Element contents
Series: Elements in Public Economics
Economic Principles of Commodity Taxation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 March 2021
Summary
The authors provide a broad overview of economic aspects of commodity taxation, focussing in particular on theory and on policy applications in OECD countries. Some major papers in public economics have discussed whether these taxes should be levied at a uniform rate, or whether different commodities should be taxed differently, for reasons of either equity or efficiency. The authors begin with this question, and then discuss further issues, including the economic incidence of commodity taxes, the properties of the VAT, the taxation of financial services, the international aspects of commodity taxation, and environmental and health policy aspects.
Keywords
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Public EconomicsOnline ISBN: 9781009004497Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 22 April 2021
References
Agrawal, D. R. (2015). The tax gradient: Spatial aspects of fiscal competition. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7, 1–29.Google Scholar
Agrawal, D. R. (2017). The Internet as a Tax Haven? The Effect of the Internet on Tax Competition. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2328479Google Scholar
Ahmad, E., & Stern, N. (1984). The theory of reform and the Indian indirect taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 25, 25–8.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., Lockwood, B. B., & Taubinsky, D. (2018). Ramsey strikes back: Optimal commodity taxes and redistribution in the presence of salience. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, 88–92.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., Lockwood, B. B., & Taubinsky, D. (2019). Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134, 1557–626.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1976). The design of tax structure: Direct versus indirect taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 6, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., & Gordon, R. H. (2002). Taxation of financial services under a VAT. American Economic Review, 92, 411–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., Devereux, M., Keen, M., & Vella, J. (2017). Destination-Based Cash Flow Taxation. Oxford: Saïd Business School.Google Scholar
Bargain, O., & Donni, O. (2014). Optimal commodity taxation and redistribution within households. Economica, 81, 48–62.Google Scholar
Barham, V., Poddar, S. N., & Whalley, J. (1987). The tax treatment of insurance under a consumption type, destination basis VAT. National Tax Journal, 40, 171–81.Google Scholar
Bastani, S., Blomquist, S., & Pirttilä, J. (2015). Counterargument to the recommendation in the Mirrlees Review. Oxford Economic Papers, 67, 455–478.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. J. (1972). On taxation and the control of externalities. American Economic Review, 62, 307–22.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. American Economic Review, 84, 396–418.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96, 675–700.Google Scholar
Belan, P., Gauthier, S., & Laroque, G. (2008). Optimal grouping of commodities for indirect taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1738–50.Google Scholar
Bento, A. M., Goulder, L. H., Jacobsen, M. R., & von Haefen, R. H. (2009). Efficiency and distributional impacts of increased U.S. gasoline taxes. American Economic Review, 99, 667–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benzarti, Y., & Carloni, D. (2019). Who really benefits from consumption tax cuts? Evidence from a large VAT reform in France. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11, 38–63.Google Scholar
Benzarti, Y., Carloni, D., Harju, J., & Kosonen, T. (2020). What goes up may not come down: Asymmetric incidence of value-added taxes. Journal of Political Economy, 128, 4438–74.Google Scholar
Besley, T. J. (1988). A simple model for merit good arguments. Journal of Public Economics, 35, 371–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T. J., & Rosen, H. S. (1999). Sales taxes and prices: An empirical analysis. National Tax Journal, 52, 157–78.Google Scholar
Blumkin, T., Ruffle, B., & Ganun, Y. (2012). Are income and consumption taxes ever really equivalent? Evidence from a real-effort experiment with real goods. European Economic Review, 56, 1200–19.Google Scholar
Boadway, R. W. (2012). From Optimal Tax Theory to Tax Policy: Retrospective and Prospective Views. Munich Lectures in Economics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boadway, R., & Gahvari, F. (2006). Optimal taxation with consumption time as a leisure or labor substitute. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1851–78.Google Scholar
Boadway, R., & Keen, M. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on the taxation of capital income and financial services: A survey. In Honohan, P. (ed.), Taxation of Financial Intermediation. Theory and Practice for Emerging Economies. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–80.Google Scholar
Boadway, R., Marchand, M., & Pestieau, P. (1994). Towards a theory of the direct-indirect tax mix. Journal of Public Economics, 55, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boadway, R. W., & Richter, W. F. (2005). Trading off tax distortions and tax evasion. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 7, 361–81.Google Scholar
Bohm, P., & Russell, C. (1985). Comparative analysis of alternative policy instruments. In Kneese, A. V., & Sweeney, J. L. (eds.), Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 1. New York: Elsevier, pp. 395–460.Google Scholar
Boiteux, M. (1956). Sur la gestion des monopoles publics astreints à l’équilibre budgétaire. Econometrica, 24, 22–40.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, L. (1994), Destination- and origin-based taxation under international capital mobility. International Tax and Public Finance, 1, 247–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovenberg, A. L., & de Mooij, R. (1994). Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. American Economic Review, 84, 1085–9.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, A. L., & van der Ploeg, F. (1996). Optimal taxation, public goods and environmental policy with involuntary unemployment. Journal of Public Economics, 62, 59–83.Google Scholar
Browning, M., & Meghir, C. (1991). The effects of male and female labour supply on commodity demands. Econometrica, 59, 925–51.Google Scholar
Büttner, T., & Erbe, K. (2014). Revenue and welfare effects of financial sector VAT exemption. International Tax and Public Finance, 21, 1028–50.Google Scholar
Carbonnier, C. (2007). Who pays sales taxes? Evidence from French VAT reforms, 1987–1999. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1219–29.Google Scholar
Chetty, R. (2012). Bounds on elasticities with optimization frictions: A Synthesis of micro and macro evidence on labor supply. Econometrica, 80, 969–1018.Google Scholar
Chetty, R., Looney, A., & Kroft, K. (2009). Salience and taxation: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 99, 1145–77.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. (1984). Which commodity taxes should supplement the income tax? Journal of Public Economics, 24, 195–220.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. (1985). The choice of excise taxes when savings and labour decisions are distorted. Journal of Public Economics, 28, 95–110.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. (1994). Cross-border shopping and the optimum commodity tax in a competitive and monopoly market. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96, 329–41.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. (2017). Indirect taxation of financial services. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 6675.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V. & Jansen, E. S. (1978). Implicit social preferences in the Norwegian system of indirect taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 10, 217–45.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V., & Smith, S. (2001). The economics of duty-free shopping. CESifo Working Paper No 595.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V., & Smith, S. (2004). National policy interests in the duty-free market. CESifo Economic Studies, 50, 351–75.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V., & Smith, S. (2008). Optimal commodity taxation with duty-free shopping. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 274–96.Google Scholar
Christiansen, V., & Smith, S. (2012). Externality-correcting taxes and regulation. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114, 358–83.Google Scholar
Cnossen, S., & Shoup, C. S. (1987), Coordination of value-added taxes. In Cnossen, S. (ed.), Tax Coordination in the European Community. Deventer: Kluwer, pp. 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cnossen, S., & Smart, M. (2005). Taxation of tobacco. In Cnossen, S. (ed.), Theory and Practice of Excise Taxation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 21–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, W. J., & Hague, D. C. (1953). Complementarity and the excess burden of taxation, Review of Economic Studies, 21, 21–30.Google Scholar
Crawford, I., Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2010). Value Added Tax and Excises. In Mirrlees, J., et al. (eds.), Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–362.Google Scholar
Crawford, I., & Tanner, S. (1995). Bringing it all back home: Alcohol taxation and cross-border shopping, Fiscal Studies, 16, 94–114.Google Scholar
Cremer, H., & Gahvari, F. (1996). Tax evasion and optimal commodity taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 50, 261–75.Google Scholar
Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., & Ladoux, N. (1998). Externalities and optimal taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 343–64.Google Scholar
Cremer, H., Gahvari, F., & Ladoux, N. (2003). Environmental taxes with heterogeneous consumers: An application to energy consumption in France. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2791–815.Google Scholar
Cashin, D., & Unayama, T. (2016). Measuring intertemporal substitution in consumption: Evidence from a VAT increase in Japan. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 98, 285–97.Google Scholar
Delipalla, S., & Keen, M. (1992). The comparison between ad valorem and specific taxation under imperfect competition, Journal of Public Economics, 49, 351–67.Google Scholar
De Paula, Á. , & Scheinkman, J. A. (2010). Value-added taxes, chain effects, and informality. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2, 195–221.Google Scholar
Devereux, M. P., & Vella, J. (2017). Implications of Digitalization for International Corporate Tax Reform. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation. Working Paper 17/07.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. (1973). Consumption externalities and imperfect corrective pricing, Bell Journal of Economics, 4, 526–38.Google Scholar
Diamond, P., & Mirrlees, J. A. (1971). Optimal taxation and public production I: Production efficiency; II Tax rules. American Economic Review, 61, 8–27 and 261–278.Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E. (1978). Optimal tax perturbations. Journal of Public Economics, 10, 139–77.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (1975). Welfare effects of tax and price changes. Journal of Public Economics, 4, 103–23.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. (1996). Special-interest lobbying and endogenous commodity taxation. Eastern Economic Journal, 22, 375–88.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1997). Common agency and Coordination: General theory and application to government policy making. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 752–69.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. K., & Stern, N. H. (1982). Oligopoly and welfare: A unified presentation with applications to trade and development. European Economic Review, 19, 123–43.Google Scholar
Ebrill, L., Keen, M., Bodin, J.-P., & Summers, V. (2001). The Modern VAT. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Edwards, J., Keen, M., & Tuomala, M. (1994). Income tax, commodity taxes and public good provision: a brief guide. FinanzArchiv, 51, 472–87.Google Scholar
Emran, S. M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2005). On selective indirect tax reform in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 599–623.Google Scholar
Feldstein, M. (1975). On the theory of tax reform. Journal of Public Economics, 6, 77–104.Google Scholar
Fratianni, M., & Christie, H. (1981). Abolishing fiscal frontiers within the EEC. Public Finance – Finances publiques, 36, 411–29.Google Scholar
Fullerton, D., Leicester, A., & Smith, S. (2010). Environmental taxes. In Mirrlees, J., et al. (eds.), Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 423–518.Google Scholar
Fullerton, D., & Metcalf, G. E. (2001). Environmental controls, scarcity rents, and pre-existing distortions, Journal of Public Economics, 80, 249–67.Google Scholar
Fullerton, D., & West, S. E. (2002). Can taxes on cars and on gasoline mimic an unavailable tax on emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 135–57.Google Scholar
Fullerton, D., & West, S. E. (2010). Tax and subsidy combinations for the control of car pollution. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 10: Iss. 1 (Advances), Article 8.Google Scholar
Gaarder, I. (2018). Incidence and distributional effects of value added taxes. Economic Journal, 129, 853–76.Google Scholar
Gahvari, F. (2007). On optimal commodity taxes when consumption is time consuming. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
Gahvari, F., & Yang, C. C. (1993) Optimal commodity taxation and household consumption activities Public Finance Quarterly, 21, 479–87.Google Scholar
Gilitzer, C, Kleven, H. J., & Slemrod, J. (2017). A characteristics approach to optimal taxation: Line drawing and tax-driven product innovation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119, 240–67.Google Scholar
Gillingham, K., & Stock, J. H. (2018). The costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32, 53–72.Google Scholar
Goolsbee, A. (2000). In a world without borders: The impact of taxes on internet commerce. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 561–76.Google Scholar
Goolsbee, A., Lovenheim, M. F., & Slemrod, J. (2010). Playing with fire: Cigarettes, taxes, and competition from the internet. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2, 131–54.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. (1989). Tax reform via commodity grouping. Journal of Public Economics, 39, 67–81.Google Scholar
Goulder, L. H. (1995). Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157–83.Google Scholar
Green, J., & Sheshinski, E. (1976). Direct versus indirect remedies for externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 797–808.Google Scholar
Greenstone, M., Kopits, E., & Wolverton, A. (2013). Developing a social cost of carbon for US regulatory analysis: A methodology and interpretation. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, J. (2010). Value added tax and excises: Commentary. In Mirrlees, J., et al. (eds.), Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 405–22.Google Scholar
Gruber, J., & Koszegi, B. (2001). Is addiction ‘rational’? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1261–303.Google Scholar
Gruber, J., & Koszegi, B. (2002). A theory of government regulation of addictive bads: optimal tax levels and tax incidence for cigarette excise taxation. NBER Working Paper No 8777.Google Scholar
Grubert, H., & Mackie, J. (2000). Must financial services be taxed under a consumption tax? National Tax Journal, 53, 23–40.Google Scholar
Guesnerie, R. (1977). On the direction of tax reform. Journal of Public Economics, 7, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, M., Leibtag, E., & Lovenheim, M. (2012). The heterogenous geographic and socioeconomic incidence of cigarette taxes: Evidence from Nielsen homescan data. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4, 169–98.Google Scholar
Harju, J., Kosonen, T., & Nordström-Skans, O. (2018). Firm types, price-setting strategies, and consumption-tax incidence. Journal of Public Economics, 165, 48–72.Google Scholar
Ilzetzki, E. (2018). Tax reform and the political economy of the tax base. Journal of Public Economics, 164, 197–210.Google Scholar
Jack, W. (2000). The treatment of financial services under a broad-based consumption tax. National Tax Journal, 53, 841–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, B., & Boadway, R. (2014). Optimal linear commodity taxation under optimal non-linear income taxation. Journal of Public Economics 117, 201–10.Google Scholar
Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux sans frontières: Tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. American Economic Review, 83, 877–92.Google Scholar
Kay, J. A., & Keen, M. J. (1983). How should commodities be taxed? Market structure, product heterogeneity and the optimal structure of commodity taxes. European Economic Review, 23, 339–58.Google Scholar
Keen, M. (1993). The welfare economics of tax coordination in the European Community, Fiscal Studies 14, 15–36.Google Scholar
Keen, M. (2002). Some international issues in commodity taxation, Swedish Economic Policy Review, 9, 9–37.Google Scholar
Keen, M. (2008). VAT, tariffs, and withholding: border taxes and informality in developing countries. Journal of Public Economics. 92, 1892–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, M, & Mintz, J. (2004). The optimal threshold for a value-added tax. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 559–76.Google Scholar
Keen, M., & Smith, S. (1996) The future of value added tax in the European Union. Economic Policy, 23, 375–420.Google Scholar
Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2000) Viva VIVAT! International Tax and Public Finance, 7, 741–51.Google Scholar
Keen, M., & Smith, S. (2006). VAT fraud and evasion. What do we know, and what can be done? National Tax Journal, 59, 861–87.Google Scholar
Kinnaman, T. (2006). Policy watch: Examining the justification for residential recycling. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 219–32.Google Scholar
Kleven, H. J. (2004) Optimum taxation and the allocation of time. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 545–57.Google Scholar
Kleven, H. J., Richter, W. F., & Sørensen, P. B. (2000). Optimal taxation with household production. Oxford Economic Papers 52, 584–94.Google Scholar
Kneese, A. V, . & Bower, B. T. (1968). Managing water quality. Economics, technology, institutions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kopczuk, W., Marion, J., Muehlegger, E., & Slemrod, J. (2016) Does tax-collection invariance hold? Evasion and pass-through of state diesel taxes. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8. 251–86.Google Scholar
Koskela, E. & Schöb, R. (1999). Alleviating unemployment: The case for green tax reforms. European Economic Review. 43, 1723–46.Google Scholar
Kosonen, T. (2015). More and cheaper haircuts after VAT cut? On the efficiency and incidence of service sector consumption taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 131, 87–100.Google Scholar
Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 443–77.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157.Google Scholar
Leal, A., López-Laborda, J., & Rodrigo, F. (2010). Cross-border shopping: A survey. International Advances in Economic Research, 16, 135–48.Google Scholar
Lockwood, B. (2015). How should financial intermediation services be taxed? In de Mooij, R., & Nicodème, G. (eds.), Taxation and Regulation of the Financial Sector. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 133–56.Google Scholar
Lockwood, B., de Meza, D. & Myles, G. (1994a). When are destination and origin regimes equivalent? International Tax and Public Finance, 1, 5–24.Google Scholar
Lockwood, B., de Meza, D., & Myles, G. (1994b). The equivalence between destination and non-reciprocal restricted origin regimes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96, 311–28.Google Scholar
Lockwood, B., & Yerushalmi, E. (2019). How should payment services be taxed? Social Choice and Welfare, 53, 21–47.Google Scholar
Madden, D. (1995). An analysis of indirect tax reform in Ireland in the 1980s. Fiscal Studies, 16, 18–37.Google Scholar
Meade Report (1978). The Structure and Reform of Indirect Taxation: Report of a Committee chaired by Professor J. E. Meade. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Merriman, D. (2010). The micro-geography of tax avoidance: evidence from littered cigarette packs in Chicago. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2, 61–84.Google Scholar
Millock, K., & Sterner, T. (2004). NOx emissions in France and Sweden: advanced fee schemes versus regulation. In Harrington, W., Morgenstern, R. D., & Sterner, T. (eds.), Choosing Environmental Policy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 117–32.Google Scholar
Mintz, J., & Tulkens, H. (1986). Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation: equilibrium and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 133–72.Google Scholar
Miravete, E., Seim, K., & Thurk, J. (2018). Market power and the Laffer curve. Econometrica, 86, 1651–1687.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. B. (1976). Public Finance in Theory and Practice. New York: McGraw- Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Newell, R., & Stavins, R. (2003). Cost heterogeneity and the potential savings from market-based policies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23, 43–59.Google Scholar
Nielsen, S. B. (2001). A simple model of commodity taxation and cross-border shopping. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103, 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygård, O. E., & Revesz, J. T. (2016). A literature review on optimal indirect taxation and the uniformity debate. Review of Public Economics, 218, 107–38.Google Scholar
Nygård, O. E., Slemrod, J., & Thoresen, T. O. (2019). Distributional implications of joint tax evasion. The Economic Journal, 129, 1894–923.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing it now or later. American Economic Review, 89, 103–24.Google Scholar
OECD (2013). The Swedish Tax on Nitrogen Oxide Emissions: Lessons in Environmental Policy Reform. OECD Environmental Policy Paper No 2. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
OECD (2015). Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Palmer, K., and Walls, M. (1997), Optimal policies for solid waste disposal: taxes, subsidies, and standards. Journal of Public Economics, 65, 193–205.Google Scholar
Parry, I. (1995). Pollution taxes and revenue recycling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 64–77.Google Scholar
Parry, I. (2003), Fiscal interactions and the case for carbon taxes over grandfathered carbon permits. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 385–99.Google Scholar
Parry, I., Walls, M., & Harrington, W. (2007). Automobile externalities and policies. Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 373–99.Google Scholar
Pearce, D. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The Economic Journal, 101, 938–48.Google Scholar
Pirttilä, J., & Tuomala, M. (1997). Income tax, commodity tax and environmental policy. International Tax and Public Finance, 4, 379–93.Google Scholar
Pless, J., & van Benthem, A. A. (2019). Pass-through as a test for market power: An application to solar subsidies. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11, 367–401.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. (1927). A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal, 37, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M. J., & Spence, M. (1976). Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. Journal of Public Economics, 5, 193–208.Google Scholar
Saez, E. (2002) The desirability of commodity taxation under non-linear income taxation and heterogeneous tastes. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 217–30.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1975). Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities. Swedish Journal of Economics, 77, 86–98.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1976). Direct versus indirect Pigovian taxation. European Economic Review, 7, 337–49.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1990). Tax distortions and household production. Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 78–90.Google Scholar
Sandmo, A. (1995). Public finance and the environment. In Bovenberg, L. & Cnossen, S. (eds.), Public Economics and the Environment in an Imperfect World. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandmo, A. (2000). The Public Economics of the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schroyen, F. (2005). An alternative way to model merit good arguments. Journal of Public Economics, 89, 957–66.Google Scholar
Schwarz, J., & Repetto, R. (2000). Nonseparable utility and the double dividend debate: Reconsidering the tax interaction effect. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15, 149–57.Google Scholar
Seade, J. (1985). Profitable Cost Increases and the Shifting Of Taxation: Equilibrium Response of Markets in Oligopoly. Warwick Economic Research Papers No. 260.Google Scholar
Shibata, H. (1967), The theory of economic unions: A comparative analysis of customs unions, free trade areas and tax unions. In Shoup, C. S. (ed.), Fiscal Harmonisation in Common Markets. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 145–264.Google Scholar
Sinclair, P. (1992), High does nothing and rising is worse: carbon taxes should keep declining to cut harmful emissions, The Manchester School, 60, 41–52.Google Scholar
Sinn, H.-W. (2007), Public Policies Against Global Warming, CESifo Working Paper 2087, Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
Smith, S. (2005). Economic issues in alcohol taxation. In Cnossen, S. (ed.), Theory and Practice of Excise Taxation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–83.Google Scholar
Sørensen, P. B. (2007). The theory of optimal taxation: what is the policy relevance? International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 383–406.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (1982). Optimum taxation with errors in administration. Journal of Public Economics, 17, 181–211.Google Scholar
Stern, N. (1987). The effects of taxation, price control and government contracts in oligopoly and monopolistic competition. Journal of Public Economics, 32, 133–58.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (1982). Self-selection and Pareto efficient taxation. Journal of Public Economics, 17, 213–40.Google Scholar
Ulph, A., Ulph, D., & Pezzey, J. (1991). Should a Carbon Tax Rise or Fall over Time? University of Bristol, Department of Economics, Discussion Paper No 91/309.Google Scholar
Viscusi, W. K. (1995). Cigarette taxation and the social consequences of smoking. Tax Policy and the Economy, 9, 51–101.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. (1974). Prices versus quantities. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 477–91.Google Scholar
Weyl, E. G., and Fabinger, M. (2013). Pass-through as an economic tool: Principles of incidence under imperfect competition. Journal of Political Economy, 121, 528–83.Google Scholar
Weymark, J. A. (1979). A reconciliation of recent results in optimal taxation theory. Journal of Public Economics, 12, 171–89.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. D. (1989). On the optimal tax base for commodity taxation. American Economic Review, 79, 1196–206.Google Scholar
- 7
- Cited by