Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:18:16.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zimbabwe's Wildlife Utilization Programs: Grassroots Democracy or an Extension of State Power?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Kevin A. Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Are apparently successful “grassroots” conservation programs in Africa paradoxically a boon for the extension of central state authority? Can decentralization actually serve to bring about recentralization, giving governments not only new sources of revenue, but also more legitimacy in marginal rural areas? By exploring the current and historical relationships between Zimbabwean rural people and the wildlife that surrounds them, one can hopefully gain insights into why Zimbabwe's wildlife population is among one of the most diverse and thriving in Africa. The cases explored in this article clearly indicate that, in theory, the more rural people are allowed and encouraged to participate in the management of big game, and the more material benefits they accrue, the higher their stake will become in conserving those living resources. This seems to be the case as far as receiving financial benefits are concerned. Still, the implications of such sustainable utilization for the furtherance of the state's power have been unclear in scholarship to date. Zimbabwe's environmental programs have been hailed by scholars and the media alike as pathbreaking ventures into grassroots control over natural resources. This study proposes the following hypothesis, using Zimbabwe's Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE) as an empirical test case: the establishment of wildlife utilization programs in agriculturally marginal rural areas also serves the interests of the Zimbabwean government to extend its authority in these otherwise neglected areas.

Type
Articles
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , April 1996 , pp. 103 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bianchi, R. 1989. Unruly Corporatism: Associational Life in Twentieth Century Egypt. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bienen, H. 1977. “State and Revolution: The Work of Amilcar Cabral,” Journal of Modern African Studies, 15: 555–68.Google Scholar
Bratton, M. 1994. “Microdemocracy? The Merger of Farmer Unions in Zimbabwe,? African Studies Review, 37:9–38.Google Scholar
Government of Zimbabwe. 1987. Annual Economic Review of Zimbabwe, 1986. Harare: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Helmsling, A. 1989. Transforming Rural Local Government: Zimbabwe's Post-Independence Experience [RUP Occasional Paper 19]. Harare: University of Zimbabwe: Department of Rural and Urban Planning.Google Scholar
Herbst, J. 1990. State Politics in Zimbabwe. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications.Google Scholar
International Union for the Conservation of Nature. 1988. The Nature of Zimbabwe: A Guide to Conservation and Development. Coleshill, UK: Albany House.Google Scholar
Jackson, R., and Rosberg, C., 1982. Personal Rule in Black Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, D. 1990. Cattle, Wildlife, Both, or Neither: a Guide to an Appropriate Response [WWF MAPS Project Paper 5]. Harare: WWF.Google Scholar
Katerere, Y., Gore, C., and Moyo, S.. 1991. The Case for Sustainable Development in Zimbabwe. Harare: ENDA-Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Leys, C. 1975. Underdevelopment in Kenya: The Political Economy of Neo-colonialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Martin, R. 1986. Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Natural Resources (CAMPFIRE). Harare: Department of National Parks and Wildlife Management.Google Scholar
Moore, B. 1966. Power in Washington. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mozaffar, S. 1989. “Clarifying Some Analytical Issues in Corporatism,” in Nyangoro, J. & Shaw, T. (ed.) Corporatism in Africa: Comparative Analysis and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Murombedzi, J. 1992. Decentralization or Recentralization? Implementing CAMPFIRE in the Omay Communal Lands of the Nyamiuyami District. Harare: Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Murphree, M. 1990. Decentralizing the Proprietorship of Wildlife Resources in Zimbabwe's Communal Lands. Harare: Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. 1977. “Corporatism and the Question of the State,” in Malloy, J. (ed.) Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ougaard, M. 1982. “Some Remarks Concerning Peripheral Capitalism and the Peripheral State,” Science and Society, 46: 385–404.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. 1991. CAMPFIRE: A Zimbabwean Approach to Sustainable Development and Community Empowerment through Wildlife Utilization. Harare: Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Rothchild, D. and Chazan, N.. 1989. The Precarious Balance. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Samoff, J. 1982. “Class, Class Conflict, and the State in Africa,’ Political Science Quarterly, 97: 105–28.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. 1974. ‘Still the Century of Corporatism?’ Review of Politics, 36: 85–131.Google Scholar
Shaw, T. and Nyangoro, J.. 1989. ‘Conclusion,’ in Nyangoro, J. & Shaw, T. (eds.) Corporatism in Africa, Comparative Analysis and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Rezvlutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. 1992. Wildlife: Relic of the Past or Resource of the Future? Harare: The Zimbabwe Trust.Google Scholar
Thomas, S. 1991. The Legacy of Dualism and Decisionmaking: The Prospects for Local Institutional Development in CAMPFIRE. Harare: Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe.Google Scholar
Young, C. and Turner, T.. 1985. The Rise and Decline of the Zairean State. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Zimbabwe Wildlife 1989. “Zimbabwe Wild News,” Zimbabwe Wildlife (June 1989), 20–21.Google Scholar