Part V
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 July 2017
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- What is a Mathematical Concept? , pp. 159 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Allen, K., & Mendick, H. (2012). Young people’s uses of celebrity: Class, gender and ‘improper’ celebrity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 77–93.Google Scholar
Bellos, A. (2015). How to solve the maths GCSE question about Hannah’s sweets that went viral. Retrieved 22 July 2015, from www.theguardian.com/science/alexs-adventures-in-numberland/2015/jun/05/how-to-solve-the-maths-gcse-question-about-hannahs-sweets-that-went-viralGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B. (2015). Hitler reacts to Edexcel GCSE Maths 1MA0 Paper 1. Retrieved 22 July 2015, from www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgTSe5InLbgGoogle Scholar
Department for Education (2014). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study. Retrieved 8 July 2015, from www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-studyGoogle Scholar
Duchin, M. (2004). The sexual politics of genius. Retrieved 8 July 2015, from mduchin.math.tufts.edu/genius.pdfGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality (volume 1): The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). Queer(y)ing capitalist organization. Organization, 3(4), 541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G. H. (1940/1969). A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hossain, S., Mendick, H. & Adler, J. (2013). Troubling “understanding mathematics in-depth”: Its role in the identity work of student-teachers in England. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littler, J. (2013). Meritocracy as plutocracy: The marketising of ‘equality’ under neoliberalism. New Formations, 80/81, 52–72.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, A. (2012). Unpacking understanding: The (re)search for the Holy Grail of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 385–399.Google Scholar
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press (McGraw-Hill Education).Google Scholar
momoneymopingu, (2015). Hitler reacts to GCSE Edexcel Maths (Paper 1 June 2015). Retrieved 22 July 2015, from www.youtube.com/watch?v=A5QfTEVw3icGoogle Scholar
Noriega, M. (2015). Read the rejection letters Disney used to send any woman who wanted to be an animator. Retrieved 22 July 2015, from www.vox.com/2015/7/16/8978351/famous-rejection-letters-disney-animator-womenGoogle Scholar
Sedgwick, E. K. (1993/2002). What’s queer? Retrieved 22 July 2015, from users.clas.ufl.edu/kristinjoos/spring02/syp3000/queerreading.htmlGoogle Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1999). Introduction, in Ma, L., Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics (pp. ix–xii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stinson, D. (2013). Negotiating the “white male math myth”: African American male students and success in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilchins, R. (2004). Queer theory, gender theory: An instant primer. Los Angeles, CA: Alyson Books.Google Scholar
References
Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Barwell, R. (2009). Researchers’ descriptions and the construction of mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwell, R. & Abtahi, Y. (2015). Morality and news media representations of mathematics education. In Mukhopadhyay, S. & Greer, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 298–311). Portland, OR: Portland State University.Google Scholar
Camara, W. J. & Shaw, E. J. (2012). The media and educational testing: In pursuit of the truth or in pursuit of a good story? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(2), 33–37.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S. & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11(2), 367–380.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the discursive and cognitive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1(4), 515–542.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.Google Scholar
Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619–634.Google Scholar
Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: Some aspects of the extraordinary impact of the OECD’s PISA study on the German education system. In Ertl, H. (Ed.), Cross-national attraction in education: Accounts from England and Germany (pp. 195–208). Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
Kee, C. P., Ibrahim, F., Ahmad, F. & Khiang, C. C. (2012). Frame contention between news sources and news media: Framing the dispute of teaching Mathematics and Science in English. Asian Social Science, 8(5), 16–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, T. & Meaney, T. (2014). It’s just as well kids don’t vote: The positioning of children through public discourse around national testing. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 377–397.Google Scholar
Pons, X. (2012). Going beyond the ‘PISA shock’ discourse: An analysis of the cognitive reception of PISA in six European countries, 2001–2008. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 206–226.Google Scholar
Price, V. & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In Barett, G. A. & Boster, F. J (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
Semetko, H. A. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.Google Scholar
Waldow, F. (2009). Review essay: What PISA did and did not do: Germany after the ‘PISA-shock’. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 476–483.Google Scholar
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, T. (2011). Mathematics education and subjectivity: Cultures and cultural renewal. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Brown, T. & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Heywood, D., Solomon, Y. & Zagorianakos, A. (2012). Experiencing the space we share. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(4), 561–572.Google Scholar
Doxiadis, A. & Mazur, B. (Eds.) (2012). Circles disturbed: The interplay of mathematics and narrative. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: The ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malabou, M. (2011). Is confession the accomplishment of recognition? Rousseau and the unthought of religion. In Žižek, S, Crockett, C, & Davis, C (Eds.), Hegel and the infinite: Religion, politics and dialectic (pp. 19–30). New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pais, A. & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the Political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 9–24.Google Scholar
Palmer, A. (2011). ‘‘How many sums can I do’’? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
Paton, G. (2012). Numeracy campaign: 17m adults ‘struggle with primary school maths’, The Telegraph, 2 March.Google Scholar
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2011). The spectre of ideology. In Szeman, I. & Kaposy, T. (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology pp. 228–244. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. & Millbank, J. (2009). The monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or dialectic? Davis, C. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar