To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Classical computation is based on algorithms that manipulate binary variables (bits), which convey the information being processed. Such algorithms are formed by logic units (logic gates), which are basic functions of binary variables yielding an output that will be used in the next step of the algorithm, and so on. Algorithms of classical computation make extensive use of irreversible gates, which can only be used in one direction and, consequently, loose information. Quantum computation, conversely, uses the quantum states of a given Hilbert space (qubits) to store the information [290, 291, 292]. Then, it takes advantage of the fact that these states have a unitary evolution to build data-processing algorithms, which only possess reversible, unitary logic gates. An important point in this scheme is that coherence of the quantum states storing the information is a crucial requirement; otherwise, the information is lost. Nevertheless, we know that quantum systems rapidly loose their coherence as we increase their size. A clever method of coherence protection, therefore, must be devised if we want to have a quantum computer operating on a human scale. For this reason, quantum computation, since its inception, has been always related to the principles of quantum mechanics.
The main method of coherence protection involves excitations having the so-called non-abelian statistics. Such excitations were shown to occur in the ν = 5/2 plateaus of systems presenting the quantum Hall effect, which is described by the Moore–Read Pfaffian wave-function. Such a state is associated to a Landau–Ginzburg type field theory consisting in the level 2 non-abelian SU(2) Chern–Simons theory in the same way the odd denominator plateaus described by the Laughlin wave-function are associated to the Zhang–Hansson–Kivelson abelian Chern–Simons–Landau–Ginzburg theory. We have shown that the vortex excitations of this theory correspond to the (abelian) anyon excitations of Laughlis's wave-function. In an analogous way, the vortex excitations of the non-abelian Chern–Simons theory are associated to the Pfaffian wave-function excitations, which present non-abelian statistics. Such gapped bulk excitations produce gapless Dirac excitations on the edges, which may combine in specific ways to reproduce the non-abelian statistics exhibited by the bulk vortex states.
Carbon has four electrons in its outer electronic shell, which contains one s and three p orbitals. This, however, is the picture for an isolated atom. When the carbon atom is part of a material with a given crystal structure, almost invariably, for energetic reasons imposed by geometric constraints associated with the crystal structure of the material, two or more of these orbitals combine in a hybrid form that is a linear combination of the former. This interesting phenomenon is known as hybridization. When the four orbitals combine in the so-called sp3 hybridization, the hybrid orbitals assemble in the form of a tetrahedron, which is the basic building block of diamond. Conversely, when three orbitals, namely, one s and two p, combine to create hybrid sp2 orbitals, these are now co-planar, pointing to directions that make an angle of 120◦ among themselves. An unexpectedly vast and extremely interesting amount of physical phenomena emerge in materials formed by this form of carbon. Among these we find polyacetylene and graphene, respectively, possessing one- and two-dimensional structures.
Polyacetylene is a polymer presenting a sequence of CH radicals, formed by carbon atoms, each one with three sp2 hybridized orbitals having covalent bonds with two adjacent carbon atoms, thus forming a zig-zag chain (transpolyacetylene). The third hybridized orbital of each carbon atom is covalently bonded to a hydrogen atom. There remains a p-orbital, which does not hybridize, which is occupied by a single electron. Since this orbital admits up to two electrons with opposite spins, the carbon p-electrons in polyacetylene can move all over the chain, being therefore responsible for most of the interesting physics of this polymer. Especially interesting effects derive from the interplay of the carbon p-electrons with the lattice, imparticular with deformations thereof possessing nontrivial topological properties and, for this reason, called topological solitons.
Polyacetylene exhibits remarkable effects, such as the Peierls mechanism, induced by the electron-lattice interaction, by which a gap is generated where otherwise there would be a Fermi surface.
Until 1986, the highest temperature at which superconductivity had been observed was 23.2K in Nb3Ge. There was an issue as to whether BCS theory would impose an upper limit on the critical temperature for the onset of superconductivity. Actually, as remarked before, the exponential factor in (23.24) may be viewed as responsible for the relatively low temperatures of the BCS superconductors. That expression for Tc has in fact a mathematical upper limit, of the order of the Debye temperature, which is typically about a few hundred Kelvin. This, however, would correspond to an infinite value of the product ƛN(EF) of coupling parameter and Fermi level density-of-states. The mathematical upper bound, consequently, is way above the temperatures corresponding to realistic physical values of parameters. In 1986, La2–xx BaxCuO4 and La2–x SrxCuO4 (LSCO) where shown to present a superconducting phase at temperatures up to about 40K. Soon after, Y Ba2Cu3O6+x (YBCO) was shown to have a superconducting phase up to 92K. These were the first members of the cuprate family, which contains materials such as HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+x, which exhibits a superconducting phase up to a temperature of the order of 130K without pressure and of about 160K under high pressure. Many indications suggest that the mechanism leading to superconductivity in cuprates is not the phonon-mediated BCS mechanism. There is general consensus on this point. Nevertheless, there is so far no agreement about the specific mechanism leading to the formation of Cooper pairs in cuprates, despite the many proposals that have been made. In this chapter, we keep mostly in the region where consensus has been reached, except for Section 24.4, which contains our own contribution to the subject.
Crystal Structure, CuO2 Planes and Phase Diagram
A common feature of all materials belonging to the cuprates family is the presence of CuO2 planes, consisting in a square lattice, which, before doping, contains Cu++ ions on the sites and O−− ions on the links. The latter has a 2p6 electronic configuration, whereas the former is in a 3d9 configuration. The oxygen ions are in a noble gas configuration, while the copper ions have an unpaired electron, which creates a localized magnetic moment at each site.