Book contents
- What Is Quantum Information?
- What Is Quantum Information?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Information
- Part II Information and Quantum Mechanics
- Part III Probability, Correlations, and Information
- 8 On the Tension between Ontology and Epistemology in Quantum Probabilities
- 9 Inferential versus Dynamical Conceptions of Physics
- 10 Classical Models for Quantum Information
- 11 On the Relative Character of Quantum Correlations
- Index
- References
10 - Classical Models for Quantum Information
from Part III - Probability, Correlations, and Information
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
Book contents
- What Is Quantum Information?
- What Is Quantum Information?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Information
- Part II Information and Quantum Mechanics
- Part III Probability, Correlations, and Information
- 8 On the Tension between Ontology and Epistemology in Quantum Probabilities
- 9 Inferential versus Dynamical Conceptions of Physics
- 10 Classical Models for Quantum Information
- 11 On the Relative Character of Quantum Correlations
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- What is Quantum Information? , pp. 207 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aaronson, S. and Arkhipov, A. (2011). “The Computational Complexity of Linear Optics.” Pp. 333–342 in Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Aerts, D. (1998). “The Hidden Measurement Formalism: What can Be Explained and Where Quantum Paradoxes Remain.” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 37: 291–304.Google Scholar
Aiello, A., Töppell, F., Marquardt, C., Giacobino, E., and Leuchs, G. (2015). “Quantum-Like Non-separable Structures in Optical Beams.” New Journal of Physics, 17: 043024.Google Scholar
Amaral, B., Terra Cunha, M., and Cabello, A. (2014). “Exclusivity Principle Forbids Sets of Correlations Larger than the Quantum Set.” PhysicsReview A, 89: 030101.Google Scholar
Barnum, H., Barrett, J., Clark, L., Leifer, M., Spekkens, R., Stepanik, N., Wilce, A., and Wilke, R. (2010). “Entropy and Information Causality in General Probabilistic Theories.” New Journal of Physics, 12: 033024.Google Scholar
Beltrametti, E. and Cassinelli, G. (1981). The Logic of Quantum Mechanics. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, Volume 15. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, N., Van Linbiden, H., Van den Heuvell, L., and Spreeuw, R. (2002). “Implementation of Quantum Search Algorithm Using Classical Fourier Optics.” Physics Review Letters, 88: 137901.Google Scholar
Brady, R. and Anderson, R. (2014). “Why Bouncing Droplets Are a Pretty Good Model of Quantum Mechanics.” arXiv:1401.4356v1 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., and Wehner, S. (2014). “Bell Nonlocality.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 86: 419–478.Google Scholar
Bub, J. (2007). “Quantum Computation from a Quantum Logical Perspective.” Quantum Information & Computation, 7: 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabello, A. (2014). “Exclusivity Principle and the Quantum Bound of the Bell Inequality.” Physics Review A, 90: 062125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., and Russell, N. J. (2015). “Universal Linear Optics.” Science, 349: 711–716.Google Scholar
Cerf, N., Adami, C., and Kwiat, P. (1998). “Optical Simulation of Quantum Logic.” Physical Review A, 57: 1477–1480.Google Scholar
Clifton, R., Bub, J., and Halvorson, H. (2003). “Characterizing Quantum Theory in Terms of Information-Theoretic Constraints.” Foundations of Physics, 33: 1561–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couder, Y. and Fort, E. (2006). “Single-Particle Diffraction and Interference at a Macroscopic Scale.” Physical Review Letters, 97: 154101.Google Scholar
Couder, Y., Fort, E., Gautier, C., and Boudaoud, A. (2005). “From Bouncing to Floating: Noncoalescence of Drops on a Fluid Bath.” Physical Review Letters, 94: 177801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, R. T. (1946). “Probability, Frequency and Reasonable Expectation.” American Journal of Physics, 14: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. T. (1961). The Algebra of Probable Inference. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Barros, J. A. and Oas, G. (2014). “Negative Probabilities and Counter-factual Reasoning in Quantum Cognition.” Physica Scripta, 163: 014008.Google Scholar
de Barros, J. and Oas, G. (2015). “Some Examples of Contextuality in Physics: Implications to Quantum Cognition.” Pp. 153–184 in Dzhafarov, E., Jordan, S., Zhang, R., and Cervantes, V. (eds.), Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
De Finetti, B. (1937).“La Prévision: ses Lois Logiques, ses Sources Subjectives.” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré. Reprinted as “Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources.” In Kyburg, H. E. and Smokler, H. E. (eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, 1964. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Deutsch, D. and Ekert, A. (2000). “Introduction to Quantum Computation.” Pp. 92–131 in Boumeester, D., Ekert, A. and Zeilinger, A. (eds.), The Physics of Quantum Information. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Everett, H. (1957). “Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462.Google Scholar
Feynman, R. (1951). “The Concept of Probability in Quantum Mechanics.” Pp. 533–541 in Neyman, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Francisco, D., Iemmi, C., Paz, J. P., and Ledesma, S. (2006a). “Optical Simulation of the Quantum Hadamard Operator.” Optics Communications, 268: 340–345.Google Scholar
Francisco, D., Iemmi, C., Paz, J. P., and Ledesma, S. (2006b). “Simulating a Quantum Walk with Classical Optics.” Physical Review A, 74: 052327.Google Scholar
Francisco, D. and Ledesma, S. (2008). “Classical Optics Analogy of Quantum Teleportation.” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 25: 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, C. and Schack, R. (2013). “Quantum-Bayesian Coherence.” Reviews of Modern Physics, 85: 1693–1715.Google Scholar
Gleason, A. (1957). “Measures on the Closed Subspaces of a Hilbert Space.” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6: 885–893.Google Scholar
Goldin, M., Francisco, D., and Ledesma, S. (2010). “Simulating Bell Inequality Violations with Classical Optics Encoded Qubits.” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 27: 779–786.Google Scholar
Gühne, O., Kleinmann, M., Cabello, A., Larsson, J., Kirchmair, G., Zahringer, F., Gerritsma, R., and Roos, C. (2010). “Compatibility and Noncontextuality for Sequential Measurements.” Physical Review A, 81: 022121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holik, F. (2014). “Logic, Geometry and Probability Theory.” SOP Transactions on Theoretical Physics, 1: 128–137.Google Scholar
Holik, F., Bosyk, G. M., and Bellomo, G. (2015). “Quantum Information as a Non-Kolmogorovian Generalization of Shannon’s Theory.” Entropy, 17: 7349–7373.Google Scholar
Holik, F. and Plastino, A. (2014). “Quantum Mechanics: A New Turn in Probability Theory.” Pp. 399–414 in Ezziane, Z. (ed.), Contemporary Research in Quantum Systems. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Holik, F., Plastino, A., and Sáenz, M. (2014). “A Discussion on the Origin of Quantum Probabilities.” Annals of Physics, 340: 293–310.Google Scholar
Holik, F., Plastino, A., and Sáenz, M. (2016). “Natural Information Measures for Contextual Probabilistic Models.” Quantum Information & Computation, 16: 115–133.Google Scholar
Jozsa, R. (2000). “Quantum Algorithms.” Pp. 104–125 in Boumeester, D., Ekert, A., and Zeilinger, A. (eds.), The Physics of Quantum Information. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Kwiat, P., Mitchell, J., Schwindt, P., and White, A. (2000). “Grover’s Search Algorithm: An Optical Approach.” Journal of Modern Optics, 47: 257–266.Google Scholar
Landauer, R. (1996). “The Physical Nature of Information.” Physics Letters A, 217: 188–193.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016a). “What Is Quantum Information?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 56: 17–26.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O., Holik, F., and Vanni, L. (2016b). “What Is Shannon Information?” Synthese, 193: 1983–2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maassen, H. and Uffink, J. (1988). “Generalized Entropic Uncertainty Relations.” Physical Review Letters, 60: 1103–1106.Google Scholar
Man’ko, M. A., Man’ko, V. I., and Vilela Mendes, R. (2001). “Quantum Computation by Quantumlike Systems.” Physics Letters A, 288: 132–138.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. and Chuang, I. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oas, G. and de Barros, J. A. (2015). “Principles Defining Quantum Mechanics.” Pp. 335–366 in Dzhafarov, E., Jordan, S., Zhang, R., and Cervantes, V. (eds.), Contextuality from Quantum Physics to Psychology. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Popescu, S. (1994). “Bell’s Inequalities versus Teleportation: What Is Nonlocality?” Physical Review Letters, 72: 797–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popescu, S. (2014). “Nonlocality Beyond Quantum Mechanics.” Nature Physics, 10: 264–270.Google Scholar
Puentes, G., La Mela, C., Ledesma, S., Iemmi, C., Paz, J. P., and Saraceno, M. (2004). “Optical Simulation of Quantum Algorithms Using Programmable Liquid-Crystal Displays.” Physical Review A, 69: 042319.Google Scholar
Qian, X.-F., Little, B., Howell, J. C., and Eberly, J. H. (2015). “Shifting the Quantum-Classical Boundary: Theory and Experiment for Statistically Classical Optical Fields.” Optica, 2: 611–615.Google Scholar
Renes, J. (2013). “The Physics of Quantum Information: Complementarity, Uncertainty and Entanglement.” International Journal of Quantum Information, 11: 1330002.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. (1948). “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
Short, A. and Wehner, S. (2010). “Entropy in General Physical Theories.” New Journal of Physics, 12: 033023.Google Scholar
Spreeuw, R. (1998). “A Classical Analogy of Entanglement.” Foundations of Physics, 28: 361–374.Google Scholar
Spreeuw, R. (2001). “Classical Wave-Optics Analogy of Quantum-Information Processing.” Physical Review A, 63: 062302.Google Scholar