To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A lattice metric singularity occurs when unit cells defining two (or more) lattices yield the identical set of unique calculated d-spacings. The existence of such singularities, therefore, has a practical impact on the indexing of powder patterns. For example, when experimental data from ζ-LiBO2 were indexed, two solutions (a rhombohedral and a monoclinic lattice) with approximately the same figure of merit were found. These two lattices yield the same set of unique d-spacings even though they are characterized by different reduced cells with cell volumes in the ratio 2 to 1. From the indexing point of view, both answers are correct. A singularity of this type is common and not a mathematical rarity. In fact, any rhombohedral cell of this kind has a derivative monoclinic subcell, each of which gives the same set of unique calculated d-spacings. In actual cases like this, one can run into a trap. Due to experimental error and input parameters, an indexing program may determine only one of the cells with a high figure of merit. When this happens, it is critical to recognize that another solution exists, especially if one has determined the lower symmetry lattice.
New powder X-ray diffraction data for magnesio-, ferro-, and manganaxinite, obtained from samples closely corresponding to the three end-members of the axinite mineral group, were obtained using a conventional Bragg–Brentano diffractometer. Space group is P 1¯. Powder patterns were indexed using Peacock's normal orientation, which gave: a=7.1381(3), b=9.1626(4), c=8.9421(4) Å, α=91.903(4), β=98.105(3), γ=77.468(4)° for magnesioaxinite; a=7.1479(4), b=9.1962(5), c=8.9576(4) Å, α=91.857(4), β=98.177(4), γ=77.359(4)° for ferroaxinite, and a=7.1849(4), b=9.2152(5), c=8.9765(4) Å, α=91.761(4), β=98.153(4), γ=77.150(4)° for manganaxinite. Peacock's orientation has been adopted in all recent structural and crystal chemical studies of axinite, but it differs from that reported on the JCPDS cards (29-344, 27-076 and 27-084, respectively). New data include an increased number of indexed peaks.
A perfect general purpose standard specimen for high accuracy line-profile analysis is shown to be an illusion. Balancing the partly contradictory requirements, an optimum standard specimen for a parafocusing diffractometer is developed. To obtain the optimum standard specimen, a 5–10 μm particle size fraction is taken from the NIST certified Si powder SRM640a, about 1.5 mg/cm2 of this powder is uniformly deposited on a (510) oriented Si single-crystal wafer and the assembly is heat treated for 2 h at 1273 K to remove lattice imperfections. All procedures necessary are precisely given, easily applicable, and reproducing. For the present standard specimens, the random errors due to crystal statistics are quantified and shown to be acceptable for spinning specimens; the systematic errors due to residual size and transparency broadening are determined semi-empirically and can be eliminated, if desired. Thus the proposed optimum standard specimen allows the determination of instrumental line profiles free from systematic errors and with random errors in the line width of the order of 0.001 °2θ, allowing a full use of the capacities of modern diffractometers and data evaluation procedures.
This paper describes a new method for the simultaneous determination of mineral composition, mass thickness and mass absorption coefficient of a thin layer of a crystalline substance deposited on a crystalline substrate.
The samples were deposited on membrane disc filters, consisting of mixtures of cellulose acetate and cellulose nitrate. Quantitative results are achieved by measuring the diffraction intensity of the analyte and the attenuation of a reflection of the crystalline material supporting the deposited sample. The mean accuracy of the analysis was found to be: ≈ 3% for mass thickness, ≈ 1% for mass absorption coefficient and ≈ 4% for quantitative mineralogical determination.
The high-temperature phases Cu4In, Cu9In4(h) and Cu2In(h) cannot be retained by quenching. In contrast to this, splat-cooling specimens of these alloys yielded single phase products. Cell parameters in the range of homogeneity of these phases were measured. Powder crystal data for Cu4In(W type), Cu9In4(h) (Cu9Al4type) and Cu2In(h) (Ni2In type) are given.
The crystal structure of a new compound Li2Mg2(WO4)3 has been determined by means of X-ray powder diffraction. Li2Mg2(WO4)3 belongs to the orthorhombic system, with space group Pnma and the lattice parameters are: a = 5.1129 Å, b = 10.462 A, and c = 17.612 Å at room.temperature. Its measured density is Dm = 5.48 g/cm3, and each unit cell contains four formula weights.
A new high temperature form of Y2O3 has been synthesized at 2220 °C by a laser beam heating technique. The new form has a face-centered cubic structure with a = 5.2644(3)Å, Z = 2, Dx = 5.14 g/cm3, and is considered to have a fluorite-type structure containing disordered oxygen vacancies.