To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this chapter we consider relatively low Reynolds number flow of a thin film. Such a film may exist between two rigid walls, as in a bearing, or in a droplet, e.g. paint, spreading under gravity on a rigid surface. In either case the geometry of the problem allows us to simplify equation (3.2) in a way that is similar to the technique used to derive boundary layer theory in Chapter 2. The differences are that the order of magnitude of the width of the thin layer is dictated by the data of the problem and, since the layer is confined geometrically, there is no need to match with an outer flow.
Lubrication theory for slider bearings
The simple observation that a sheet of paper can slide across a smooth floor shows that a thin layer of fluid can support a relatively large normal load while offering very little resistance to tangential motion. More important mechanical examples occur in the lubrication of machinery and this motivates the study of slider bearings. A slider bearing consists of a thin layer of viscous fluid confined between nearly parallel walls that are in relative tangential motion.
A two-dimensional bearing is shown in figure 4.1 in which the plane y = 0 moves with constant velocity U in the x-direction and the top of the bearing (the slider) is fixed.
These lecture notes are intended to provide third-year mathematics undergraduates who are already familiar with inviscid fluid dynamics with some of the basic facts about the modelling and analysis of viscous flows. Writing the notes has been an interesting task because so many of the phenomena to be described are not only associated with vitally important mechanisms in everyday life but they are also readily observable without any need for instrumentation. More sophisticated realisations are also readily available, for instance in the very valuable collection of photographs “An Album of Fluid Motion”, edited by Van Dyke (2). Thus it is all the more stimulating when the mathematics that emerges when these phenomena are modelled is novel and suggestive of new methodologies.
The notes are strictly not self-contained and should be read in conjunction with standard texts which are referenced. We have concentrated on trying to present some of the salient physical ideas and mathematical ramifications as starkly as possible and, to this end, many of the exercises have been designed to be worked as an integral part of the notes; they are only put at the end of chapters for convenience. The starred exercises cover more advanced material and can be omitted at a first reading.
Experience has shown us that, in the twentieth century, theoretical mechanics generally has been one of the best vehicles for learning about physical applied mathematics.
De uiterlijke eigenheden der zee, de kleuren en de verschillende golfvormen en de wijze waarop de grote baren omslaan, kokend aanbruisen, schuim-betijgerd uitzwalpen en zich terugslepen van 't vlakke zand – die herdacht zij en minde zij zoals een minnaar de trekken en gebaren van zijn geliefde herdenkt en mint.
Frederik van Eeden, Van de koele meren des doods, 1900
Those were the waves my friend …
The beginning
In the spring of 1984 Klaus Hasselmann invited wave modellers to Hamburg to discuss possible joint work. The WAM (Wave Modelling) group emerged. I dutifully reported on progress (Komen, 1985a,b, 1986, 1987a,b, 1990, 1991a,b). Now, ten years later, the WAM group has achieved what it wanted to achieve: a third generation computer model has been developed, which is able to predict the wave conditions at sea; it is used for global and regional applications; the model is a useful tool for interpreting satellite observations of the ocean and increased our understanding of the role of waves in air/sea interaction and the coupling between the atmosphere and the ocean. The results obtained are presented in this book.
WAM was one of a number of international collaborations: JONSWAP, SWAMP, SWIM, WAM, … Observations during the Joint North Sea Wave Project (Hasselmann et al, 1973) and also by Mitsuyasu and collaborators (Mitsuyasu, 1966, 1969, Mitsuyasu et al, 1971) had established the importance of the nonlinear transfer in governing the shape and evolution of a wind sea spectrum. Based on this finding ‘parametric’ wave models had been developed based on the approximation of a self-similar shape of the wind-sea spectrum.
The WAM group has realized its objectives: a third generation wave model has been developed; it runs in global and regional modes; it extended our understanding of the underlying physics; and data assimilation schemes have been developed and tested. This book is testimony of what has been achieved. However, careful reading will also reveal open ends, which range from small inconsistencies to major open issues. In this chapter we give an outlook on expected developments.
Compared to the so-called second generation models considerable progress has been made regarding the formulation of the evolution equation for the wave spectrum. The present WAM model is based on an explicit formulation of the physics of generation of waves by wind, nonlinear wave-wave interactions and dissipation due to whitecapping and bottom processes, rather than on the approach of ad hoc modelling which was commonplace with second generation models. The latter approach was shown to be inadequate under extreme circumstances such as hurricanes (SWAMP, 1985), while the WAM model gives for rapidly varying wind fields very satisfactory results (see chapter IV). Nevertheless, under ‘normal’ circumstances both approaches give similar results for the wave height. The reason for this is that although second generation models have inadequate physics they have been tuned to a considerable extent. Thus, the benefits of a third generation model are mainly related to a better representation of the spectrum itself and to a more explicit formulation of the underlying physics of wave evolution.
Despite the progress, we still are not able to make wave predictions that always fall within the error bands of the observations.
Impact of satellite wave measurements on wave modelling
Through the launch of ocean observing satellites, wave modellers are now for the first time receiving detailed wave data on a global, continuous basis. This can be expected to have a profound impact on wave modelling. The first us ocean satellite SEASAT demonstrated in 1978 that wave heights could be accurately measured with a radar altimeter and that a SAR (synthetic aperture radar) was capable of imaging ocean waves. Unfortunately, SEASAT failed after three months, and further satellite wave measurements were not made until the radar altimeter aboard GEOSAT was put into orbit in 1985. This changed with the launch of the first European Remote Sensing Satellite ERS-1 in July 1991. Since then, both radar altimeter and SAR wave data have been produced again globally in a continuous, near-real-time mode (cf. table 1.1).
Even before satellite wave data became available on a quasi-operational basis, the recognized potential of these data had a strong influence on wave modelling. One of the principal motivations for developing the third generation wave model WAM was to provide a state-of-the-art model for the assimilation of global wind and wave data from satellites for improved wind and wave field analysis and forecasting. Prior to the development of the WAM model, wave modellers had available only first and second generation wave models. The former were known to be based on incorrect physics, while the latter contained essentially correct physics but were restricted numerically through an artificial separation of the spectrum into a wind sea component of prescribed spectral shape and a swell spectrum, with rather arbitrary parametrizations of the coupling between the two spectral regimes.
The third generation ocean wave models considered in this book are numerical models which integrate the dynamical equations that describe the evolution of a wave field. Their development followed progress in understanding ocean wave dynamics and experience with practical forecasting methods.
The study of ocean wave dynamics has a very long history indeed. Khandekar (1989) quotes Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, Leonardo da Vinci and Benjamin Franklin. In Phillips (1977) it is recalled how Lagrange, Airy, Stokes and Rayleigh, the ‘nineteenth century pioneers of modern theoretical fluid dynamics’, sought to account for the properties of surface waves. Subsequent progress in the twentieth century has been enormous, as any reader of, for instance, the Journal of Fluid Mechanics will realize. The subject has grown so large that it is nearly impossible for one person to have a comprehensive knowledge of all aspects. There are a number of useful textbooks, devoted totally or in part to water waves (Krauss, 1973, Whitham, 1974, Phillips, 1977 and LeBlond and Mysak, 1978, for example). Subjects that are of special relevance to wave modelling are the propagation of waves, their generation by wind, their nonlinear properties, their dissipation and their statistical description. We will discuss all these aspects in later sections where we will also indicate the historical perspective. Here it is enough to recall the milestones formed by the theoretical work of Phillips and Miles on wave generation and by Hasselmann's theory of four wave interactions.