Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-jtdwj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T11:44:52.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Care dependence in old age: preferences, practices and implications in two Indonesian communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2012

ELISABETH SCHRÖDER-BUTTERFILL  and
TENGKU SYAWILA FITHRY
ELISABETH SCHRÖDER-BUTTERFILL*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Ageing, University of Southampton, UK.
TENGKU SYAWILA FITHRY
Affiliation:
Formerly Department of Anthropology, Universitas Andalas, Padang, Indonesia.
*
Address for correspondence: Elisabeth Schröder-Butterfill, Centre for Research on Ageing, University of Southampton, Murray Building (58/4079), Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. E-mail: e.schroeder-butterfill@soton.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The provision of physical care is a sensitive matter in all cultures and is circumscribed by moral injunctions and personal preferences. Research on Western cultures has shown care networks to be narrow subsets of people's wider networks and revealed dependence to be deeply undermining of full personhood. In non-Western societies these issues have received little attention, although it is sometimes assumed that care provision and dependence are much less problematic. This paper uses longitudinal ethnographic data from two ethnic groups in rural Indonesia to compare care preferences and practices in old age and to examine the implications of care dependence. The groups manifest varying degrees of daughter preference in care and differ in the extent to which notions of shame and avoidance prohibit cross-gender intimate care and care by ‘non-blood’ relatives. Demographic and social constraints often necessitate compromises in actual care arrangements (e.g. dependence on in-laws, neighbours or paid carers), not all of which are compatible with quality care and a valued identity. We argue that by probing the norms and practices surrounding care provision in different socio-cultural settings, it becomes possible to arrive at a deeper understanding of kinship, personhood and sociality. These insights are not only of sociological interest but have implications for people's vulnerability to poor quality care in old age.

Keywords

caredependencenetworkspersonhoodvulnerabilitygenderethnographyIndonesia

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Ageing & Society , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , March 2014 , pp. 361 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, E. 1990. Daughters caring for elderly parents. In Gubrium, J. F. and Sankar, A. (eds), The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 189–206.Google Scholar
Agree, E. M., Biddlecom, A. and Valente, T. W. 2005. Intergenerational transfers of resources between older persons and extended kin in Taiwan and the Philippines. Population Studies, 59, 2, 181–95.Google Scholar
Arber, S. and Evandrou, M. (eds) 1997. Ageing, Independence and the Life Course. Athenaeum Press, Gateshead, UK.Google Scholar
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 1995. Gender differences in informal caring. Health and Social Care in the Community, 3, 1, 19–31.Google Scholar
Arifin, E. N. and Ananta, A. (eds) 2009. Older Persons in Southeast Asia: An Emerging Asset. ISEAS Publisher, Singapore.Google Scholar
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2010. Sensus Penduduk 2010: Jumlah dan Distribusi Penduduk (Population Census 2010: Total and Distribution of Population). Online: http://sp2010.bps.go.id/index.php/site/index [accessed 31st July 2012].Google Scholar
Barker, J. 2009. Between humans and ghosts: the decrepit elderly. In Sokolovsky, J. (ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging: Worldwide Perspectives. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, 606–22.Google Scholar
Barker, J. and Mitteness, L. 1990. Invisible caregivers in the spotlight: non-kin caregivers of frail older adults. In Gubrium, J. F. and Sankar, A. (eds), The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 101–27.Google Scholar
Barker, J. and Mitteness, L. 1994. Introduction: a critical approach to threats to adult status. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 3, 233–7.Google Scholar
Barth, F. 1969. Introduction. In Barth, F. (ed.), Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Cultural Difference. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, 9–38.Google Scholar
Beatty, A. 1999. Varieties of Javanese Religion: An Anthropological Account. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biddlecom, A., Chayovan, N. and Ofstedal, M. B. 2003. Intergenerational support and transfers. In Hermalin, A. (ed.), The Well-being of the Elderly in Asia: A Four-country Comparative Study. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 185–229.Google Scholar
Brewer, L. 2001. Gender socialization and the cultural construction of elder caregivers. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 3, 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Sociological Association 2002. Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association. British Sociological Association, Durham, UK.Google Scholar
Calasanti, T. and Bowen, M. E. 2006. Spousal caregiving and crossing gender boundaries: maintaining gendered identities. Journal of Aging Studies, 20, 3, 253–63.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. and Martin-Matthews, A. 2003. The gendered nature of men's filial care. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 58B, 6, S350–8.Google Scholar
Carsten, J. 1997. The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chen, A. J. and Jones, G. W. 1989. Ageing in ASEAN: Its Socio-economic Consequences. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.Google Scholar
Cong, Z. and Silverstein, M. 2008. Intergenerational support and depression among elders in rural China: do daughters-in-law matter? Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 3, 599–612.Google Scholar
Connidis, I. A. and Kemp, C. L. 2008. Negotiating actual and anticipated parental support: multiple sibling voices in three-generation families. Journal of Aging Studies, 22, 3, 229–38.Google Scholar
Cowgill, D. O. and Holmes, L. D. 1972. Ageing and Modernization. Appleton Century, New York.Google Scholar
de Jong, W., Roth, C., Badini-Kinda, F. and Bhagyanath, S. 2005. Ageing in Insecurity: Case Studies on Social Security and Gender in India and Burkina Faso. Lit Verlag, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 1970 [1966]. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Pelican, Harmondsworth, UK.Google Scholar
Ebenstein, A. and Leung, S. 2010. Son preference and access to social insurance: evidence from China's rural pension program. Population and Development Review, 36, 1, 47–70.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M. and Glaser, K. 2003. Combining work and family life: the pension penalty of caring. Ageing & Society, 23, 5, 583–602.Google Scholar
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1990. Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing & Society, 10, 2, 151–75.Google Scholar
Fischer, L. R., Rogne, L. and Eustis, N. 1990. Support systems for the familyless elderly: care without commitment. In Gubrium, J. F. and Sankar, A. (eds), The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 129–43.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1960. The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Geertz, H. 1961. The Javanese Family: A Study of Kinship and Socialization. Free Press of Glencoe, New York.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M., Schuler, S. S. and Ross, J. 1983. Social and economic forces affecting intergenerational relations in extended families in a Third World country: a cautionary tale from South Asia. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 6, 716–24.Google Scholar
Grundy, E. 2006. Ageing and vulnerable elderly people: European perspectives. Ageing & Society, 26, 1, 105–34.Google Scholar
Herskovits, E. and Mitteness, L. 1994. Transgressions and sickness in old age. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 3, 327–40.Google Scholar
Hockey, J. and James, A. 1993. Growing Up and Growing Old: Ageing and Dependency in the Life Course. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Ikels, C. 1997. Long-term care and the disabled elderly in urban China. In Sokolovsky, J. (ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging. Greenwood, Westport, Connecticut, 452–71.Google Scholar
Indrizal, E. 2004 a. Problems of elderly without children: a case study of the matrilineal Minangkabau, West Sumatra. In Kreager, P. and Schröder-Butterfill, E. (eds), Ageing Without Children: European and Asian Perspectives. Berghahn, Oxford, 49–76.Google Scholar
Indrizal, E. 2004 b. Kesehatan Orang Lansia: Masalah, Pelayanan dan Implikasinya. Paper presented to the Dissemination Workshop on ‘Indonesia's Elderly: Problems and Potential’, 31 May, Pusat Penelitian Kesehatan, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Indrizal, E., Kreager, P. and Schröder-Butterfill, E. 2009. The structural vulnerability of older people in a matrilineal society: the Minangkabau of West Sumatra, Indonesia. In Sokolovsky, J. (ed.), The Cultural Context of Aging: Worldwide Perspectives. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, 383–94.Google Scholar
Kabir, Z. N., Parker, M. G., Szebehely, M. and Tishelman, C. 2001. Influence of sociocultural and structural factors on functional ability: the case of elderly people in Bangladesh. Journal of Aging and Health, 13, 3, 355–78.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. and Antonucci, T. 1980. Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles, and social support. In Baltes, P. B. and Brim, O. (eds), Life Span Development and Behavior. Academic Press, New York, 253–86.Google Scholar
Keating, N., Otfinowsky, P., Wenger, G. C., Fast, J. and Derksen, L. 2003. Understanding the caring capacity of informal networks of frail seniors: a case for care networks. Ageing & Society, 23, 1, 115–27.Google Scholar
Knodel, J. and Debavalya, N. 1997. Living arrangements and support among the elderly in Southeast Asia: an introduction. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 12, 4, 5–16.Google Scholar
Kreager, P. 1986. Demographic regimes as cultural systems. In Coleman, D. and Schofield, R. (eds), The State of Population Theory. Blackwell, Oxford, 131–55.Google Scholar
Kreager, P. 2006. Migration, social structure and old-age support networks: a comparison of three Indonesian communities. Ageing & Society, 26, 1, 37–60.Google Scholar
Kreager, P. and Schröder-Butterfill, E. 2007. Gaps in the family networks of older people in three rural Indonesian communities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 22, 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
Lawton, J. 1998. Contemporary hospice care: the sequestration of the unbounded body and ‘dirty dying’. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 2, 121–43.Google Scholar
Litwak, E. and Szelenyi, I. 1969. Primary group structures and their functions: kin, neighbors, and friends. American Sociological Review, 34, 4, 465–81.Google Scholar
Luborsky, M. 1994. The cultural adversity of physical disability: erosion of full adult personhood. Journal of Aging Studies, 8, 3, 239–53.Google Scholar
Marianti, R. 2004. In the absence of family support: cases of childless widows in urban neighbourhoods of East Java. In Kreager, P. and Schröder-Butterfill, E. (eds), Ageing Without Children: European and Asian Perspectives. Berghahn, Oxford, 147–71.Google Scholar
Niehof, A. 2002. The household production of care. In Butijn, C., Groot-Marcus, J. P., Linden, M. V. D., Steenbekkers, L. and Terpstra, P. (eds), Changes at the Other End of the Chain: Everyday Consumption in a Multidisciplinary Perspective. Shaker, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 179–88.Google Scholar
Pillemer, K. and Suitor, J. 2006. Making choices: a within-family study of caregiver selection. The Gerontologist, 46, 4, 439–48.Google Scholar
Rose, H. and Bruce, E. 1995. Mututal care but differential esteem: caring between older couples. In Arber, S. and Ginn, J. (eds), Connecting Gender and Ageing: A Sociological Approach. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 114–28.Google Scholar
Sanday, P. R. 2002. Women at the Center: Life in a Modern Matriarchy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Schröder-Butterfill, E. 2004 a. Adoption, patronage, and charity: arrangements for the elderly without children in East Java. In Kreager, P. and Schröder-Butterfill, E. (eds), Ageing Without Children: European and Asian Perspectives. Berghahn, Oxford, 106–46.Google Scholar
Schröder-Butterfill, E. 2004 b. Inter-generational family support provided by older people in Indonesia. Ageing & Society, 24, 4, 497–530.Google Scholar
Schröder-Butterfill, E. 2006. The impact of kinship networks on old-age vulnerability in Indonesia. Annales de Démographie Historique, 2005, 2, 139–63.Google Scholar
Schröder-Butterfill, E. and Kreager, P. 2005. Actual and de facto childlessness in old age: evidence and implications from East Java, Indonesia. Population and Development Review, 31, 1, 19–55.Google Scholar
Schröder-Butterfill, E. and Marianti, R. 2006. A framework for understanding old-age vulnerabilities. Ageing & Society, 26, 1, 9–35.Google Scholar
Shaibu, S. and Wallhagen, M. 2002. Family caregiving of the elderly in Botswana: boundaries of culturally acceptable options and resources. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 17, 1, 139–54.Google Scholar
Silverman, M. and Huelsman, E. 1990. The dynamics of long-term familial caregiving. In Gubrium, J. F. and Sankar, A. (eds), The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 173–88.Google Scholar
Sokolovsky, J. (ed.) 2009. The Cultural Context of Aging: Worldwide Perspectives. Praeger, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Stone, R., Cafferata, G. L. and Sangl, J. 1987. Caregivers of the frail elderly: a national profile. The Gerontologist, 27, 5, 616–26.Google Scholar
Szinovacz, M. and Davey, A. 2007. Changes in adult child caregiver networks. The Gerontologist, 47, 3, 280–95.Google Scholar
Szinovacz, M. and Davey, A. 2008. The division of parent care between spouses. Ageing & Society, 28, 4, 571–97.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. 2000 a. Bathing: The Body and Community Care. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. 2000 b. Carework as a form of bodywork. Ageing & Society, 20, 4, 389–411.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. 2004. The body, gender, and age: feminist insights in social gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 1, 59–73.Google Scholar
Twigg, J. 2006. The Body in Health and Social Care. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK.Google Scholar
Ungerson, C. 1987. Policy is Personal: Sex, Gender and Informal Care. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
United Nations 2010. World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
van der Geest, S. 2002. Respect and reciprocity: care of elderly people in rural Ghana. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 17, 1, 3–31.Google Scholar
van Eeuwijk, P. 2003. Urban elderly with chronic illness: local understandings and emerging discrepancies in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Anthropology and Medicine, 10, 3, 325–41.Google Scholar
van Eeuwijk, P. 2006. Old-age vulnerability, ill-health and care support in urban areas of Indonesia. Ageing & Society, 26, 1, 61–80.Google Scholar
Vatuk, S. 1990. ‘To be a burden on others’: dependency anxiety among the elderly in India. In Lynch, O. M. (ed.), Divine Passions: The Social Construction of Emotion in India. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, 64–88.Google Scholar
Wenger, G. C. 1990. Personal care: variation by network type, style and capacity. In Gubrium, J. F. and Sankar, A. (eds), The Home Care Experience: Ethnography and Policy. Sage, Newbury Park, California, 145–71.Google Scholar
Wenger, G. C. 1997. Social networks and the prediction of elderly people at risk. Aging and Mental Health, 1, 4, 311–20.Google Scholar
Wenger, G. C. 2001. Ageing without children: rural Wales. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 16, 1, 79–109.Google Scholar
Wong, O. 2005. Gender and intimate caregiving for the elderly in Hong Kong. Journal of Aging Studies, 19, 3, 375–91.Google Scholar