Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:37:37.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Human attitudes and values

Tradition and transformation and zombies

from Part I - The historical and contemporary contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

By
Peter Corkeron
Edited by
James Higham ,
Lars Bejder  and
Rob Williams
Peter Corkeron
Affiliation:
Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA
James Higham
Affiliation:
University of Otago, New Zealand
Lars Bejder
Affiliation:
Murdoch University, Western Australia
Rob Williams
Affiliation:
University of St Andrews, Scotland
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Tradition is commonly cited in arguments justifying the continuation of commercial whaling (e.g. Morishita, 2006). Rather than explore the meaning and context of whaling traditions, I shall focus on the more general question of how we perceive animals, and what those perceptions mean for how people relate to animals. Then I shall describe the recent transformations in those who support whaling, and those who oppose it, focusing on whale-watching. Finally, I question whether the non-government organization (NGO) support for whale-watching as a replacement for whaling has become, itself, a tradition that has morphed into a zombie.

Zombies may seem an odd addition to the discussion of the role of nature-based tourism in conservation, but here, I discuss a zombie idea, rather than the shambling undead. Recently, the construct of ‘zombie’ ideas has been introduced (Quiggin, 2010) in macroeconomics. A zombie idea is one that should have been killed off long ago, given available evidence that it is wrong, and yet it just will not die. Although the impetus for zombie concepts came from macroeconomics (Quiggin, 2010), the construct has been taken up by authors in other areas: for example, military history (Stockings, 2010), environmental economics (Reyes, 2011) and ecology (Fox, 2011).

Type
Chapter
Information
Whale-watching
Sustainable Tourism and Ecological Management
 , pp. 48 - 56
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous (2006). 2006 Resolutions The resolutions made at the 58th IWC annual meeting in St. Kitts & Nevis, 2006. Available at:
Anonymous (2010). Nr. 21/2010 – Þjóðhagslegt gildi hvalveiða. Available at:
Anonymous (2012). Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Animal Behaviour, 83, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C.S., Steel, D., Choi, Y., et al. (2010). Genetic evidence of illegal trade in protected whales links Japan with the US and South Korea. Biology Letters 6, 647–650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boye, T.K., Simon, M. & Madsen, P.T. (2010). Habitat use of humpback whales in Godthaabsfjord, West Greenland, with implications for commercial exploitation. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 1529–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockington, D. & Duffy, R. (2010). Capitalism and conservation: The production and reproduction of biodiversity conservation. Antipode 42, 469–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrier, J.G. (2010). Protecting the environment the natural way: Ethical consumption and commodity fetishism. Antipode 42, 672–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caughley, G. (1985). Problems in wildlife management. In Messel, H. (Ed.), The Study of Populations. Sydney: Pergamon Press, pp. 129–135.Google Scholar
Clapham, P.J., Berggren, P., Childerhouse, S., et al. (2003). Whaling as science. Bioscience 53, 210–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkeron, P.J. (2006a). How shall we watch whales? In Lavigne, D.M. (Ed.), Gaining Ground: In pursuit of ecological sustainability. Proceedings of an international forum. Guelph, ON: The International Fund for Animal Welfare and Limerick, Ireland: University of Limerick, pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
Corkeron, P.J. (2006b). Opposing views of the ‘ecosystem approach’ to fisheries management. Conservation Biology 20, 617–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkeron, P.J. (2007). Iceland, whaling and ecosystem-based fishery management. Available at:
Corkeron, P.J. (2009a). Reconsidering the science of scientific whaling. Marine Ecology Progress Series 375, 305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkeron, P.J. (2009b). Marine mammals’ influence on ecosystem processes affecting fisheries in the Barents Sea is trivial. Biology Letters 5, 204–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costello, C., Gerber, L. & Gaines, S. (2012). A market approach to saving whales. Nature 481, 139–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dakin, W.J. (1934). Whalemen Adventurers: The story of whaling in Australian waters and other southern seas related thereto, from the days of sail to modern times. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2011). Zombie ideas in ecology. Available from:
Gales, N.J., Kasuya, T., Clapham, P.J. & Brownell, R.L. (2005). Japan's whaling plan under scrutiny. Nature 435, 883–884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamazaki, T. & Tanno, D. (2001). Approval of whaling and whaling-related beliefs: Public opinion in whaling and nonwhaling countries. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 6, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J. (2007). Is there a role for ecologists in an ecosystem approach to the management of marine resources?Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 17, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, J.E.S. & Lusseau, D. (2007). Urgent need for empirical research into whaling and whale watching. Conservation Biology 21, 554–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hjort, J. (1914). Fluctuations in the great fisheries of northern Europe viewed in the light of biological research. Rapports, Conceil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 20, 1–228.Google Scholar
Hoyt, E. (2001). Whale Watching 2001: Worldwide tourism numbers, expenditures, and expanding socioeconomic benefits. Yarmouth Port, MA: International Fund for Animal Welfare, pp. i–vi, 1–158.Google Scholar
Icelandic Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture (2009). Questions and Answers about sustainable whaling. Available at:
IFAW (2009). Press release. ‘New Report Documents Massive Growth in Whale Watching’. Available at:
IFAW (2011). Press release. ‘New whale protection campaign urges tourists visiting Iceland to avoid eating whale meat’. Available at:
Igoe, J., Neves, K. & Brockington, D. (2010). A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: Theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode 42, 486–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliff, M. (2010). Contemporary initiatives on the future of the International Whaling Commission. Marine Policy 34, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingebrigtsen, A. (1929). Whales caught in the North Atlantic and other seas. Rapports, Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 56, 123–135.Google Scholar
IWC (2011a). Catches taken: Under objection or Under Reservation. Catches under Objection since 1985. Available at:
IWC (2011b). Special Permit Catches since 1985. Available at:
Jørgensen, C., Enberg, K. & Dunlop, E.S., et al. (2007). Managing evolving fish stocksScience 318, 1247–1248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lislevand, T. (2009). Nødvendig med norsk hval- og selfangst? Available at
Ludvigsen, S. (2005). The Norwegian position on culling. Science 305, 497–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, J. (2006). Multiple analysis of the whaling issue: Understanding the dispute by a matrix. Marine Policy 30, 802–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishita, J. (2008). What is the ecosystem approach for fisheries management? Marine Policy 32, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murawski, S. (2007). Ten myths concerning ecosystem approaches to marine resource management. Marine Policy 31, 681–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NAMMCO (2010). Marine Ecosystem Management Conference is now canceled. Available at:
Neves, K. (2010). Cashing in on cetourism: A critical ecological engagement with dominant E-NGO discourses on whaling, cetacean conservation and whale-watching. Antipode 42, 719–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, S., Campbell, R., Cortez, H. & Knowles, T. (2009). Whale Watching Worldwide: Tourism numbers, expenditures and expanding economic benefits. A special report from the International Fund for Animal Welfare. Yarmouth, MA: Economists at Large.Google Scholar
Pikitch, E.K., Santora, C., Babcock, E.A., et al. (2004). Fishery management and culling: Response. Science 306, 1892.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie economics: How dead ideas still walk among us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 216 pp.Google Scholar
Reyes, O. (2011). Zombie carbon and sectoral market mechanisms. Capitalism Nature Socialism 22, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ris, M. (1993). Conflicting cultural values: Whale tourism in northern Norway. Arctic 46, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockings, C. (Ed.) (2010). Zombie Myths of Australian Military History. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press. 279 pp.
Suter, K.D. (1982). Australia's new whaling policy: Formulation and implementation. Marine Policy 6, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tønnessen, J.N. & Johnsen, A.O. (1982). The History of Modern Whaling (transl. by R.I. Christophersen). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
WDCS (2010). Reinventing the Whale. The whaling industry's development of new applications for whale oil and other products in pharmaceuticals, health supplements and animal feed. 12 pp. Available at:
WDCS (2011). Press release. ‘WDCS calls on visitors to Iceland not to eat whale meat’ Available at:
Wilson, C. & Tisdell, C. (2003). Conservation and economic benefits of wildlife-based tourism: Sea turtles and whales as case studies. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 8, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Øien, N. (1988). The distribution of killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the North Atlantic based on Norwegian catches. Rit Fiskideildar 11, 65–78.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Human attitudes and values
    • By Peter Corkeron, Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA
  • Edited by James Higham, University of Otago, New Zealand, Lars Bejder, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Rob Williams, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Whale-watching
  • Online publication: 05 April 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018166.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Human attitudes and values
    • By Peter Corkeron, Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA
  • Edited by James Higham, University of Otago, New Zealand, Lars Bejder, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Rob Williams, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Whale-watching
  • Online publication: 05 April 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018166.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Human attitudes and values
    • By Peter Corkeron, Bioacoustics Research Program, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA
  • Edited by James Higham, University of Otago, New Zealand, Lars Bejder, Murdoch University, Western Australia, Rob Williams, University of St Andrews, Scotland
  • Book: Whale-watching
  • Online publication: 05 April 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139018166.005
Available formats
×