam (New York: The Free Press, 1993); Willbanks James, The Tet Offensive: A Concise History (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006); and Wirtz James, The Tet Offensive: Intelligence Failure in War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994). On the war’s other great campaign, the Spring Offensive, refer to Andradé Dale, Trial by Fire: The 1972 Easter Offensive, America’s Last Vietnam Battle (New York: Hippocrene Books, 1995) and Randolph Stephen’s masterful study, Powerful and Brutal Weapons: Nixon, Kissinger, and the Easter Offensive (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007).
The antiwar movement in the United States and elsewhere is the subject of Chatfield Charles, The American Peace Movement: Ideals and Activism (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992); DeBenedetti Charles and Chatfield Charles, An American Ordeal: The Antiwar Movement of the Vietnam Era (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1990); Dickerson James, North to Canada: Men and Women against the Vietnam War (Westport: Praeger, 1999); Foley Michael, Confronting the War Machine: Draft Resistance during the Vietnam War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003); Gilbert Marc Jason (ed.), The Vietnam War on Campus: Other Voices, More Distant Drums (Westport: Praeger, 2001); Gitlin Todd, The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003); Hall Simon, Peace and Freedom: The Civil Rights and Antiwar Movements in the 1960s (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004) and Rethinking the American Anti-War Movement (New York: Routledge, 2010); Hershberger Mary, Traveling to Vietnam: American Peace Activists and the War (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1998); Hunt Andrew, The Turning: A History of Vietnam Veterans Against the War (New York: New York University Press, 1999); Lewis Penny, Hardhats, Hippies, and Hawks: The Vietnam Antiwar Movement as Myth and Memory (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013); Small Melvin, Covering Dissent: The Media and the Anti-Vietnam War Movement (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1994); Small Melvin and Hoover William (eds.), Give Peace a Chance: Exploring the Vietnam Antiwar Movement (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1992); and Wu Judy Tzu-Chun, Radicals on the Road: Internationalism, Orientalism, and Feminism during the Vietnam Era (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013), which provides an enthralling take on the American antiwar movement.
For details about the peace process and the talks in Paris, refer to Asselin Pierre, A Bitter Peace: Washington, Hanoi, and the Making of the Paris Agreement (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002) and Berman Larry, No Peace, No Honor: Nixon, Kissinger, and Betrayal in Vietnam (New York: The Free Press, 2001). Goodman Allan’s The Lost Peace: America’s Search for a Negotiated Settlement of the Vietnam War (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 1978) is also useful but dated, as are Kraslow David and Loory Stuart, The Secret Search for Peace in Vietnam (New York: Random House, 1968) and Thies Wallace, When Governments Collide: Coercion and Diplomacy in the Vietnam Conflict, 1964–1968 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980). Herring George (ed.), Secret Diplomacy of the Vietnam War: The Negotiating Volumes of the Pentagon Papers (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1983) includes worthwhile documentary evidence, plus sound insights from Herring himself. The memoir by Kissinger Henry, White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1979) and his more recent Ending the Vietnam War: A History of America’s Involvement in and Extrication from the Vietnam War (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003) are valuable, albeit somewhat polemical and self-serving. Gardner Lloyd and Gittinger Ted (eds.), The Search for Peace in Vietnam, 1964–1968 (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2004) has much merit, as does James Hershberg’s painstakingly-researched and entrancing Marigold: The Lost Chance for Peace in Vietnam (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012).
The South Vietnamese experience in the war remains poorly documented. Diem Bui, In the Jaws of History (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987) is written by a former South Vietnamese ambassador to the United States. Hung Nguyen Tien and Schecter Jerrold, The Palace File (New York: Harper & Row, 1986) similarly presents an official interpretation of events. Taylor Keith (ed.), Voices from the Second Republic of South Vietnam (1967–1975) (Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications, 2015) is quite decent. On the armed forces of the Saigon regime, see Brigham Robert, ARVN: Life and Death in the South Vietnamese Army (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2006) and Wiest Andy, Vietnam’s Forgotten Army: Heroism and Betrayal in the ARVN (New York: New York University Press, 2009).
A few outstanding works exist on the role of Hanoi’s allies during the war, and should be read by all serious students. They include Jian Chen, Mao’s China and the Cold War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001); Olsen Mari, Soviet-Vietnam Relations and the Role of China, 1949–64: Changing Alliances (New York: Routledge, 2006); Zhai Qiang, China and the Vietnam Wars (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000); and the two studies based on Russian archives by Gaiduk Ilya, Confronting Vietnam: Soviet Policy Toward the Indochina Conflict, 1954–1963 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003) and The Soviet Union and the Vietnam War (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996). The best works on the Sino-Soviet dispute, and its implications for the war in Vietnam, are Khoo Nicholas, Collateral Damage: Sino-Soviet Rivalry and the Termination of the Sino-Vietnamese Alliance (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Lüthi Lorenz, The Sino-Soviet Split, 1956–1966 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008); and Radchenko Sergei, Two Suns in the Heavens: The Sino-Soviet Struggle for Supremacy, 1962–1967 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009).
Few works have been published in English specifically addressing the last two years of the war, after the United States withdrew the last of its combat forces. Two riveting accounts are Snepp Frank, Decent Interval: An Insider’s Account of Saigon’s Indecent End Told by the CIA’s Chief Strategy Analyst in Vietnam (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002) and Veith George, Black April: The Fall of South Vietnam, 1973–75 (New York: Encounter Books, 2012). Other valuable works are Dawson Alan, 55 Days: The Fall of South Vietnam (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1977); Haley Edward, Congress and the Fall of South Vietnam and Cambodia (Rutherford: Associated University Presses, 1982); Herrington Stuart, Peace with Honor? An American Reports on Vietnam, 1973–75 (Novato: Presidio Press, 1983); Isaacs Arnold, Without Honor: Defeat in Vietnam and Cambodia (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983); Porter Gareth, A Peace Denied: The U.S., Vietnam, and the Paris Agreements (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1975); and Willbanks James, Abandoning Vietnam: How America Left and South Vietnam Lost Its War (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2004).
Comprehensive studies of Vietnam in the postwar era include Duiker William, Vietnam: Revolution in Transition (Boulder: Westview Press, 1995); Elliott David, Changing Worlds: Vietnam’s Transition from Cold War to Globalization (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012); and Palmujoki Eero, Vietnam and the World: Marxist-Leninist Doctrine and the Changes in International Relations, 1975–93 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997).
On the 1979 Sino-Vietnamese Border War specifically see Morris Stephen, Why Vietnam Invaded Cambodia: Political Culture and the Causes of War (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999); Westad Odd Arne and Quinn-Judge Sophie (eds.), The Third Indochina War: Conflict between China, Vietnam and Cambodia, 1972–79 (New York: Routledge, 2006); and Zhang Xiaoming, Deng Xiaoping’s Long War: The Military Conflict between China and Vietnam, 1979–1991 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2015). The ongoing Sino-Vietnamese dispute in the South China Sea is placed in its proper historical context in Hayton Bill’s terrific The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014).
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 15th December 2017 - 21st February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.