Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T09:43:43.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing Hazard Rate of Mixtures for Natural Exponential Families

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Shaul K. Bar-Lev*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Gérard Letac*
Affiliation:
Université Paul Sabatier
*
Postal address: Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel. Email address: barlev@stat.haifa.ac.il
∗∗ Postal address: Laboratoire de Statistique et Probabilités, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France. Email address: letac@cict.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hazard rates play an important role in various areas, e.g. reliability theory, survival analysis, biostatistics, queueing theory, and actuarial studies. Mixtures of distributions are also of great preeminence in such areas as most populations of components are indeed heterogeneous. In this study we present a sufficient condition for mixtures of two elements of the same natural exponential family (NEF) to have an increasing hazard rate. We then apply this condition to some classical NEFs having either quadratic or cubic variance functions (VFs) and others as well. Particular attention is paid to the hyperbolic cosine NEF having a quadratic VF, the Ressel NEF having a cubic VF, and the NEF generated by Kummer distributions of type 2. The application of such a sufficient condition is quite intricate and cumbersome, in particular when applied to the latter three NEFs. Various lemmas and propositions are needed to verify this condition for such NEFs. It should be pointed out, however, that our results are mainly applied to a mixture of two populations.

Type
General Applied Probability
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

References

Abad, J. and Sesma, J. (1995). Computation of the regular confluent hypergeometric function. Mathematica J.. 5, 7476.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. E. and Proschan, F. (1965). Mathematical Theory of Reliability. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Ben Salah, N. and Masmoudi, A. (2011). The real powers of the convolution of a gamma distribution and a Bernoulli distribution. J. Theoret. Prob. 24, 450453.Google Scholar
Block, H. W., Li, Y. and Savits, T. H. (2003). Initial and final behavior of failure rate functions for mixtures and systems. J. Appl. Prob. 40, 721740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, H. W., Li, Y. and Savits, T. H. (2005). Mixtures of normal distributions: modality and failure rate. Statist. Prob. Lett. 74, 253264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, D. L. (2002). Tricomi and Kummer functions in occurrence, waiting times and exceedance statistics. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 16, 207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosam, E. B. and Shanbhag, D. N. (1997). An extended Laha-Lukacs characterization result based on a regression property. J. Statist. Planning Infer. 63, 173186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, R. E. (1980). Bathtub and related failure rate characterization. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 75, 667672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. S. and Ryzhik, I. M. (1980). Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. (1968). Total Positivity, Vol. 1. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. and Proschan, F. (1960). Pólya type distributions of convolutions. Ann. Math. Statist. 31, 721736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokonendji, C. C. (2001). First passage times on zero and one for natural exponential families. Statist. Prob. Lett. 51, 293298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letac, G. and Mora, M. (1990). Natural real exponential families with cubic variance functions. Ann. Statist. 18, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, C. N. (1982). Natural exponential families with quadratic variance functions. Ann. Statist. 10, 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. and Hernandez, P. J. (2004). How to obtain bathtub-shaped failure rate models from normal mixtures. Prob. Eng. Inf. Sci. 18, 511531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J., Guillamón, A. and Ruiz, M. C. (2009). Generalized mixtures in reliability modelling: applications to the construction of bathtub shaped hazard models and the study of systems. Appl. Stoch. Models Business Industry 25, 323337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, K. W. and Kotz, S. (1995). Kummer-Gamma and Kummer-Beta univariate and multivariate distributions. Res. Rep., Department of Res. Rep..Google Scholar
Pakes, A. G. (1996). A hitting time for Lévy processes, with applications to dams and branching processes. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 5, 521544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, N. U. (1965). Queues and Inventories. A Study of Their Basic Stochastic Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G. (2007). Stochastic Orders. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibuya, M. (2006). Applications of hyperbolic secant distributions. Japanese J. Appl. Statist. 35, 1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanbhag, D. N. (1979). Diagonality of the Bhattacharyya matrix as a characterization. Theory Prob. Appl. 24, 430433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, L. J. (1960). Confluent Hypergeometric Functions. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smyth, G. K. (1994). A note on modelling cross correlations: hyperbolic secant regression. Biometrika 81, 396402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zolotarev, V. M. (1967). On the divisibility of stable laws. Theory Prob. Appl. 12, 506508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar