To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Reflective civics is a duty and delight for free people, especially Americans, given our founding principles viewing citizenship as not only a right but also a duty and a matter of sacred honor. American schooling K-16, and civic culture, can redress our recent deficits of civic health and of individual mental and spiritual health by emphasizing the higher meaning provided throughout the study of, and civil discussion about, citizenship and self-government in both civil society and public affairs. Then sections on (a) Civic Friendship and Replenishing America’s Civic Capital – including renewal of civil society and voluntary associations; (b) A Sputnik Moment for Academia: Restoring a Higher Civics – emphasizing the need for professors and higher education leaders to provide guidance and a good example on renewing civics, and supporting its renewal in K-12 schooling and civic culture; and (c) Lincoln’s Higher Call – that a renewed civics across K-16 and American culture should emphasize the consensus-forging figure of Lincoln, his magnanimity and statesmanship in the Second Inaugural in particular, calling for “malice toward none” and “charity for all.”
Allen Ginsberg visited China in 1984, first as part of an American delegation of writers and then as a private traveler. He visited many cities over a period of several months and spent time lecturing on American poetry. He found China oppressive and, in many ways, disappointing, and also he suffered many health problems owing to the pollution there; but nonetheless his time in China was a creatively fertile period for him, resulting in a number of important poems. This chapter details his travels around China, focusing on a sense of paranoia that plagued him because he was in a totalitarian state where he was constantly observed. It also looks at the poems that emerged from his trip, examining the various influences his inquiries into Chinese poetry had on his own work.
This chapter tackles relationships between Allen Ginsberg and the New York School poets as more than biographical. It considers how Ginsberg and the New York School poets reinterpreted qualities of heightened emotion and supple linguistic powers that are featured and valued in T. S. Eliot’s poetry and criticism. Ironically, this influence counters the impersonal poetic qualities for which Eliot’s influence is more commonly known and which helped to impersonalize much post-World War II poetry to which New York School, Beat, and Confessional Poetry mutinied. However, Ginsberg and the New York School poets led this vanguard earlier and to more effect than Robert Lowell and others described in or influenced by M. L. Rosenthal’s 1959 Nation article, “Poetry as Confession.” Like Eliot, Ginsberg and the New York School poets emphasize the role of the second person addressee, particularly in the works of Frank O’Hara and his “Personism.”
The chapter provides an overview of the multifaceted cultural significance of Allen Ginsberg. While Ginsberg appeared in numerous works, performances, and actions from the late 1950s until his death in 1997 (and continues to enjoy an afterlife in popular and literary culture), in every case these appearances mean something. Hypersensitive Beatnik misfit, spokesman for the Summer of Love, conduit for Eastern mysticism, drug advocate, punk rocker, itinerant scholar, and gay-rights champion (to name only the most prominent of Ginsberg’s manifestations), Ginsberg’s lasting representation – that of the gifted and innovative poet – is the one that will linger.
The Educating for American Democracy report (2021) proposes a national- consensus approach to civics and history education for K-12 public schools, emphasizing civic knowledge and civic virtues as the priority, and the necessary foundations for constructive and responsible civic participation. It then has three sections: (a) Tocqueville, Common Schools, and the Invention of American Civics – including discussion of Horace Mann, and Henry Randall Waite and the American Institute of Civics; (b) Educating for American Democracy: Civic Knowledge and Civic Virtues – summarizing the seven Themes of the report and its Roadmap of curricular guidance (ranging from Civic Participation and We the People to A New Constitution and A People in the World); and (c) American Exemplars of Reflective Patriotism and Civic Honesty – with subsections on Abolitionism and the Constitutional Confidence of Douglass and Lincoln; Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, and American Justice for Women; and Martin Luther King, Jr. and Persistent Hope in American Justice.
Allen Ginsberg taught Shelley’s notion of the poet as legislator and the Romantic ideologeme that art could save the world, and conceived of the poet as shaman. He heard his father recite Romantic verse daily for years before he learned to read. This informed his championing of poetry’s “aural renaissance,” in which he played a role. Ginsberg’s early exposure to the first blues recordings made him a lifelong aficionado who taught blues as poetry. Immersion with Kerouac and friends in the New York jazz scene of the 1940s–1950s informed his and Kerouac’s writing, as they adapted jazz – which they equated to “Black speech” – in their writing. The Beats’ synthesis of post-Whitmanic American poetics with the rhythms and inflections of African-American vernacular speech took that argot to the masses, and influenced the 1960s generation of rockers, in particular the two musical phenomena that would carry the Beat/Romantic vision into global mass culture: Bob Dylan and the Beatles.
This chapter begins by examining America's civic crisis and the failure of civics in K-16, with remedies proposed including the national-consensus approach of the Educating for American Democracy 2021 study and the renewal efforts in higher education, including public university reforms that establish departments of Civic Thought and Leadership. It then turns to three sections: (a) Franklin’s warning and Lincoln’s: America’s crisis and our civics failure; (b) Rediscovering America’s reflective, discursive patriotism; and (c) American Hopefulness and Exemplars Sustaining the Republic (introducing Washington, Douglass, Lincoln, Stanton, Anthony, and King)
This chapter explores the importance of Ginsberg’s sexuality in the context of his life and work. Aware of his nonnormative sexual desires from an early age, Ginsberg’s lifelong quest for self-understanding was necessarily shaped and informed by poetic explorations into his sexuality, his relationship with which was sometimes fraught. His work bears the imprint of his enduring preoccupation with the variable experiences of queer minds and bodies (often his own) in both straight and queer spaces. The chapter examines selected canonical poems including “A Supermarket in California,” “My Sad Self,” “Howl,” “City Midnight Junk Strains,” and “The Green Automobile,” in order to highlight their generative provocations in the context of a period of prevailing queer invisibility and to emphasize Ginsberg’s legacy as a queer poet in the twenty-first century. The chapter also examines the relationship between Ginsberg’s status as a queer pioneer and some of the more troubling aspects of his in some areas limited and limiting visions and modes of sexuality.
During his month-long visit to Cuba in 1965, Allen Ginsberg’s ideals of expressive freedom, sexual openness, and poetic individualism came into direct conflict with the increasingly repressive Castroist regime. Invited by the state organization Casa de las Américas to judge a poetry competition, Ginsberg quickly drew scrutiny from the regime for his outspoken views on homosexuality, drug use, and freedom of expression. His subsequent surveillance by the state’s vice squad, arrest, and deportation underscored the Cuban government’s intolerance for nonconformist expression, especially as it pertained to sexuality and dissent. Ginsberg’s experiences, recorded in his Cuban diaries, letters, and poems, reveal a central paradox of revolutionary politics: While seeking liberation, regimes might deploy repressive mechanisms of censorship and control. Ginsberg’s confrontation with Cold War ideologies – both US and Cuban – solidified his vision of a humanist poetics aimed at disrupting authoritarian systems and expanding consciousness through individuals’ radical self-expression.
This chapter argues that it is in the enlightened self-interest of higher education to renew a top-priority place for citizenship education both to restore core academic missions and to redress the deficit of public confidence that recent academic trends have yielded. It then develops four sections: (a) Renewing the Academy’s Core Mission through Civic Education – including the public university reform movement establishing new colleges, departments, and centers of civics, also renewal efforts in private universities and across higher education, with an emphasis on restoring intellectual diversity and lively discourse in academia through renewal of American civics; (b) A Higher Civics: Civic Thought and Leadership – on the rise of a new academic field in the past decade, including a summary of a course on American civic thought, institutions, and political debate recently developed at Arizona State University; and (c) Leadership Education and the American Balance of Theory and Prudence, emphasizing the importance of study of statesmanship, statecraft, and leadership to prepare public servants for our constitutional democratic republic; and (d) America Civics and Renewed Pluralism in Campus Discourse.
Allen Ginsberg’s entrance into Columbia University in 1943, through to his graduation in 1948, constitute a key phase in his evolution as poet and inerasable presence in the Beat Movement. The classes he takes there with key teachers such as Lionel Trilling become essential even as he develops familiarity with the Manhattan of Greenwich Village, East Harlem, the galleries, jazz, café culture, and the darker reaches of Times Square and 42nd Street. While at Columbia he experiences his celebrated Blake vision and meets Lucien Carr, Herbert Huncke, David Kammerer, Henri Cru, and, essentially, Jack Kerouac, William S. Burroughs, and Neal Cassady. Briefly expelled from Columbia, with a brief stint in the maritime service which takes him to West Africa, he returns to the university and embarks even more fully on the career which will lead to “Howl” and his standing as Beat legendary name.
The seven decades of Allen Ginsberg’s life and poetic work coincided with major changes in societies’ approaches to the mentally ill. Mid century, near rock-bottom in this difficult evolution, Allen burst onto the scene with “Howl” and then “Kaddish”. Allen’s shocking and monumental works said we need to face mental illness and madness, stop seeing them as apart from ourselves, find spiritual meaning, take risks, and make major changes to humanize our approaches. With the approval of Allen and later his estate, I could conduct new research to bring us closer to Allen and Naomi’s lifelong involvement with madness and mental illness and why it matters in relation to his poetry. The result was Best Minds: How Allen Ginsberg Made Revolutionary Poetry from Madness (2023). Allen’s radical acceptance of madness as a basic and potentially beneficial human capacity was far ahead of his time in inviting readers to change how we understand and engage with madness and mental illness.
The chapter offers a contextualization of Ginsberg’s interest and models in French, identifying the key influential figures whose overt (for Rimbaud) or more subtle (for Perse) influences as role and poetic models are traceable in Ginsberg’s early Columbia year journals and the search for his own voice and poetic form. French intertexts in Ginsberg’s early journals then contextualize the emergence of Rimbaud and Perse as role models for both lifestyle and poetics, while intertextual echoes provide some hypotheses as to these poets’ influence. As Ginsberg carefully recorded his life as a poet, lectured, or signaled his influences, method, and technique, peritexts are useful lenses to observe both the construction of Ginsberg’s claimed, asserted, or archived French poetry influences. This chapter will address the reshaping, interpreting, and molding of this material into a language and graft of his own, a personal cosmology, of epic dimension, that would imprint most of his long poems.
Some people are taught that Allen Ginsberg’s most famous poem “Howl” was written spontaneously in a form inspired by Walt Whitman, was read in its entirety for the first time at a well-documented performance at the 6 Gallery, and that Ginsberg was brought to trial because of the ideas in his poem relating to homosexuality. This essay argues that “Howl” was heavily crafted after being simultaneously influenced by the form of Christopher Smart’s “Jubilate Agno” and the language of Jack Kerouac’s mind-thought prose, that probably only a draft of Part I of “Howl” was first read at the 6 Gallery, and that Lawrence Ferlinghetti was tried in court for publishing specific “filthy” words – some represented by dots – in Howl and Other Poems. What we can learn about all the discrepancies and myths is that Beat Studies scholars need to be open to questioning what we have previously accepted as facts.
Over the course of his career, Ginsberg became known as much for his political activism as for his poetry. In fact, Ginsberg didn’t necessarily see a strong distinction between his poetry and his political activism, and this chapter traces how his political consciousness emerged in the early 1960s at the same time he was developing new kinds of poetics to articulate this political consciousness. During the 1960s, Ginsberg became a central figure in the growing and increasingly visible counterculture. The war in Vietnam was a major catalyst for his embrace of countercultural political activism, and as the 1960s unfolded, he came to see language, the corruption of language, and its bad faith use by politicians and others in power as symptom of a callous, violent American culture that seemed to revel in oppression, self-repression, and in escalating the war. He turned to poetry as a counter to this “black magic language,” notably in poems such as “Wichita Vortex Sutra,” and this chapter shows how Ginsberg saw his socially and politically engaged poems of the era as doing the crucially important work of raising or changing consciousness about the war and a host of other social and political issues.