Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:33:16.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2018

Sven Fuchs
Affiliation:
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Thomas Thaler
Affiliation:
University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, D., Loch, A. (2014). Possible negative feedbacks from “gold-plating” irrigation infrastructure. Agricultural Water Management 145, 134–44.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N. (2000a). Indicators of social and economic vulnerability to climate change in Vietnam. Norwich: CSERGE Working Paper GEC.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N. (2000b). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography 24 (3), 347–64.Google Scholar
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16 (3), 268–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Rockström, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309 (5737), 1036–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. J. W., Emanuel, K., Lin, N., de Moel, H. (2014). Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science 344 (6183), 473–5.Google Scholar
Akbas, S., Blahut, J., Sterlacchini, S. (2009). Critical assessment of existing physical vulnerability estimation approaches for debris flows. In Malet, J., Remaître, A., Bogaard, T. (eds.), Landslide processes: From geomorphological mapping to dynamic modelling. Strasbourg: CERG Editions, pp: 229–33.Google Scholar
Akçar, S. (2001). Grassroots women’s collectives – roles in post-disaster effort: Potential for sustainable partnership and good governance (lessons learned from the Marmara Earthquake in Turkey). New York: United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women.Google Scholar
Alcott, B. (2005). Jevons’ paradox. Ecological Economics 54, 921.Google Scholar
Alcott, B. (2008). Historical overview of the Jevons paradox in the literature. In Polimeni, J. M., Kozo, M., Giampietro, M., Alcott, B. (eds.), The Jevons paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements. London: Earthscan, pp: 778.Google Scholar
Aldrich, D. P. (2011). The power of people: Social capital’s role in recovery from the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Natural Hazards 56 (3), 595611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience. Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, H. E., Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving: London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aleksandrova, M., Gain, A. K., Giupponi, C. (2016). Assessing agricultural systems vulnerability to climate change to inform adaptation planning: An application in Khorezm, Uzbekistan. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 21 (8), 1263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, D. (1993). Natural disasters. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. (1997). The study of natural disasters, 1977–97: Some reflections on a changing field of knowledge. Disasters 21 (4), 284304.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Guildford: Terra Publishing.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. (2005). Vulnerability to landslides. In Glade, T., Anderson, M., Crozier, M. (eds.), Landslide hazard and risk. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp: 175–98.Google Scholar
Alexander, D. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13 (11), 2707–16.Google Scholar
Amadio, M., Mysiak, J., Carrera, L., Koks, E. (2016). Improving flood damage assessment models in Italy. Natural Hazards 82 (3), 2075–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amirebrahimi, S., Rajabifard, A., Mendis, P., Ngo, T. (2016). A framework for a microscale flood damage assessment and visualization for a building using BIM–GIS integration. International Journal of Digital Earth 9 (4), 363–86.Google Scholar
Anderies, J. M., Ryan, P., Walker, B. H. (2006). Loss of resilience, crisis, and institutional change: Lessons from an intensive agricultural system in southeastern Australia. Ecosystems 9 (6), 865–78.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. B., Woodrow, P. J. (1989). Rising from the ashes: Development strategies in times of disaster. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Ch., Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4), 543–71.Google Scholar
Apel, H., Aronica, G., Kreibich, H., Thieken, A. (2009). Flood risk analyses – how detailed do we need to be? Natural Hazards 49 (1), 7998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, M. (2008). The role of risk transfer and insurance in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Stockholm: Commission on Climate Change and Development.Google Scholar
Arnould, M. (1976). Geological hazards – Insurance and legal and technical aspects. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology 14, 263–74.Google Scholar
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4), 216–24.Google Scholar
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58 (10), 4601–14.Google Scholar
Arts, B. J. M. (2006). Forests, institutions, discourses: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest politics. Wageningen: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Asprone, D., Manfredi, G. (2015). Linking disaster resilience and urban sustainability: A global approach for future cities. Disasters 39 (s1), s96s111.Google Scholar
Atkisson, A., Petak, W., Alesch, J. (1984). Natural hazards exposures, losses and mitigation costs in the United States 1970–2000. Transactions – Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 72, 106–12.Google Scholar
Avenarius, C. (2003). The structure of constraints: Social networks of immigrants from Taiwan. Unpublished dissertation, Colonge: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Avenarius, C., Johnson, J. C. (2004). Recovery from natural disasters and the “Lack of weak ties”. Portoroz, Slovenia: International Network for Social Network Analysis.Google Scholar
Ayyub, B. M. (2014). Systems resilience for multihazard environments: Definition, metrics, and valuation for decision making. Risk Analysis 34 (2), 340–55.Google Scholar
Bahadur, A. V., Ibrahim, M., Tanner, T. (2010). The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Baker, C. R. (2014). Breakdowns of accountability in the face of natural disasters: The case of hurricane Katrina. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 25 (7), 620–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, D., Refsgaard, K. (2007). Institutional development and scale matching in disaster response management. Ecological Economics 63, 331–43.Google Scholar
Balica, S. F., Wright, N. G., van der Meulen, F. (2012). A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Natural Hazards 64 (1), 73105.Google Scholar
Baltensperger, E., Buomberger, P., Luppa, A. A., Wicki, A., Keller, B. (2008). Regulation and intervention in the insurance industry – fundamental issues. Zurich: The Geneva Reports – Risk and Insurance Research.Google Scholar
Bankoff, G. (2001). Rendering the world unsafe: “Vulnerability” as western discourse. Disasters 25 (1), 1935.Google Scholar
Bankoff, G. (2007). Living with risk, coping with disasters. Hazard as a frequent life experience in the Philippines. Education About Asia 12 (2), 26–9.Google Scholar
Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., Hilhorst, D. (eds.) (2004). Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development, and people. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Barnes, A. (2010). Heritage award nomination form: Nomination document for the Somerset Dam. Brisbane: Engineering Heritage Australia.Google Scholar
Barnett, J., Lambert, S., Fry, I. (2008). The hazards of indicators: Insights from the environmental vulnerability index. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98 (1), 102–19.Google Scholar
Barredo, J. (2007). Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950–2005. Natural Hazards 42 (1), 125–48.Google Scholar
Barredo, J. (2009). Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970–2006. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (1), 91104.Google Scholar
Barrios, R. E. (2014). “Here, I’m not at ease”: Anthropological perspectives on community resilience. Disasters 38 (2), 329–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateman, I. J., Brouwer, R., Ferrini, S., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D. N., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Liekens, I., Navrud, S., de Nocker, L., Šceponavičiute, R., Semeniene, D. (2011). Making benefit transfer work: Deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics 50 (3), 365–87.Google Scholar
Battista, F., Baas, S. (2004). The role of local institutions in reducing vulnerability to recurrent natural disasters and in sustainable livelihoods development. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Batty, M. (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319 (5864), 769–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baum, J. A. C. (eds.) (2002). The Blackwell companion to organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M., Watkins, M. D. (2008). Predictable surprises. The disasters you should have seen coming and how to prevent them. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Beatley, T. (2009). Planning for coastal resilience: Best practices for calamitous times. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Beatley, T., Brower, D., Schwab, A. (1994). An introduction to coastal zone management. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Bec, A., McLennan, C. L., Moyle, B. D. (2016). Community resilience to long-term tourism decline and rejuvenation: A literature review and conceptual model. Current Issues in Tourism 19 (5), 431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccari, B. (2016). A comparative analysis of disaster risk, vulnerability and resilience composite indicators. PLoS Currents Disasters. Edition 1. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.453df025e34b682e9737f95070f9b970.Google Scholar
Becker, A., Grünewald, U. (2003). Flood risk in central Europe. Science 300, 1099.Google Scholar
Béné, C., Frankenberger, T., Nelson, S. (2015). Design, monitoring and evaluation of resilience interventions: Conceptual and empirical considerations. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Béné, C., Headey, D., Haddad, L., von Grebmer, K. (2016). Is resilience a useful concept in the context of food security and nutrition programmes? Some conceptual and practicial considerations. Food Security 8 (1), 123–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, M. H., Craig, R. K. (2014). The end of sustainability. Society & Natural Resources 27 (7), 777–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrand, K., Mayer, B., Brumback, B., Zhang, Y. (2015). Assessing the relationship between social vulnerability and community resilience to hazards. Social Indicators Research, 122, 391409.Google Scholar
Berke, P., Godschalk, D. (2009). Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies. Journal of Planning Literature 23 (3), 227–40.Google Scholar
Berke, P., Smith, G., Lyles, W. (2012). Planning for resiliency: Evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act. Natural Hazards Review 13 (2), 139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berke, P., Spurlock, D., Hess, G., Band, L. (2013). Local comprehensive plan quality and regional ecosystem protection: The case of the Jordan Lake watershed, North Carolina, USA. Land Use Policy 31, 450–59.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: Lessons from resilience thinking. Natural Hazards 41 (2), 283–95.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berrittella, M., Hoekstra, A. Y., Rehdanz, K., Roson, R., Tol, R. S. J. (2007). The economic impact of restricted water supply: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Water Research 41 (8), 1799–813.Google Scholar
Bertrand, D., Naaim, M., Brun, M. (2010). Physical vulnerability of reinforced concrete buildings impacted by snow avalanches. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10 (7), 1531–45.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, L. M. (2013). The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340 (6139), 1438–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bettencourt, L. M., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (17), 7301–6.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, L. M., West, G. B. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature 467 (7318), 912–13.Google Scholar
Bettencourt, L. M., West, G. B. (2011). Bigger cities do more with less. Scientific American 305 (3), 52–3.Google Scholar
Biesbroek, G. R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M., Kabat, P. (2013). On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change 13 (5), 1119–29.Google Scholar
Biljecki, F., Stoter, J., Ledoux, H., Zlatanova, S., Cöltekin, A. (2015). Applications of 3D city models: State of the art review. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4 (4), 2842–89.Google Scholar
Bin, O., Polasky, S. (2004). Effects of flood hazards on property values: Evidence before and after hurricane Floyd. Land Economics 80 (4), 490500.Google Scholar
Birkland, T. A., Burby, R. J., Conrad, D., Cortner, H., Michener, W. K. (2003). River ecology and flood hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards Review 4 (1), 4654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkmann, J. (2006a). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Birkmann, J. (ed.), Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp: 754.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J. (2006b). Indicators and criteria for measuring vulnerability: Theoretical bases and requirements. In Birkmann, J. (ed.), Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp: 5577.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J. (2013a). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Birkmann, J. (ed.), Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. 2nd edition. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp: 954.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J. (ed.) (2013b). Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. 2nd edition. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J., Cardona, O. D., Carreno, L., Barbat, A., Pelling, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Kienberger, S., Kelier, M., Alexander, D., Zeil, P., Welle, T. (2013). Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: The MOVE framework. Natural Hazards 67 (2), 193211.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J., Cutter, S. L., Rothman, D. S., Welle, T., Garschagen, M., van Ruijven, B., O’Neill, B., Preston, B. L., Kienberger, S., Cordona, O. D., Siagian, T., Hidayati, D., Setiadi, N., Binder, C. R., Hughes, B., Pulwarty, R. (2013). Scenarios for vulnerability: Opportunities and constraints in the context of climate change and disaster risk. Climatic Change 133 (1), 5368.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J., Kienberger, S., Alexander, D. (eds.) (2014). Assessment of vulnerability to natural hazards: A European perspective. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Birol, E., Karousakis, K., Koundouri, P. (2006). Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application. Science of the Total Environment 365 (1–3), 105–22.Google Scholar
Birol, E., Koundouri, P., Kountouris, Y. (2011). Assessing the economic viability of alternative water resources in water-scarce regions: Combining economic valuation, cost-benefit analysis and discounting. Ecological Economics 69 (4), 839–47.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P. M., Cannon, T., Davis, I., Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
BMLFUW – The Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management (2017). Austrian Service for Torrent and Avalanche Control. www.die-wildbach.at/ [last accessed: January 15, 2017].Google Scholar
Bohle, H. G. (2001). Vulnerability and criticality: Perspectives from social geography. IHDP Update 2, 35.Google Scholar
Bohle, H. G. (2008). Förderung von Resilience als Herausforderung für die Risikowelten von morgen. In Felgentreff, C., Glade, T. (eds.), Naturrisiken und Sozialkatastrophen, Berlin: Springer Spektrum, pp: 435–41.Google Scholar
Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E., Watts, M. J. (1994). Climate change and social vulnerability: Toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Global Environmental Change 4 (1), 3748.Google Scholar
Bohle, H. G., Etzold, B., Keck, M. (2009). Resilience as agency. IHDP Update 2, 813.Google Scholar
Boin, A., Comfort, L. K., Demchak, C. C. (2010). The rise of resilience. In Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., Demchak, C. C. (eds.), Designing resilience. Preparing for extreme events. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp: 112.Google Scholar
Boin, A., McConnell, A. (2007). Preparing for critical infrastructure breakdowns: The limits of crisis management and the need for resilience. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 15 (1), 50–9.Google Scholar
Bollens, S. A., Kaiser, E. J., Burby, R. J. (1988). Evaluating the effects of local floodplain management policies on property owner behavior. Environmental management 12 (3), 311–25.Google Scholar
Boon, H. J., Cottrell, A., King, D., Stevenson, R. B., Millar, J. (2012). Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory for modelling community resilience to natural disasters. Natural Hazards 60 (2), 381408.Google Scholar
Bosello, F., Nicholls, R. J., Richards, J., Roson, R., Tol, R. S. J. (2012). Economic impacts of climate change in Europe: Sea-level rise. Climate Change 112 (1), 6381.Google Scholar
Bosher, L., Dainty, A., Carrillo, P., Glass, J. (2007). Built-in resilience to disasters: A pre-emptive approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 14 (5), 434–46.Google Scholar
Botzen, W. J. W., Aerts, J. C. J. H., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2009). Willingness of the homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance. Ecological Economics 68, 2265–77.Google Scholar
Botzen, W. J. W., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2008). Insurance against climate change and flooding in the Netherlands: Present, future, and comparison with other countries. Risk Analysis 28 (2), 413–26.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Box, P., Bird, D., Haynes, K., King, D. (2016). Shared responsibility and social vulnerability in the 2011 Brisbane flood. Natural Hazards 81 (3), 1549–68.Google Scholar
Boyd, E., Folke, C. (eds.) (2012). Adapting institutions: Governance, complexity and social-ecological resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Ibarraran, M. E. (2009). Extreme climate events and adaptation: An exploratory analysis of drought in Mexico. Environment and Development Economics 14 (3), 371–95.Google Scholar
Bozza, A., Asprone, D., Manfredi, G. (2015). Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters. Natural Hazards 78 (3), 1729–48.Google Scholar
Briceño, S. (2015). Looking back and beyond Sendai: 25 years of international policy experience on disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 6 (1), 17.Google Scholar
Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Farrugia, N., Vella, S. (2006). Conceptualising and measuring economic resilience. In Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Kisanga, E. J. (eds.), Building the economic resilience of small states. London: Formatek, pp: 265–88.Google Scholar
Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Farrugia, N., Vella, S. (2009). Economic vulnerability and resilience: Concepts and measurements. Oxford Development Studies 37 (3), 229–47.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Davis, S. E. III, Highfield, W. E., Bernhardt, S. (2008a). A spatial-temporal analysis of section 404 wetland alteration in Texas and Florida: Thirteen years of impact along the coast. Wetlands 28 (1), 107–16.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Highfield, W. E., Grover, H., Vedlitz, A. (2008b). Identifying the Impact of the built environment on flood damage in Texas. Disasters 32 (1), 118.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Grover, H., Lindquist, E., Vedlitz, A. (2010). Examining climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviours among public sector organisations in the USA. Local Environment 15 (6), 591603.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Highfield, W., Carrasco, V. (2004). Measuring the collective planning capabilities of local jurisdictions to manage ecological systems in southern Florida. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69 (1), 3350.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Highfield, W. E., Kang, J. E. (2011). Rising waters: Causes and consequences of flooding in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Kang, J. E., Bernhardt, S. P. (2010). Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: The role of organizational capacity. Natural Hazards 52 (1), 167–84.Google Scholar
Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Maghelal, P., Grover, H., Highfield, W. (2007). The rising costs of floods: Examining the impact of planning and development decisions on property damage in Florida. Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (3), 330–45.Google Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research Working Paper 38, 116.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R., Schaafsma, M. (2013). Modelling risk adaptation and mitigation behaviour under different climate change scenarios. Climate Change 117 (1), 1129.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R., van Ek, R. (2004). Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 50 (1–2), 121.Google Scholar
Browne, M. J., Hoyt, R. E. (2000). The demand for flood insurance: Empirical evidence. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20 (3), 291306.Google Scholar
Bründl, M., Fuchs, S., Sandersen, F., Kveldsvik, V., Eidsvig, U., Bischof, N., Korup, O., Rheinberger, C., Romang, H., Barbolini, M. (2008). Technical report, Deliverable 5.2, Integral risk management of snow avalanches, rock avalanches and debris flow in Europe. Davos: IRASMOS Consortium.Google Scholar
Bruneau, M., Chang, S., Eguchi, R., Lee, G., O’Rourke, T., Reinhorn, A., Shinozuka, M., Tierney, K., Wallace, W., von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 19 (4), 733–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1975). The Samaritan’s dilemma. In Phelps, E. A. (ed.), Altruism, morality and economic theory. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, pp: 7185.Google Scholar
Büchele, B., Kreibich, H., Kron, A., Thieken, A. H., Ihringer, J., Oberle, P., Merz, B., Nestmann, F. (2006). Flood-risk mapping: Contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 6 (4), 485503.Google Scholar
Burby, R. J. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the paradoxes of government disaster policy: Bringing about wise governmental decisions for hazardous areas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604 (1), 171–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burby, R. J., May, P. J. (1998). Intergovernmental environmental planning: Addressing the commitment conundrum. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41 (1), 95110.Google Scholar
Burrell, A. (2011). Evaluating policies for delivering agri-environmental public goods. OECD Workshop on the Evaluation of Agri-environmental Policies. Braunschweig: OECD.Google Scholar
Burton, C., Cutter, S. L. (2008). Levee failures and social vulnerability in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area, California. Natural Hazards Review 9 (3), 136–49.Google Scholar
Burton, I., Kates, R. W. (1964). The floodplain and the seashore: A comparative analysis of hazard zone occupance. Geographical Review 54 (3), 366–85.Google Scholar
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., White, G. F. (1978). The environment as hazard. 1st edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., White, G. F. (1993). The environment as hazard. 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Buskens, V. (1998). The social structure of trust. Social Networks 20 (3), 265–89.Google Scholar
Butts, C. T., Acton, R. M., Marcum, C. (2012). Interorganizational collaboration in the Hurricane Katrina response. Journal of Social Structure 13 (1), 136.Google Scholar
Cammerer, H., Thieken, A. H., Lammel, J. (2013). Adaptability and transferability of flood loss functions in residential areas. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13 (11), 3063–81.Google Scholar
Cannon, T. (1994). Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of “natural” disasters. In Varley, A. (ed.), Disasters, Development, and Environment. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., pp: 1330.Google Scholar
Cannon, T. (2006). Vulnerability analysis, livelihoods and disasters. In Ammann, W. J., Dannenmann, S., Vulliet, L. (eds.), Coping with risks due to natural hazards in the 21st Century. London: Taylor & Francis, pp: 41–9.Google Scholar
Cannon, T., Twigg, J., Rowell, J. (2003). Social vulnerability, sustainable livelihoods and disasters Investigating methodologies for vulnerability assessments and their links with the sustainable livelihoods approach. www.eldis.org/go/home&id=21628&type=Document#.WRxe_MakKHs [last accessed: January 10, 2017].Google Scholar
Cardillo, A., Scellato, S., Latora, V., Porta, S. (2006). Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns. Physical Review E 73 (6), 066107.Google Scholar
Cardona, O. D. (2004). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., Hilhorst, D. (eds.), Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. London: Earthscan, pp: 3751.Google Scholar
Cardona, O. D. (2005). Indicators of disaster risk and risk management: Program for Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Cardona, O. D., van Aalst, M. K., Birkmann, J., Fordham, M., McGregor, G., Perez, R., Pulwarty, R. S., Schipper, E. L. F., Sinh, B. T. (2012). Determinants of risk: Exposure and vulnerability. In Field, C. B., Barros, V., Stockeret, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G. K., Allen, S. K., Tignor, M., Midgley, P. M. (eds.), Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). New York: Cambridge University Press, pp: 65108.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J. M., Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4 (8), 765–81.Google Scholar
Carrera, L., Standardi, G., Bosello, F., Mysiak, J. (2015). Assessing direct and indirect economic impacts of a flood event through the integration of spatial and computable general equilibrium modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 63 (1), 109–22.Google Scholar
Carter, M. R., Little, P. D., Mogues, T., Negatu, W. (2007). Poverty traps and natural disasters in Ethiopia and Honduras. World Development 35 (5), 835–56.Google Scholar
Casagrande, D. G., McIlvaine-Newsad, H., Jones, E. C. (2015). Social networks of help-seeking in different types of disaster responses to the 2008 Mississippi River Floods. Human Organization 74 (4), 351–61.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, M., Asprone, D., Latora, V., Manfredi, G., Nicosia, V. (2014). Assessment of urban ecosystem resilience through hybrid social-physical complex networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 29 (8), 608–25.Google Scholar
Cavallo, E., Noy, E. (2011). Natural disasters and the economy — A survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 5 (1), 63102.Google Scholar
Cerulo, K. (2008). Never saw it coming: Cultural challenges to envisioning the worst. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, J., Tobin, G. A., Montz, B. E. (2005). Population evacuation: Assessing spatial variability in geophysical risk and social vulnerability to natural hazards. Natural Hazards Review 6 (1), 2333.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial introduction: Vulnerability, coping, and policy. IDS Bulletin 20, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S. E. (2001). Structural change in urban economies: Recovery and long-term impacts in the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. The Kokumin Keizai Zasshi 183, 4766.Google Scholar
Chasten, M. A., Rosati, J. D., McCormick, J. W., Randall, R. E. (1993). Engineering design guidance for detached breakwaters as shoreline stabilization structure. Vicksburg: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Chatterton, J. B., Pirt, J., Wood, T. R. (1979). The benefits of flood forecasting. Journal of the lnstitution of Water Engineers 33 (3), 237–52.Google Scholar
Ciscar, J. C., Feyen, L., Soria, A., Lavalle, C., Raes, F., Perry, M., Nemry, F., Demirel, H., Rozsai, M., Dosio, A., Donatelli, M., Srivastava, A., Fumagalli, D., Niemeyer, S., Shrestha, S., Ciaian, P., Himics, M., van Doorslaer, B., Barrios, S., Ibáñez, N., Forzieri, G., Rojas, R., Bianchi, A., Dowling, P., Camia, A., Libertà, G., San Miguel, J., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Barredo, J. I., Paci, D., Pycroft, J., Saveyn, B., van Regemorter, D., Revesz, T., Vandyck, T., Vrontisi, Z., Baranzelli, C., Vandecasteele, I., Silva, F., Ibarreta, D. (2014). Climate impacts in Europe. Results from the JRC PESETA II project. Como: JRC scientific and policy reports.Google Scholar
Ciurean, R. L., Schröter, D., Glade, T. (2013). Conceptual frameworks of vulnerability assessments for natural disasters reduction. In Tiefenbacher, J. (ed.), Approaches to disaster management – examining the implications of hazards, emergencies and disasters. www.intechopen.com/books/approaches-to-disaster-management-examining-the-implications-of-hazards-emergencies-and-disasters/conceptual-frameworks-of-vulnerability-assessments-for-natural-disasters-reduction [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emain, S., Jin, W., Kasperson, J X., Kasperson, R. E., Schwarz, H. E. (1998). Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: The case of Revere, Massachusetts, US. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3 (1), 5982.Google Scholar
Clegg, R. St., Courpasson, D., Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Coaffee, J., Lee, P. (2016). Urban resilience. Planning for risk, crisis and uncertainty. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cochrane, H. C. (1974). Predicting the economic impact of earthquakes. Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Cochrane, H. C. (2004). Indirect losses from natural disasters: Measurement and myth. In Okuyama, Y., Chang, S. E. (eds.), Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp: 3752.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., Siegelman, P. (2010). Testing for adverse selection in insurance markets. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 77 (1), 3984.Google Scholar
Cohen, C., Werker, E. D. (2008). The political economy of “natural” disasters. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (6), 795819.Google Scholar
Cole, S. (1995). Lifelines and livelihood: A social accounting matrix approach to calamity preparedness. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 3 (4), 111.Google Scholar
Collier, S. J., Lakoff, A. (2008). The vulnerability of vital systems: How “critical infrastructure” became a security problem. In Dunn, M. A., Kristensen, K. S. (eds.), Securing “the Homeland”: Critical infrastructure, risk and (in)security. London: Routledge, pp: 1739.Google Scholar
Collins, T. W. (2008). The political ecology of hazard vulnerability: Marginalization, facilitation and the production of differential risk to urban wildfires in Arizona’s White Mountains. Journal of Political Ecology 15 (1), 2143.Google Scholar
Collins, T. W., Grineski, S. E., de Lourdes Romo Aguilar, M. (2009). Vulnerability to environmental hazards in the Ciudad Juárez (Mexico)–El Paso (USA) metropolis: A model for spatial risk assessment in transnational context. Applied Geography 29 (3), 448–61.Google Scholar
Comfort, L. K., Boin, A., Demchak, C. C. (eds.) (2010). Designing resilience. Preparing for extreme events. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. The American Economic Review 21, 648–57.Google Scholar
Congress, U. S. (1936). Flood control act of 1936. Public Law 74-738, 49.Google Scholar
Connell, D. (2007). Water politics in the Murray-Darling basin. Riverwood: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
Cote, M., Nightingale, A. J. (2012). Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography 36 (4), 475–89.Google Scholar
Cova, T. J., Theobald, D. M., Norman, J. B. III, Siebeneck, L. (2013). Mapping wildfire evacuation vulnerability in the western US: the limits of infrastructure. Geo Journal 78 (2), 273–85.Google Scholar
Crane, T. A. (2010). Of models and meanings: Cultural resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 15 (4), 19.Google Scholar
Crase, L., O’Keefe, S., Dollery, B. (2013). Talk is cheap, or is it? The cost of consulting about uncertain reallocation of water in the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Ecological Economics 88, 206–13.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. E. S., Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. The American Political Science Review 89 (4), 582600.Google Scholar
Crichton, D. (2008). Role of insurance in reducing flood risk. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance – Issues and Practice 33 (1), 117–32.Google Scholar
Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review 24 (3), 522–37.Google Scholar
Crowley, JR, Elliott, J. (2012). Earthquake disasters and resilience in the global North: Lessons from New Zealand and Japan. The Geographical Journal 178 (3), 208–15.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography 20 (4), 529–39.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L. (ed.) (2001). American hazardscapes: The regionalization of hazards and disasters. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L. (2003). The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1), 112.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L. (2014). Building disaster resilience: Steps toward sustainability. Challenges in Sustainability 1 (2), 72–9.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L. (2016a). Resilience to what? Resilience for whom? The Geographical Journal 182 (2), 110–13.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L. (2016b). The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA. Natural Hazards 80 (2), 741–58.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Ash, K. D., Emrich, C. T. (2014). The geographies of community disaster resilience. Global Environmental Change 29, 6577.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience. Global Environmental Change 18, 598606.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84 (2), 242–61.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Burton, C. G., Emrich, C. T. (2010). Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7 (1), 51.Google Scholar
Cutter, S.L. and Corendea, C. (eds.) (2013). From social vulnerability to resilience: Measuring progress toward disaster risk reduction. SOURCE No. 17/2013. Bonn: United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS).Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T. (2006). Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604, 102–12.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Finch, C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (7), 2301–6.Google Scholar
Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (4), 713–37.Google Scholar
Dabla-Norris, E., Gündüz, Y. B. (2014). Exogenous shocks and growth crises in low-income countries: A vulnerability index. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Dai, F., Lee, C., Ngai, Y. (2002). Landslide risk assessment and management: An overview. Engineering Geology 64 (1), 6587.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E. (1974). The economics of the steady state. The American Economic Review 64 (2), 1521.Google Scholar
Daly, H. E. (1992). Allocation, distribution, and scale: Towards an economics that is efficient, just, and sustainable. Ecological Economics 6 (3), 185–93.Google Scholar
Dalziell, E. P., McManus, S. K. (2004). Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptive capacity: Implications for system performance. Presented at the international forum for engineering decision making (IFED), Stoos, Switzerland, December 6–8, 2004. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/2809 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Daniel, V. E., Florax, R. J. G. M., Rietveld, P. (2009). Flooding risk and housing values: An economic assessment of environmental hazard. Ecological Economics 69 (2), 355–65.Google Scholar
Daniell, J. E., Khazi, B., Wenzel, F., Vervaeck, A. (2011). The CATDAT damaging earthquake database. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11 (8), 2235–51.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. A., Lambert, K. B. (2001). Comparing the hurricane disaster risk of U.S. coastal counties. Natural Hazards Review 2 (3), 132–42.Google Scholar
Davidson, R., Shah, H. C. (1997). A multidisciplinary urban earthquake disaster risk index. Earthquake Spectra 13 (2), 211–23.Google Scholar
Davies, M., Béné, C., Arnall, A., Tanner, T., Newsham, A., Coirolo, C. (2013). Promoting resilient livelihoods through adaptive social protection: Lessons from 124 programmes in South Asia. Development Policy Review 31 (1), 2758.Google Scholar
Davis, I., Bellers, R. (1995). The context of community vulnerability assessment (CVA) and summary of workshop issues. Paper presented at The Assessment of Community Vulnerability in Hazard Prone Areas, Workshop, London 31 March, Committee of UN IDNDR.Google Scholar
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, L. J., Quinlan, A. E., Peterson, G. D., Wilkinson, C., Fünfgeld, H., McEvoy, D., Porter, L. (2012). Resilience: A bridging concept or a dead end? “Reframing” resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Planning Theory & Practice 13 (2), 299333.Google Scholar
Dawson, R. J., Ball, T., Werritty, J., Werritty, A., Hall, J. W., Roche, N. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of non-structural flood management measures in the Thames Estuary under conditions of socio-economic and environmental change. Global Environmental Change 21 (2), 628–46.Google Scholar
de Moel, H., Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2011). Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards 58 (1), 407–25.Google Scholar
de Moel, H., Asselman, N. E. M., Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12 (4), 1045–58.Google Scholar
de Moel, H., Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Merz, B., Penning-Rowsell, E., Ward, P. J. (2015). Flood risk assessments at different spatial scales. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 20 (6), 865–90.Google Scholar
de Sherbinin, A. (2014). Mapping the unmeasurable? Spatial analysis of vulnerability to climate change and climate variability. Unpublished dissertation, Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
Dempsey, J., Robertson, M. M. (2012). Ecosystem services: Tensions, impurities, and points of engagement within neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography 36 (6), 758–79.Google Scholar
Demuzere, M., Orru, K., Heidrich, O., Olazabal, E., Geneletti, D., Orru, H., Bhave, A. G., Mittal, N., Feliu, E., Faehnle, M. (2014). Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management 146, 107–15.Google Scholar
Dequech, D. (2006). Institutions and norms in institutional economics and sociology. Journal of Economic Issues 40 (2), 473–81.Google Scholar
Di Baldassarre, G., Viglione, A., Carr, G., Kuil, L., Yan, K., Brandimarte, L., Blöschl, G. (2015). Debates-perspectives on socio-hydrology: Capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resources Research 51, 4770–81.Google Scholar
Dibben, C., Chester, D. K. (1999). Human vulnerability in volcanic environments: The case of Furnas, Sao Miguel, Azores. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 92 (1–2), 133–50.Google Scholar
Dittmer, C., Lorenz, D. F., Reiter, J., Wenzel, B. (2016). Drei Jahre nach dem Deichbruch – Über die Gegenwart einer nicht abgeschlossenen Katastrophe. Notfallvorsorge 4, 1725.Google Scholar
Doerfel, M. L., Chewning, L. V., Lai, C. H. (2013). The evolution of networks and the resilience of interorganizational relationships after disaster. Communication Monographs 80 (4), 533–59.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (2007). Physical vulnerability modelling in natural hazard risk assessment. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 7 (2), 283–8.Google Scholar
Dovers, S. R., Handmer, J. W. (1992). Uncertainty, sustainability and change. Global Environmental Change 2 (4), 262–76.Google Scholar
Downton, M., Miller, J., Pielke, R. (2005). Reanalysis of U.S. National Weather Service flood loss database. Natural Hazards Review 6, 1322.Google Scholar
Downton, M., Pielke, R. (2005). How accurate are disaster loss data? The case of U.S. flood damage. Natural Hazards 35 (2), 211–28.Google Scholar
Drabek, T. E. (2012). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Drabek, T. E., McEntire, D. A. (2002). Emergent phenomena and multiorganizational coordination in disasters: Lessons from the research literature. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 20 (2), 197224.Google Scholar
Dutt, A. K. (2011). Institutional change and economic development: Concepts, theory and political economy. Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (4), 529–34.Google Scholar
Dutta, D., Herath, S., Musiake, K. (2003). A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology 277 (1–2), 2449.Google Scholar
Eakin, H., Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31, 365–94.Google Scholar
Ebert, A., Kerle, N., Stein, A. (2009). Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data. Natural Hazards 48 (2), 275–94.Google Scholar
Eboli, F., Parrado, R., Roson, R. (2010). Climate-change feedback on economic growth: Explorations with a dynamic general equilibrium model. Environment and Developments Economics 15 (5), 515–33.Google Scholar
ECLAC – Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2003). Handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters. Santiago de Chile: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
EEA – European Environment Agency (2016). Corine Land Cover. land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover [last accessed: January 10, 2017].Google Scholar
EEA, OECD – European Environment Agency-Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2013). European environment agency-organization for economic co-operation and development database on economic instruments. www2.oecd.org/ecoinst/queries/ [last accessed: September 30, 2013].Google Scholar
Egermann, M., Hutter, G. (2014). Perspektiven für die Annäherung der Raum- und Transitionforschung – am Beispiel des EU-Projekts ARTS. Planung Neu Denken 3, 19.Google Scholar
Egli, T. (1996). Hochwasserschutz und Raumplanung-Schutz vor Naturgefahren mit Instrumenten der Raumplanung dargestellt am Beispiel von Hochwaser und Murgängen. Unpublished dissertation, Zürich: ETH Zürich.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. R., Pais, J. (2006). Race, class, and hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research 35 (2), 295321.Google Scholar
Elmer, F., Kreibich, H., Seifert, I., Thieken, A. H. (2010). A delphi method expert survey to derive standards for flood damage data collection. Risk Analysis 30 (1), 107–24.Google Scholar
Embleton-Hamann, C. (2007). Geomorphological hazards in Austria. Geomorphology for the future–joint meeting of the Commission on Geomorphology of the Austrian geographical society and the IAG working group on geomorphology and global environmental change. Obergurgl Austria: Innsbruck University Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M., Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103 (4), 9621023.Google Scholar
Emrich, C. T. (2005). Social vulnerability in US metropolitan areas: Improvements in hazard vulnerability assessment. Unpublished dissertation, Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina.Google Scholar
Emrich, C. T., Cutter, S. L. (2011). Social vulnerability to climate-sensitive hazards in the southern United States. Weather, Climate, and Society 3 (3), 193208.Google Scholar
Enarson, E., Chakrabarti, P. D. (eds.) (2009). Women, gender and disaster: Global issues and initiatives. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Enarson, E., Morrow, B. H. (eds.) (1998). The gendered terrain of disaster: Through women’s eyes. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Eriksen, S. H., Brown, K., Kelly, P. M. (2005). The dynamics of vulnerability: Locating coping strategies in Kenya and Tanzania. The Geographical Journal 171 (4), 287305.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. (1976). Everything in its path. Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Erikson, K. (1994). A new species of trouble. The human experience of modern disaster. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Escaleras, M., Anbarci, N., Register, C. (2006). Public sector corruption and natural disasters: A potentially deadly interaction. Boca Raton: Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University.Google Scholar
Etkin, D., Haque, C., Brooks, G. (eds.) (2003). An assessment of natural hazards and disasters in Canada. Kluwer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
European Commission (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2007). EU Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the European Council on the assessment and management of flood risks. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2010). Commission staff working paper – risk assessment and mapping guidelines for disaster management. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013a). Council Regulation (EU) No 733/2013 of 22 July 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 994/98 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2013b). Green paper on the insurance of natural and man-made disaster. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission (2014). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects (Report). Economic appraisal tool for cohesion policy 2014–2020. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2017). Resilience. European civil protection and humanitarian aid operations. http://ec.europa.eu/echo/what/humanitarian-aid/resilience_en [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
European Group on Tort Law (2005). Principles of European Tort Law. Vienna, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Evans, T., Ostrom, E., Gibson, C. (2002). Scaling issues with social data in integrated assessment modelling. Intergrated Assessment 3 (2–3), 135–50.Google Scholar
Eves, C. (2002). The long-term impact of flooding on residential property values. Property Management 20 (4), 214–27.Google Scholar
Eyre, A. (2006). Remembering: Community commemoration after disaster. In Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E. L., Dynes, R. (eds.), Handbook of disaster research. New York: Springer, pp: 441–55.Google Scholar
Faas, A. J., Jones, E. C., Whiteford, L. M., Tobin, G. A., Murphy, A. D. (2014). Gendered access to formal and informal resources in postdisaster development in the Ecuadorian Andes. Mountain Research and Development 34 (3), 223–34.Google Scholar
Fell, R. (1994). Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 31, 261–72.Google Scholar
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (2001). Ensuring that structures built on fill in or near special flood hazard areas are reasonably safe from flooding in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Program. www.ct.gov/demhs/lib/demhs/hmgp/guidance/tb10_01_fill_in_sfha.pdf [last accessed: May 31, 2016].Google Scholar
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (2013). National Flood Insurance Program community rating system coordinator’s manual. www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/8768?id=2434 [last accessed: September 23, 2013].Google Scholar
FEMA – Federal Emergency Management Agency (2015). Brazoria County adopts freeboard regulation in combatting flood loss. Mitigation best practices portfolio. www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1441822561672-254e32a71d6e179b8d32ecfbbb1358d4/08-Brazoria-County-Adopts-Freeboard-Regulation-in-Combatting-Flood-Loss_web.pdf [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Fekete, A. (2009). Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (2), 393403.Google Scholar
Fekete, A. (2012). Spatial disaster vulnerability and risk assessments: Challenges in their quality and acceptance. Natural Hazards 61 (3), 1161–78.Google Scholar
Fekete, A., Damm, M., Birkmann, J. (2010). Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards 55 (3), 729–47.Google Scholar
Fekete, A., Hufschmidt, G. (2014). From application to evaluation: Addressing the usefulness of resilience and vulnerability. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5 (1), 12.Google Scholar
Fekete, A., Hufschmidt, G., Kruse, S. (2014). Benefits and challenges of resilience and vulnerability for disaster risk management. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5 (1), 320.Google Scholar
Fekete, A., Hufschmidt, G. (eds.) (2016). Atlas der Verwundbarkeit und Resilienz – Pilotausgabe zu Deutschland, Österreich, Liechtenstein und Schweiz; Köln & Bonn | Atlas of Vulnerability and Resilience – Pilot version for Germany, Austria, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. www.kavoma.de/atlas-vr [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Fekete, A., Tzavella, K., Armas, L., Binner, J., Garschagen, M., Giupponi, C., Mojtahed, V., Pettita, M., Schneiderbauer, S., Serre, D. (2015). Critical data source; tool or even infrastructure? Challenges of geographic information systems and remote sensing for disaster risk governance. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 4 (4), 1848–69.Google Scholar
Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Dokken, D. J., Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Bilir, T. E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K. L., Estrada, Y. O., Genova, R. C., Girma, B., Kissel, E. S., Levy, A. N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P. R., White, L. L. (eds.) (2014) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finch, C., Emrich, C. T., Cutter, S. L. (2010). Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Population & Environment 31 (4), 179202.Google Scholar
Fletcher, S., Cox, R. S., Scannell, L., Heykoop, C., Tobin-Gurley, J., Peek, L. (2016). Youth creating disaster recovery and resilience: A multi-site arts-based youth engagement research project. Children, Youth and Environments 26 (1), 148–63.Google Scholar
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience. The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16 (3), 253–67.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C., Walker, B., Bengtsson, J., Berkes, F., Colding, J., Danell, K., Falkenmark, M., Gordon, L., Kasperson, R. E., Kautsky, N., Kinzig, A., Levin, S., Maler, K. G., Moberg, F., Ohlsson, L., Olsson, P., Ostrom, E., Reid, W., Rockstrom, J., Savenije, H., and Svedin, U. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Scientific background paper on resilience for the process of the world summit on sustainable development. Stockholm, Sweden: Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15 (4), 20.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Colding, J., Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis. Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp: 352–87.Google Scholar
Folmer, H., Johansson-Stenman, O. (2011). Does environmental economics produce aeroplanes without engines? On the need for an environmental social science. Environmental and Resource Economics 48 (3), 337–61.Google Scholar
Forino, G., von Meding, J., Brewer, G., Gajendran, T. (2014). Disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation policy in Australia. Procedia Economics and Finance 18, 473–82.Google Scholar
Fotheringham, A. S., Brundson, C., Charlton, M. (2002). Geographically weighted regression: The analysis of spatially varying relationships. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. (2000). Why is cost-benefit analysis so controversial? The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (S2), 913–30.Google Scholar
Frazier, T. G., Wood, N., Yarnal, B. (2010). Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida. Applied Geography 30 (4), 506–17.Google Scholar
Frazier, T. G., Wood, N., Yarnal, B., Bauer, D. H. (2010). Influence of potential sea level rise on societal vulnerability to hurricane storm-surge hazards, Sarasota County, Florida. Applied Geography 30 (4), 490505.Google Scholar
Frazier, T. G., Thompson, C. M., Dezzani, R. J., Butsick, D. (2013). Spatial and temporal quantification of resilience at the community scale. Applied Geography 42, 95107.Google Scholar
Frazier, T. G., Thompson, C. M., Dezzani, R. J. (2014). A framework for the development of the SERV model: A Spatially Explicit Resilience-Vulnerability model. Applied Geography 51, 158–72.Google Scholar
Freeman, A. M. (2003). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Washington: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. (1990). Vergleichende Analyse von Institutionen: Die Sicht der politischen Ökonomie. Staatswissenschaft und Staatpraxis 2, 158–75.Google Scholar
Froot, K. A. (2001). The market for catastrophe risk: A clinical examination. Journal of Financial Economics 60 (2–3), 529–71.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S. (2009). Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria – Paradigms of vulnerability revisited. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (2), 337–52.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S., Heiss, K., Hübl, J. (2007). Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 7 (5), 495506.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S., Keiler, M., Sokratov, S., Shnyparkov, A. (2013). Spatiotemporal dynamics: The need for an innovative approach in mountain hazard risk management. Natural Hazards 68 (3), 1217–41.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S., Keiler, M., Zischg, A. (2015). A spatiotemporal multi-hazard exposure assessment based on property data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 15 (9), 2127–42.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S., Kuhlicke, C., Meyer, V. (2011). Editorial for the special issue: Vulnerability to natural hazards – the challenge of integration. Natural Hazards 58 (2), 609–19.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S., McAlpin, M. C. (2005). The net benefit of public expenditures on avalanche defence structures in the municipality of Davos, Switzerland. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5 (3), 319–30.Google Scholar
Fuchs, S., Röthlisberger, V., Thaler, T., Zischg, A., Keiler, M. (2017). Natural hazard management from a co-evolutionary perspective: Exposure and policy response in the European Alps. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107 (2), 382–92.Google Scholar
Fuller, R. B., Snyder, J. (1969). Operating manual for spaceship earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Furedi, F. (2007). The changing meaning of disaster. Area 39 (4), 482–9.Google Scholar
Füssel, H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change 17, 155–67.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. C. (2007). Resilience of traditional societies in facing natural hazards. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 16 (4), 522–44.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. C. (2015). People’s response to disasters in the Philippines: Vulnerability, capacities and resilience. Palgrave Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. C., Clavé, E., Vibert, O., Dedi, A., Denain, J. C., Efendi, Y., Grancher, D., Liamon, C. C., Sari, D. R., Setiawan, R. (2008). Ethnic groups’ response to the 26th December 2004 earthquake and tsunami in Aceh, Indonesia. Natural Hazards 47 (1), 1738.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. C., Maceda, E. A., Stasiak, E., Le Berre, I., Espaldon, M. V. O. (2009). Sustainable livelihoods and people’s vulnerability in the face of coastal hazards. Journal of Coastal Conservation 13 (2–3), 119–29.Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. C., Texier, P. (2010). Religions, natural hazards, and disasters: An introduction. Religion 40 (2), 81–4.Google Scholar
Gain, A. K., Giupponi, C. (2015). A dynamic assessment of water scarcity risk in the Lower Brahmaputra River Basin: An integrated approach. Ecological Indicators 48, 120–31.Google Scholar
Gain, A. K., Giupponi, C., Renaud, F. G. (2012). Climate change adaptation and vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in developing countries: A generalized framework and a feasibility study in Bangladesh. Water 4 (2), 345–66.Google Scholar
Gall, M. (2013). From Social Vulnerability to Resilience: Measuring Progress toward Disaster Risk Reduction. InterSecTions (Interdisciplinary Security Connections) 13/2013. Bonn: United Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security.Google Scholar
Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience in children’s adaptation to negative life events and stressed environments. Pediatrics 20 (9), 459–66.Google Scholar
Garrick, D., Whitten, S., Coggan, A. (2013). Understanding the evolution and performance of water markets and allocation policy: A transaction costs analysis framework. Ecological Economics 88, 195205.Google Scholar
Garschagen, M. (2013). Resilience and organisational institutionalism from a cross-cultural perspective: An exploration based on urban climate change adaptation in Vietnam. Natural Hazards 67 (1), 2546.Google Scholar
Gerl, T., Kreibich, H., Franco, G., Marechal, D., Schröter, K. (2016). A review of flood loss models as basis for harmonization and benchmarking. PLoS One 11 (7), e0159791.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., Ahn, T. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics 32, 217–39.Google Scholar
Gill, J. C., Malamud, B. D. (2014). Reviewing and visualizing the interactions of natural hazards. Reviews of Geophysics 52 (4), 680722.Google Scholar
Giupponi, C., Biscaro, C. (2015). Vulnerabilities—bibliometric analysis and literature review of evolving concepts. Environmental Research Letters 10 (12), 123002.Google Scholar
Giupponi, C., Mojtahed, V., Gain, A., Balbi, S. (2015). Integrated risk assessment of water-related disasters. In Paron, P., Di Baldassarre, G., Shroder, J. F. (eds.), Hydro-meteorological hazards, risks, and disasters. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp: 163200.Google Scholar
Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review 4 (3), 136–43.Google Scholar
Goklany, I. M. (2007). Integrated strategies to reduce vulnerability and advance adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12 (5), 755–86.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. E. (ed.) (2012). Collaborative resilience. Moving through crisis to opportunity. Cambridge/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, B. K., Vado, L. A. (2007). Public responses to agricultural disasters: Rethinking the role of government. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 55 (4), 399417.Google Scholar
Google Maps (2017a). Picture of Rome and the city map, showing an analogy with the circular shape. www.google.at/maps/place/Rom,+Italien/@41.909986,12.3959155,11z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x132f6196f9928ebb:0xb90f770693656e38!8m2!3d41.9027835!4d12.4963655 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Google Maps (2017b). Picture of Philadelphia and a map of the city showing its typically rectangular shape. www.google.at/maps/place/Philadelphia,+Pennsylvania,+USA/@40.0046684,-75.2581155,11z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x89c6b7d8d4b54beb:0x89f514d88c3e58c1!8m2!3d39.9525839!4d-75.1652215 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Google Maps (2017c). Picture of the city of Palma Nuova and its typically star shaped planimetry. www.google.at/maps/place/33057+Palmanova,+Udine,+Italien/@45.9055387,13.3056509,16z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x477bb089f331a869:0x5d2129dbb7a04c79!8m2!3d45.909424!4d13.3057286 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Google Maps (2017d). Map of Naples’ historical center. www.google.at/maps/search/Map+of+Naples%E2%80%99+historical+center/@26.136492,-81.8074225,15z/data=!3m1!4b1 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Gotham, K. F., Campanella, R. (2011). Coupled vulnerability and resilience: The dynamics of cross-scale interactions in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ecology and Society 16 (3), 12.Google Scholar
Graf, W. L. (2001). Damage control: Restoring the physical integrity of America’s rivers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (1), 127.Google Scholar
Graveline, N. (2016). Economic calibrated models for water allocation in agricultural production: A review. Environmental Modelling & Software 81, 1225.Google Scholar
Green, C. (2003). Handbook of water economics. Principles and practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Green, C. (2004). The evaluation of vulnerability to flooding. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 13 (4), 323–29.Google Scholar
Green, C., Tunstall, S. M. (1991). Is the economic evaluation of environmental resources possible? Journal of Environmental Management 33 (2), 123–41.Google Scholar
Green, R. (2008). Informal settlements and natural hazard vulnerability in rapid growth cities. In Bosher, L. (ed.), Hazards and the built environment: Attaining built-in resilience. Oxon: Taylor & Francis, pp: 218–37.Google Scholar
Greene, D. L., Kahn, J. R., Gibson, R. C. (1999). Fuel economy rebound effect for U.S. household vehicles. The Energy Journal 20 (3), 131.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gruber, M. (2008). Alternative solutions for public and private catastrophe funding in Austria. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science 8 (4), 603–16.Google Scholar
Guillard-Gonçalves, C., Cutter, S. L., Emrich, C. T., Zezere, J. L. (2015). Application of Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) and delineation of natural risk zones in Greater Lisbon, Portugal. Journal of Risk Research 18 (5), 651–74.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31 (1), 425–39.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H. (2003). Adaptive dancing. Interactions between social resilience and ecological crises. In Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp: 3352.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H. (2010). Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecology and Society 15 (2), 18.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S. (eds.) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, Covelo, London: Island press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L., Light, S. S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences 39 (4), 323–34.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S., Light, S. S. (eds.) (1995). Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jong, P., Nooteboom, S., Bergsma, E. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy 13 (6), 459–71.Google Scholar
Hagan, P., Maguire, B. (2007). Disasters and communities. Understanding social resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 22 (2), 1620.Google Scholar
Hahn, M. B., Riederer, A. M., Foster, S. O. (2009). The livelihood vulnerability index: A pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—A case study in Mozambique. Global Environmental Change 19 (1), 7488.Google Scholar
Haimes, Y., Horowitz, B., Lambert, J., Santos, J., Lian, C., Crowther, K. (2005). Inoperability input-output model for interdependent infrastructure sectors. I: Theory and methodology. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 11 (2), 6779.Google Scholar
Hall, B., Kerr, M. L. (1991). 1991-1992 green index. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hall, J. W., Brown, S., Nicholls, R. J., Pidgeon, N. F., Watson, R. T. (2012). Proportionate adaptation. Nature Climate Change 2 (12), 833–34.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S. (2008). An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Analysis 28 (3), 779–99.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S. (2014). Economic resilience: Definition and measurement. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Bonzanigo, L., Fay, M., Kane, T., Narloch, U., Rozenberg, J., Treguer, D., Vogt-Schilb, A. (2015). Shock waves: Managing the impacts of climate change on poverty. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S., Bangalore, M., Vogt-Schilb, A. C. (2016). Assessing socioeconomic resilience to floods in 90 countries. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S., Green, C., Nicholls, R. J., Corfee-Morlot, J. (2013). Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change 3 (9), 802–6.Google Scholar
Hallegate, S., Henriet, F., Corfee-Morlot, J. (2011). The economics of climate change impacts and policy benefits at city scale: A conceptual framework. Climatic Change 104 (1), 5187.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. J. (2007). Coastal landscape and the hedonic price of accommodation. Ecological Economics 62 (3–4), 594602.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. J., Chen, A. S., Djordjevic, S., Butler, D., Mark, O. (2015). Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review. Urban Water Journal 12 (1), 1429.Google Scholar
Hanak, E., Stryjewski, E. (2012). California’s water market. By the numbers – update 2012. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Handmer, J. W. (1986). ANUFLOOD in New Zealand: Part 2, Background to flood loss measurement. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hanley, N. D., Spash, C. L. (1994). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Edward Elgar, Hampshire: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Harou, J. J., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Rosenberg, D. E., Medellín-Azuara, J., Lund, J. R., Howitt, R. E. (2009). Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. Journal of Hydrology 375 (3–4), 627–43.Google Scholar
Härtel, C. E. J., Latemore, G. M. (2011). Mud and tears: The human face of disaster – A case study of the Queensland floods, January 2011. Journal of Management and Organization 17 (6), 864–72.Google Scholar
Hausmann, P., Kurz, C., Rebuffoni, G. (2012). Floods in Switzerland – an underestimated risk. Zurich: Swiss Re.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. L., Maurer, K. (2010). Bonding, bridging and linking: How social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. British Journal of Social Work 40 (6), 1777–93.Google Scholar
Healey, P. (2009). In search of the “strategic” in spatial strategy making. Planning Theory & Practice 10 (4), 439–57.Google Scholar
Heckelei, T., Britz, W., Zhang, Y. (2012). Positive mathematical programming approaches – Recent developments in literature and applied modelling. www.fupress.net/index.php/bae/article/view/10567 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Heesen, J., Lorenz, D. F., Nagenborg, M., Voss, M., Wenzel, B. (2014). Blind spots on Achilles’ heel. On the limitations of Vulnerability and resilience mapping in research. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 5 (1), 7485.Google Scholar
Hempel, L., Lorenz, D. F. (2014). Resilience as an element of a sociology of expression. Behemoth 7 (2), 2672.Google Scholar
Henkel, K. E., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L. (2006). Institutional discrimination, individual racism and Hurricane Katrina. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 6 (1), 99124.Google Scholar
Herman, O. W. (1969). Econometrics as pioneering in nonexperimental model building. Econometrica 37 (3), 369–81.Google Scholar
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E., Pahl-Wostl, C. (2012). Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: The role of institutional resilience. Ecology and Society 17 (2), 8.Google Scholar
Hewitt, K. (1983). The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In Hewitt, K. (ed.), Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology. Boston: Allen & Unwin Inc., pp: 332.Google Scholar
Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions of risk: A geographical introduction to disasters. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Hewitt, K., Burton, I. (1971). The hazardousness of a place: A regional ecology of damaging events. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Heyes, A. (2000). Implementing environmental regulation: Enforcement and compliance. Journal of Regulatory Economics 17 (2), 107–29.Google Scholar
Hill, E. W., Wial, H., Wolman, H. (2008). Exploring regional economic resilience. Berkeley: Institute of Regional Economic Development, University of California. www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/59420 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Hinkel, J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science – policy interface. Global Environmental Change 21 (1), 198208.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E., Schröder, K. E. E., Wells, M., Malek, M. (2002). Communal versus individualistic construction of sense of mastery in facing life challenges. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 21 (4), 362–69.Google Scholar
Hochrainer, S. (2006). Macroeconomic risk management against natural disasters: Analysis focussed on governments in developing countries. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hochrainer, S. (2009). Assessing the macroeconomic impacts of natural disasters – are there any? Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1988). Economics and institution. A manifesto for a modern institutional economics. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2000). What is the essence of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues 34, 317–29.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2003). The hidden persuaders: Institutions and individuals in economic theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (2), 159–75.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues 40 (1), 125.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2007). Institutions and individuals: Interaction and evolution. Organization Studies 28 (1), 95116.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M., Jiang, S. (2007). The economics of corruption and the corruption of economics: An institutionalist perspective. Journal of Economic Issues 41 (4), 1043–61.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4, 123.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In Clark, W. C., Munn, R. E. (eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp: 292317.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In Schulze, P. (ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints. Washington: National Academy, pp: 3144.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social system. Ecosystems 4 (5), 390405.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H., Peterson, G. D. (2002). Sustainability and panarchies. In Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, Covelo, London: Island press, pp: 63102.Google Scholar
Holub, M., Fuchs, S. (2008). Benefits of local structural protection to mitigate torrent-related hazards. In Brebbia, C. A., Beriatos, E. (eds.), Risk analysis VI: Simulation and hazard mitigation. Southampton. Boston: WIT Press, pp: 401–11.Google Scholar
Holub, M., Fuchs, S. (2009). Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria – Legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (2), 523–37.Google Scholar
Holub, M., Suda, J., Fuchs, S. (2012). Mountain hazards: Reducing vulnerability by adapted building design. Environmental Earth Sciences 66 (7), 1853–70.Google Scholar
Höppner, C., Whittle, R., Bründl, M., Buchecker, M. (2012). Linking social capacities and risk communication in Europe: A gap between theory and practice? Natural Hazards 64 (2), 1753–78.Google Scholar
Horridge, M., Madden, J., Wittwer, G. (2005). The impact of the 2002–2003 drought on Australia. Journal of Policy Modelling 27 (3), 285308.Google Scholar
Hossain, K., Quaik, S., Ismail, N., Rafatullah, M., Ali, I., Hatta, Z. A., Avasn, M., Pant, G., Rameeja, S. (2015). Climate change-perceived impacts on agriculture, vulnerability and response strategies for improving adaptation practice in developing countries (South asian region). International Journal of Agricultural Research 11 (1), 112.Google Scholar
HUD – US Department of Housing and Urban Development Department (2015). Sandy damage estimates based on FEMA IA registrant inspection data. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/sandy-damage-estimates-based-on-fema-ia-registrant-inspection-data [last accessed: October 28, 2016].Google Scholar
HUD – US Department of Housing and Urban Development Department (2017). National disaster resilience competition. HUD Exchange. www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg-dr/resilient-recovery/ [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
Hufschmidt, G. (2011). A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts. Natural Hazards 58 (2), 621–43.Google Scholar
Husby, T. G., Mechler, R., Jongman, B. (2016). What if Dutch investors started worrying about flood risk? Implications for disaster risk reduction. Regional Environmental Change 16 (2), 565–74.Google Scholar
Hutter, G. (2007). Strategic planning for long-term flood risk management – some suggestions for learning how to make strategy at regional and local level. International Planning Studies 12 (3), 273–89.Google Scholar
Hutter, G. (2016). Collaborative governance and rare floods in urban regions – dealing with uncertainty and surprise. Environmental Science & Policy 55, 302–8.Google Scholar
Hutter, G., Kuhlicke, C. (2013). Resilience, talk and action – Exploring the meanings of resilience in the context of planning and institutions. Planning Practice & Research 28 (3), 294306.Google Scholar
Hutter, G., Leibenath, M., Mattissek, A. (2014). Governing through resilience? Exploring flood protection in Dresden, Germany. Social Sciences 3 (2), 272–87.Google Scholar
Hutter, G., Schinke, R. (2016). Learning from and for rare floods in Dresden – how public officials interpret damage simulation results at the building type level. E3S Web of Conferences 7 (16005), 18.Google Scholar
Huxham, Ch., Vangen, S. E. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Milton Park/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
ICC – Insurance Compensation Consortium (2014). Insurance compensation consortium. www.consorseguros.es/web/ [last accessed: February 02, 2014].Google Scholar
ICPR – International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (2001). Rhine-Atlas. Koblenz: International Rhine Commission for the Protection of the Rhine. www.rheinatlas.de [last accessed January 10, 2017].Google Scholar
IDGEC – International Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (1999). Institutional dimensions of global environmental change. Bonn: IHDP Report.Google Scholar
IFRC – International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (2012). Law and regulation for the reduction of risk from natural hazards in Austria: A national law desk study. Geneva: IFRC.Google Scholar
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2017). Global Platform on DRR. Bulletin 141 (11), 26 May 2017. http://enb.iisd.org/isdr/globalplatform/2017/html/enbplus141num11e.html [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014a). IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5) (No. WGII). Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014b). Annex II: Glossary. In Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K., Meyer, L. A. (eds.), Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–30.Google Scholar
ISTAT – Istituto nazionale di statistica (2011). 14 Censimento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni. http://dawinci.istat.it/MD/dawinciMD.jsp [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Janssen, M. A., Schoon, M. L., Ke, K. W., and Borner, K. (2006). Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16, 240–52.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional re(turns) and the strategic – relational approach. Environment and Planning A 33, 1213–35.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. (2011). Metagovernance. In Bevir, M. (ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance. London: Sage, pp: 106123.Google Scholar
Joas, H., Knöbl, W. (2013). Sozialtheorie. Zwanzig einführende Vorlesungen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2011). Creating and enabling environment for reducing disaster risk: Recent experience of regulatory frameworks for land, planning and building in low and middle-income countries. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. P., Stanforth, A., Lulla, V., Luber, G. (2012). Developing an applied extreme heat vulnerability index utilizing socioeconomic and environmental data. Applied Geography 35 (1–2), 2331.Google Scholar
Jones, E. C., Faas, A. J., Murphy, A. D., Tobin, G. A., Whiteford, L. M., McCarty, C. (2013). Cross-cultural and site-based influences on demographic, well-being, and social network predictors of risk perception in hazard and disaster settings in Ecuador and Mexico. Human Nature 24 (1), 532.Google Scholar
Jones, E. C., Murphy, A. D., Faas, A. J., Tobin, G. A., McCarty, C., Whiteford, L. M. (2015). Postdisaster reciprocity and the development of inequality in personal networks. Economic Anthropology 2 (2), 385404.Google Scholar
Jones, E. C., Tobin, G. A., McCarty, C., Whiteford, L., Murphy, A., Faas, A. J., Yepes, H. (2014). Articulation of personal network structure with gendered well-being in disaster and relocation settings. In Roeder, L. W. (ed.), Issues of Gender and Sexual Orientation in Humanitarian Emergencies. Dordrecht: Springer, pp: 1931.Google Scholar
Jongman, B., Koks, E. E., Husby, T. G., Ward, P. J. (2014). Increasing flood exposure in the Netherlands: Implications for risk financing. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14 (5), 1245–55.Google Scholar
Jongman, B., Kreibich, H., Apel, H., Barredo, J. I., Bates, P. D., Feyen, L., Gericke, A., Neal, J., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Ward, P. J. (2012). Comparative flood damage model assessment: Towards a European approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12 (12), 3733–52.Google Scholar
Jongman, B., Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Coughlan de Perez, E., van Aalst, M. K., Kron, W., Ward, P. J. (2015). Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (8), E227180.Google Scholar
Jonkman, S. N., Bockarjova, M., Kok, M., Bernardini, P. (2008). Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics 66 (1), 7790.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. (2013). Resilience as embedded neoliberalism: A governmentality approach. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (1), 3852.Google Scholar
Jun, K. S., Chung, E. S., Sung, J. Y., Lee, K. S. (2011). Development of spatial water resources vulnerability index considering climate change impacts. Science of The Total Environment 409 (24), 5228–42.Google Scholar
Kahn, M. E. (2005). The death toll from natural disasters: The role of income, gegraphy and institutions. Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2), 271–84.Google Scholar
Kajitani, Y., Tatano, H. (2009). Estimation of lifeline resilience factors based on surveys of Japanese industries. The Professional Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute 25 (4), 755–76.Google Scholar
Kaniasty, K. (2012). Predicting social psychological well-being following trauma: The role of postdisaster social support. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 4 (1), 2233.Google Scholar
Kappes, M., Papathoma-Köhle, M., Keiler, M. (2012). Assessing physical vulnerability for multi-hazards using an indicator-based methodology. Applied Geography 32 (2), 577–90.Google Scholar
Kapucu, N., Hawkins, C. V., Rivera, F. I. (eds.) (2013). Disaster resiliency: Interdisciplinary perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kapucu, N., Ozerdem, A. (2011). Managing emergencies and crises. Burlington: Jones and Barlett.Google Scholar
Karagiorgos, K., Heiser, M., Thaler, T., Hübl, J., Fuchs, S. (2016). Micro-sized enterprises: Vulnerability to flash floods. Natural Hazards 84 (2), 1091–107.Google Scholar
Kasperson, R. E., Kasperson, J. X., Dow, K. (2001). Vulnerability, equity, and global environmental change. In Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E. (eds.), Global environmental risk. Sterling: Earthscan. pp: 247–72.Google Scholar
Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Turner, B. L. (eds.) (1995). Regions at risk: comparisons of threatened environments. Tokyo: United Nations University.Google Scholar
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8 (2), 177–87.Google Scholar
Kates, R. W., Travis, W. R., Wilbanks, T. J. (2012). Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (19), 7156–61.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Kayes, D. C. (2015). Organizational resilience. How learning sustains organizations in crisis, disaster, and breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, M., Sakdadolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde 67 (1), 519.Google Scholar
Keiler, M., Zischg, A., Fuchs, S., Hama, M., Stötter, J. (2005). Avalanche related damage potential – changes of persons and mobile values since the mid-twentieth century, case study Galtür. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5 (1), 4958.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. M., Adger, W. N. (2000). Theory and practise in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47 (4), 325–52.Google Scholar
Kelman, I., Mather, T. A. (2008). Living with volcanoes: The sustainable livelihoods approach for volcano-related opportunities. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 172 (3), 189–98.Google Scholar
Kelman, I., Spence, R. (2004). An overview of flood actions on buildings. Engineering Geology 73 (3–4), 297309.Google Scholar
Kelman, I., Gaillard, J. C., Lewis, J., Mercer, J. (2016). Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change. Natural Hazards 82, S129S143.Google Scholar
Khasalamwa, S. (2009). Is “build back better” a response to vulnerability? Analysis of post-tsunami humanitarian interventions in Sri Lanka. Norwegian Journal of Geography 63 (1), 7388.Google Scholar
Kiedrzyńska, E., Kiedrzyński, M., Zalewski, M. (2014). Sustainable floodplain management for flood prevention and water quality improvement. Natural Hazards 76 (2), 955–77.Google Scholar
Kimhi, S. (2014). Levels of resilience: Associations among individual, community, and national resilience. Journal of Health Psychology 21 (2), 164–70.Google Scholar
Kind, J. M. (2014). Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. Journal of Flood Risk Management 7 (2), 103–17.Google Scholar
King, D. (2001). Uses and limitations of socioeconomic indicators of community vulnerability to natural hazards: Data and disasters in Northern Australia. Natural Hazards 24 (2), 147–56.Google Scholar
King, D., MacGregor, C. (2000). Using social indicators to measure community vulnerability to natural hazards. Australian Journal of Emergency Management 15 (3), 52–7.Google Scholar
Klein, R. J., Nicholls, R. J., Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 5 (1), 3545.Google Scholar
Kleindorfer, P. R., Kunreuther, H. (1999). The complementary roles of mitigation and insurance in managing catastrophic risks. Risk Analysis 19 (4), 727–38.Google Scholar
Klinke, A., Renn, O. (2002). A new approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk-based, precaution-based, and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis 22 (6), 1071–94.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, R. (2010). Addressing corruption in Haiti. Vienna: UNDOC.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Medina, R., Cova, T. J. (2011). Visualizing diurnal population change in urban areas for emergency management. Professional Geographer 63 (1), 113–30.Google Scholar
Koks, E. E., Jongman, B., Husby, T. G., Botzen, W. J. W. (2015). Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environmental Science & Policy 47, 4252.Google Scholar
Koontz, T. M. (2003). An introduction to the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework for forest management research. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Korf, B., Habullah, S., Hollenbach, P., Klem, B. (2010). The gift of disaster: The commodification of good intentions in post-tsunami Sri-Lanka. Disasters 34 (S1), s60s77.Google Scholar
Kousky, C. (2010). Learning from extreme events: Risk perceptions after the flood. Land Economics 86 (3), 395422.Google Scholar
Kousky, C., Kunreuther, H. (2013). Addressing affordability in the national flood insurance program. Washington: Resources for the Future and the Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center.Google Scholar
Kreibich, H., Piroth, K., Seifert, I., Maiwald, H., Kunert, U., Schwarz, J., Merz, B., Thieken, A. H. (2009). Is flow velocity a significant parameter in flood damage modelling? Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (5), 1679–92.Google Scholar
Kreibich, H., Seifert, I., Merz, B., Thieken, A. H. (2010). Development of FLEMOcs – A new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector. Hydrological Sciences Journal 55 (8), 1302–14.Google Scholar
Kreibich, H., Thieken, A. H. (2008). Assessment of damage caused by high groundwater inundation. Water Resources Research 44 (9), W09409.Google Scholar
Kreibich, H., Thieken, A. H., Petrow, T., Müller, M., Merz, B. (2005). Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures – lessons learned from the Elbe flood in August 2002. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5 (1), 117–26.Google Scholar
Kreibich, H., van den Berg, J. C. J. M., Bouwer, L. M., Bubeck, P., Ciavola, P., Green, C., Hallegatte, S., Logar, I., Meyer, V., Schwarze, R., Thieken, A. H. (2014). Costing natural hazards. Nature Climate Change 4 (5), 303–6.Google Scholar
Kroll, C. A., Landis, J. D., Shen, Q., Stryker, S. (1991). Economic impacts of the Loma Prieta earthquake: A focus on small business. Studies on the Loma Prieta Earthquake. Berkely: University of California, Transportation Centre.Google Scholar
Krzysztofowicz, R., Davis, D. R. (1983). Category-unit loss functions for flood forecast-response system evaluation. Water Resources Research 19 (6), 1476–80.Google Scholar
Kuhlicke, C. (2013). Resilience: A capacity and a myth: Findings from an in-depth case study in disaster management research. Natural Hazards 67 (1), 6176.Google Scholar
Kuhlicke, C., Scolobig, A., Tapsell, S., Steinführer, A., De Marchi, B. (2011). Contextualizing social vulnerability: Findings from case studies across Europe. Natural Hazards 58 (2), 789810.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H. (1996). Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 12 (2–3), 171–87.Google Scholar
Kunreuther, H., Pauly, M. (2006). Rules rather than discretion: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Risk Uncertainty 33 (1), 101–16.Google Scholar
Kuttner, R. (1999). Everything for sale. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lammond, J., Proverbs, D., Hammond, F. (2010). The impact of flooding on the price of residential property: A transactional analysis of the UK market. Housing Studies 25 (3), 335–56.Google Scholar
Larkin, S., Fox-Lent, C., Eisenberg, D. A., Trump, B. D., Wallace, S., Chadderton, C., Linkov, I. (2015). Benchmarking agency and organizational practices in resilience decision making. Environment Systems & Decisions, 35 (2), 185–95.Google Scholar
Larson, L., Pasencia, D. (2001). No adverse impact: New direction in floodplain management policy. Natural Hazards Review 2 (4), 167–81.Google Scholar
Latora, V., Marchiori, M. (2001). Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Physical Review Letters 87 (19), 198701.Google Scholar
Lei, Y., Wang, J., Yue, Y., Zhou, H., Yin, W. 2014. Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective. Natural Hazards, 70, 609–27.Google Scholar
Leiter, A. M., Pruckner, G. J. (2009). Proportionality of willingness to pay to small changes in risk: The impact of attitudinal factors in scope tests. Environmental and Resource Economics 42 (2), 169–86.Google Scholar
Lenzen, M. (2011). Aggregation versus disaggregation in input-output analysis of the environment. Economic Systems Research 23 (1), 7389.Google Scholar
Leone, F., Asté, J.-P., Leroi, E. (1996). L’évaluation de la vulnérabilité aux mouvements du terrain: Pour une meilleure quantification du risque. Revue de Géographie Alpine 84 (1), 3546.Google Scholar
Leone, F., Asté, J.-P., Velásquez, E. (1995). Contribution des constats d’endommagement au développement d’une méthodologie d’évaluation de la vulnérabilité appliquée aux phénomènes de mouvements de terrain. Bulletin de l’Association de Géographes 1995 (4), 350–71.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. (2011). The hidden perpetrator of under-development and vulnerability to natural hazards and disasters. JAMBA: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies 3 (2), 464–75.Google Scholar
Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Mechler, R., Hochrainer, S. (2011). Insurance against losses from natural disasters in developing countries. Evidence, gaps and the way forward. Journal of Integrated Disaster Risk Management 1 (1), 5981.Google Scholar
Little, R. G. (2002). Controlling cascading failure: Understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology 9 (1), 109–23.Google Scholar
Little, R. G. (2004). A socio-technical systems approach to understanding and enhancing the reliability of interdependent infrastructure systems. International Journal of Emergency Management 2 (1-2), 98110.Google Scholar
Liverman, D. M. (1990). Vulnerability to global environmental change. In Kasperson, R. E., Dow, K., Golding, D., Kasperson, J. X. (eds.), Understanding global environmental change: The contributions of risk analysis and management. Worcester: Clark University, pp: 2744.Google Scholar
Lo, A. Y., Spash, C. (2013). Deliberative monetary valuation: In search of a democratic and value plural approach to environmental policy. Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (4), 768–89.Google Scholar
Lobo, J., Bettencourt, L. M., Strumsky, D., West, G. B. (2013). Urban scaling and the production function for cities. PloS One 8 (3), e58407.Google Scholar
Loch, A., Adamson, D., Mallawaarachchi, T. (2014). Role of hydrology and economics in water management policy under increasing uncertainty. Journal of Hydrology 518 (Part A), 516.Google Scholar
Loch, A., Bjornlund, H., Wheeler, S., Connor, J. (2012). Allocation trade in Australia: A qualitative understanding or irrigator motives and behaviour. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 56 (1), 4260.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, K. G., Downing, T. E., Nicholls, R. J., Parker, D., Vafeidis, A. T., Dawson, R., Hall, J. (2008). Plausible responses to the threat of rapid sea-level rise in the Thames Estuary. Climatic Change 91 (1), 145–69.Google Scholar
Lorenz, D. F. (2013). The diversity of resilience. Contributions from social science perspective. Natural Hazards 67 (1), 724.Google Scholar
Lorenz, D. F., Dittmer, C. (2016). Resilience in catastrophes, disasters and emergencies. Socio-scientific perspectives. In Maurer, A. (ed.), New perspectives on resilience in socio-economic spheres. Heidelberg: Springer, pp: 2559.Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. (1924). Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Loucks, D., Stedinger, J. (2007). Thoughts on the economics of floodplain development in the U.S. In Vasiliev, O., van Gelder, P., Plate, E., Bolgov, M. (eds.), Extreme hydrological events: New concepts for security. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 319.Google Scholar
Lüchters, G., Menkhoff, L. (1996). Human development as statistical artifact. World Development 24 (8), 1385–92.Google Scholar
Lucini, B. (2014). Multicultural approaches to disaster and cultural resilience. How to consider them to improve disaster management and prevention: The Italian case of two earthquakes. Procedia Economics and Finance 18, 151–6.Google Scholar
Luechinger, S., Raschky, P. A. (2009). Valuing flood disasters using the life satisfaction approach. Journal of Public Economics 93 (3–4), 620–3.Google Scholar
Luino, F., Cirio, C. G., Biddoccu, M., Agangi, A., Giuletto, W., Godone, F., Nigrelli, G. (2009). Application of a model to the evaluation of flood damage. GeoInformatica 13 (3), 339–53.Google Scholar
Luisetti, T., Turner, R. K., Bateman, I. J., Morse-Jones, S., Adams, C., Fonseca, L. (2011). Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England. Ocean and Coastal Management 54 (3), 212–24.Google Scholar
Lukes, S. (2005). Power – a radical review. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macamo, E. (2003). Nach der Katastrophe ist die Katastrophe. Die 2000er Überschwemmung in der dörflichen Wahrnehmung in Mosambik. In Clausen, L., Geenen, E. M., Macamo, E. (eds.), Entsetzliche soziale Prozesse. Theorie und Empirie der Katastrophen. Münster: LIT, pp: 167–84.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D., Derickson, K. D. (2013). From resilience to resourcefulness: A critique of resilience policy and activism. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2), 253–70.Google Scholar
Magis, K. (2010). Community resilience: An indicator of social sustainability. Society and Natural Resources 23 (5), 401–16.Google Scholar
Mallory-Hill, S., Preiser, W. F., Watson, C. G. (2012). Enhancing building performance. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Mancini, A., Salvati, L., Sateriano, A., Mancino, G., Ferrara, A. (2012). Conceptualizing and measuring the “economy” dimension in the evaluation of socio-ecological resilience: A brief commentary. International Journal of Latest Trends in Finance and Economic Sciences 2 (3), 190–6.Google Scholar
Manuel, P., Rapaport, E., Keefe, J., Krawchenko, T. (2015). Coastal climate change and aging communities in Atlantic Canada: A methodological overview of community asset and social vulnerability mapping. The Canadian Geographer 59 (4), 433–46.Google Scholar
Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30 (4), 433–50.Google Scholar
Manyena, S. B. (2014). Disaster resilience: A question of “multiple faces” and “multiple spaces”? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 8, 19.Google Scholar
Manyena, S. B., O’Brien, G., O’Keefe, P., Rose, J. (2011). Disaster resilience: A bounce back or bounce forward ability? Local Environment 16 (5), 417–24.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 7187.Google Scholar
Markard, J., Raven, R., Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy 41, 955–67.Google Scholar
Marsh, G. P. (1869). Man and nature or physical geography as modified by human action. New York: Charles Scribner and Co.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. (2013). Transaction costs, collective action and adaptation in managing complex social-ecological systems. Ecological Economics 88, 185–94.Google Scholar
Mason, M. S., Haynes, K., Walker, G. (2013). Cyclone tracy and the road to improving wind-resistant design. In Boulter, S., Palutikof, J., Karoly, D.-J., Guitart, D. (eds.), Natural disasters and adaptation to climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp: 8794.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S. (2014). Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development 85 (1), 620.Google Scholar
Masten, A., Obradović, J. (2008). Disaster preparation and recovery: Lessons from research on resilience in human development. Ecology and Society 13 (1), 9.Google Scholar
Matyas, D. and Pelling, M. (2012). Disaster vulnerability and resilience: Theory, modelling and prospective. London: Foresight, Government Office for Science.Google Scholar
Matthewman, S. (2015). Disasters, risks and revelation. Making sense of our times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mavrouli, O., Corominas, J. (2010). Vulnerability of simple reinforced concrete buildings to damage by rockfalls. Landslides 7 (2), 169–80.Google Scholar
Mazzorana, B., Simoni, S., Scherer, C., Gems, B., Fuchs, S., Keiler, M. (2014). A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18 (9), 3817–36.Google Scholar
McEntire, D. A., Myers, A. (2004). Preparing communities for disasters: Issues and processes for government readiness. Disaster Prevention and Management 13 (2), 140–52.Google Scholar
Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M. (2014). Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: Is vulnerability the missing link? Climatic Change 133 (1), 2335.Google Scholar
Melecky, C., Raddatz, C. (2011). How do governments respond after catastrophes? Natural-disaster shocks and the fiscal stance. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Menoni, S., Molinari, D., Parker, D., Ballio, F., Tapsell, S. (2012). Assessing multifaceted vulnerability and resilience in order to design risk-mitigation strategies. Natural Hazards 64 (3), 2057–82.Google Scholar
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., Thieken, A. H. (2010). Review article – assessment of economic flood damage. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10 (8), 1697–724.Google Scholar
Messer, N. M. (2003). The role of local institutions and their interaction in disaster risk mitigation: A literature review. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Messias, D. K. H., Barrington, C., Lacy, E. (2012). Latino social network dynamics and the Hurricane Katrina disaster. Disasters 36 (1), 101–21.Google Scholar
Messner, F., Meyer, V. (2005). Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception—challenges for flood damage research. Leipzig: UFZ-Diskussionspapiere No. 13/2005.Google Scholar
Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Meyer, V., Tunstall, S., van der Veen, A. (2007). Evaluating flood damages: Guidance and recommendations on principles and methods. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:5602db10-274c-40da-953f-34475ded1755?collection=research [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
Methmann, C., Oels, A. (2014). Vulnerability. In Death, C. (ed.), Critical environmental politics. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, pp: 277286.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The “actors” of modern society: The cultural construction of social agency. Sociological Theory 18 (1), 100–20.Google Scholar
Meyer, V., Becker, N., Markantonis, V., Schwarze, R., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Bouwer, L. M., Bubeck, P., Ciavola, P., Genovese, E., Green, C., Hallegatte, S., Kreibich, H., Lequeux, Q., Logar, I., Papyrakis, E., Pfurtscheller, C., Poussin, J., Przyluski, V., Thieken, A. H., Viavattene, C. (2013). Review article: Assessing the costs of natural hazards – state of the art and knowledge gaps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13 (5), 1351–73.Google Scholar
Michel-Kerjan, E. O., Kousky, C. (2010). Come rain or shine: Evidence on flood insurance purchases in Florida. Journal of Risk and Insurance 77 (2), 369–97.Google Scholar
Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1967). The small world problem. Psychology Today 2 (1), 60–7.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities. Science 167 (3924), 1461–8.Google Scholar
Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., Walker, B., Birkmann, J., Van der Leeuw, S., Rockström, J., Hinkel, J., Downing, T., Folke, C., and Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: Complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society, 15 (3), 11. [online] www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art11/.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. K., Devine, N., Jagger, K. (1989). A contextual model of natural hazard. Geographical Review 79 (4), 391409.Google Scholar
Molinari, D., Menoni, S., Aronica, G. T., Ballio, F., Berni, N., Pandolfo, C., Stelluti, M., Minucci, G. (2014). Ex-post damage assessment: an Italian experience. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14 (4), 901–16.Google Scholar
Montz, B. E. (1992). The effects of flooding on residential property values in three New Zealand communities. Disasters 16 (4), 283–93.Google Scholar
Montz, B. E., Cross, J., Cutter, S. L. (2005). Hazards. In Gaile, G. L., Wilmott, C. J. (eds.), Geography in America at the dawn of the 21st century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp: 479–91.Google Scholar
Moodysson, J., Jonsson, O. (2007). Knowledge collaboration and proximity: The spatial organization of biotech innovation projects. European Urban and Regional Studies 14 (2), 115–31.Google Scholar
Mudelsee, M., Börngen, M., Tetzlaff, G., Grünewald, U. (2003). No upward trends in the occurrence of extreme floods in central Europe. Nature 425 (6954), 166–9.Google Scholar
Munich, Re (2011). NATHAN, World Map of Natural Hazards, version 2011. München: Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
Munich, Re (2017). Topics GEO: Natural catastrophes 2016. Analyses, assessments, positions. München: Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
MURL – Ministry for Environment, Regional Planning and Agriculture of North-Rhine Westphalia (2000). Potentielle Hochwasserschäden am Rhein in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Düsseldorf: Landesregierung Nordrhein-Westfalen.Google Scholar
Mysiak, J., Testella, F., Bonaiuto, M., Carrus, G., De Dominicis, S., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Firus, K., Grifoni, P. (2013). Flood risk management in Italy: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the EU Floods Directive (2007/60/EC). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 13 (11), 2883–90.Google Scholar
NAS – National Academies of Science (2012). Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington: The National Academics. www.nap.edu/catalog/13457/disaster-resilience-a-national-imperative.Google Scholar
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2016). Community resilience planning guide for buildings and infrastructure systems, Volume 1. Washington: US Department of Commerce, NIST Special Publication 1190–1. www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/community-resilience-planning-guide-volume-1_0.pdf [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2012). Disaster resilience: A national imperative. Washington: US National Academies of Science.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2014). Reducing coastal risks on the East and Gulf Coasts. Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience framework. The Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32, 395419.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J., Holt, G. D., Proverbs, D. (2001). Towards standardising the assessment of flood damage properties in the UK. Structural Survey 19 (4), 163–72.Google Scholar
Nicholls, R. J., Hanson, S., Herweijer, C., Patmore, N., Hallegatte, S., Corfee-Morlot, J., Chateau, J., Muir-Wood, R. (2008). Ranking port cities with high exposure and vulnerability to climate extremes: Exposure estimates. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Nilson, C., Berggren, K. (2000). Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. BioScience 50 (9), 783–92.Google Scholar
Nixon, R. (2014). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Boston: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
Norberg, J., Cumming, G. S. (2013). Complexity theory for a sustainable future. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, F. H., Friedman, M. J., Watson, P. J. (2002). 60,000 disaster victims speak: Part II. Summary and implications of the disaster mental health research. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 65 (3), 240–60.Google Scholar
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P. (2007). Community resilience and the principles of mass trauma intervention. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes 70 (4), 320–8.Google Scholar
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capabilities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology 41 (1–2), 127–50.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noy, I. (2009). The macroeconomic consequences of disasters. Journal of Development Economics 88 (2), 221–31.Google Scholar
NRC – National Research Council (1999). The impacts of natural disasters: A framework for loss estimation. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
NRC – National Research Council (2012). Disaster resilience – a national imperative. imperative. Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
NRC – National Research Council (2014). Reducing coastal risks on the East and Gulf Coasts. Washington: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
NRE – Department of Natural Resources and Environment (2000). Rapid appraisal method (RAM) for floodplain management. Melbourne: Report prepared by Read Sturgess and Associates.Google Scholar
NR&M (Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland Government) (2002): Guidance on the Assessment of Tangible Flood Damages, Report. Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
O’Brien, K. L., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venema, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, H., Javed, A., Bhadwal, S., Barg, S., Nygaard, L., West, J. (2004). Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change 14, 303–13.Google Scholar
Oberndorfer, S., Fuchs, S., Rickenmann, D., Andrecs, P. (2007). Vulnerabilitätsanalyse und monetäre Schadensbewertung von Wildbachereignissen in Österreich. Vienna: Bundesforschungs- und Ausbildungszentrum für Wald, Naturgefahren und Landschaft (BfW).Google Scholar
O’Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L. P., Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7 (1), 7388.Google Scholar
Obrist, B., Pfeiffer, C., Henley, R. (2010). Multi-layered social resilience: A new approach in mitigation research. Progress in Development Studies 10 (4), 283–93.Google Scholar
OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user’s guide. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). Guidelines for resilience systems analysis: How to analyse risk and build a roadmap to resilience. OECD Publishing. Available at www.oecd.org/dac/Resilience%20Systems%20Analysis%20FINAL.pdf [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2015). The economic consequences of climate change. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016). Strengthening economic resilience: Insights from the post-1970 record of severe recessions and financial crises. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Ofei-Mensah, A., Bennett, J. (2013). Transaction costs of alternative greenhouse gas policies in the Australian transport energy sector. Ecological Economics 88, 214–21.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P., Westgate, K., Wisner, B. (1976). Taking the naturalness out of natural disasters. Nature 260, 566–7.Google Scholar
Okuyama, Y. (2009). Critical review of methodologies on disaster impact estimation. Background paper for assessment on the economics of disaster risk reduction. The Global Facility for Disaster Research and Recovery (GFDRR). Genf: GFDRR.Google Scholar
Okuyama, Y. (2014). Disaster and economic structural change: Case study on the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. Economic Systems Research 26 (1), 98117.Google Scholar
Okuyama, Y., Hewing, G. J. D., Sonis, M. (2004). Measuring economic impacts of disasters: Interregional input-output analysis using sequential interindustry model. In Okuyama, Y., Chang, S. E. (eds.), Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp: 77102.Google Scholar
Oliver-Smith, A. (1991). Successes and failures in post-disaster resettlement. Disasters 15 (1), 1223.Google Scholar
Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Ardalan, A., Paton, D., Jabbari, H., Khankeh, H. R. (2015). Community disaster resilience: A systematic review on assessment models and tools. PLOS Currents Disasters, Apr 8. Edition 1. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed.Google Scholar
Oumeraci, H. (1994). Review and analysis of vertical breakwater failures — lessons learned. Coastal Engineering 22 (1–2), 329.Google Scholar
Özyurt, G., Ergin, A. (2010). Improving coastal vulnerability assessments to sea-level rise: A new indicator-based methodology for decision makers. Journal of Coastal Research 26 (2), 265–73.Google Scholar
Paavola, J. (2008). Governing atmospheric sinks: The architecture of entitlements in the global commons. International Journal of the Commons 2, 313–36.Google Scholar
Papathoma-Köhle, M. (2016). Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: Application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16 (8), 1771–90.Google Scholar
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Kappes, M., Keiler, M., Glade, T. (2011). Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: State of the art and future needs. Natural Hazards 58 (2), 645–80.Google Scholar
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Zischg, A., Fuchs, S., Glade, T., Keiler, M. (2015). Loss estimation for landslides in mountain areas – an integrated toolbox for vulnerability assessment and damage documentation. Environmental Modelling & Software 63, 156–69.Google Scholar
Papathoma-Köhle, M., Gems, B., Sturm, M., Fuchs, S. (2017). Matrices, curves and indicators: A review of approaches to assess physical vulnerability to debris flows. Earth-Science Reviews 171, 272–88.Google Scholar
Pappenberger, F., Cloke, H. L., Parker, D. J., Wetterhall, F., Richardson, D. S., Thielen, J. (2015). The monetary benefit of early flood warnings in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 51, 278–91.Google Scholar
Park, J., Cho, J., Rose, A. (2011). Modeling a major source of economic resilience to disasters: Recapturing lost production. Natural Hazards 58 (1), 163–82.Google Scholar
Paton, D., Anderson, E., Becker, J., Petersen, J. (2015). Developing a comprehensive model of hazard preparedness: Lessons from the Christchurch earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14, 3745.Google Scholar
Paton, D., Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas Publisher: Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Pattiaratchi, C. (1997). Design studies and performance monitoring of an artificial surfing reef: Cable Station, Western Australia. Sydney: Proceedings of the 1st International Surfing Reef Symposium.Google Scholar
Paul, B. K. (2011). Environmental hazards and disasters–context, perspectives and management. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Pauw, K., Thurlow, J., Bachu, M., Van Seventer, D. E. (2011). The economic costs of extreme weather events: A hydrometeorological CGE analysis for Malawi. Environment and Development Economics 16 (2), 177–98.Google Scholar
Pearce, L. (2003). Disaster management and community planning: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards 28 (2–3), 211–28.Google Scholar
Pearce, D., Moran, D. (1994). The economic value of biodiversity. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Peduzzi, P., Dao, H., Herold, C., Mouton, F. (2009). Assessing global exposure and vulnerability towards natural hazards: The Disaster Risk Index. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9 (4), 1149–59.Google Scholar
Peek, L. (2008). Children and disasters: Understanding vulnerability, developing capacities, and promoting resilience—an introduction. Children Youth and Environments 18 (1), 129.Google Scholar
Pelling, M. (ed.). (2003). Natural disasters and development in a globalizing world. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pelling, M. (2003b). The vulnerability of cities. Natural disasters and social resilience. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Pelling, M. (2011). Adaptation to climate change: From resilience to transformation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pelling, M. (2013). Review of global risk index projects: Conclusions for sub-national and local approaches. In Birkmann, J. (ed.) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, 2nd Edition, Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp. 167–96.Google Scholar
Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Chatterton, J. (1977). The benefits of flood alleviation: A manual of assessment techniques. Aldershot: Gower Technical Press.Google Scholar
Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Johnson, C., Tunstall, S., Tapsell, S., Morris, J., Chatterton, J., Green, C. (2005). The benefits of flood and coastal risk management: A handbook of assessment techniques. London: Middlesex University Press.Google Scholar
Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Priest, S., Johnson, C. (2014). The evolution of UK flood insurance: Incremental change over siy decades. International Journal of Water Resources Development 30 (4), 694713.Google Scholar
Pérez-Blanco, C. D., Delacámara, G., Gómez, C. M. (2015). Water charging and water saving in agriculture. Insights from a Revealed Preference Model in a Mediterranean basin. Environmental Modelling & Software 69, 90100.Google Scholar
Pérez-Blanco, C. D., Delacámara, G., Gómez, C. M. (2016). Revealing the willingness to pay for income insurance in agriculture. Journal of Risk Research 19 (7), 873–93.Google Scholar
Pérez-Blanco, C. D., Gómez, C. M. (2014). Insuring water: A practical risk management option in water-scarce and drought-prone regions? Water Policy 16 (2), 244–63.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (2007). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petrolia, D. R., Landry, C. E., Coble, K. H. (2013). Risk preferences, risk perceptions, and flood insurance. Land Economics 89 (2), 227–45.Google Scholar
Pfurtscheller, C. (2014). Regional economic impacts of natural hazards – the case of the 2005 Alpine flood event in Tyrol (Austria). Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14 (2), 359–78.Google Scholar
Phillips, B. D., Hearn Morrow, B. (eds.) (2008). Women and disasters: From theory to practice. Bloomington: Xlibris Corporation.Google Scholar
Pimm, S. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307, 321–26.Google Scholar
Pistrika, A. K., Jonkman, S. N. (2009). Damage to residential buildings due to flooding of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina. Natural Hazards 54 (2), 413–34.Google Scholar
Plate, E. J. (2002). Flood risk and flood management. Journal of Hydrology 267 (1–2), 211.Google Scholar
Pomonis, A. (2002). The Mount Parnitha (Athens) earthquake of September 7, 1999: A disaster management perspective. Natural Hazards 27 (1), 171–99.Google Scholar
Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H. (eds.) (2004). Handbook of organizational change and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pope, J. (1997). Responding to coastal erosion and flooding damages. Journal of Coastal Research 13 (3), 704–10.Google Scholar
Pope, J., Dean, J. L. (1986). Development of design criteria for segmented breakwaters. Proceedings, 20th International Conference Coastal Engineering. New York: ASCE, pp: 2144–58.Google Scholar
Prettenthaler, F., Amrusch, P., Habsburg-Lothringen, C. (2010). Estimation of an absolute flood damage curve based on an Austrian case study under a dam breach scenario. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 10 (4), 881–94.Google Scholar
Priest, S. (2014). Review of international flood insurance and recovery mechanisms: Implications for New Zealand and the resilience of older people. London: Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.Google Scholar
Prince, S. H. (1920). Catastrophe and social change: Based upon a sociological study if the Halifax Disaster. London: King and Son.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G., Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (2), 229–52.Google Scholar
Pugh, J., 2014. Resilience, complexity and post-liberalism. Area 46 (3), 313–19.Google Scholar
Queensland Government (1988). Queensland parliamentary debates [Hansard] (Legislative Assembly, Parliamentary Debate No. Thursday, August 25, 1988). Brisbane: Queensland Government.Google Scholar
Queensland Government (2016). Natural hazards, risk and resilience. Guidance for considering natural hazards, risk and resilience when designating land for community infrastructure. Technical manual. State Planning Policy – state interest guidance. Queensland, Australia: Department of Infrastructure, Local Government and Planning. www.dilgp.qld.gov.au/resources/guideline/spp/spp-technical-manual-considering-natural-hazards-when-designating-land.pdf [last accessed: May 01, 2017].Google Scholar
Queensland Government (2017). 2017 Brisbane river catchment flood study map. www.qld.gov.au/environment/water/catchments/brisbane-river-studies/ [last accessed: March 29, 2017].Google Scholar
Queensland Water Commission (2010). South East Queensland water strategy. Brisbane: Queensland WaterCommission.Google Scholar
Rabin, M., Kőszegi, B. (2007). Mistakes in choice-based welfare analysis. American Economic Review 97 (2), 477–81.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V., Walz, J. (2012). Haiti: Where has all the money gone? Washington: Centre for Gloval Development.Google Scholar
Raschky, P. A. (2008). Institutions and the losses from natural disasters. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 8 (4), 627–34.Google Scholar
Raschky, P. A., Schwarze, R., Schwindt, M., Zahn, F. (2013). Uncertainty of governmental relief and the crowding out of flood insurance. Environmental and Resource Economics 54 (2), 179200.Google Scholar
Raschky, P. A., Schwindt, M. (2009). Aid, natural disasters and the Samaritan’s dilemma. Washington: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Raschky, P. A., Weck-Hannemann, H. (2007). Charity hazard – a real hazard to natural disaster insurance? Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Reed, D. A., Kapur, K. C., Christie, R. D. (2009). Methodology for assessing the resilience of networked infrastructure. IEEE Systems Journal 3 (2), 174–80.Google Scholar
Reid, C. E., Mann, J. K., Alfasso, R., English, P. B., King, G. C., Lincoln, R. A., Margolis, H. G., Rubado, D. J., Sabato, J. E., West, N. L., Woods, B., Navarro, K. M., Balmes, J. R. (2012). Evaluation of a heat vulnerability index on abnormally hot days: An environmental public health tracking study. Environmental Health Perspectives 120 (5), 715–20.Google Scholar
Reissman, D. B., Spencer, S., Tanielian, T. L., Stein, B. D. (2005). Integrating behavioral aspects into community preparedness and response systems. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 10 (3–4), 707–20.Google Scholar
Renn, O. (2008a). Concepts of risk: An interdisciplinary review – part 1: Disciplinary risk concepts. Gaia 17 (1), 5066.Google Scholar
Renn, O. (2008b). Concepts of risk: An interdisciplinary review – part 2: Integrative approaches. Gaia 17 (2), 196204.Google Scholar
Renn, O., Klinke, A., van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio 40 (2), 231–46.Google Scholar
Republic of Austria (1966). Katastrophenfondgesetz. BGBl 207/1966. Vienna: Bundesgesetzblatt.Google Scholar
Republic of Austria (1975). Forstgesetz. BGBl. 440/1975. Vienna: Bundesgesetzblatt.Google Scholar
Republic of Austria (1996). Katastrophenfondsgesetz BGBl. 201/1996. Vienna: Bundesgesetzblatt.Google Scholar
Republic of Austria (2014). Wasserrechtgesetz 1959. BGBl. I 54/2014. Vienna: Bundesgesetzblatt.Google Scholar
Resilience (2009). National infrastructure advisory council. Washington: Homeland Security.Google Scholar
Rivera, F. I., Kapucu, N. (2015). Disaster vulnerability, hazards and resilience: Perspectives from Florida. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Roberts, N. J., Nadim, F., Kalsnes, B. (2009). Quantification of vulnerability to natural hazards. Georisk 3 (3), 164–73.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. M., Carson, D. A. (2016). Resilient communities: Transitions, pathways and resourcefulness. The Geographical Journal 182 (2), 114–22.Google Scholar
Rose, A. (1995). Input-output economics and computable general equilibrium model. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 6 (3), 295304.Google Scholar
Rose, A. (2004). Economic principles, issues and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. In Okuyama, Y., Chang, S. E. (eds.), Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp: 1336.Google Scholar
Rose, A. (2007). Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contexts. Environmental Hazards 7 (4), 383–92.Google Scholar
Rose, A. (2009). Economic resilience to disasters. Los Angeles: Community and Regional Resilience Institute.Google Scholar
Rose, A., Benavides, J., Chang, S. E., Szczesniak, P., Lim, D. (1997). The regional economic impact of an earthquake: Direct and indirect effects of electricity lifeline disruptions. Journal of Regional Science 37 (3), 437–58.Google Scholar
Rose, A., Krausmann, E. (2013). An economic framework for the development of a resilience index for business recovery. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 5, 7383.Google Scholar
Rose, A., Liao, S. Y. (2005). Modelling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruption. Journal of Regional Science 45 (1), 75112.Google Scholar
Rose, A., Oladosu, G., Liao, S. (2007). Business interruption impacts of a terrorist attack on the electric power system of Los Angeles: Customer resilience to a total blackout. Risk Analysis 27 (3), 513–31.Google Scholar
Rufat, S. (2013). Spectroscopy of urban vulnerability. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3), 505–25.Google Scholar
Rufat, S., Tate, E., Burton, C. G., Maroof, A. S. (2015). Social vulnerability to floods: Review of case studies and implications for measurement. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14, Part 4, 470–86.Google Scholar
Russell, C. (1970). Losses from natural hazards. Land Economics 43, 383–93.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., Spash, C. L. (2011). Is WTP an attitudinal measure? Empirical analysis of the psychological explanation for contingent values. Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (5), 674–87.Google Scholar
Rygel, L., O`Sullivan, D., Yarnal, B. (2006). A method for constructing a social vulnerability index. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 11 (3), 741–64.Google Scholar
Saisana, M., Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. Ispra, JRC – Joint Research Centre. European Commission.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. (1938). A note on the pure theory of consumers’ behaviour. Economica 5 (17), 6171.Google Scholar
Sarewitz, D., Pielke, R., Keykhah, M. (2003). Vulnerability and risk: Some thoughts from a political and policy perspective. Risk Analysis 23 (4), 805810.Google Scholar
Saunders, W. S. A., Becker, J. S. (2015). A discussion of resilience and sustainability: Land use planning recovery from the Canterbury earthquake sequence, New Zealand. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 14, 7381.Google Scholar
Scawthorn, C., Flores, P., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., Jones, C., Lawrence, M. (2006a). HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. I: Overview and flood hazard characterization. Natural Hazards Review 7 (2), 6071.Google Scholar
Scawthorn, C., Flores, P., Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., Jones, C., Lawrence, M. (2006b). HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology. II. damage and loss assessment. Natural Hazards Review 7 (2), 7281.Google Scholar
Schindler, S., Sebesvari, Z., Damm, C., Euller, K., Mauerhofer, V., Schneidergruber, A., Biró, M., Essl, F., Kanka, R., Lauwaars, S. G., Schulz-Zunkel, C., Sluis, T., van der Kropik, M., Gasso, V., Krug, A., Pusch, M. T., Zulka, K. P., Lazowski, W., Hainz-Renetzeder, C., Henle, K., Wrbka, T. (2014). Multifunctionality of floodplain landscapes: Relating management options to ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 29 (2), 229–44.Google Scholar
Schmidtlein, M. C., Deutsch, R. C., Piegorsch, W. W., Cutter, S. L. (2008). A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Analysis 28 (4), 1099–114.Google Scholar
Schmidtlein, M. C., Shafer, J. M., Berry, M., Cutter, S. L. (2011). Modeled earthquake losses and social vulnerability in Charleston, South Carolina. Applied Geography 31 (1), 269–81.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Thomè, P. (2006). Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of european regions. Helsinki: Geological Survey of Finland.Google Scholar
Schneiderbauer, S., Ehrlich, D. (2006). Social levels and hazard (in)dependence in determining vulnerability. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies. J. Birkmann. Tokyo: United Nations University Press, pp: 78102.Google Scholar
Schuster, R., Fleming, R. (1986). Economic losses and fatalities due to landslides. Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists 23 (1), 1128.Google Scholar
Schwarz, J., Maiwald, H. (2007). Prognose der Bauwerksschädigung unter Hochwassereinwirkung. Bautechnik 84 (7), 450–64.Google Scholar
Schwarz, J., Maiwald, H. (2008). Damage and loss prediction model based on the vulnerability of building types. 4th International Symposium on Flood Defence, Toronto, Canada. http://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/escidoc:6057:6/component/escidoc:6058/74_Schwarz.pdf [last accessed: January 10, 2017].Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Scussolini, P., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Jongman, B., Bouwer, L. M., Winsemius, H. C., de Moel, H., Ward, P. J. (2016). FLOPROS: An evolving global database of flood protection standards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 16 (5), 1049–61.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Seqwater. (2016). Weekly water security and consumption update (No. February 12, 2016). Brisbane: Seqwater.Google Scholar
Seqwater. (2017). 2017 Dam levels. www.seqwater.com.au/water-supply/dam-levels [last accessed: April 26, 2017].Google Scholar
Shabman, L. A., Damianos, D. I. (1976). Flood hazard effects on residential property values. Journal of Water Resources and Planning WR1, 151–62.Google Scholar
Shakra, V. A. (2016). Measuring the feasibility of elevating residential structures in flood vulnerable areas at the parcel level as a hazard mitigation approach: The case of 100-year inundated areas in Galveston County, Texas. Unpublished Master Thesis, Galveston: Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Sharifi, A., Yamagata, Y. (2016). On the suitability of assessment tools for guiding communities towards disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 115–24.Google Scholar
Shaw, D., Scully, J., Hart, T. (2014). The paradox of social resilience: How cognitive strategies and coping mechanisms attenuate and accentuate resilience. Global Environmental Change 25, 194203.Google Scholar
Shaw, R., Goda, K. (2004). From disaster to sustainable civil society: The Kobe experience. Disasters 28 (1), 1640.Google Scholar
Sherrieb, K., Norris, F. H. and Galea, S. (2010). Measuring capacities for community resilience. Social Indicators Research, 99, 227–47.Google Scholar
Shinozuka, M., Rose, A., Eguchi, R. (eds.) (1998). Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes: An analysis of electricity lifeline disruptions in the new Madrid area. Buffalo: Multidisciplinary Centre for Earthquake Engineering Research.Google Scholar
Siebeneck, L. (2016). Examining social, physical, and environmental dimensions of tornado vulnerability in Texas. Journal of Emergency Management 14 (2), 139–51.Google Scholar
Siebeneck, L., Arlikatti, S., Andrew, S. A. (2015). Using provincial baseline indicators to model geographic variations of disaster resilience in Thailand. Natural Hazards 79 (2), 955–75.Google Scholar
Simarmata, H. A. (2015). How informal institutions manage flood-risk at community level: An empirical study of Kampung Muara baru, Jakarta. In Velasquez, J., Panda, A. (eds.), The “state of DRR at the local level”: A 2015 report on the pattern of disaster risk reduction actions at local level. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
Skantz, T., Strickland, T. (1987). House prices and a flood event: An empirical investigation of market efficiency. Journal of Real Estate Research 2 (2), 7583.Google Scholar
Skoufias, E. (2003). Economic crises and natural disasters: Coping strategies and policy implications. World Development 31 (7), 1087–102.Google Scholar
Smit, B., Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3), 282–92.Google Scholar
Smith, D. I. (1981). Actual and potential flood damage: A case study for urban Lismore, NSW, Australia. Applied Geography 1, 31–9.Google Scholar
Smith, D. I. (1994). Flood damage estimation – a review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions. Water SA 20 (3), 231–8.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2013). Environmental hazards. Assessing risk and reducing disaster. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Petley, D. N. (2009). Environmental hazards – assessing risk and reducing disaster. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Tobin, G. A. (1979). Human adjustment to the flood hazard. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, K., Ward, R. (1998). Floods: Physical processes and human impacts. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Spiekermann, R., Kienberger, S., Norton, J., Briones, F., Weichselgartner, J. (2015). The disaster-knowledge matrix – reframing and evaluating the knowledge challenges in disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 13, 96108.Google Scholar
SSHAC – Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (1997). Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts. Washington: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.Google Scholar
Standard & Poor’s (2015a). Storm alert: Natural disasters can damage sovereign creditworthiness. New York: Standard & Poor’s.Google Scholar
Standard & Poor’s (2015b). The heat is on: How climate change can impact sovereign ratings. New York: Standard & Poor’s.Google Scholar
Stein, J., Moreno, P., Conrad, D., Ellis, S. (2000). Troubled waters: Congress, the corps of engineers, and wasteful water projects. Washington: Taxpayers for common sense and National Wildlife Federation.Google Scholar
Steinführer, A., Kuhlicke, C. (2007). Social vulnerability and the 2002 flood. Country Report Germany (Mulde River). Leipzig: UFZ Centre for Environmental Research.Google Scholar
Stiefelmeyer, H., Hlatky, T. (2008). HORA – An Austrian platform for natural hazards as a new way in risk communication. In Mikoš, M., Hübl, J., Koboltschnig, G. (eds.), International symposion interpraevent. Klagenfurt: Internationale Forschungsgesellschaft Interpraevent, pp: 229–36.Google Scholar
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P. M. (eds.) (2013) Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strübing, J. (2013). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine komprimierte Einführung für Studierende. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
Stumpp, E. M. (2013). New in town? On resilience and “resilient cities”. Cities 32, 164–6.Google Scholar
Sugarman, S. D. (2006). Roles of government in compensating disaster victims. Berkeley: The Berkeley Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Surminski, S. (2009). How can the insurance industry promote climate change adaptation? A case study from the UK. London: Chartered Insurance Institute.Google Scholar
Surminski, S., Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. J. W., Hudson, P., Mysiak, J., Pérez-Blanco, C. D. (2015). Reflections on the current debate on how to link flood insurance and disaster risk reduction in the European Union. Natural Hazards 79 (3), 1451–79.Google Scholar
Surminski, S., Oramas-Dorta, D. (2014). Flood insurance schemes and climate adaptation in developing countries. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 7, 154–64.Google Scholar
Sutcliffe, K. M., Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In Cameron, K., Dutton, J. E., Quinn, R. E. (eds.), Positive organizational scholarship. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler, pp: 94110.Google Scholar
Swiss, Re (2016). Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters in 2015. Zurich: Swiss Reinsurance Company.Google Scholar
Tapsell, S., McCarthy, S., Faulkner, H., Alexander, M. (2010). Social vulnerability to natural hazards. London: Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University.Google Scholar
Tapsell, S., Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Tunstall, S. M., Wilson, T. L. (2002). Vulnerability to flooding: Health and social dimensions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A – Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 360 (1796), 1511–25.Google Scholar
Tate, E. (2012). Social vulnerability indices: A comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Natural Hazards 63 (2), 325–47.Google Scholar
Tate, E. (2013). Uncertainty analysis for a social vulnerability index. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (3), 526–43.Google Scholar
Telford, J. (2007). The international humanitarian system and the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunamis. Disasters 31 (1), 128.Google Scholar
Thaler, T. (2015). Rescaling in flood risk governance – new spatial and institutional arrangements and structures. Unpublished dissertation, Middlesex University.Google Scholar
Thaler, T., Boteler, B., Dworak, T., Holen, S., Lago, M. (2014). Investigating the use of environmental benefits in the policy decision process: A qualitative study focusing on the EU water policy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (10), 1515–30.Google Scholar
Thaler, T., Priest, S. J., Fuchs, S. (2016). Evolving inter-regional co-operation in flood risk management: Distances and types of partnership approaches in Austria. Regional Environmental Change 16 (3), 841–53.Google Scholar
Thieken, A. H., Müller, M., Kreibich, H., Merz, B. (2005). Flood damage and influencing factors: New insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany. Water Resource Research 41 (12), W12430.Google Scholar
Thieken, A. H., Olschewski, A., Kreibich, H., Kobsch, S., Merz, B. (2008). Development and evaluation of FLEMOps – a new flood loss estimation model for the private sector. In Proverbs, D., Brebbia, C. A., Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (eds.), Flood recovery, innovation and response. London: WIT Press, pp: 315–24.Google Scholar
Thywissen, K. (2006). Components of risk. A comparative glossary. Bonn: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, K. (1997). Business impacts of the Northridge Earthquake. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 5 (2), 8797.Google Scholar
Tierney, K. (2014). The social roots of risk. Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, K. (2015). Resilience and the neoliberal project: Discourses, critiques, practices – and Katrina. American Behavioral Scientist 59 (10), 1327–42.Google Scholar
Timmerman, P. (1981). Vulnerability, resilience and the collapse of society: A review of models and possible climatic applications. Toronto: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A. (1999). Sustainability and community resilience: The holy grail of hazards planning?. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 1 (1), 1325.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A. (2015). Risk mitigation: We are all going to die. In Fra Paleo, U. (ed.), Risk governance. The articulation of hazard, politics and ecology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp: 495–7.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A., Montz, B. E. (1988). Catastrophic flooding and the response of the real estate market. The Social Science Journal 25 (2), 167–77.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A., Montz, B. E. (1995). The flood hazard and dynamics of the urban residential land market. Water Resource Bulletin 30 (4), 673–85.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A., Montz, B. E. (1997). Natural hazards: Explanation and integration. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A., Montz, B. E. (2015). Evolving approaches to understanding natural hazards. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A., Whiteford, L. M., Jones, E. C., Murphy, A. D., Garren, S. J., Padros, C. V. (2011). The role of individual well-being in risk perception and evacuation for chronic vs. acute natural hazards in Mexico. Applied Geography 31 (2), 700–11.Google Scholar
Tobin, G. A., Whiteford, L. M., Murphy, A. D., Jones, E. C., McCarty, C. (2014). Modeling social networks and community resilience in chronic disasters: Case studies from volcanic areas in Ecuador and Mexico. In Gasparini, P., Daetano, M., Asprone, D. (eds.), Resilience and sustainability in relation to natural disasters: A challenge for future cities. Dordrecht: Springer, pp: 1344.Google Scholar
Tompkins, E. L., Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Parker, D., Platt, S., Priest, S., So, E., Spence, R. (2012). Institutions and disaster outcomes: Successes, weaknesses and significant research needs. www.gov.uk/government/publications/disaster-outcomes-role-of-institutions [last accessed: May 01, 2017].Google Scholar
Torres, H. R. (2017). How lessons from a past disaster can influence resilience and climate adaptation in Broward County, Florida. Unpublished dissertation, Tampa: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Totschnig, R., Fuchs, S. (2013). Mountain torrents: Quantifying vulnerability and assessing uncertainties. Engineering Geology 155, 3144.Google Scholar
Totschnig, R., Sedlacek, W., Fuchs, S. (2011). A quantitative vulnerability function for fluvial sediment transport. Natural Hazards 58 (2), 681703.Google Scholar
Transparency International (2010). What is transparency international? Retrieved 24 November 2016, from www.transparency.org/about_us [last accessed: May 01, 2017].Google Scholar
Tsertsvadze, A., Clar, C., Court, R., Clarke, A., Mistry, H., Sutcliffe, P. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Journal of Manipulative Physiological Therapeutics 37 (6), 343–62.Google Scholar
Tuccillo, J. V., Buttenfield, B. P. (2016). Model-based clustering of social vulnerability to urban extreme heat events. In Miller, J. A., O’Sullivan, D., Wiegand, N. (eds.), Geographic information science: 9th international conference, GIScience 2016, Montreal, QC, Canada, September 27–30, 2016. Cham: Springer, pp: 114–29.Google Scholar
Turner, B. L. II (2010). Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Global Environmental Change 20 (4), 570–6.Google Scholar
Turner, B. L. II, Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., Polsky, C., Pulsipher, A., Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings, National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100 (14), 8074–9.Google Scholar
Turner, R. K. (2007). Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: Retrospects and future prospects. Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1), 253–69.Google Scholar
Turnpenny, J., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., Jordan, A., Hertin, J., Nykvist, B. (2008). Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51 (6), 759–75.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. (2015). Disaster risk reduction. Good practice review. London: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
UK Government, Office for Science. (2012). Foresight reducing risks of future disasters for decision makers, final project report. London: The Government Office for Science. www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/286476/12-1289-reducing-risks-of-future-disasters-report.pdf [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
UK Government. (2014). Resilience in society: Infrastructure, communities and businesses. www.gov.uk/guidance/resilience-in-society-infrastructure-communities-and-businesses [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
UNDRO (1980). Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis. Geneva: Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator.Google Scholar
UNDRO (1984). Disaster prevention and mitigation – a compendium of current knowledge. Preparedness aspects. Volume 11. New York: Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator.Google Scholar
Unger, D. G. and Powell, D. R. (1980). Supporting families under stress: The role of social networks. Family Relations 29 (4), 566–74.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (1994). Yokohama strategy and plan of action for a safer world: Guidelines for natural disaster prevention, preparedness and mitigation. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2004). Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives Volume 1 and 2. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005-2015. Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2009). Terminology on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2011). Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015 mid-term review. United Nations Office for DisasterRisk Reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2012a). Number of climate-related disasters around the world (1980–2011). www.preventionweb.net/files/20120613_ClimateDisaster1980-2011.pdf [last accessed: February 1, 2014].Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2012b). Terminology on DisasterRisk Reduction. United Nations Office for DisasterRisk Reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2014). Progress and challenges in DisasterRisk Reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2015a). Sendai framework for DisasterRisk Reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2015b). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2015 (GAR15). United Nations Office for DisasterRisk Reduction. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
UNISDR – United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. (2017). Terminology, www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology#letter-m [last accessed: July 03, 2017].Google Scholar
United Nations – Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/ [last accessed: March 02, 2017].Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. (1989). International decade for natural disaster reduction. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 236 session 44 of 22 December 1989. New York: United Nations General Assembly.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2014). Zero draft of the post-2015 framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations, Sendai (Japan). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UNU Wider – United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research. (2008). Economic vulnerability and resilience. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.Google Scholar
Url, T., Sinabell, F. (2008). Flood risk exposure in Austria–options for bearing risk efficiently. Schnollers Jahrbuch: Journal of Applied Social Sciences Studies/Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 128 (4), 593614.Google Scholar
US Economic Development Administration (2016). Comprehensive economic development strategy (CEDS) content guidelines: Recommendations for creating an impactful CEDS. Washington: US Economic Development Administration.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship. A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D., Garud, R., Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van den Honert, R. C., McAneney, J. (2011). The 2011 Brisbane floods: Causes, impacts and implications. Water 3 (4), 1149–73.Google Scholar
van der Vink, G. E. (2007). Democracy, GDP and natural disasters. Geotimes: Earth, Energy and Environment News. www.geotimes.org/oct07/article.html?id=feature_democracy.html [last accessed: January 10, 2017].Google Scholar
van Deth, J. W., Zmerli, S. (2010). Introduction: Civicness, equality, and democracy—A “Dark Side” of social capital? American Behavioral Scientist 53 (5), 631–9.Google Scholar
Varduhn, V., Mundani, R. P., Rank, E. (2015). Multi-resolution models: Recent progress in coupling 3D geometry to environmental numerical simulation. In Breunig, M., Al-Doori, M., Butwilowski, E., Kuper, P. V., Benner, J., Haefele, K. H. (eds.), 3D geoinformation science: Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp: 5569.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. New York: WW Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (2012). Revealed preference and its applications. The Economic Journal 122 (560), 332–8.Google Scholar
Varnes, D. (1984). Landslide hazard zonation: A review of principles and practice. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Vatn, A. (2009). An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecological Economics 68, 2207–15.Google Scholar
Vatn, A., Bromley, D. W. (1994). Choices without prices without apologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (2), 129–48.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. B. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study in the evolution of institutions. New York, Macmillian.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. B. (1914). The instinct of workmanship and the state of the industrial arts. New York, Macmillian.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. B. (1919). The place of science in modern civilisation and other essays. New York, Huebsch.Google Scholar
Villagrán de León, J. C. (2006). Vulnerability. A conceptual and methodological review. Bonn: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Vink, K., Takeuchi, K. (2013). International comparison of measures taken for vulnerable people in disaster risk management laws. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 4, 6370.Google Scholar
Visser, H., Petersen, A. C., Ligtvoet, W. (2014). On the relation between weather-related disaster impacts, vulnerability and climate change. Climate Change 125 (3), 461–77.Google Scholar
Visualtheasurus (2017). Thinkmap Visualtheasurus. www.visualthesaurus.com/ [last accessed: February 23, 2017].Google Scholar
Vogel, C., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E., Dabelko, G. D. (2007). Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships. Global Environmental Change, 17 (3–4), 349–64.Google Scholar
Vogt-Schilb, A., Hallegatte, S. (2014). Marginal abatement cost curves and the optimal timing of mitigation measures. Energy Policy 66, 645–53.Google Scholar
von Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. (1971). The economics of environmental policy. Land Economics 47 (1), 3645.Google Scholar
Von Peter, G., Von Dahlen, S., Saxena, S. C. (2012). Unmitigated disasters? New evidence on the macroeconomic cost of natural catastrophes. www.bis.org/publ/work394.htm [last accessed: May 23, 2017].Google Scholar
Voss, M. (2008). The vulnerable can’t speak. An integrative vulnerability approach to disaster and climate change research. Behemoth 1 (3), 3956.Google Scholar
Voss, M. (2009). Vulnerabilität. In Hammerl, C., Kolnberger, T. (eds.), Naturkatastrophen: Rezeption – Bewältigung – Verarbeitung. Vienna: Studien-Verlag, pp: 103–21.Google Scholar
Voss, M., Funk, L. (2015). Participative vulnerability and resilience assessment and the example of the Tao People (Taiwan). In Krüger, F., Bankoff, G., Cannon, T., Orlowski, B., Schipper, L. (eds.), Cultures and disasters. Understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. London: Routledge, pp: 255–76.Google Scholar
Voss, M., Wagner, K. (2010). Learning from (small) disasters. Natural Hazards 55 (3), 657–69.Google Scholar
Vulturius, G. (2013). Policy change and policy learning for enhanced flood policies at local, subnational and EU level. In Keskitalo, E. C. H. (ed.), Climate change and flood risk management. Adaptation and extreme events at the local level. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp: 121–49.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9 (2), 5.Google Scholar
Wang, B., Ruel, M., Couture, R., vanDine, D., Bobrowsky, P., Blais-Stevens, A. (2013). Current status of landslide guidelines around the world. In Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K. (eds.), Landslide Science and Practice, Vol. 7. Berlin: Springer, pp: 271–7.Google Scholar
Ward, P. J., Jongman, B., Sperna Weiland, F. C., Bouwman, A., van Beek, R., Bierkens, M. F. P., Ligtvoet, W., Winsemius, H. C. (2013). Assessing flood risk at the global scale: Model setup, results, and sensitivity. Environmental Research Letters 8 (4), 044019.Google Scholar
Warner, K., Ranger, N., Surminski, S., Arnold, M., Linnerooth-Bayer, J., Michel-Kerjan, E., Kovacs, P., Herweijer, C. (2009). Adaptation to climate change: Linking disaster risk reduction and insurance. Geneva: UNISDR.Google Scholar
Watts, M. J., Bohle, H. G. (1993). The space of vulnerability: The causal structure of hunger and famine. Progress in Human Geography 17 (1), 4367.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature 393 (6684), 440–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WEF – World Economic Forum (2016). Global risks 2016. Davos: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Weichselgartner, J. (2001a). Disaster mitigation: The concept of vulnerability revisited. Disaster Prevention and Management 10 (2), 8594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weichselgartner, J. (2001b). Naturgefahren als soziale Konstruktion. Unpublished dissertation, Bonn: University of Bonn.Google Scholar
Weichselgartner, J., Kelman, I. (2015). Geographies of resilience challenges and opportunities of a descriptive concept. Progress in Human Geography 39 (3), 249–67.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations. The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administration Science Quarterly 38 (4), 628–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected. Sustained performance in a complex world. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., Obstfeld, D. (1999). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Research in Organizational Behavior 21, 81124.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16 (4), 409–21.Google Scholar
Weil, F., Lee, M. R., Shihadeh, E. S. (2012). The burdens of social capital: How socially-involved people dealt with stress after Hurricane Katrina. Social Science Research 41 (1), 110–19.Google Scholar
Wein, A., Rose, A. (2011). Economic resilience lessons from the ShakeOut Earthquake scenario. Earthquake Spectra 27 (2), 559–73.Google Scholar
Welsh, M. (2014). Resilience and responsibility: Governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal 180 (1), 1526.Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1971). The children of Kauai. A longitudinal study from the prenatal period to age ten. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1993). Resilience and recovery: Findings from the Kauai longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology 5 (4), 503–15.Google Scholar
Werner, E., Smith, R. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Westley, F., Carpenter, S. R., Brock, W. A., Holling, C. S., Gunderson, L. H. (2002). Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In Gunderson, L. H., Holling, C. S. (eds.), Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington: Island Press, pp: 103–20.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (1936). Limit of economic justification for flood protection. Journal of Land and Public Utility Economics 12, 133–48.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (1945). Human adjustment to floods. A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Working Paper No. 29.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (1973). Natural hazards research. In Chorley, R. J. (ed.), Directions in geography. London: Methuen, pp: 193216.Google Scholar
White, G. F. (1978). Natural hazards and the third world—a reply. Human Ecology 6 (2), 229–31.Google Scholar
White, G. F., Kates, R. W., Burton, I. (2001). Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazards management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards 3 (3), 8192.Google Scholar
Whiteford, L. M., Tobin, G. A. (2009). If the pyroclastic flow doesn’t kill you, the recovery will: Cascading impacts of Mt. Tungurahua’s eruptions in rural Ecuador. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/geo_facpub/55 [last accessed: May 22, 2017].Google Scholar
WHO – World Health Organisation (2014). Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick: Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3), 595613.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. (2010). Multifunctional “quality” and rural community resilience. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (3), 364–81.Google Scholar
Wilson, N. J. (2014). The politics of adaptation: Subsistence livelihoods and vulnerability to climate change in the Koyukon Athabascan village of Ruby, Alaska. Human Ecology 42 (1), 87101.Google Scholar
Winsemius, H. C., Aerts, J. C. J. H., van Beek, L. P. H., Bierkens, M. F. P., Bouwman, A., Jongman, B., Kwadijk, J. C. J., Ligtvoet, W., Lucas, P. L., van Vuuren, D. P., Ward, P. J. (2016). Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nature Climate Change 6, 381–5.Google Scholar
Winter, S. C., May, P. J. (2001). Motivation for compliance with environmental regulations. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (4), 675–98.Google Scholar
Winter, M. G., Smith, J. T., Fotopoulou, S., Pitilakis, K., Mavrouli, O., Corominas, J., Argyroudis, S. (2014). Recommendations for the quantitative analysis of landslide risk. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 73 (2), 291305.Google Scholar
Wirth, P., Hutter, G., Schanze, J. (2010). Flood risk management and regional governance – The case of Weisseritz Regio (Germany). In Kluvánková-Oravská, T. (ed.), From government to governance? New governance for water and biodiversity in an enlarged Europe. Pargue: Alfa Nakladatelství, pp: 128–41.Google Scholar
Wisner, B. (1998). Marginality and vulnerability: Why the homeless of Tokyo don’t ‘count’ in disaster preparations. Applied Geography 18 (1), 2533.Google Scholar
Wisner, B. (2016). Vulnerability as concept, model, metric, and tool. Natural Hazard Science: Oxford Research Encyclopedias. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.013.25 http://naturalhazardscience.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389407.001.0001/acrefore-9780199389407-e-25 [last accessed: March 02. 2017].Google Scholar
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T. and Davis, I. (2004). At risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wisner, B., Gaillard, J. C., Kelman, I. (eds.) (2012). Handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction and management. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisner, B., Luce, H. R. (1993). Disaster vulnerability: Scale, power and daily life. GeoJournal 30 (2), 127–40.Google Scholar
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough”. Landscape and Urban Planning 125, 234–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wymann von Dach, S., Bachmann, F., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Fuchs, S., Keiler, M., Mishra, A., Sötz, E. (eds.) (2017). Safer lives and livelihoods in mountains: Making the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction work for sustainable mountain development. Bern: Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, with Bern Open Publishing (BOP).Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (1989). International cooperation: Building regimes for natural resources and the environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional dynamics: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Global Environmental Change 20 (3), 378–85.Google Scholar
Young, O. R., Berkhout, F., Gallopin, G. C., Janssen, M. A., Ostrom, E., van der Leeuw, S. (2006). The globalization of socio-ecological systems. An agenda for scientific research. Global Environmental Change 16 (3), 304–16.Google Scholar
Young, P. H. (1996). The economicy of convention. The Journal of Economic Perspective 10 (2), 105–22.Google Scholar
Zander, M. (2010). Armes Kind – starkes Kind? Die Chance der Resilienz. Wiesbaden: VS – Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Zautra, A. J., 2009. Resilience: One part recovery, two parts sustainability. Journal of Personality 77 (6), 1935–43.Google Scholar
Zebrowski, C. R. (2013). The nature of resilience. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses 1 (3), 59173.Google Scholar
Zeller, C. (2004). North Atlantic innovative relations of Swiss pharmaceuticals and the importance of regional biotech arenas. Economic Geography 80 (1), 83111.Google Scholar
Zijderveld, A. C. (2000). The institutional imperative – The interface of institutions and networks. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, K. (2010). Der veränderte Stellenwert von Wissen in der Planung. Ein Beitrag zu einem wissensbasierten Verständnis von Planung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 68 (2), 115–25.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M., Keiler, M. (2015). International frameworks for disaster risk reduction: Useful guidance for sustainable mountain development? Mountain Research and Development 35 (2), 195202.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×