Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 March 2021
Debates about workplace resistance and dissent are a central aspect of Labour Process Theory (Burawoy, 1979; Thompson, 1997; Thompson and Smith, 2017). This chapter focuses on care work in the non-profit social services (NPSS), and argues that resistance in this sector is a series of compromises and moral projects. With the objective of extending Labour Process Theory and commenting on resistance in the context of austerity, this chapter draws on qualitative data and on Ackroyd and Thompson's (1999; 2013) three-part analytic frame (described in more detail later) exploring the dynamics of resistance and dissent in care work.
The NPSS is funded largely by government and grew dramatically under welfare state contracting out (Cunningham, 2008; Eikenberry, 2009). It provides support and care services to a range of populations such as the elderly, young, people with disabilities and people with mental health issues. Agencies come in a variety of sizes, from very small (one or two employees) to very large (1,000+ workers), and some operate as regional or national non-profit chains.
Mirroring the contradictory relations of the austerity-linked, contracted-out state that funds most non-profit care in Canada, workplace resistance and dissent in the NPSS is an unstable equilibrium that can legitimize austerity, act as a catalyst to undermine it, or both. NPSS staff members often have altruistic/social justice identities outside of the workplace, and they seek these values in the organization's mission, work content and workplace relationships. Workers’ personal values often form the bedrock on which oppositional identities and practices are built, enhanced, frustrated and circumscribed, or a combination of all these factors simultaneously (Van Til, 2009; Nickel and Eikenberry, 2016). Most workers assume that altruistic values and identities will be held in common by fellow employees and managers, and seek ways to bond with others in the workplace around this presumed shared identity. In addition, they often educate and mobilize each other around ongoing political and social understandings of social justice and care (Aronson and Smith, 2010; 2011). This shared, oppositional analysis can extend beyond the workplace to analyses of the larger society and the ways that unjust relations are seen to be active in the workplace.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.