To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The statistical analysis of ocean waves discussed in previous chapters assumes that waves are a Gaussian random process; namely, waves are a steady-state, ergodic random process and displacement from the mean obeys the normal probability law. Verification that deep ocean waves are a Gaussian process was given in Section 1.1 through the central limit theorem. It has also been verified through observations at sea as well as in laboratory tests that waves can be considered a Gaussian random process even in very severe seas if the water depth is sufficiently deep.
The above statement, however, is no longer true for waves in finite water depth. Time histories of waves in shallow water show a definite excess of high crests and shallow troughs as demonstrated in the example shown in Figure 1.1(b), and thereby the histogram of wave displacement is not symmetric with respect to its mean value, as shown in Figure 1.2(b). Thus, waves in shallow water are considered to be a non-Gaussian random process. This implies that ocean waves transform from Gaussian to non-Gaussian as they propagate from deep to shallow water.
Figure 9.1 shows a portion of wave records measured simultaneously at various water depths during the ARSLOE Project carried out by the Coastal Engineering Research Center at Duck, North Carolina.
This section presents the theoretical background for predicting extreme values (extreme wave height, extreme sea state, etc.) which provide invaluable information for the design and operation of marine systems. The extreme value is defined as the largest value of a random variable expected to occur in a specified number of observations. Note that the extreme value is defined as a function of the number of samples. In the naval and ocean engineering area, however, it is highly desirable to estimate the largest wave height expected to occur in one hour, or the severest sea state expected to be encountered in 50 years, for example. This information can be obtained by estimating the number of waves (or sea states) per unit time, and thereby the number of samples necessary for evaluating the extreme value is converted to time.
The concept supporting the estimation of extreme values is order statistics which is outlined in the following. Let us consider a sample set consisting of wave heights taken in the sequence of observations (x1, x2, …, xn). Each element of the random sample xi is assumed to be statistically independent having the same probability density function f(x). In the case of wave height observations, each xi is considered to obey the Rayleigh probability law.
People routinely employ a variety of numerical methods to analyze waves in materials with complex constitutive equations and boundary conditions. Indeed, it may appear to you that the number of numerical solution methods is equal to or greater than the number of numerical analysts. However, most of these algorithms are based on a few simple concepts. Here we shall discuss these concepts by examining several algorithms. We shall solve the linear wave equation with a numerical algorithm derived from the method of characteristics, and we shall solve the equations describing nonlinear waves with a numerical algorithm derived from the method of finite differences. Through these examples, you will become acquainted with the fundamental issues in the numerical analysis of waves. You will need to understand these issues to successfully select and apply any good commercial software package to analyze your wave-propagation problems.
We can only obtain analytic solutions to the equations describing nonlinear waves for a very limited set of geometries, constitutive equations, and boundary conditions. For example, the Riemann integrals yield a solution for a one-dimensional simple wave in an infinite volume of nonlinear-elastic material; however, obtaining analytic solutions for the interaction of two simple waves ranges from difficult to impossible depending upon the constitutive equations of the medium. Without the advent of the digital computer and sophisticated methods of numerical analysis, advances in the field of nonlinear wave motion and the development of constitutive theories for dynamic loading of materials would have stagnated over the past 40 years.
The aim of this book is to describe the physics of nonlinear stress waves in fluids and solids. These waves cause changes not only in force and motion but also in heat and temperature. We introduce our topic by describing two experiments that have greatly contributed to our understanding of nonlinear waves.
The study of waves is important to virtually every branch of science and engineering. Indeed, waves are also important to everyday life. Sound waves allow us to hear, and electromagnetic waves allow us to see. In this book, we restrict our study to one important class of waves often called stress waves. These waves propagate through gases, liquids, and solids. Stress waves in gases and liquids are usually called pressure waves. This nomenclature is derived from the fact that internal forces in solid bodies are represented by a stress tensor, and internal forces in inviscid liquids and gases are represented by a special form of stress called pressure. In Chapter 1, we shall learn the distinction between stress and pressure.
Sound is the most commonly experienced pressure wave. Indeed, anyone standing in a thunderstorm knows that lightening is seen before the report of its thunder is heard. This simple observation reveals the single, most important feature of any wave – its finite velocity. We know there is always a lapse of time between the cause of a sound wave and when we hear it.
The sea provides the most intuitive image we have of wave motion. As a wave passes, we notice that seaweed floating in the water moves slightly forward and then returns, and the motion of the wave seems only weakly connected to the motion of the water. Sometimes several waves merge into a single wave of much greater energy. The stronger wave travels at a slower speed, which allows other weaker waves behind it to catch up and add to its strength. Sometimes, these waves destroy ships at sea (see the opening quote of the preface). We know that wave motion causes changes in both the mechanical field and the thermal field, but much of what we know about wave motion in solids and fluids can be explained with a purely mechanical theory. In this chapter we study mechanical waves. To do this, we first define the elastic material. This material is described by a constitutive equation that only contains the mechanical variables associated with force and motion. We show that a linear-elastic material yields one type of solution called a linear wave. A nonlinear-elastic material yields a variety of solutions that include compression waves, rarefaction waves, and shock waves. To study these waves, we use the d'Alembert solution, the Riemann integral, the method of characteristics, the theory of singular surfaces, and the steady-wave solution.
Elastic Material
It is a common observation that individual materials react differently to applied loads.
Throughout our development of mechanics and thermomechanics we have used constitutive models to describe waves in materials. In Chapter 2 we used the constitutive model for an elastic material to describe linear-elastic waves, structured waves, and shock discontinuities. However, we could not describe the steady wave with this constitutive model. In Chapter 3 we introduced more complex constitutive models for materials that dissipate work and conduct heat. We used the viscous material, the thermoviscous material, and the thermoelastic material to extend our description of nonlinear waves. These constitutive models are quite general descriptions that include gases, liquids, and solids. More specific constitutive models are discussed in this chapter. These models include the ideal gas and the Mie–Grüneisen solid. We also study plastic flow, porosity, and detonation.
We often calculate nonlinear wave phenomena with complex numerical computer codes. With such powerful capabilities you may be tempted to simply characterize the energy state of a material with large tables of data that yield values of equilibrium stress, temperature, stiffnesses, specifics heats, and thermal expansion coefficients for given values of F and η. Accurate computations of some very common materials rely heavily upon this method. The computation of nonlinear pressure waves in water is an important example. However, even with this capability, questions arise about the constitutive descriptions of these materials. For example, if water is heated by a shock wave, it often spontaneously “flashes” to steam when the pressure drops again in response to a release wave.
To analyze waves in nonlinear materials, we must derive the equations governing the motion of such materials. In this chapter we define three types of motion: translation, rotation, and deformation. We define a quantity called the deformation gradient. This quantity is used to describe volume strain, longitudinal strain, and shear strain. Then stress and pressure are discussed. We introduce these concepts in three spatial dimensions and then specialize the results to one spatial dimension. The chapter closes with a derivation of two important laws of motion: the conservation of mass and the balance of momentum.
Index Notation
We begin by introducing a compact and convenient way to describe quantities in three spatial dimensions with a Cartesian coordinate system. We also show how to transform quantities between different Cartesian coordinate systems.
Cartesian Coordinates and Vectors
A Cartesian coordinate system has three straight coordinates that are mutually perpendicular to each other (see Figure 1.1). The coordinates are named x1, x2, and x3. The subscripts 1, 2, and 3 are called indices. When we let k represent any of these indices, we can refer to the coordinates by the compact notation xk. Each coordinate xk also has a shaded arrow that represents a unit coordinate vectorik. We use a boldface symbol to denote a vector. The length of each ik is equal to unity.
Now consider another vector v that is drawn with arbitrary angles to the three coordinates. We draw a box with sides parallel to ik and with v as a diagonal.
In the late seventeenth century, Isaac Newton presented the fundamental concepts of motion, force, and momentum. With these concepts, he made many successful predictions of physical phenomena; however, when he attempted to predict the speed of sound in air, he failed. It was not until a century later, when the distinction between temperature and heat was understood, that Laplace was able to achieve an accurate prediction of this wave velocity.
As in Newton's day, we often do not appreciate that even weak elastic waves cause changes not only in stress and strain but also temperature. Because these temperature changes are small and reversible, they are not in our common perception. In contrast, strong shock waves cause irreversible changes in temperature. Most solids when subjected to repeated hammer blows become noticeably hotter to the touch. To describe the distinctions between these types of waves, we must introduce the fundamentals of thermodynamics, including the concepts of heat, temperature, and entropy.
Why must we study thermodynamics? In Chapter 2 we studied a wide range of wave phenomena using the mechanical concepts of force and motion. Using only the constitutive model for an elastic material, we developed detailed analyses of the nonlinear structured wave, the transition of a compression wave into a shock wave, and the decay of a shock wave as it is overtaken by a rarefaction wave. We have analyzed wave motion in solids, liquids, and adiabatic gases.
… one day, well off the Patagonian coast, while the sloop was reaching under short sail, a tremendous wave, the culmination, it seemed, of many waves, rolled down upon her in a storm, roaring as it came. I had only a moment to get all sail down and myself up on the peak halyards, out of danger when I saw the mighty crest towering masthead-high above me. The mountain of water submerged my vessel. She shook in every timber and reeled under the weight of the sea, but rose quickly out of it, and rode grandly over the rollers that followed. It may have been a minute that from my hold in the rigging I could see no part of the Spray's hull. Perhaps it was even less time than that, but it seemed a long while, for under great excitement one lives fast, and in a few seconds one may think a great deal of one's past life.
– Captain Joshua Slocum Sailing Alone Around the World, 1895
During July 1994 while I was writing this book, fragments of the comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 crashed into Jupiter. As each fragment entered the Jovian atmosphere, it formed a shock wave, similar to the bow wave in front of a boat. Heat generated within these waves ignited the atmosphere of Jupiter creating fireballs the size of the earth.
The flow characteristics of solid particles in a gas–solid suspension vary significantly with the geometric and material properties of the particle. The geometric properties of particles include their size, size distribution, and shape. Particles in a gas–solid flow of practical interest are usually of nonspherical or irregular shapes and polydispersed sizes. The geometric properties of particles affect the particle flow behavior through an interaction with the gas medium as exhibited by the drag force, the distribution of the boundary layer on the particle surface, and the generation and dissipation of wake vortices. The material properties of particles include such characteristics as physical adsorption, elastic and plastic deformation, ductile and brittle fracturing, solid electrification, magnetization, heat conduction and thermal radiation, and optical transmission. The material properties affect the long– and short–range interparticle forces, and particle attrition and erosion behavior in gas–solid flows. The geometric and material properties of particles also represent the basic parameters affecting the flow regimes in gas–solid systems such as fluidized beds.
In this chapter, the basic definitions of the equivalent diameter for an individual particle of irregular shape and its corresponding particle sizing techniques are presented. Typical density functions characterizing the particle size distribution for polydispersed particle systems are introduced. Several formulae expressing the particle size averaging methods are given. Basic characteristics of various material properties are illustrated.
Particle Size and Sizing Methods
The particle size affects the dynamic behavior of a gas–solid flow [Dallavalle, 1948]. An illustration of the relative magnitudes of particle sizes in various multiphase systems is given in Fig. 1.1 [Soo, 1990].