To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We will now focus our attention on the final book of the Pentateuch, Deuteronomy. We will discover that, even as the book recounts what has come before for the sake of Israel poised to enter the promised land, it does so in a new setting, in an innovative literary format, and with distinctive emphases that speak to generations present and yet to come.
Deuteronomy consists of four collections of speeches given by Moses, set off by literary superscriptions. Scholars have determined that the book is organized in the form of an ancient international treaty. Following a historical prologue, the speeches reiterate and affirm Torah instruction, institute a covenant renewal that links blessings with covenant fidelity, and detail provisions for Israel after Moses’ death (recounted in the final chapter of the book). Deuteronomy is distinctive in the Pentateuch for its focus on the centralization of Israel’s religious cult at the place where Yahweh will cause his name to dwell, the great statement of faith known as the Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4), and the first explicit statements of monotheism in the Old Testament.
All historiography or history writing is done with a purpose, and the purpose of Israel as expressed in the Old Testament was clearly religious and theological. The Israelites sought to record their relationship with God in the past – to relate their unique understanding of God, his universe, and his relationship to Israel. Additionally significant is the fact that Israel was among the first nations in the ancient world to write history.
This chapter will take us into the library of ancient Israel to get a better look at how the books of the Old Testament narrate history and how these books have been organized. Specifically, we will investigate the sources that appear to have been interwoven to create the so-called Primary History. These sources are characterized by their distinctive ways of referring to God and by their themes and literary techniques. We will observe that the Old Testament presents the Primary History in such a way as to provide a framework for understanding the historical contexts of all the rest of the Old Testament books.
This chapter explores the navigational space utilized by poets and novelists who are bent on an appealing production that can earn them the right as new hosts of precursors’ themes and expressions and thus to be thought of as writers of distinctive merit. While philologists and literary critics are on the watch to uncover infringements, the new intertext is often a dense textual engagement driven by a desire for something desired by another. This principle means that there are works that set a standard for the host who would like to own or surpass them. A struggle creates a combative arena where players devise innovations and inventions that strive to escape the strict applications of the canon. This chapter introduces the major tenth-century critics and their perspective on language and its transformation from the uncouth to the refined, as shown in poetry and poetics, where a grounding for a large intertext rests on precursors’s texts that serve now as palimpsests, an almost unrecognized basal source.
In Extra Help you will see how easy it is to understand the subjunctive mood using the pattern we have followed so far for the verb. In Extra Material, we will think about the aspect of the subjunctive mood.
In this chapter, you meet no new grammatical principles, but the rules you have met will save you a great deal of effort. In the Extra Material, we’ll examine the significance of aspect in the ‘other moods’, beginning with general principles and how they apply to the infinitive.
Ancient Israel existed in real time and space. In time, we will recall that ancient Israel was preceded by thousands of years of world history, including, for example, the first writing of the Sumerians (third millennium bce), the Babylonian Empire, and the renowned history of ancient Egypt. In space, Israel was part of Syria–Palestine. Together with Egypt and Mesopotamia, Israel constituted a vast swath of arable land known as the “Fertile Crescent.” Syria–Palestine was thus a vital land bridge between three continents and, likewise, highly vulnerable to surrounding power struggles. The latter meant frequent invasions and domination by a succession of world empires.
The primary purpose of Israel’s story contained in the pages of the Old Testament is to explore its relationship with God. Yahweh initiated an intimate relationship with a man named Abraham, which was defined by a covenant and by promises of descendants and land. The ensuing history covers an era that left its own mark on world history, in no small part due to Israel’s legacy. The age between 800 and 200 bce(the Axial Age) witnessed the appearance of ethical religion and rational philosophy in human civilization. Israel gave the world the Old Testament and the concept of monotheism emerging in its pages.
A survey of the evidence for textile production and trade shows extensive market activities, supported by state enforcement of agreements. The most intrusive form of state intervention was the imposition of a monthly quota to be delivered by weavers, accounting for up to half of their production volume. This may have represented the transformation of an existing quota arrangement attested in New Kingdom Egypt. However, the cash-based Ptolemaic system, in which weavers were compensated and could substitute cash payments for their deliveries, had a different dynamic. The stable demand offered by the quotas offset some of the risk of production for the market by the weavers. This arrangement made the state into an oversized market player, but the textiles it collected were not sold through retail concessions but put to practical use or exported. In addition, weavers and other occupations were subject to taxation in cash, the state levied customs and sales taxes, and it derived revenues from flax cultivation and sheep husbandry, likewise without exercising exclusive control and using private contractors. Attempts at local monopolies were rather undertaken by professional associations.
This chapter examines the introduction of the calendar ca. 300, which it makes part of the broad reconfiguration of the civic order that took place around this time. The calendar’s structure was probably appropriated from Pythagorean circles in southern Italy. Many of its features were intended to regulate the comitium, one of the most significant places in the city, which was also reconfigured in these years to link it firmly and directly to the heavens. The cycle of market-days or nundinae is also an important element. The logic behind it remains largely unexamined, and it has usually been viewed as having no cultic significance. Instead, the nundinal cycle was linked to formal intercalary cycles of the kind that in the Greek world were often associated with speculation about ideal political orders and their relationships with the gods.
Having examined the nature of Old Testament poetry, we will now explore two books by way of example. Proverbs and Job are unique in that they are most often identified as portions of the Old Testament’s wisdom traditions. Wisdom was a highly valued and enduring concept well attested across the ancient Near East. Here you will learn a general definition of the concept and learn why scholars disagree on whether there existed a distinct literary category, “Wisdom literature,” in the ancient world. Certain literary materials from Egypt’s wisdom traditions represent primarily “standard wisdom,” characterized by proverbial sayings. These aphorisms embody predictable patterns born of everyday life experience and observation. From Mesopotamia, we have wisdom traditions that are generally more speculative and less optimistic, and willing to wrestle with the difficult question of theodicy.
The Old Testament book of Proverbs is a collection of standard expressions of wisdom, presented as an educational curriculum and commonly based on the principle of retribution theology. The book of Job is a literary masterpiece representative of speculative wisdom. Although it displays a critique of retribution theology, Job’s message honors the tension between a loving God, a righteous individual, and retributive justice. In Israel’s wisdom traditions we will observe in particular a distinctive moral and ethical dimension that results from Israel’s relationship to Yahweh.
This chapter will lay some historical groundwork in preparation for our consideration of Old Testament books included in the Primary History. As we attempt to reconstruct Israel’s history, we will discover several challenges. The first is how best to relate the historical accounts in the biblical texts with the evidence of modern archaeology. One example, excavation at the ancient settlement of Jericho (featured in the conquest narrative of Joshua), will demonstrate the difficulty of the endeavor and the need for a balanced interpretive approach.
A second challenge is that of Old Testament chronology, which must be relative since we lack evidence for fixed dates prior to the seventh century bce. Only as we move through the Old Testament to later events can we confirm dates of biblical accounts with parallels in ancient Near Eastern sources. Finally, we will consider what we can know of Israel’s history of religious ideas. Although biblical texts were written and preserved by members of the “official” religion, we can detect the vestiges of “local” and “family” religion from earlier sources used to compile the Old Testament.
In previous chapters, we focused on the structure and content of the books in the Pentateuch. Here, we will explore the religion of Moses that emerges from these materials. Specifically, we will observe the way in which divine revelation developed from direct communication with individuals such as Abraham and Moses to mediated revelation through a written Torah and the priesthood. We will explore the significant concepts of holiness, covenant, and practical monotheism, particularly as compared to the religion of the ancestral narratives (Genesis) and that of surrounding ancient Near Eastern cultures.
It will be important that we consider the characteristics of Mosaic religion against the backdrop of the ancient Near East at a time when certain polytheistic cultures are known to have elevated a single deity above their other gods – known as a “theology of exaltation.” Furthermore, we will explore some possible influences and origins for the Yahwistic faith – the religion so foundational for the remaining Old Testament and whose roots belong to monotheistic religions down to the present.
This chapter foregrounds the case of disputation and debates about borrowing, theft, and intertextuality. Al-Jāḥiẓ succinctly argues that a certain appealing saying would suffer use and modification over time until no one could claim it, although everyone regards it as its new host’s property. Thus, when al-Āmidī, and later al-Qāḍī al-Jurjānī, argue that theft applies only to unique inventions, the property of a specific person, disputation was to calm down, but not to disappear. The shift in discussion centered on invention and, by implication, away from ʿamūd al-shiʿr (the standardized poetry canon). While previous debates relate to Abū Tammām and his detractors’ critique of the presumed excessive stylistic contrivance found in badīʿ (inventiveness in meaning, figuration, and expression), the discursive tenth-century debates shift more toward al-Mutanabbī, as the strongest poet who was bound to gather his defenders and detractors, a two-camp situation, carefully studied by al-Qāḍī al-Jurjānī in his al-Wasāṭah, where he provides a concise terminology that is to feed generations of critics like Ibn Rashīq (d. 456/1064), whose short chapter on thievery undermines al-Ḥātimī’s significant, albeit convoluted, lexicon.