To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article considers a corpus of images created between 1650 and 1750 within Italian Capuchin missions to Kongo and Angola. It demonstrates how these visual creations, though European in form, craftsmanship, and intended audience, were in fact penned by encounter and the products of cross-cultural interactions. Contrasting the Central African images with two well-known and oft-studied Franciscan visual projects from early colonial Mexico, the article further reflects on the stakes of making visible the mixings present, but often overlooked or silenced, in early modern images born from encounters between Europeans and the people they considered their Others.
Paradigmatic of a cultural shift in Irish education in the 1960s, St Brendan’s Community School in Birr, County Offaly was designed by Peter and Mary Doyle as a flexible and extendable mat-building articulated by generous social spaces including exterior courtyards and an interior ‘street’. Owned by the Department of Education and Skills, administered by a Board of Management and occupied by approximately one thousand staff and pupils daily, St Brendan’s has been in continuous use since its opening in 1980. Generations of students have benefited from the intimate relationship between the cultural and social life of the school and the architectural form, fabric, and technology that facilitates it. But by the beginning of the twentieth-first century, due to the lack of consideration given to such aspects at the time it was conceived and constructed, the building was suffering from ongoing material degradation and issues in environmental performance.
This article reflects on a research project undertaken on the school, which aimed to provide the means by which its learning environment and energy use could be improved and optimised in a manner consistent with the integrity of the architects’ conceptual thinking and built design: the opportunity for St Brendan’s to continue its course as a successful paradigm, this time for twenty-first-century education through the reconciliation of its future use with its social and education heritage. Guided by the ‘three dimensions of modernity’ - social, technical, and aesthetic - this process involved the development of new ‘ways of seeing’ and ‘methods of action’ applied to the school realised through the production of a series of representations that collectively identified, mapped, and re-presented the significances and values of the school, element by element. The relationships between these phenomena were complex and necessitated an innovative interdisciplinary approach.
St Brendan’s may have embodied a radical new social agenda for education and indeed society in twentieth-century Ireland in its architecture, but the building remains unlisted and, until recently, its significance (nationally and internationally) has been much overlooked. Part of this project’s agenda, therefore, involved raising awareness in the value of the building among existing and potential future stakeholders. The creation of accessible forms of communication that would both synthesise and make clear the complex data generated and the relationships between them was of central importance to the team’s approach. The paper ultimately argues that while attuned to a specific site, these techniques contain the possibility of a wider application, a new visual literacy for the conservation of twentieth-century buildings.
This article argues that early modern literary and visual texts from Shakespeare's “Comedy of Errors” to Spenser's “Faerie Queene” repeatedly represent and render womanhood as a specifically and singularly white construction; in so doing, they establish the co-constitution of gender and race and their conscription by the contingencies of class. As this formation of white womanhood is in turn mobilized to underwrite the operations of violence and enslavement, white women themselves—and white womanhood as a politically and socially disciplined and disciplining category—emerge as not only the mediators but also the authors of these global and transhistorical processes.
This is not an ordinary book about town planning; rather, it is a collection of accounts from the coalface of planning workplaces in the public and private sectors. This chapter has two purposes in introducing the book. The first is to set out the themes that run through it and which are pivotal in debating the future for planning. The themes constitute the main elements discussed in our empirical stories, and in this chapter we review previous research to set the context for these stories. Second, we outline the methods underpinning our empirical work, which are grounded in the rich tradition of organisational ethnography that forms the basis of our analysis. The next section thus introduces the themes that underpin the book.
1.1 What matters in contemporary planning research: the book's structuring themes
The book has five main themes running through it, which are central to planning's future orientations: the nature and purpose of contemporary planning; the privatisation of planning; commercialisation and business practices in public- and private-sector planning; the nature of contemporary planning work and workplaces; and professionalism and the attendant ethics of planning work. Together they illuminate how contemporary planning is practised and to what effects. The themes have been determined through a literature review, but principally they have been arrived at ‘bottom-up’ through our empirical analysis detailed in the chapters that follow. Each chapter centres on one or more of these key themes.
Our first theme concerns the nature and purpose of contemporary planning. There is a rich literature here which is briefly explored in the next section. This discussion frames subsequent chapters which show how planning work is both much changed but also hugely resonant with past times. Perhaps the most significant element of contemporary planning literature attends to the much-changed political economy of planning, as neoliberal processes have come to dominate procedures of city-making and appear to bypass, or render ineffective, established planning processes and their attendant democratic safeguards (for example, Raco and Savini, 2019). Our contribution is to view issues such as these through the lens of the daily realities of planners, examining how they construct, interpret, resist or facilitate such challenges.