Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:43:04.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Vertical Accountability in Communist Regimes

The Role of Citizen Complaints in Bulgaria and China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2013

Martin K. Dimitrov
Affiliation:
Tulane University, Louisiana
Get access

Summary

The chapters in this volume aim to identify the institutional foundations of the resilience of communist regimes. This task is complicated by the fact that some communist regimes collapsed in 1989–1991, whereas others survived this watershed period. The contributors to the volume approach the question of collapse in different ways. Some emphasize differences by presenting theoretical arguments about the presence of certain variables in the countries that collapsed and their absence in countries that survived. For example, Bernstein (Chapter 2) discusses political liberalization in the Soviet Union and its absence in China, whereas Bunce and Wolchik (Chapter 5) and Kramer (Chapter 6) highlight the susceptibility of the Eastern Bloc to contagion and the ability of the East Asian communist regimes to avoid contagion. In a similar vein, Tismaneanu (Chapter 3) discusses ideological erosion in Eastern Europe and the reinvigoration of ideology in China and North Korea. Ideological erosion in Europe also provides the background against which Charles Armstrong (Chapter 4) discusses the essential role of ideology for the maintenance of the North Korean regime. In turn, Gallagher and Hanson (Chapter 7) argue that the absence of both carrots and sticks explains Soviet collapse, whereas the survival of communist regimes after 1989 is based on varying combinations of carrots and sticks. Other chapters take a different approach by focusing only on resilient regimes. Examples are provided by Tsai (Chapter 8), who discusses the contribution of private entrepreneurs to regime resilience in China and Vietnam, and by Abrami, Malesky, and Zheng (Chapter 9), who explore variation in the institutions of vertical and horizontal accountability in China and Vietnam. These two chapters allow us to investigate in depth the causal mechanisms that link a certain variable to the outcome of regime resilience.

This chapter presents a third approach for assessing the impact of individual variables on regime resilience. It tracks how changes in the same variable (erosion in vertical accountability) had the same short-term effect (instability due to decreasing popular loyalty) in both Bulgaria and in China prior to 1989. Despite this shared instability, one regime collapsed whereas the other survived through the use of force. This chapter therefore allows us to distinguish between regime decay and regime collapse: although both Bulgaria and China experienced decay prior to 1989, only one of the two regimes collapsed. The chapter also investigates China’s ongoing efforts to strengthen accountability after 1989, thus highlighting the contribution of institutions of accountability to regime resilience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Why Communism Did Not Collapse
Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience in Asia and Europe
, pp. 276 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Guan, Xiao, “Mao Zedong tongzhi chuli renmin laixin pianduan” (Episodes from Comrade Mao Zedong’s Handling of People’s Letters), Renmin xinfang, no. 2 (1985), 2–3
Deutz-Schroeder, Monika and Staadt, Jochen, eds., Teurer Genosse! Briefe an Erich Honecker (Dear Comrade: Letters to Erich Honecker) (Berlin: Transit, 1994)
Cook, Linda J., The Soviet Social Contract and Why It Failed: Welfare Policy and Workers’ Politics from Brezhnev to Yeltsin (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Kochanowky, Jerzy, “‘. . . jesteśmy już przywyczajeni’: Prolegomena do społeczno-modernizacyinych kulis ‘problemu mięsnego’ v PRL” (“We’ve Become Accustomed”: Prolegomena to the Socio-modernization Backdrop of the “Meat Problem” in the People’s Republic of Poland), Przegląd historyczny 96:4 (2005), 587–605Google Scholar
Hübner, Peter and Hübner, Christa, Sozialismus als soziale Frage: Sozialpolitik in der DDR und Polen 1968–1976 (Socialism as a Social Question: Social Policy in the GDR and Poland, 1968–1976) (Köln: Böhlau, 2008), esp. 133–141Google Scholar
VTsIOM, Obshchestvennoe mnenie v tsifrakh, no. 8 (15) (April 1990), 15.
Whiting, Susan, “The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grass Roots: The Paradox of Party Rule,” in Naughton, Barry and Yang, Dali, eds., Holding China Together: Diversity and National Integration in the Post-Deng Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 101–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Edward, “The Myth of Accountability,” Michigan Law Review 103:8 (August 2005), 2073–2136Google Scholar
Philp, Mark, “Delimiting Democratic Accountability,” Political Studies 57:1 (2009), 28–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert Roberts, Jennifer, Accountability in Athenian Government (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982), esp. 14–29Google Scholar
Landry, Pierre F., Decentralized Authoritarianism in China: The Communist Party’s Control of Local Elites in the Post-Mao Era (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D. and Schwartz, Thomas, “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science 28:1 (1984), 165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher, eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003)CrossRef
Yonhap News Agency [Seoul], North Korea Handbook [Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2003], 153)Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Sheila, Tear Off the Masks! Identity and Imposture in Twentieth-Century Russia (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle, Smolensk under Soviet Rule (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958), 378–408Google Scholar
Dimitrov, Martin K., “Zhalbite na grazhdanite v komunisticheska Bulgariia” (Citizen Complaints in Communist Bulgaria), in Znepolski, Ivailo, ed., Da poznaem komunizma (Getting to Know Communism) (Sofia: Ciela, 2012), 167–225Google Scholar
Friedrich, Walter, Förster, Peter, and Starke, Kurt, eds., Das Zentralinstitut für Jugendforschung Leipzig, 1966–1990: Geschichte, Methoden, Erkenntnisse (Central Institute for Youth Research in Leipzig, 1966–1990: History, Methods, Findings) (Berlin: Edition Ost, 1999)
Pravda, Alex, “East-West Interdependence and the Social Compact in Eastern Europe,” in Bornstein, Morris, Gitelman, Zvi, and Zimmerman, William, eds., East-West Relations and the Future of Eastern Europe: Politics and Economics (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1981), 162–187Google Scholar
Zlobodnevni problemi (Problems of the Day), no. 2 (1983)
State Gazette, no. 52 (July 4, 1980).
Chukrin, Georgi, Zapiski ot totalitarnoto vreme: Kraiat (Notes from the Totalitarian Period: The End) (Sofia: Iztok-Zapad, 2007), 85.Google Scholar
Nikova, Gospodinka, “Zhivkovata ikonomicheska reforma, perestroikata i startut na skritata privatizatsiia v Bulgariia” (Zhivkov’s Economic Reforms, Perestroika, and the Beginning of Hidden Privatization in Bulgaria), Istoricheski Pregled, no. 5–6 (2003), 92–125
Baeva, Iskra, Iztochna Evropa prez XX vek: Idei, konflikti, mitove (Eastern Europe in the Twentieth Century: Ideas, Conflicts, Myths) (Sofia: Paradigma, 2010), 462–493Google Scholar
Ivanov, Martin, Reformatorstvo bez reformi (Reform-Mindedness without Reforms) (Sofia: Ciela, 2008)Google Scholar
Ivanov, Dimitur, Politicheskoto protivopostaviane v Bulgariia 1956–1989 (Political Opposition in Bulgaria, 1956–1989) (Sofia: Ares Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Kuran, Timur, “Now Out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989,” World Politics 44:1 (1991), 7–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne, “The Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91,” World Politics 47:1 (1994), 42–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Mark, “The Collapse of East European Communism and the Repercussions within the Soviet Union,” Journal of Cold War Studies 5:4 (2003), 178–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis, “The Decay and Breakdown of Communist One-Party Systems,” Annual Review of Political Science 2:1 (1999), 323–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, James R., Political Participation in Communist China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967), 177–179Google Scholar
Shi, Tianjian, Political Participation in Beijing (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997), esp. 60–66Google Scholar
Chunfeng huayu ji (Annals of Spring Breezes and Rain) (Beijing: Qunzhong chubanshe, 1981)
Jiecheng, Diao, Renmin xinfang shilüe, 1949–1995 (History of People’s Letters and Visits, 1949–1995) (Beijing: Beijing jingji xueyuan chubanshe, 1996)Google Scholar
Thireau, Isabelle and Linshan, Hua, Les Ruses de la démocratie: Protester en Chine (The Tricks of Democracy: Protesting in China) (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2010), 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walder, Andrew G., Communist Neo-Traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986)Google Scholar
Renmin xinfang, no. 22 (1985), 2–3
Renmin xinfang, no. 1 (1988), 15–17
Walder, Andrew G., “Workers, Managers, and the State: The Reform Era and the Political Crisis of 1989,” The China Quarterly, no. 127 (1991), 467–492
Liang, Zhao, comp., The Tiananmen Papers (New York: Public Affairs, 2001)Google Scholar
Renmin xinfang, no. 11 (1989), 2
Renmin xinfang, no. 10 (1989), 2
Renmin xinfang, no. 11 (1989), 2–4
Renmin xinfang, no. 10 (1989), 3–8
Renmin xinfang, no. 2 (1990), 2–3
Perry, Elizabeth J., Challenging the Mandate of Heaven: Social Protest and State Power in China (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 2001)Google Scholar
O’Brien, Kevin J. and Li, Lianjiang, Rightful Resistance in Rural China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Yongshun, Collective Resistance in China: Why Popular Protests Succeed or Fail (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Chen, Xi, Social Protest and Contentious Authoritarianism in China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Li, Lianjiang, Liu, Mingxing, and O’Brien, Kevin, “Petitioning Beijing: The High Tide of 2003–2006,” China Quarterly, no. 210 (June 2012), 313–334
Zhongguo tongji nianjian 2010 (China Statistical Yearbook 2010) (Beijing: Zhongguo tongji chubanshe, 2010), 118
Zouping nianjian 1986–1995 (Zouping Yearbook 1986–1995) (Ji’nan: Qilu shushe, 1997), 83–84
Renmin xinfang, no. 12 (1998), 11–13
Croll, Elisabeth J., “Social Welfare Reform: Trends and Tensions,China Quarterly, no. 159 (1999), 684–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckett, Jane, “State, Collectivism, and Worker Privilege: A Study of Urban Health Insurance Reform,” China Quarterly, no. 177 (2004), 155–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwan, Ching, Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007)Google Scholar
Hurst, William, The Chinese Worker after Socialism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Thomas P. and , Xiaobo, Taxation without Representation in Contemporary Rural China (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonghe, Zhang and Wei, Zhang, Lintong xinfang: Zhongguo jiceng xinfang wenti yanjiu baogao (Letters and Visits in Lintong: Research Report on Grassroots Letters and Visits in China) (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 2009)Google Scholar
Ling, Zhao, “Xinfang gaige yinfa zhengyi” [Reform of Letters and Visits System Gives Rise to Controversy], Nanfang zhoumo, November 18, 2004).
Weiye, Lin and Hanmin, Liu, Gong’an jiguan yingdui quntixing shijian shiwu yu celüe (Practical Affairs and Strategy of the Response of the Public Security Organs to Mass Incidents) (Beijing: Zhongguo renmin gong’an daxue chubanshe, 2008), 3Google Scholar
China Human Rights Yearbook 2007–2008 ([N.P.]: Chinese Human Rights Defenders, 2008), 4–10
Jingqiong, Wang, “Beijing to Close Down Thousands of Liaison Offices,” China Daily, January 25, 2010
Lam, Willy, “The Grim Future of the Wukan Model for Managing Dissent,” China Brief 12:1 (January 6, 2012), 3–5Google Scholar
Deyu, Chen, Renmin chenqing an diwei zhi yanjiu (Research on Citizen Petitions) (Taipei: Xingzhengyuan yanjiu fazhan kaohe weiyuanhui, 1983)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×