Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:25:49.633Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the distance between convex-ordered random variables, with applications

Part of: Limit theorems Distribution theory Distribution theory - Probability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Michael V. Boutsikas  and
Eutichia Vaggelatou
Michael V. Boutsikas*
Affiliation:
University of Piraeus
Eutichia Vaggelatou*
Affiliation:
National Technical University of Athens
*
∗ Postal address: Department of Statistics and Insurance Science, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli and Dimitriou str., 185 34 Piraeus, Greece. Email address: mbouts@unipi.gr
∗∗ Postal address: Department of Applied Mathematics and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens, GR-15780 Athens, Greece.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simple approximation techniques are developed exploiting relationships between generalized convex orders and appropriate probability metrics. In particular, the distance between s-convex ordered random variables is investigated. Results connecting positive or negative dependence concepts and convex ordering are also presented. These results lead to approximations and bounds for the distributions of sums of positively or negatively dependent random variables. Applications and extensions of the main results pertaining to compound Poisson, normal and exponential approximation are provided as well.

Keywords

Stochastic orders of convex typeprobability metricspositive dependencenegative dependencecompound Poisson approximationrate of convergence in CLTexponential approximationgeometric convolutionsageing distributions

MSC classification

Primary: 60E15: Inequalities; stochastic orderings 62E17: Approximations to distributions (nonasymptotic)
Secondary: 60F05: Central limit and other weak theorems 62E20: Asymptotic distribution theory

Information

Type
General Applied Probability
Information
Advances in Applied Probability , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 349 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barbour, A. D. and Chryssaphinou, O. (2001). Compound Poisson approximation: a users guide. Ann. Appl. Prob. 11, 964–1002.Google Scholar
Barbour, A. D., Holst, L. and Janson, S. (1992). Poisson Approximation. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1981). Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing. To Begin With, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
Birkel, T. (1988). On the convergence rate in the central limit theorem for associated processes. Ann. Prob. 16, 1685–1698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkel, T. (1993). A functional central limit theorem for positively dependent random variables. J. Multivariate Anal. 44, 314–320.Google Scholar
Boutsikas, M. V. and Koutras, M. V. (2000). A bound for the distribution of the sum of discrete associated or negatively associated random variables. Ann. Appl. Prob. 10, 1137–1150.Google Scholar
Brown, M. (1990). Error bounds for exponential approximations of geometric convolutions. Ann. Prob. 18, 1388–1402.Google Scholar
Burton, R., Dabrowski, A. R. and Dehling, H. (1986). An invariance principle for weakly associated random vectors. Stoch. Process. Appl. 23, 301–306.Google Scholar
Chacon, R. V. and Walsh, J. B. (1976). One-dimensional potential embedding. In Séminaire de Probabilités X (Lecture Notes Math. 511), ed. Meyer, P. A., Springer, Berlin, 19–23.Google Scholar
Cox, J. T. and Grimmett, G. (1984). Central limit theorems for associated random sequences and the percolation model. Ann. Prob. 12, 514–528.Google Scholar
Dabrowski, A. R. and Dehling, H. (1988). A Berry–Esseen theorem and a functional law of the iterated logarithm for weakly associated random variables. Stoch. Process. Appl. 30, 277–289.Google Scholar
Daley, D. J. (1988). Tight bounds on the exponential approximation of some aging distributions. Ann. Prob. 16, 414–423.Google Scholar
Denuit, M. and Van Bellegem, S. (2001). On the stop-loss and total variation distances between random sums. Statist. Prob. Lett. 53, 153–165.Google Scholar
Denuit, M., Dhaene, J. and Ribas, C. (2001). Does positive dependence between individual risks increase stop-loss premiums? Insurance Math. Econom. 28, 305–308.Google Scholar
Denuit, M., Lefèvre, C. and Shaked, M. (1998). The s-convex orders among real random variables, with applications. Math. Inequal. Appl. 1, 585–613.Google Scholar
Denuit, M., Lefèvre, C. and Utev, S. (2002). Measuring the impact of dependence between claims occurrences. Insurance Math. Econom. 30, 1–19.Google Scholar
de Pril, N. and Dhaene, J. (1992). Error bounds for compound Poisson approximations of the individual risk model. ASTIN Bull. 22, 135–148.Google Scholar
Dhaene, J. and Goovaerts, M. J. (1996). Dependency of risks and stop-loss order. ASTIN Bull. 26, 201–212.Google Scholar
Dhaene, J. and Goovaerts, M. J. (1997). On the dependency of risks in the individual life model. Insurance Math. Econom. 19, 243–253.Google Scholar
Esary, J. D., Proschan, F. and Walkup, D. (1967). Association of random variables with applications. Ann. Math. Statist. 38, 1466–1474.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1976). Continua of stochastic dominance relations for bounded probability distributions. J. Math. Econom. 3, 295–311.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1980a). Continua of stochastic dominance relations for unbounded probability distributions. J. Math. Econom. 7, 271–285.Google Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1980b). Stochastic dominance and moments of distributions. Math. Operat. Res. 5, 94–100.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. (1981). An Introduction to Mathematical Risk Theory (S. S. Huebner Foundation Monogr. Ser. 8), Irwin, Richard D., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
Gerber, H. (1984). Error bounds for the compound Poisson approximation. Insurance Math. Econom. 3, 191–194.Google Scholar
Joag-Dev, K. (1983). Independence via uncorrelatedness under certain dependence structures. Ann. Prob. 11, 1037–1041.Google Scholar
Joag-Dev, K. and Proschan, F. (1983). Negative association of random variables, with applications. Ann. Statist. 11, 286–295.Google Scholar
Kaas, R. (1993). How to and how not to compute stop-loss premiums in practice. Insurance Math. Econom. 13, 241–254.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. and Novikoff, A. (1963). Generalized convex inequalities. Pacific J. Math. 13, 1251–1279.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, C. and Utev, S. (1998). On order-preserving properties of probability metrics. J. Theoret. Prob. 11, 907–920.Google Scholar
Lehmann, E. L. (1966). Some concepts of dependence. Ann. Math. Statist. 37, 1137–1153.Google Scholar
Machina, M. J. and Pratt, J. W. (1997). Increasing risk: some direct constructions. J. Risk Uncertainty 14, 103–127.Google Scholar
Meilijson, I. (1983). On the Azéma–Yor stopping time. In Seminar on Probability XVII (Lecture Notes Math. 986), Springer, Berlin, pp. 225–226.Google Scholar
Müller, A., (1997). Stochastic orders generated by integrals: a unified study. Adv. Appl. Prob. 29, 414–428.Google Scholar
Newman, C. M. (1980). Normal fluctuations and the FKG inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys. 74, 119–128.Google Scholar
Newman, C. M. and Wright, A. L. (1981). An invariance principle for certain dependent sequences. Ann. Prob. 9, 671–675.Google Scholar
Rachev, S. T. (1991). Probability Metrics and the Stability of Stochastic Models. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Rachev, S. T. and Rüschendorf, L. (1990). Approximation of sums by compound Poisson distributions with respect to stop-loss distances. Adv. Appl. Prob. 22, 350–374.Google Scholar
Senatov, V. V. (1980). Uniform estimates of the rate of convergence in the multi-dimensional central limit theorem. Theory Prob. Appl. 25, 745–759.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (1994). Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Shao, Q.-M. (2000). A comparison theorem on moment inequalities between negatively associated and independent random variables. J. Theoret. Prob. 13, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoyan, D. (1983). Comparison Methods for Queues and Other Stochastic Models. John Wiley, Chichester. (Translation from the German edited by D. J. Daley.)Google Scholar
Szekli, R. (1995). Stochastic Ordering and Dependence in Applied Probability (Lecture Notes Statist. 97). Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Tchen, A. H. (1980). Inequalities for distributions with given marginals. Ann. Prob. 8, 814–827.Google Scholar
Wood, T. E. (1983). A Berry–Esseen theorem for associated random variables. Ann. Prob. 11, 1042–1047.Google Scholar
Yu, H. (1985). An invariance principle for associated sequences of random variables. J. Engin. Math. 2, 55–60.Google Scholar
Zolotarev, V. M. (1983). Probability metrics. Theory Prob. Appl. 28, 278–302.Google Scholar