To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A HISTORICAL AND TOPOGRAPHICAL OVERVIEW OF THE DOMUS AUREA
Whatever else can be said of Nero's reign, it must have been interesting. Never before nor since has an autocrat been so wholly devoted to the arts, regardless of cost and generally to the exclusion of all else. This phenomenon is well documented, both in ancient literary sources and in the artistic record, not only in terms of Nero's effusive patronage of the arts in all media, but also in terms of the high quality and often audaciously experimental nature of the works executed under his auspices. As was commonly the fate of emperors whose damnation was important to the subsequent dynasty, much Neronian art was systematically destroyed or reworked, leaving only a specter of its original grandeur for modern scholars. This is as true for Nero's architecture as for any art form – a tragedy in the face of a substantial literary record specifically focused on his building projects. In any case, and not surprisingly, the ancient literary tradition focuses especially on Nero's most personal building project – his palace, the Domus Aurea. That Nero would construct a building suitable for his grandiose notion of himself is perhaps predictable and, as far as we can tell, it was a project to which he was devoted from the earliest possible moment in his reign.
PRE-NERONIAN TYPE X AND RELATED MASONRY (ROOMS 65–80)
The Type X project is the most problematic and controversial phase in the Esquiline Wing (Figs. 11 and 12). It ought not be, however. Missing or encrusted facing means that Type X cannot be described in detail as a masonry type, but the chronological position of the Type X project relative to the other phases in the Pentagonal Court is unambiguous. Type X is a distantly pre-Neronian construction, reused by Severus and Celer to form all of the Northwest Group (Rooms 65–70) of their Pentagonal Court and the west half of the North Group (the North Group is Rooms 71–83; the Type X part is Rooms 71–74, 76 and the west half of Room 80, as indicated on Fig. 11).
The masonry details are described later, but because the Type X phase is controversial, an emphatic summation of what the data tell us about it may be useful from the outset. The Type X remnant provides two sides of the Pentagonal Court, the largest and externally most distinctive design feature in the Neronian palace (the Pentagonal Court). Given that, it must seem that the Type X was an integral part of the Neronian design and must perforce have been built as part of the Neronian project. This is false; the Type X segments were reused by Severus and Celer, not built by them.
MASONRY IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF THE OCTAGON SUITE
Besides the dome itself, the most important architectural features of the Octagon Suite are the vault haunch clerestory windows over the extrados of the dome and the groin vaults in Rooms 123 and 125. The groin vaults are the earliest known examples of this motif in Roman concrete, discussed in greater detail in Section 2 of this chapter, but the vault haunch clerestory windows are more informative as far as the masonry chronology of the Esquiline Wing is concerned. They are integral to the whole design concept of the Octagon Suite, both because they bond to all surrounding masonry and because they play an important rôle in the lighting system. They not only light the radiating rooms, but also help lighten the appearance of the dome when viewed from inside Room 128 by letting light stream into the radiating rooms above the vault. They give the viewer in Room 128 the sense that there is nothing above the vault at all, disguising the fact that that is where the structural system for the vault actually is.
Except for the groin vaults, most major features of the Octagon Suite have to do with lighting. The visual effect of a feather-light dome, appearing to hover in a sea of light all around it, is almost mystical. It is similar in visual impact to trompe l'oeuil painting, clever and wonderful.
OVERVIEW OF THE NERONIAN WEST BLOCK AND THE WEST COURT
As Figures 6 and 11 indicate, Severus and Celer found a number of standing buildings in the area of the West Block when they began their project. For the most part, their procedure is easy to reconstruct, consistent with their practice throughout the Esquiline Wing. They had their own conception of what they wanted to build here, which, as I argue presently, was a reasonably canonical patrician villa suburbana. This design is most recognizable in the original Domus Transitoria project (Neronian phase 1), but was substantially modified in the Domus Aurea project (Neronian phase 2). Because Severus and Celer were creating an imperial residence, the earlier buildings they found on the site were generally incompatible with their needs, requiring widespread razing. Not only does Figure 29 indicate the original Neronian design, but also the Neronian parts represent the scale of the razing required to clear the site for Severus and Celer's design. The area in question is interesting in itself. Keeping in mind that Neronian phase 1 was the Domus Transitoria project, that is, before the great fire of a.d. 64, Severus and Celer did not have a completely free hand over the entire Esquiline hill, but had to make do with whatever parcels of land Nero could obtain for them. Apparently, this did not include some of the commercial properties in the Pentagonal Court area, nor whatever stood in the area of the East Block.
The kind of investigation that the Department of Education and Skills (DfES) has brought about through its exemplar design initiative should be commonplace in architectural culture. For an exemplar design is, or should be, an embodiment of theory in a particularly clear and intense way. The DfES has given 11 architects the opportunity to theorize school environments and contribute realizable ideal designs in the context of the biggest investment in primary and secondary education for over a generation.
arq's interview with Jack Pringle (6/3, pp104–106) puts a strong case for why the profession needs to engage with education and research, if it is to sustain a robust body of knowledge relevant to its clients' continuously changing demands.
Lined against one wall in the reception area of Feilden Clegg Bradley Architects' (FCBA) London office is a row of folding bicycles [2]. All are provided by the firm for the use of staff and partners. A sign of clear commitment to green and humanist causes, credentials which are surely needed by modern architects of large housing schemes. Luckily for the Brooklands Avenue project for 378 dwellings in Cambridge, the architects are supported in this commitment by their client, Countryside Properties. Also luckily, the site contains many magnificent trees. These are mostly around the perimeter, but there is one line forming a strong central spine running north-south. Better still, the west boundary is flanked by Hobson's Brook and a strip of common land.
The interview with Jack Pringle (7/2, pp104–106) provides both an interesting account of how we got here and some useful pointers towards a more integrated future which, hopefully, the RIBA can be at the heart of. The background to this situation is, of course, more fully documented in previous issues of arq including my own paper (6/4, pp297–299).
Since the World Trade Center Towers collapsed in full view of the watching world (FEMA, 2002), the improved safety of tall buildings has become of prime importance globally (Pearson, 2001). International groups such as the UK-based ‘Safety in Tall Buildings Working Group’ (Roberts, 2002), and Arups High Rise (Wainwright, 2002) which are considering these safety implications have made recommendations for improvement in three general areas:
structural systems, especially with respect to progressive collapse
fire proofing, to structure and fabric
evacuation systems, concentrating specifically on vertical evacuation systems such as elevators and stairs.