Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T05:15:45.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Firebrands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2022

By
Ali Tohidi  and
Nigel Berkeley Kaye
Edited by
Kevin Speer  and
Scott Goodrick
Kevin Speer
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Scott Goodrick
Affiliation:
US Forest Service
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews the current state of knowledge on steps in the process of generating a spot fire. Firebrand formation and data on the size and shape of firebrands generated from wildfires are described. Various elements of firebrand lofting and transport modeling, including firebrand aerodynamics, the fire plume characteristics, models for the ambient wind field, model coupling, experimental results, and a discussion on the sensitivity of the model predictions to the inevitable uncertainty in the model input parameters, are examined. Recent work on the physics of firebrand deposition and spot fire generation is noted.

Keywords

embersfirebrandsfire spottingember transportember formation
Type
Chapter
Information
Wildland Fire Dynamics
Fire Effects and Behavior from a Fluid Dynamics Perspective
 , pp. 129 - 155
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albini, FA, Alexander, ME, Cruz, MG (2012) A mathematical model for predicting the maximum potential spotting distance from a crown fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21(5), 609–627.Google Scholar
Albini, FA, Forest, I (1983) Potential Spotting Distance from Wind-Driven Surface Fires. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, UT.Google Scholar
Anthenien, RA, Tse, SD, Fernandez-Pello, AC (2006) On the trajectories of embers initially elevated or lofted by small scale ground fire plumes in high winds. Fire Safety Journal 41(5), 349–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASCE (1999) Wind Tunnel Studies of Buildings and Structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Babrauskas, V (2003) Ignition Handbook: Principles and Application to Fire Safety Engineering, Fire Investigation, Risk Management and Forensic Science. Issaquah, WA: Fire Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Baines, WD (1983) A technique for the direct measurement of volume flux of a plume. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 132, 247–256.Google Scholar
Baroudi, D, Ferrantelli, A, Li, KY, Hostikka, S (2017) A thermo-mechanical explanation for the topology of crack patterns observed on the surface of charred wood and particle fibreboard. Combustion and Flame 182, 206–215.Google Scholar
Barr, BW, Ezekoye, OA (2013) Thermo-mechanical modeling of firebrand breakage on a fractal tree. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 34(2), 2649–2656.Google Scholar
Batchelor, GK (1954) Heat convection and buoyancy effects in fluids. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 80, 339–358.Google Scholar
Baum, HR, McCaffrey, BJ (1989) Fire induced flow field: Theory and experiment. Fire Safety Science 2, 129–148.Google Scholar
Bhutia, S, Jenkins, M, Sun, R (2010) Comparison of firebrand propagation prediction by a plume model and a coupled fire/atmosphere large eddy simulator. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 2(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Briggs, GA (1984) Plume rise and buoyancy effects. In: Haugen, DA, ed. Atmospheric Science and Power Production. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, pp. 327–366.Google Scholar
Caton, SE, Hakes, RSP, Gorham, DJ, Zhou, A, Gollner, MJ (2017a) Review of pathways for building fire spread in the wildland urban interface part I: Exposure conditions. Fire Technology 53, 429–473.Google Scholar
Caton, SE, Hakes, RSP, Gorham, DJ, Zhou, A, Gollner, MJ (2017b) Review of pathways for building fire spread in the wildland urban interface part II: Response of components and systems and mitigation strategies in the United States. Fire Technology 53, 475–515.Google Scholar
Caton-Kerr, SE, Tohidi, A, Gollner, MJ (2019) Firebrand generation from thermally-degraded cylindrical wooden dowels. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 5.Google Scholar
Delichatsios, MA (1987) Air entrainment into buoyant jet flames and pool fires. Combustion and Flame 70(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
Fay, JA (2006) Model of large pool fires. Journal of Hazardous Materials 136(2), 219–232.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Pello, AC, Lautenberger, C, Rich, D, Zak, C, Urban, J, Hadden, R, Scott, S, Fereres, S (2015) Spot fire ignition of natural fuel beds by hot metal particles, embers, and sparks. Combustion Science and Technology 187(1–2), 269–295.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Pello, C (2009) Modeling wildland fire propagation and spotting. In: Fire Interdisciplinary Research on Ecosystem Services (FIRES), Seminar 3. March 31–April 1, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Finney, MA (1998) FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-Model Development and Evaluation. Research Paper RMRS-RP-4, Revised 2004. Ogden, UT: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
Friedman, MH (1963) A correlation of impact sensitivities by means of the hot spot model. Symposium (International) on Combustion 9(1), 294–302.Google Scholar
Gol’dshleger, UI, Pribytkova, KV, Barzykin, VV (1973) Ignition of a condensed explosive by a hot object of finite dimensions. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves 9(1), 99–102.Google Scholar
Grayson, M, Pang, WC, Schiff, S (2012) Three-dimensional probabilistic wind-borne debris trajectory model for building envelope impact risk assessment. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 102(Mar), 22–35.Google Scholar
Grishin, AM, Dolgov, AA, Zima, VP, Kryuchkov, DA, Reino, VV, Subbotin, AN, Tsvyk, RS (1998) Ignition of a layer of combustible forest materials. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves 34(6), 613–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadden, RM, Scott, S, Lautenberger, C, Fernandez-Pello, AC (2011) Ignition of combustible fuel beds by hot particles: an experimental and theoretical study. Fire Technology 47(2), 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakes, RSP, Salehizadeh, H, Weston-Dawkes, MJ, Gollner, MJ (2019) Thermal characterization of firebrand piles. Fire Safety Journal 104, 34–42.Google Scholar
Hedayati, F, Bahrani, B, Zhou, A, Quarles, SL, Gorham, DJ (2019) A framework to facilitate firebrand characterization. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering 5(Jul).Google Scholar
Holmes, JD (2001) Wind Loading of Structures. London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, JD (2004) Trajectories of spheres in strong winds with application to wind-borne debris. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 92(1), 9–22.Google Scholar
Hoult, DP, Weil, JC (1972) Turbulent plume in a laminar cross flow. Atmospheric Environment (1967) 6(8), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, JC (1993) Predictive calculations of the effect of an accidental heat source on a bed of forest litter. Journal of Fire Sciences 11(1), 80–86.Google Scholar
Jones, JC (1995) Improved calculations concerning the ignition of forest litter by hot particle ingress. Journal of Fire Sciences 13(5), 350–356.Google Scholar
Jones, WP, Launder, BEi (1972) The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 15(2), 301–314.Google Scholar
Karimpour, A, Kaye, NB (2012) On the stochastic nature of compact debris flight. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 100(1), 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, I, Mentrelli, A, Bosseur, F, Filippi, J-B, Pagnini, G (2016) Turbulence and fire-spotting effects into wild-land fire simulators. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 39, 300–320.Google Scholar
Kaye, NB (2015) Solutions to the compact debris flight equations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 138, 69–76.Google Scholar
Koo, E, Linn, RR, Pagni, PJ, Edminster, CB (2012) Modelling firebrand transport in wildfires using HIGRAD/FIRETEC. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21(4), 396–417.Google Scholar
Koo, E, Pagni, PJ, Weise, DR, Woycheese, JP (2010) Firebrands and spotting ignition in large-scale fires. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19(7), 818–843.Google Scholar
Kortas, S, Mindykowski, P, Consalvi, JLL, Mhiri, H, Porterie, B (2009) Experimental validation of a numerical model for the transport of firebrands. Fire Safety Journal 44(8), 1095–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautenberger, C (2013) Wildland fire modeling with an Eulerian level set method and automated calibration. Fire Safety Journal 62(Part C), 289–298.Google Scholar
Lee, JHW, Chu, VH (2003) Turbulent Jets and Plumes: A Lagrangian Approach. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Li, K, Pau, DSW, Wang, J, Ji, J (2015) Modelling pyrolysis of charring materials: Determining flame heat flux using bench-scale experiments of medium density fibreboard (MDF). Chemical Engineering Science 123, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzello, SL (2014) Enabling the investigation of structure vulnerabilities to wind-driven firebrand showers in wildland-urban interface (WUI) fires. Fire Safety Science 11, 83–96.Google Scholar
Manzello, SL, Maranghides, A, Mell, WE (2007) Firebrand generation from burning vegetation. International Journal of Wildland Fire 16, 458–462.Google Scholar
Manzello, SL, Maranghides, A, Shields, JR, Mell, WE, Hayashi, Y, Nii, D (2009) Mass and size distribution of firebrands generated from burning Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis) trees. Fire and Materials 33(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
Manzello, SL, Shields, JR, Cleary, TG, Maranghides, A, Mell, WE, Yang, JC, Hayashi, Y, Nii, D, Kurita, T (2008) On the development and characterization of a firebrand generator. Fire Safety Journal 43(4), 258–268.Google Scholar
Manzello, SL, Suzuki, S (2017) Experimental investigation of wood decking assemblies exposed to firebrand showers. Fire Safety Journal 92(Sept.), 122–131.Google Scholar
Manzello, SL, Suzuki, S, Gollner, MJ, Fernandez-Pello, AC (2020) Role of firebrand combustion in large outdoor fire spread. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 76, 100801.Google Scholar
Martin, J, Hillen, T (2016) The spotting distribution of wildfires. Applied Sciences 6(6), 177.Google Scholar
Matvienko, OV, Kasymov, DP, Filkov, AI, Daneyko, OI, Gorbatov, DA (2018) Simulation of fuel bed ignition by wildland firebrands. International Journal of Wildland Fire 27(8), 550–561.Google Scholar
Mell, WE, Manzello, SL, Maranghides, A, Butry, D, Rehm, RG (2010) The wildland–urban interface fire problem: Current approaches and research needs. International Journal of Wildland Fire 19, 238–251.Google Scholar
Mell, WE, Maranghides, A, McDermott, R, Manzello, SL (2009) Numerical simulation and experiments of burning douglas fir trees. Combustion and Flame 156(10), 2023–2041.Google Scholar
Morton, BR, Taylor, GI, Turner, JS (1956) Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 234, 1–23.Google Scholar
Pao, Y-H, Varatharajulu, V (1976) Huygens’ principle, radiation conditions, and integral formulas for the scattering of elastic waves. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(6), 1361–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, PJ (2010) Steady aerodynamics of rod and plate type debris. In 17th Australian Fluid Mechanics Conference. December 5–9, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Richards, PJ (2012) Dispersion of windborne debris. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 104 –106, 594–602.Google Scholar
Richards, PJ, Williams, N, Laing, B, McCarty, M, Pond, M (2002) Numerical calculation of the three-dimensional motion of wind-borne debris. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 96(10–11), 2188–2202.Google Scholar
Rothermel, Richard C. 1972. “A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels.” Res. Pap. INT-115. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 40 p. 115. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/32533.Google Scholar
Rowntree, GWG, Stokes, AD (1994) Fire ignition by aluminum particles of controlled size. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 14, 117–123.Google Scholar
Salehizadeh, H (2019) Critical Ignition Conditions of Structural Materials by Cylindrical Firebrands. MSc thesis, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Sardoy, N, Consalvi, JL, Kaiss, A, Fernandez-Pello, AC, Porterie, B (2008) Numerical study of ground-level distribution of firebrands generated by line fires. Combustion and Flame 154(3), 478–488.Google Scholar
Sardoy, N, Consalvi, J-L, Porterie, B, Fernandez-Pello, A (2007) Modeling transport and combustion of firebrands from burning trees. Combustion and Flame 150(3), 151–169.Google Scholar
Sardoy, N, Consalvi, J-L, Porterie, B, Kaiss, A (2006) Transport and combustion of Ponderosa Pine firebrands from isolated burning trees. In: 2006 1st International Symposium on Environment Identities and Mediterranean Area, ISEIM, July 9–12, Corte-Ajaccio, France, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
Standohar-Alfano, CD, Estes, H, Johnston, T, Morrison, MJ, Brown-Giammanco, TM (2017) Reducing losses from wind-related natural perils: Research at the IBHS research center. Frontiers in Built Environment, 3(Feb.).Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Brown, A, Manzello, SL, Suzuki, J, Hayashi, Y (2014) Firebrands generated from a full-scale structure burning under well-controlled laboratory conditions. Fire Safety Journal 63(Jan.), 43–51.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Manzello, SL (2016) Firebrand production from building components fitted with siding treatments. Fire Safety Journal 80(Feb.), 64–70.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Manzello, SL (2017) Experimental investigation of firebrand accumulation zones in front of obstacles. Fire Safety Journal 94(Dec.), 1–7.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Manzello, SL (2019) Investigating effect of wind speeds on structural firebrand generation in laboratory scale experiments. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 130(Mar.), 135–140.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Manzello, SL, Lage, M, Laing, G (2012) Firebrand generation data obtained from a full-scale structure burn. International Journal of Wildland Fire 21, 961–968.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Nii, D, Manzello, SL (2016) The performance of wood and tile roofing assemblies exposed to continuous firebrand assault. Fire and Materials 41(1), 84–96.Google Scholar
Tachikawa, M (1983) Trajectories of flat plates in uniform flow with application to wind-generated missiles. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 14(1–3), 443–453.Google Scholar
Tarifa, CS, Del Notario, PP, Moreno, FG, Villa, AR (1967) Transport and Combustion of Firebrands, final report of grants FG-SP-11 and FG-SP-146. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service.Google Scholar
Tarifa, CS, Notario, P, Moreno, FG (1965) On the flight paths and lifetimes of burning particles of wood. Symposium (International) on Combustion 10(1), 1021–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, JC, Mueller, EV, Santamaria, S, Gallagher, M, El Houssami, M, Filkov, A, Clark, K, Skowronski, N, Hadden, RM, Mell, W, Simeoni, A (2017) Investigation of firebrand generation from an experimental fire: Development of a reliable data collection methodology. Fire Safety Journal 91, 864–871.Google Scholar
Thomas, PH (1965) A comparison of some hot spot theories. Combustion and Flame 9(4), 369–372.Google Scholar
Tohidi, A, Kaye, NB (2016) Highly buoyant bent-over plumes in a boundary layer. Atmospheric Environment 131, 97–114.Google Scholar
Tohidi, A, Kaye, NB (2017a) Aerodynamic characterization of rod-like debris with application to firebrand transport. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 168, 297–311.Google Scholar
Tohidi, A, Kaye, NB (2017b) Stochastic modeling of firebrand shower scenarios. Fire Safety Journal 91, 91–102.Google Scholar
Tohidi, A, Kaye, NB (2017c) Comprehensive wind tunnel experiments of lofting and downwind transport of non-combusting rod-like model firebrands during firebrand shower scenarios. Fire Safety Journal 90, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tohidi, A, Kaye, N, Bridges, W (2015) Statistical description of firebrand size and shape distribution from coniferous trees for use in Metropolis Monte Carlo simulations of firebrand flight distance. Fire Safety Journal 77, 21–35.Google Scholar
Trucchia, A, Egorova, V, Butenko, A, Kaur, I, Pagnini, G (2019) RandomFront 2.3: A physical parameterisation of fire spotting for operational fire spread models-implementation in WRF-SFIRE and response analysis with LS-Fire+. Geoscientific Model Development 12(1), 69–87.Google Scholar
Urban, JL, Song, J, Santamaria, S, Fernandez-Pello, C (2019) Ignition of a spot smolder in a moist fuel bed by a firebrand. Fire Safety Journal 108, 102833.Google Scholar
Ventsel, E, Krauthammer, T (2001) Thin Plates and Shells: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. New York: Marcel Decker.Google Scholar
Wang, S, Chen, H, Liu, N (2015a) Ignition of expandable polystyrene foam by a hot particle: An experimental and numerical study. Journal of Hazardous Materials 283, 536–543.Google Scholar
Wang, S, Huang, X, Chen, H, Liu, N (2017) Interaction between flaming and smouldering in hot-particle ignition of forest fuels and effects of moisture and wind. International Journal of Wildland Fire 26(1), 71–81.Google Scholar
Wang, S, Huang, X, Chen, H, Liu, N, Rein, G (2015b) Ignition of low-density expandable polystyrene foam by a hot particle. Combustion and Flame 162(11), 4112–4118.Google Scholar
Woycheese, JP, Pagni, PJ (1999) Combustion models for wooden brands. In: Third International Conference on Fire Research and Engineering. Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and International Association of Fire Safety Science (IAFSS), Chicago, IL, pp. 53–71.Google Scholar
Yin, P, Liu, N, Chen, H, Lozano, JS, Shan, Y (2014) New correlation between ignition time and moisture content for pine needles attacked by firebrands. Fire Technology 50(1), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zvyagils’ kaya, AI, Subbotin, AN (1996) Influence of moisture content and heat and mass exchange with the surrounding medium on the critical conditions of initiation of surface fire. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves 32(5), 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×