To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Published for: the Astronomical Society of Australia
Journal
You have access: full Access: Full
Open access
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA) is an open access journal which publishes new and significant research in astronomy and astrophysics. PASA covers a wide range of topics within astronomy, including multi-wavelength observations, theoretical modelling, computational astronomy and visualisation. PASA also maintains its heritage of publishing results on southern hemisphere astronomy and on astronomy with Australian facilities.PASA publishes research papers, review papers and special series on topical issues, making use of expert international reviewers and an experienced Editorial Board. As an electronic-only journal, PASA publishes paper by paper, ensuring a rapid publication rate. There are no page charges. PASA's Editorial Board approve a certain number of papers per year to be made freely available without a publication fee. Cover image: Created by Natasha Hurley-Walker (Curtin / ICRAR) and the GLEAM Team. Please contact Natasha via nhw at icrar.org if you would like to use this image.
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union publishes high-quality and timely previews and reviews of fundamental and state-of-the-art astrophysical developments around the world, as presented at some nine IAU-sponsored conferences per year and at the triennial General Assemblies of the IAU. Subjects covered include fundamental astronomy; the sun and heliosphere; planetary systems; stars and variable stars; interstellar matter; the galactic system; galaxies and the Universe; optical and infrared techniques; radio astronomy; and space and high-energy astrophysics. The Proceedings are published under the auspices of the IAU.
We show that if a globally hyperbolic spacetime (M, g) extends to a non globally hyperbolic spacetime (M′, g′), and if the Cauchy horizon H for M in M′ is compact, then the Cauchy surfaces for (M, g) must be diffeomorphic to H. As a corollary to this result, we show that if a (2+1)—dimensional spacetime has compact Cauchy surfaces with topology other than T2, then it cannot be extended to a spacetime with a compact Cauchy horizon.
Introduction
Dieter Brill and one of us (JI) used to talk a lot about Mach's Principle. We both were of the Wheeler school, so our Machian discussions often focussed on issues involving the initial value formulation of Einstein's theory. One such issue was the following question: If a spacetime (M, g) is known to be globally hyperbolic, how can one tell (from intrinsic information) if a given embedded spacelike hypersurface Σ is a Cauchy surface for (M, g)? The answer to this question is important if one wants to know what minimal information about the universe “now” is needed to determine the spacetime metric (and hence its inertial frames) for all time in (M, g).
It turns out [1] that if a spacelike hypersurface Σ embedded in a globally hyperbolic spacetime is compact (without boundary), then it must be a Cauchy surface.
In dimension eight there are three basic representations for the spin group. These representations lead to a concept of triality and hence lead to the construction of two exceptional commutative algebras: The Chevalley algebra A of dimension twenty-four and the Albert algebra I of dimension twenty-seven. All of the exceptional Lie groups can be described using triality, the octonians, and these two algebras.
On a complex four-manifold, with triality a parallel field, the Dirac and associated twistor operators can be constructed on either bundle of exceptional algebras. The geometry of triality leads to refinement of duality common to four dimensions.
In nine dimensions there is a weaker notion of triality which is related to several additional multiplicative structures on J.
Introduction
Cartan's classification of simple Lie groups yields all Lie groups with some exceptions. In his thesis Cartan described these exceptional groups but, save the one of smallest rank G2, he was unable to describe the geometry of the groups. In 1950 Chevalley and Schafer successfully identified F4 and E6 as structure groups for the exceptional Jordan algebra and the Freudenthal cross product on J, respectively. Later Freudenthal successfully identified the geometry associated with the remaining exceptional groups, E7 and E8.
The form of the initial value constraints in Ashtekar's hamiltonian formulation of general relativity is recalled, and the problem of solving them is compared with that in the traditional metric variables. It is shown how the general solution of the four diffeomorphism constraints can be obtained algebraically provided the curvature is non-degenerate, and the form of the remaining (Gauss law) constraints is discussed. The method is extended to cover the case when matter is included, using an approach due to Thiemann. The application of the method to vacuum Bianchi models is given. The paper concludes with a brief discussion of alternative approaches to the initial value problem in the Ashtekar formulation.
Introduction
It is with great pleasure that we dedicate this paper to Dieter Brill, our teacher, advisor, and colleague, on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Our contribution concerns the initial value problem for general relativity, which is amongst Dieter's many areas of expertise. As is the case with almost all research activity developed around the general relativity group at the University of Maryland, the ideas we will present have benefitted from Dieter's always kind and sometimes maddening insightful questioning. Of course it is our wish that this paper will prompt some more such questioning.
A framework for a physical interpretation of quantum cosmology appropriate to a nonperturbative hamiltonian formulation is proposed. It is based on the use of matter fields to define a physical reference frame. In the case of the loop representation it is convenient to use a spatial reference frame that picks out the faces of a fixed simplicial complex and a clock built with a free scalar field. Using these fields a procedure is proposed for constructing physical states and operators in which the problem of constructing physical operators reduces to that of integrating ordinary differential equations within the algebra of spatially diffeomorphism invariant operators. One consequence is that we may conclude that the spectra of operators that measure the areas of physical surfaces are discrete independently of the matter couplings or dynamics of the gravitational field.
Using the physical observables and the physical inner product, it becomes possible to describe singularities, black holes and loss of information in a nonperturbative formulation of quantum gravity, without making reference to a background metric. While only a dynamical calculation can answer the question of whether quantum effects eliminate singularities, it is conjectured that, if they do not, loss of information is a likely result because the physical operator algebra that corresponds to measurements made at late times must be incomplete.
We use a λΦ4 scalar quantum field theory to illustrate a new approach to the study of quantum to classical transition. In this approach, the decoherence functional is employed to assign probabilities to consistent histories defined in terms of correlations among the fields at separate points, rather than the field itself. We present expressions for the quantum amplitudes associated with such histories, as well as for the decoherence functional between two of them. The dynamics of an individual consistent history may be described by a Langevintype equation, which we derive.
Dedicated to Professor Brill on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday, August 1993
Introduction
Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Paradigms of Statistical Mechanics
This paper attempts to bring together two basic concepts, one from the foundations of statistical mechanics and the other from the foundations of quantum mechanics, for the purpose of addressing two basic issues in physics:
the quantum to classical transition, and
the quantum origin of stochastic dynamics.
Both issues draw in the interlaced effects of dissipation, decoherence, noise, and fluctuation. A central concern is the role played by coarse-graining —the naturalness of its choice, the effectiveness of its implementation and the relevance of its consequences.
We propose primal-chaos black holes (PCBHs) as candidates for the missing mass. Beginning with a discussion of the mystery of the missing mass, in its various formulations, we motivate PCBHs as “dark matter.” Envisioning black hole production from colliding gravity waves, we develop a model of time symmetric, axially symmetric gravity waves by making use of the Brill methodology. Through numerical spectral-element techniques, the geometry of space is determined. We discuss trapped surfaces as the signatures of impending collapse to a black hole, and are thereby able to identify, through numerical relaxation, which geometries will undergo gravitational collapse. We are thus able to determine the critical wave amplitude at which black hole production from imploding gravity waves begins. We conclude with a brief discussion of observational limits.
Introduction
“I just can't understand it. All the young men I know are retiring.” So exclaimed Mrs. Niels Bohr in a post-war visit to Princeton on seeing Paul Dirac look from floor to ceiling and back again to floor in a desperate effort to answer her question, “Who is there now at Cambridge? Is Robert Frisch still there?”
“Frisch is retiring. I cannot remember who else is there, except me.”
Any thought of Brill retiring is foreign to anyone who sees him in action, as vigorous now as he was in his Princeton undergraduate (A.B. 1954) and graduate (Ph. D. 1959) days.
Of the many influential contributions made by Dieter Brill to the mathematical development of general relativity, one of particular significance was his discovery together with Stanley Deser, of the linearization stability problem for Einstein's equations [1]. Brill and Deser showed that the Einstein equations are not always linearization stable (in a sense we shall define more precisely below) and they initiated the long (and still continuing) technical program to deal with this problem when it arises.
Our aim in this article is not to review the extensive literature of positive results on linearization stability but rather simply to introduce the reader to this subject and then to discuss some recent research that has developed out of the study of linearization stability problems. These latter include the relationship of linearization stability questions to the problem of the Hamiltonian reduction of Einstein's equations and lead one directly to the study of a number of recent results in pure Riemannian geometry (e.g., the solution of the Yamabe problem by Schoen, Aubin, Trudinger and Yambe, the Gromov-Lawson results on the existence of metrics of positive scalar curvature and the still unfinished classification problem for compact 3-manifolds). They also include a study of the quantum analogue of the linearization stability problem which has been significantly advanced recently by the work of A.
Brill waves are the simplest (non-trivial) solutions to the vacuum constraints of general relativity. They are also rich enough in structure to allow us believe that they capture, at least in part, the generic properties of solutions of the Einstein equations. As such, they deserve the closest attention. This article illustrates this point by showing how Brill waves can be used to investigate the structure of conformal superspace.
INTRODUCTION
From time to time I amuse myself by mentally assembling a list of articles I would like to have written. The candidates for this list have to satisfy a number of criteria. Naturally, they have to be both important and interesting to me. Equally, they have to contain results that I can convince myself, however unreasonably, that I could have obtained. Every time I make my list I am struck again by the number of articles by Dieter Brill appearing on it. At first glance, this is explained by the large overlap between our interests. In reality, however, the explanation is to be found by considering the kind of article that Dieter has written over the years and the way in which he manages to convey major insights in a deceptively simple fashion.