Element contents
Voltaire's Correspondence
Digital Readings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2020
Summary
Voltaire's correspondence has been described as his 'greatest masterpiece' – but if it is, it is also his least studied. One of the most prodigious correspondences in Western literature, it poses significant interpretative challenges to the critic and reader alike. Considered individually, the letters present a series of complex, subtle, and playful literary performances; taken together, they constitute a formidable, and even forbidding, ensemble. How can modern readers even attempt to understand such an imposing work? This Element addresses this question through the use of digital reading methods and resources that enhance our understanding of this complex literary object and its relationship to Voltaire's more canonical literary output, and indeed to the Enlightenment world at large. Nicholas Cronk and Glenn Roe provide scholars and students with new pathways into this particular corpus, using tools and approaches that can then be applied to correspondences and life-writing texts in all languages and periods.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108866552Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 12 November 2020
References
Allen, T., Morrissey, R., & Roe, G. (2011). Re-imagining French lexicography: the Dictionnaire vivant de la langue française. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, 32, 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauzée, N. (1765). Néologique, Néologue. In Diderot, D and D’Alembert, J, eds., Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. XI. Paris: Libraires associés.Google Scholar
Bednarz, J. P. (2018). Shakespeare and the early modern culture of quotation. In Maxwell, J and Rumbold, K, eds., Shakespeare and Quotation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–45.Google Scholar
Bessire, F. (1999). La Bible dans la correspondence de Voltaire. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Blei, D. (2012). Topic Modeling and Digital Humanities. Journal of Digital Humanities 2(1). http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2–1/topic-modeling-and-digital-humanities-by-david-m-blei/Google Scholar
Bode, K. (2018). A World of Fiction: Digital Collections and the Future of Literary History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Brockliss, L. (2002). Calvet’s Web: Enlightenment and the Republic of Letters in Eighteenth-Century France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brunot, F. (1932). La Langue post-classique. Vol. VI of Histoire de la langue française des origines à 1900. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
Calvez, D. (1989). Le Langage proverbial de Voltaire dans sa correspondance (1704–1769), Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Clemit, P. (2019). The signal of regard: William Godwin’s correspondence networks. European Romantic Review, 30(4), 353–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comsa, M., Conroy, M., Edelstein, D., Edmondson, C., & Willan, C. (2016). The French Enlightenment network. Journal of Modern History, 88, 495–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotoni, M.-H. (1995). Le rire, la plainte et le cri dans les dernières années de la Correspondance de Voltaire. In Biondi, C, et al., eds., La Quête du bonheur et l’expression de la douleur dans la littérature et la pensée françaises: Mélanges offerts à Corrado Rosso. Geneva: Droz, pp. 46–75.Google Scholar
Cronk, N. (2007). Voltaire autoplagiaire. In Ferret, O, Goggi, G, & Volpilhac-Auger, C, eds., Copier/coller. Écriture et réécriture chez Voltaire. Pisa: PLUS, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Cronk, N. (2016a). La correspondance entre Voltaire et le duc d’Uzès: compléments à l’édition Besterman (D4585-R1, D6248-R1, D7134a). Dix-huitième siècle, 48, 607–31.Google Scholar
Cronk, N. (2016b). Voltaire and the chevalier de Jaucourt: the lessons of an epistolary corpus. Revue Voltaire, 16, 215–27.Google Scholar
Cronk, N. (2019). Voltaire’s correspondence network: questions of exploration and interpretation. In Edmondson, C & Edelstein, D, eds., Networks of Enlightenment: digital approaches to the Republic of Letters. Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
Cronk, N. (2021). Electronic Enlightenment: recreating the Republic of Letters. In Burrows, S & Roe, G, eds., Digitizing Enlightenment: digital humanities and the transformation of eighteenth-century studies. Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 55–72.Google Scholar
Cronk, N., & McNamee, R. (2005). Le projet Electronic Enlightenment de la Voltaire Foundation. Cahiers de l’AIEF (CAIEF), 57, 303–11.Google Scholar
Dawson, D. (1994). Voltaire’s Correspondence: An Epistolary Novel. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Delattre, A. (1952). Répertoire chronologique des lettres de Voltaire non recueillies dans les éditions de sa correspondance générale. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Delcourt, C. (2002). Stylometry. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire, 80(3), 979–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delon, M. (1984). ‘Homo sum … ’ Un vers de Térence comme devise des Lumières. Dix-huitième siècle, 16, 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diderot, D. (1755). Encyclopédie. In Diderot, D & D’Alembert, J, eds., Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonnés des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vol. 5. Paris: Libraires associés.Google Scholar
Diepeveen, L. (1993). Changing Voices: The Modern Quoting Poem. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D. (2008). Humanism, l’esprit philosophique, and the Encyclopédie. Republics of Letters 1(1). http://rofl.stanford.edu/node/27Google Scholar
Edelstein, D. (2016). Intellectual history and digital humanities. Modern Intellectual History, 13, 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, D. (2019). Voltaire’s European correspondents: an Enlightenment network? In Andriès, L & Bernier, M. A., eds., L’Avenir des Lumières: The Future of Enlightenment. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D. (2021). Mapping the Republic of Letters: history of a digital humanities project. In Burrows, S & Roe, G, eds., Digitizing Enlightenment: digital humanities and the transformation of eighteenth-century studies. Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 73–88.Google Scholar
Edelstein, D., & Kassabova, B. (2018). How England fell off the map of Voltaire’s Enlightenment. Modern Intellectual History, 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S147924431800015XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, D., Morrissey, R., & Roe, G. (2013). To quote or not to quote: citation strategies in the Encyclopédie. Journal of the History of Ideas, 74(2), 213–36.Google Scholar
Edmondson, C., & Edelstein, D., eds. (2019). Networks of Enlightenment: Digital Approaches to the Republic of Letters. Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Engelsing, R. (1974). Der Bürger als Leser: Lesergeschichte in Deutschland 1500–1800. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, I., Bernhard, D., & Gérard, C. (2014). From non word to new word: automatically identifying neologisms in French newspapers. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC).Google Scholar
Fish, S. (2012). The digital humanities and the transcending of mortality. The New York Times, 9 January 2012.Google Scholar
Fumaroli, M. (2003). L’anti-Emile: Voltaire et ses éducateurs jésuites. Revue Voltaire, 3, 217–32.Google Scholar
Gavin, M. (2018). Vector semantics, William Empson, and the study of ambiguity. Critical Inquiry, 44, 641–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibert, P. (2010). L’Invention critique de la Bible, XVe–XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Gallimard-NRF.Google Scholar
Goyet, F. (1996). Le Sublime du ‘lieu commun’. L’Invention rhétorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W., Leskovec, J., & Jarafsky, D. (2016). Diachronic word embeddings reveal statistical laws of semantic change. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, T., & Bizer, C. (2011). Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, D. (1998). The evolution of stylometry in humanities scholarship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13(3), 111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotson, H., & Wallnig, T., eds. (2019). Reassembling the Republic of Letters in the Digital Age: Standards, Systems, Scholarship. Göttingen: Göttingen University Press.Google Scholar
Lilti, A. (2014). Figures publiques: l’invention de la célébrité 1750–1850. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
McGann, J. (2006). From text to work: digital tools and the emergence of the social text. Text, 16, 49–62.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. (1999). Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervaud, C. (2009). Voltaire’s correspondence. In N. Cronk, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Voltaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mervaud, M. (2011). Voltaire lexicographe: note sur la néologie, les créations verbales et les mots rares de Voltaire, principalement dans les Questions sur l’Encyclopédie. Revue Voltaire, 11, 341–65.Google Scholar
Moncrif, F.-A. (1751). Qu’on ne peut ni ne doit fixer une langue vivante. In Œuvres, vol. 2. Paris: Lecteur de la Reine.Google Scholar
Norman, L. (2011). The Shock of the Ancient: Literature and History in Early Modern France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, M., Horton, R., & Roe, G. (2011). Something borrowed: sequence alignment and the identification of similar passages in large text collections. Digital Studies / le Champ Numérique, 2(1). http://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.258Google Scholar
Pascal, B. (1992). Œuvres complètes, vol. 3, ed. Mesnard, J. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Piper, A. (2015). Novel devotions: conversional reading, computational modeling, and the modern novel. New Literary History, 46(1), 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, A. (2018). Enumerations: Data and Literary Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, G., and Sinclair, S. (2016). Hermeneutica: Computer-Assisted Interpretation in the Humanities. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, G. (2012). Intertextuality and influence in the age of Enlightenment: sequence alignment applications for humanities research. Digital Humanities 2012, 345–7.Google Scholar
Roe, G. (2018). A sheep in Wolff’s clothing: Émilie Du Châtelet and the Encyclopédie. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 51(2), 179–96.Google Scholar
Schmidt, B. (2015). Vector space models for the digital humanities. [blog post], 25 October: http://bookworm.benschmidt.org/posts/2015–10-25-Word-Embeddings.html.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. (1990). Yours. In Ricks, C & Michaels, L, eds., The State of the Language: 1990s Edition. London: Faber and Faber, pp. 451–6.Google Scholar
Underwood, T. (2017). A genealogy of distant reading. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 11(2).Google Scholar
Underwood, T. (2019). Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . (1784–9). Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, 70 vols. Kehl: Société littéraire-typographique.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . (1968–2021). Œuvres complètes de Voltaire, 203 vols. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 16
- Cited by