To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
An insurance company is a financial intermediary whose main line of business is the sale of a particular type of contingent contract, called an insurance policy. Under this contract, [in return for the premium], the insurer promises to pay some amount to the policy-holder, or to some other beneficiary, following the occurrence of an insured event.
For VAT purposes, most countries lump together insurance and financial services rendered by financial institutions. The typical pattern is to include insurance within the definition of exempt financial services. There are some exceptions.
Israel taxes insurance companies under a system administered by the income tax department. The Israeli tax is calculated under an addition method that includes wages and profits but does not allow any deduction for VAT paid on business inputs. New Zealand taxes insurance other than life insurance under its Goods and Services Tax (GST). South Africa and some other southern African countries follow the New Zealand pattern of taxing property and casualty insurance on the margin between premiums received and claims paid. Australia also is taxing property and casualty insurance under its new GST but departs from the New Zealand approach with respect to input credits available to insurers on claims paid.
The following is a nonexclusive list of insurance-related transactions that may be taxed, zero rated, or granted exemption from tax.
Thanks to our students at Wayne State, Harvard, and Michigan law schools for their contributions to the revision of this book. Thanks to Dean Frank Wu and Wayne State University Law School, and to Georgia Clark, Director of the Wayne Law Library, and her staff for the support that made this revision possible. Thanks to our colleague Richard Ainsworth and the two anonymous readers who made helpful suggestions on how we could improve our first attempt at comparative value added tax. Thanks to Karen Kissinger for her very helpful research assistance. Thanks to our faculty assistants, Olive Hyman and Lise Berg, for their assistance with various aspects of the manuscript. Thanks to John Berger, our editor at Cambridge University Press, and Peggy Rote, Laura Lawrie, and Dianne Scent for their help in the process of converting our manuscript to final text.
The cutoff date for this book generally was March 31, 2006, although we have included some material published after that date. In particular, we included some European Court of Justice cases, including those covering the Italian subnational tax (IRAP) and some VAT-abusive transactions. This book is not intended to be exhaustive. It therefore does not include all significant cases in all countries or even all English-speaking countries. It is designed to illustrate, analyze, and explain the principal theoretical and operating features of value added taxes, including their adoption and implementation.
Excluding VATs that are covered only tangentially in this book, such as those in effect in China, Russia, and excluding those in civil law, non-English-speaking countries outside the European Union (EU), most VATs imposed at the national level can be classified in four groups. The most prevalent form of VAT is the harmonized VAT in the EU member states. The EU model has the most extensive case law on VAT issues. More recent entrants to the VAT family have expanded the VAT base and made other significant changes. Other customs or common market communities may move to harmonize their indirect taxes in order to provide for the free movement of goods, services, and capital within the community.
New Zealand departed from the EU model in a number of significant ways, including the expansion of the tax base for its Goods and Services Tax (GST) by limiting exemptions and zero rating and by taxing many government services. South Africa modeled its VAT after the New Zealand GST, but included some of its own unique features. For example, South Africa taxes all fee-based financial services.
Canada has a national VAT (its GST) and several provinces have harmonized VATs. The combined Quebec-national GSTs are administered by Quebec. The combined national and maritime provinces GSTs (the Harmonized Sales Tax) are administered at the national level. The Canadian GST is discussed elsewhere in the book.
One of the most complicated problems in designing a VAT base involves the taxation of real (immovable) property. The tax base should consist of the personal consumption element in real property (for residential property, living quarters either owned or leased). In the United States, housing represents over 16 percent of total personal consumption expenditures. The difficulty is to identify the personal consumption element, especially for real property that may be used for business or personal purposes.
There are a number of possible techniques for taxing real property under a VAT. They must consider valuation and other administrative issues in the context of business versus personal, investment versus consumption.
ARRAY OF VAT TREATMENT OF REAL (OR IMMOVABLE) PROPERTY
A variety of approaches to the taxation of real property are available, even if they are based on the principles that a VAT is a tax on personal consumption, and the tax should not be imposed on the same value added to goods or services more than once.
Real property is a long-lived asset, even more so than other consumer durables. Ideally, the current use of consumer durables should be taxed each year. This approach raises significant administrative and practical problems. As a result, most consumer durables are taxed at the time of purchase (based on the consideration paid). This approach reflects a decision to tax the present discounted value of the stream of future personal consumption. The same approach could be used for real property.
For most countries with VATs, international trade is a significant component of their economies. A country with a VAT must define the jurisdictional reach of the tax; that is, the tax may be imposed on production within the country (an origin principle VAT), on domestic consumption (a destination principle VAT), or some combination of the two. Almost every country with a VAT relies on the destination principle to define the jurisdictional limits of the tax. Under a pure destination principle, imports are taxed and exports are completely free of tax (zero rated). With this system, it is important to identify the value of goods and services that are exported (and when they are exported) and identify the value of taxable imports and determine when they are taxable.
This chapter discusses the place of supply rules in the context of international trade, including the troublesome issues on cross-border transactions relating to the place where services are rendered.
The location or place of an international sale of services has become more significant with the advent of electronic commerce. A significant problem with electronic commerce is to determine if the sale is of goods or services. For example, if computer software, music, and videos are transmitted by electronic signals rather than in compact disks or other physical form, is the transaction a sale of goods or a sale of services?
Under the credit or invoice VAT used almost universally, tax liability for each period is calculated as the difference between the tax imposed or collected on taxable sales (output tax) and tax paid or incurred both on taxable purchases and on taxable imports (input tax credit). Some credit-invoice VATs are worded so that the input tax is deducted from tax on taxable sales (output tax). In this book, input tax credit and input tax deduction are used interchangeably to mean subtraction of input tax from output tax.
Unlike an income tax imposed on an income base that requires capital goods to be capitalized and depreciated and requires beginning and ending inventories to be taken into account in determining gross income from sales, VATs typically are consumption-based taxes that allow an immediate input credit for tax imposed on purchases of capital goods and inventory items. There are some exceptions discussed in this chapter.
Nations with VATs provide varying input credit rules. For example, in Mexico, there is a threshold condition. Only VAT on goods or services deductible for income tax purposes can qualify for input credits. The qualifying input VAT still may be disallowed, such as input VAT attributable to exempt supplies.
The EU Sixth VAT Directive contains extensive rules on the availability of input tax credits (or what under the Directive is referred to as deductions).
Most VAT regimes impose VAT only on sales for consideration, and the sale is taxable if there is a clear connection between the sale and that consideration. This chapter examines the required link between a sale and the consideration received by the seller that is a prerequisite to a taxable sale.
The classification of a sale as a sale of goods or a sale of services may be significant for tax purposes. For example, in most countries, imports of most goods are taxed but imports of only specified services are taxed. A sale for a single price may incorporate elements of multiple supplies that are taxed differently. For example, a portion of the sale, if supplied independently, would be taxable at a positive rate, and another portion, if supplied independently, may be exempt from tax. It therefore is significant for VAT purposes if the transaction is respected as a single supply or is treated as multiple supplies. In some cases, a transaction that includes elements that are both taxable and exempt, the VAT legislation and case law may draw a distinction between mixed supplies (with main and incidental elements) that are classified as a single supply of the main element, and composite supplies that can be disaggregated and classified as multiple independent supplies. This chapter explores the question – “what is ‘the supply’ for VAT purposes?
The timing (or tax accounting) rules are used to identify the tax period in which a taxpayer must pay tax on imports, report taxable sales, and claim deductions or credits for tax paid on allowable imports and domestic purchases. When a VAT is introduced or the rate is changed, transition rules are needed to identify if sales and purchases are made before or after the effective date of the new or modified VAT.
VAT generally is imposed on the amount of money and the value of nonmonetary consideration received for a taxable supply. Special valuation rules are provided for particular transactions. This chapter covers the timing, transition, and valuation rules.
THE TIMING RULES
ACCRUAL, INVOICE, AND CASH METHODS – IN GENERAL
This section discusses the rules governing the basic methods of accounting for VAT. It does not discuss the innumerable varieties of special schemes for retailers that are available in many countries.
Some countries do not allow any person to use the cash method. Other countries permit registered persons who meet the statutory conditions (usually related to a lower level of taxable turnover) to report on the cash method.
The limits or prohibitions against the use of the cash method are imposed in order to prevent the mismatching that occurs if the seller can defer the payment of output tax to the government, yet the buyer can claim an immediate credit.
This chapter covers the use of exemptions and zero rating under a VAT. As discussed in more detail in Chapter 2, the exemption may be an “item” exemption limited to particular supplies or an “entity” exemption applicable to all or most supplies by a particular kind of entity. Zero rating generally is provided for exports of goods (regardless of the nature of the goods exported) and exports of some services. An exemption may be provided for all supplies by a unit of government or nonprofit organization, the exemption may be provided based on the nature of the goods or services supplied, or may be provided for all supplies except those that compete with the private sector.
The next few parts of this chapter cover zero rating, exemptions, and mixed supplies, with attention focused on the complexity resulting from borderline cases involving “item” exemptions or “item” zero rating.
Part VI of this chapter discusses some of the special VAT problems associated with the nonprofit–governmental sectors and proposals to include certain services by these sectors in the VAT base.
ZERO-RATED SALES
IN GENERAL
A zero-rated sale is a taxable sale, subject to tax at a zero rate, and input tax on purchases attributable to that sale is creditable. The sale therefore is basically free of VAT. If a sale at retail is zero rated, the consumer buys the item free of VAT. If the zero rate applied only at an intermediate (such as wholesale) stage, and the retail stage were taxable, the tax not collected at the intermediate stage would be recovered on the retail sale.
The United Kingdom consists of England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. For the most part, the labor law of the United Kingdom can be treated as a single system with no major differences among the jurisdictions.
The labor law of the United Kingdom must be considered in the context of the supranational law of the European Union. In 1997, after the election of the Labour Party, the United Kingdom signed the Amsterdam Treaty, subjecting it to directives under the Maastricht Treaty's Social Protocol. It is the obligation of EU members to ensure that their law conforms to the requirements of directives, which are Community law. A member, such as the United Kingdom, can determine that its existing law conforms to Community law, can amend its existing law to come into compliance, or it can pass new laws. The United Kingdom has enacted a number of labor laws intended to bring its law into conformity with EU directives. The most significant law is the Employment Relations Act of 1999. The United Kingdom's membership in the EU and its attendant obligations must be kept in mind as one studies U.K. labor law. Refer to Chapter 7 on the European Union for further discussion of European Community labor law. For a useful table correlating EU employment directives with implementing U.K. legislation, see http://www.dti.gov.uk/employment/employment-legislation/employment-directives/index.html.
By agreeing to form the Dominion of Canada, the provinces of Ontario, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick created the nation of Canada on July 1, 1867, even though it remained tied to England. Over time the Confederation expanded so that it now is made up of ten provinces, each with its own legislature, and three northern territories administered by the federal government. In terms of landmass, Canada is the second largest country in the world but it has a population of only about thirty million. The francophone population comprises about 24 percent of the population but is concentrated in Quebec, which was the original French colonial settlement. In the balance of the country, United Kingdom ancestries predominate, although there has been much immigration from elsewhere. Indigenous peoples live in some concentration in the three northern territories. A member of the G8 and the OECD, Canada has the seventh largest economy in the developed world. While importing 25 percent of its GNP, Canada exports about 33 percent (whereas the United States exports only about 8 percent of its gross national product and the OECD average is about 23 percent). The United States accounts for about 75 percent of the exports from Canada. From 1985 to 2002, trade between the two countries has more than doubled.