Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T09:00:37.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Distributed Computing with MapReduce and Pig

from Part 3 - Building Web Scale Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Serge Abiteboul
Affiliation:
INRIA Saclay – Île-de- France
Ioana Manolescu
Affiliation:
INRIA Saclay – Île-de- France
Philippe Rigaux
Affiliation:
Conservatoire Nationale des Arts et Metiers, Paris
Marie-Christine Rousset
Affiliation:
Université de Grenoble, France
Pierre Senellart
Affiliation:
Télécom ParisTech, France
Get access

Summary

So far, the discussion on distributed systems has been limited to data storage, and to a few data management primitives (e.g., write(), read(), search(), etc.). For real applications, one also needs to develop and execute more complex programs that process the available datasets and effectively exploit the available resources.

The naive approach that consists in getting all the required data at the Client in order to apply locally some processing, often looses in a distributed setting. First, some processing may not be available locally. Moreover, centralizing all the information then processing it, would simply miss all the advantages brought by a powerful cluster of hundreds or even thousands machines. We have to use distribution. One can consider two main scenarios for data processing in distributed systems.

Distributed processing and workflow: In the first one, an application disposes of large data sets and needs to apply to them some processes that are available on remote sites. When this is the case, the problem is to send the data to the appropriate locations, and then sequence the remote executions. This workflow scenario is typically implemented using Web services and some high-level coordination language.

Distributed data and MapReduce: In a second scenario, the data sets are already distributed in a number of servers, and, conversely to the previous scenario, we “push” programs to these servers. Indeed, due to network bandwidth issues, it is often more cost-effective to send a small piece of program from the Client to Servers, than to transfer large data volumes to a single Client.

Type
Chapter
Information
Web Data Management , pp. 339 - 363
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×