To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Bollobás and Riordan introduce a Tutte polynomial for coloured graphs and matroids in [3]. We observe that this polynomial has an expansion as a sum indexed by the subsets of the ground-set of a coloured matroid, generalizing the subset expansion of the Tutte polynomial. We also discuss similar expansions of other contraction–deletion invariants of graphs and matroids.
It is shown that the hard-core model on ${{\mathbb Z}}^d$ exhibits a phase transition at activities above some function $\lambda(d)$ which tends to zero as $d\rightarrow \infty$. More precisely, consider the usual nearest neighbour graph on ${{\mathbb Z}}^d$, and write ${\cal E}$ and ${\cal O}$ for the sets of even and odd vertices (defined in the obvious way). Set $${\cal G}L_M={\cal G}L_M^d =\{z\in{{\mathbb Z}}^d:\|z\|_{\infty}\leq M\},\quad \partial^{\star} {\cal G}L_M =\{z\in{{\mathbb Z}}^d:\|z\|_{\infty}= M\},$$ and write ${\cal I}({\cal G}L_M)$ for the collection of independent sets (sets of vertices spanning no edges) in ${\cal G}L_M$. For $\lambda>0$ let ${\bf I}$ be chosen from ${\cal I}({\cal G}L_M)$ with $\Pr({\bf I}=I) \propto \lambda^{|I|}$.
TheoremThere is a constant$C$such that if$\lambda > Cd^{-1/4}\log^{3/4}d$, then$$\lim_{M\rightarrow\infty}\Pr(\underline{0}\in{\bf I}|{\bf I}\supseteq \partial^{\star} {\cal G}L_M\cap {\cal E})~> \lim_{M\rightarrow\infty}\Pr(\underline{0}\in{\bf I}| {\bf I}\supseteq \partial^{\star} {\cal G}L_M\cap {\cal O}).$$ Thus, roughly speaking, the influence of the boundary on behaviour at the origin persists as the boundary recedes.
We consider two interrelated tasks in a synchronous $n$-node ring: distributed constant colouring and local communication. We investigate the impact of the amount of knowledge available to nodes on the time of completing these tasks. Every node knows the labels of nodes up to a distance $r$ from it, called the knowledge radius. In distributed constant colouring every node has to assign itself one out of a constant number of colours, so that adjacent nodes get different colours. In local communication every node has to communicate a message to both of its neighbours. We study these problems in two popular communication models: the one-way model, in which each node can only either transmit to one neighbour or receive from one neighbour, in any round, and the radio model, in which simultaneous receiving from two neighbours results in interference noise. Hence the main problem in fast execution of the above tasks is breaking symmetry with restricted knowledge of the ring.
We show that distributed constant colouring and local communication are tightly related and one can be used to accomplish the other. Also, in most situations the optimal time is the same for both of them, and it strongly depends on knowledge radius. For knowledge radius $r=0$, i.e., when each node knows only its own label, our bounds on time for both tasks are tight in both models: the optimal time in the one-way model is $\Theta(n)$, while in the radio model it is $\Theta(\log n)$. For knowledge radius $r=1$ both tasks can be accomplished in time $O(\log \log n)$ in the one-way model, if the ring is oriented. For $2 \leq r \leq c \log ^* n$, where $c < 1/2$, the upper bounds on time are $O(\log^{(2r)} n)$ in the one-way model and $O(\log ^{(2\lfloor r/2 \rfloor)} n)$ in the radio model; the lower bound is $\Omega (\log^* n)$, in both models. For $r \geq (\log^*n)/2$ both tasks can be completed in constant time, in the one-way model, and distributed constant colouring also in the radio model. Finally, if $r \geq \log^*n$ then constant time is also enough for local communication in the radio model.
We consider random planar graphs on $n$ labelled nodes, and show in particular that if the graph is picked uniformly at random then the expected number of edges is at least $\frac{13}{7}n +o(n)$. To prove this result we give a lower bound on the size of the set of edges that can be added to a planar graph on $n$ nodes and $m$ edges while keeping it planar, and in particular we see that if $m$ is at most $\frac{13}{7}n - c$ (for a suitable constant~$c$) then at least this number of edges can be added.
Incomplete-block designs for experiments were first developed by Yates at Rothamsted Experimental Station. He produced a remarkable collection of designs for individual experiments. Two of them are shown, with the data from the experiment, in Example 4.3 on page 97 and Exercise 5.9 on page 141. This type of design poses two questions for statisticians: (i) what is the best way of choosing subsets of the treatments to allocate to the blocks, given the resource constraints? (ii) how should the data from the experiment be analysed?
Designs with partial balance help statisticians to answer both of these questions. The designs were formally introduced by Bose and Nair in 1939. The fundamental underlying concept is the association scheme, which was defined in its own right by Bose and Shimamoto in 1952. Theorem 5.2 on page 114 shows the importance of association schemes: the pattern of variances matches the pattern of concurrences.
Many experiments have more than one system of blocks. These can have complicated inter-relationships, like the examples in Section 7.1, which are all taken from real experiments. The general structure is called an orthogonal block structure. Although these were introduced independently of partially balanced incomplete-block designs, they too are association schemes. Thus association schemes play an important role in the design of experiments.