Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2016
Introduction
The overwhelming majority of women in the Indian informal sector are home-based workers. Eighty percent of homeworkers, that is home-based workers who work for piece-wages rather than on own-account, are women (Mehrotra and Biggeri 2007). Even after working for up to seven or eight hours a day homeworking women only earn around Rs 30, far below the minimum wage for unskilled workers (AIDWA 2010, Sengupta et al. 2007). Why are wages so low in home-based work? A recent study of homeworking women in Delhi found that most of the women interviewed did not consider themselves “workers” but rather “wives or mothers trying to make their little contribution to the family income” (AIDWA 2010). Despite women's long history of labour force participation in artisanal and other informal industry, and despite several academic and policy studies, women's work is not considered “real work,” but rather “spare-time work,” “help,” or “income-generating activity.” Thus in addition to well-known factors such as a captive labour force resulting from social restrictions, lower fallback options, and low labour productivity, one hypothesis that emerges from the literature on home-based work is that the undervaluation of women's work can be linked to different values placed on women's as opposed to men's time. Since homework is seen as being performed in the time left over after housework responsibilities such as cooking, cleaning, child-care and other care work, have been discharged, it is described, by contractors, husbands, as well as women, as being performed in “free time.” However, while references to this “spare-time discourse” are frequent, few studies have pursued the argument beyond anecdotes.
Drawing upon time-use surveys and interviews of women workers in the Banaras textile industry, I argue that women's time is undervalued in the market because it is seen as having a very low opportunity cost and their knowledge is undervalued because it is acquired informally and “free of cost.” The result is that even when women spend a full working day on skilled work, they are paid wages half that men receive for manual labour. The majority of women surveyed and interviewed in the present study are poor Muslims from the Ansari community and are subject to varying degrees of restrictions due to purdah. They are thus located at the intersection of class, caste, and gender hierarchies.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.