To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This book teaches students and scholars of Greco-Roman medical history how to use and critically assess archaeological materials. Ancient medicine is a subject dominated by textual sources, yet there is a wealth of archaeological remains that can be used to broaden our understanding of medicine in the past. In order to use the information properly, this book explains how to ask questions of an archaeological nature, how to access different types of archaeological materials, and how to overcome problems the researcher might face. It also acts as an introduction to the archaeology of medicine for archaeologists interested in this aspect of their subject. Although the focus is on the Greco-Roman period, the methods and theories explained within the text can be applied to other periods in history. The areas covered include text as material culture, images, artifacts, spaces of medicine, and science and archaeology.
“When the student is ready, the teacher will appear.”
Buddhist proverb
Introduction
Time to go for victory. Time to submit your proposal. No, wait a moment; you should first ask people with experience to criticize and professionalize all your application’s components: from language to utilization, from idea to work plan to budget. Listen carefully to their feedback and attend to all the potential weaknesses, if not flaws, in your proposal. You can be sure that the funding agency will send your proposal out for review to senior peers, collect their critiques, possibly confront you with their points, and then decide on your proposal: go or no-go. And the no-go will hurt, especially if you realize you could have prevented some of the criticism in advance, if only you’d known. So, take time to organize getting feedback before submission and take what is being said seriously, very seriously: use other people’s talents, benefit from whatever coaching, mentoring, and training is available as much as you can!
Mentoring. Can help from experienced scientists (grant laureates) make the difference? The answer seems to be almost too obvious. Contact potential mentors, even if they appear highly intimidating to you!
Coaching. Are you an expert on budgets, intellectual property protection, marketing, or other non-scientific tasks? Or do you want to become such an expert? Probably not. So seek some coaching to save time and equally advance the quality of your proposal! But where do you find these people?
Training. How about training on the job? You simply write, submit, fail, learn, revise, resubmit, and so on. This is an extensive and painful training program! Taking tailored courses may help you speed up the process.