Book contents
- What Is Quantum Information?
- What Is Quantum Information?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Information
- Part II Information and Quantum Mechanics
- 4 Quantum versus Classical Information
- 5 Quantum Information and Locality
- 6 Pragmatic Information in Quantum Mechanics
- 7 Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness
- Part III Probability, Correlations, and Information
- Index
- References
5 - Quantum Information and Locality
from Part II - Information and Quantum Mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 July 2017
By
Book contents
- What Is Quantum Information?
- What Is Quantum Information?
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I The Concept of Information
- Part II Information and Quantum Mechanics
- 4 Quantum versus Classical Information
- 5 Quantum Information and Locality
- 6 Pragmatic Information in Quantum Mechanics
- 7 Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness
- Part III Probability, Correlations, and Information
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- What is Quantum Information? , pp. 93 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Barrett, S. D. and Kok, P. (2005). “Efficient High-Fidelity Quantum Computation Using Matter Qubits and Linear Optics.” Physical Review A, 71: 060310.Google Scholar
Caulton, A. (2014). “Qualitative Individuation in Permutation-Invariant Quantum Mechanics.” arXiv:1409.0247v1 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (1988). “Overlap and Distinguishability of Quantum States.” Physics Letters A, 126: 303–306.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (2014). “The Logic of Identity: Distinguishability and Indistinguishability in Classical and Quantum Physics.” Foundations of Physics, 44: 1302–1316.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (2017). “Niels Bohr and the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics.” Forthcoming in Folse, H. and Faye, J. (eds.), Niels Bohr and Philosophy of Physics: Twenty First Century Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. and Lubberdink, A. (2011). “How Classical Particles Emerge from the Quantum World.” Foundations of Physics, 41: 1051–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieks, D. and Versteegh, M. A. M. (2008). “Identical Particles and Weak Discernibility.” Foundations of Physics, 38: 923–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenfest, T. and Ehrenfest, T. (1909). Begriffliche Grundlagen der statistischen Auffassung in der Mechanik. Leipzig: Teubner. English translation: Conceptual Foundations of the Statistical Approach in Mechanics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1959.Google Scholar
Ghirardi, G., Marinatto, L., and Weber, T. (2002). “Entanglement and Properties of Composite Quantum Systems: A Conceptual and Mathematical Analysis.” Journal of Statistical Physics, 108: 49–122.Google Scholar
Giustina, M., Versteegh, A. M. et al. (2015). “Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell’s Theorem with Entangled Photons.” Physical Review Letters, 115: 250401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hensen, B. et al. (2015). “Loophole-Free Bell Inequality Violation Using Electron Spins Separated by 1.3 Kilometers.” Nature, 526: 682–686.Google Scholar
Jaeger, G. and Shimony, A. (1995). “Optimal Distinction between Two Non-orthogonal Quantum States.” Physics Letters A, 197: 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladyman, J., Linnebo, Ø., and Bigaj, T. (2013). “Entanglement and Non-factorizability.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 44: 215–221.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. and Dieks, D. (2016a). “Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.” In Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 Edition. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/qm-modal/Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. and Dieks, D. (2016b). “Particles in a Quantum Ontology of Properties.” Pp. 123–143 in Bigaj, T. and Wüthrich, C. (eds.), Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics. Leiden: Rodopi-Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaler, J. (2016). “Interpretation Neutrality in the Classical Domain of Quantum Theory.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 53: 54–72.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1948). “The Mathematical Theory of Communication.” Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27: 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by