Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mzfmx Total loading time: 0.437 Render date: 2022-08-11T06:47:19.040Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Socio-Economic Resources and Differential Ageing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2008

Karl Ulrich Mayer
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education, Berlin.
Michael Wagner
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education, Berlin.

Abstract

The Sociology and Social Policy Research Unit of the Berlin Aging Study focuses on four substantive areas: (1) life course antecedents and generational experiences, (2) later phases of the family life course, (3) action resources and social participation, and (4) economic situations and the provision of care. This paper reports results on the relationship between social and economic inequality and differential ageing, using the BASE multidisciplinary Intake Assessment (N = 360). The socio-economic position of older people is measured along three dimensions: economic resources, social status and prestige, and cultural status. Several ageing outcomes are considered, including functional physical health, cognitive functioning and mental health, overall subjective well-being, social autonomy and dependency. First, we show that old people as a group are neither socially nor economically homogeneous: very old women possess unusually low economic resources; and cohort differences in educational attainment are carried into old age. Second, cognitive functioning and mental health are positively correlated with socio-economic resources, while functional physical health is not. For women, socio-economic resources slightly affect overall subjective well-being, and are linked to the likelihood of living in a nursing home. We speculate that the wide availability of compulsory health insurance reduces social differentials in physical health and that these inequalities may determine who survives into old age.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, T. and Wysong, J. 1991. Sozialer Status, gesundheitliches Risiko und Krankenversicherung: Eine vergleichende Analyse der BRD und den USA. Sozialund Präventivmedizin, 36, 166175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiach, P. and Curtis, S. 1990. Social inequalities in self-reported morbidity: interpretation and comparison of data from Britain and France. Social Science and Medicine, 31 (3), 267274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alber, J. 1991. The impact of public policies on older people in the Federal Republic of Germany (Report for the European Actions on Older People, Konstanz, Spring 1991). Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Baden Wurttemberg.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. and Newman, J. F. 1973. Societal and individual health determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51, 95124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 1991. Gender and Later Life. A Sociological Analysis of Resources and Constraints. Sage, London.Google Scholar
Atchley, R. C. 1989. A continuity theory of normal aging. The Gerontologist, 29 (2), 183190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, M. M., Mayr, U., Borchelt, M., Maas, I. and Wilms, H.-U. 1993. Everyday competence in old and very old age: an interdisciplinary perspective. Ageing and Society, this issue.Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. 1987. Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: on the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23 (5), 611626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltes, P. B., Mayer, K. U., Helmchen, H. and Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. 1993. The Berlin Aging Study (BASE): overview and design. Ageing and Society, this issue.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Cutler, N. E., Mangen, D. J. and Marshall, V. W. 1985. Generations, cohorts, and relations between age groups. In Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, second edition, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 304338.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L., Olander, E. B. and Haddad, A. A. 1976. The ‘generation gap’ and aging family members: toward a conceptual model. In Gubrium, J. F. (ed.), Time, Roles, and Self in Old Age. Human Sciences Press, New York, pp. 237263 and 347351.Google Scholar
Bengtson, V. L. and Schütze, Y. 1992. Altern und Generationenbeziehungen: Aussichten für das kommende Jahrhundert. In Baltes, P. B. and Mittelstraß, J. (eds), Zukunft des Alterns und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 492517.Google Scholar
Berkman, L. F. 1986. The association between educational attainment and mental status examinations: of etiologic significance for senile dementias or not? Journal of Chronic Diseases, 39 (3), 171174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birren, J. E. 1969. The concept of functional age, theoretical background. International symposium on the assessment of functional age. Psychological and physiological aspects. Leiden, Holland, August 21st, 1968. Human Development, 12, 214215.Google Scholar
Birren, J. E. and Renner, V. J. 1977. Research on the psychology of ageing: principles and experimentation. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W. (eds), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 338.Google Scholar
Black, D., Morris, J. N., Smith, C. and Townsend, P. 1992. The Black Report (edited by Peter Townsend and Nick Davidson). In Inequalities in Health. Penguin, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, pp. 31213.Google Scholar
Blane, D., Smith, G. D. and Bartley, M. 1990. Social class differences in years of potential life lost: size, trends and principal causes. British Medical Journal, 301, 429432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Brückner, E. 1993. Lebensverläufe und gesellschaftlicher Wandel. Konzeption, Design und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1919–1921. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 44. Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education, Berlin.Google Scholar
Brückner, E. and Mayer, K. U. 1987. Lebensgeschichte und Austritt aus der Erwerbstätigkeit im Alter-am Beispiel der Geburtsjahrgänge 1919–21. Zeitschrift für Sozialisationsforschung und Erziehungssoziologie, 7 (2), 101116.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. 1989. Foundations of Social Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Crystal, S. and Shea, D. 1990. Cumulative advantage, cumulative disadvantage, and inequality among elderly people. The Gerontologist, 30 (4), 437443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cumming, E. and Henry, W. E. 1961. Growing Old. The Process of Disengagement. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Dinkel, R. 1984. Sterblichkeit in Perioden- und Kohortenbetrachtung. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 13 (2), 477500.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1971. Social Differentiation and Stratification. Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H. Jr 1974. The Children of the Great Depression. Social Change and Life Experience. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Elder, G. H. Jr 1985. Perspectives on the life course. In Birren, J. E. and Schaie, K. W.. (ed.), Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions, 1968–1980. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, pp. 2349.Google Scholar
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. 1975. ‘Mini-Mental State’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fratiglioni, L. 1993. Epidemiology of Alzheimer's Disease. Issues of etiology and validity. Munksgaard, Copenhagen.Google ScholarPubMed
Gilberg, R. 1992. Pflegebedarf im Alter: Welche Hilfs- und Pflegequellen werden genutzt? Poster, presented at 26th Deutscher Soziologentag, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Gordon, C. and Gaitz, C. M. 1976. Leisure and lives: personal expressivity across the life span. In Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 310341.Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. F. 1973. The Myth of the Golden Years. A Socio-environmental Theory of Aging. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Hagestad, G. P. 1990. Social perspectives on the life course. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, third edition, Academic, San Diego, California, pp. 151168.Google Scholar
Handl, J. 1977. Sozio-ökonomischer Status und der Prozeß der Statuszuweisung - Entwicklung und Anwendung einer Skala. In Handl, J., Mayer, K. U. and Müller, W. (eds), Klassenlagen und Sozialstruktur. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 101153.Google Scholar
Handl, J., Mayer, K. U. and Müller, W. (eds) 1977. Klassenlagen und Sozialstruktur. Campus, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. and Semrau, P. 1989. Trends in poverty and low income in the Federal Republic of Germany (Sfb-3-working paper no. 306). Sonderforschungsbereich 3, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. and Stubig, H.-J. 1985. Strukturen der personellen Verteilung von Nettoeinkommen und Wohlfahrtspositionen. In Hauser, R. and Engel, B. (eds), Soziale Sicherung und Einkommensverteilung. Empirische Analysen für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 4197.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. and Wagner, G. 1992. Altern und soziale Sicherung. In Baltes, P. B. and Mittelstraß, J. (eds), Zukunft des Alterns und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 581613.Google Scholar
Henretta, J. C. 1992. Uniformity and diversity: life course institutionalization and late-life work exit. Sociological Quarterly, 33 (2), 265279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henretta, J. C. and Campbell, R. T. 1976. Status attainment and status maintenance: a study of stratification in old age. American Sociological Review, 41, 981992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J. S., Kessler, R. C., Herzog, R., Mero, R. P., Kinney, A. M. and Breslow, M. J. 1990. Age, socioeconomic status, and health. Milbank Quarterly, 68 (3), 383411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, M. 1961. Toward a theory of leisure for social gerontology. In Kleemeier, R. W. (ed.), Aging and Leisure. A Perspective into the Meaningful Use of Time. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 389412.Google Scholar
Katz, S., Downs, T. D., Cash, H. R. and Grotz, R. C. 1970. Progress in development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist, 10, 2030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A. and Jaffe, M. W. 1963. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of the American Medical Association, 185, 9499.Google ScholarPubMed
Klein, L. E., Roca, R. P., McArthur, J., Vogelsang, G., Klein, G. B. and Kirby, S. M. 1985. Diagnosing dementia. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the mental status examination. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 33 (7), 483488.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohli, M. 1990. Das Alter als Herausforderung für die Theorie sozialer Ungleichheit. In Berger, P. A. and Hradil, S. (eds), Lebenslagen, Lebensläufe, Lebensstile (Soziale Welt, Sonderband 7). Schwartz, Göttingen, Niedersachsen, Germany, pp. 387406.Google Scholar
Kohli, M. 1992. Altern in soziologischer Perspektive. In Baltes, P. B. and Mittelstraß, J. (eds), Zukunft des Alterns und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 231259.Google Scholar
Kohli, M., Freter, H.-J., Langehennig, M., Roth, S., Simoneit, G. and Tregel, S. 1992. Engagement im Ruhestand. Rentner zwischen Erwerb, Ehrenamt und Hobby. Leske and Budrich, Opladen, Germany.Google Scholar
Kreckel, R. 1987. Neue Ungleichheiten und alte Deutungmuster. Über die Kritikresistenz des vertikalen Gesellschaftsmodells in der Soziologie. In Giesen, B. and Haferkamp, H. (eds), Soziologie der sozialen Ungleichheit. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Germany, pp. 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P. 1975. The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: a revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30 (1), 8589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehr, U. 1987. Zur Situation der älterwerdenden Frau. Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven biszum Jahre 2000. Beck, Munich.Google Scholar
JrLongino, C. F., Warheit, G. J. and Green, J. A. 1989. Class, aging, and health. In Markides, K. S. (ed.), Aging and Health. Perspectives on gender, race, ethnicity, and class. Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 79109.Google Scholar
Maas, I. and Clausen, G. 1991. Social participation of the very old: the importance of social and health factors. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Markides, K. S. and Machalek, R. 1984. Selective survival, aging and society. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 3, 207222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmot, M. G., Smith, G. D., Stansfeld, S., Patel, C., North, F. and Head, J. 1991. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. The Lancet, 337, 13871393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matras, J. 1990. Dependency, Obligations, and Entitlements: a New Sociology of Aging, the Life Course, and the Elderly. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. 1977. Statushierarchie und Heiratsmarkt - Empirische Analysen zur Struktur des Schichtungssystems in der Bundesrepublik und zur Ableitung einer Skala des sozialen Status. In Handl, J., Mayer, K. U. and Müller, W. (eds), Klassenlagen und Sozialstruktur. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 155232.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. 1980. Sozialhistorische Materialien zum Verhältnis von Bildungs- und Beschäftigungssystem bei Frauen. In Beck, U., Hörning, K. H. and Thomssen, W. (eds), Bildungsexpansion und betriebliche Beschäftigungspolitik. Aktuelle Entwicklungstendenzen im Vermittlungszusammenhang von Bildung und Beschäftigung. Beiträge zum 19. Deutschen Soziologentag Berlin 1979. Campus, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 6079.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. 1988. German survivors of the second world war: collective experiences and impacts on the life course. In Riley, M. W. (ed.), Social Structures and Human Lives (Social Change and the Life Course, Vol. I, American Sociological Association presidential series). Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. (ed.) 1990. Lebensverläufe und sozialer Wandel (Sonderheft 31 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie). Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, Germany.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, K. U. 1992. Bildung und Arbeit in einer alternden Bevölkerung. In Bakes, P. B. and Mittelstraß, J. (eds), Zukunft des Alterns und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung. De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 518543.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. and Brückner, E. 1989. Lebensverläufe und Wohlfahrtsentwicklung. Konzeption, Design, und Methodik der Erhebung von Lebensverläufen der Geburtsjahrgänge 1929–1931, 1939–1941, 1949–1951. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung Nr. 35. Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education, Berlin.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. and Huinink, J. 1990. Age, period, and cohort in the study of the life course: a comparison of classical A-P-C-analysis with event history analysis, or farewell to Lexis? In Magnusson, D. and Bergman, L. R. (eds), Data Quality in Longitudinal Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 211232.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. and Müller, W. 1986. The state and the structure of the life course. In Sørensen, A. B., Weinert, F. E. and Sherrod, L. (eds), Human Development and the Life Course; Multidisciplinary Perspectives, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New York, pp. 217245.Google Scholar
Mayer, K. U. and Schoepflin, U. 1989. The state and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 187209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, K. U. and Tuma, N. B. (eds) 1990. Event History Analysis in Life Course Research. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Motel, A. and Wagner, M. 1993. In press. Armut im Alter? Ergebnisse der Berliner Altersstudie zur Einkommenslage alter und sehr alter Menschen. Zeitschrift für Soziologie.Google Scholar
Myles, J. 1984. Old Age in the Welfare State: The Political Economy of Public Pensions. Little and Brown, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Myles, J. and Quadagno, J. (eds) 1991. States, Labor Markets and the Future of Old-Age Policy. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1943. The kinship system of the contemporary United States. American Anthropologist, 45 (1), 2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passuth, P. M. and Bengtson, V. L. 1988. Sociological theories of aging: current perspectives and future directions. In Birren, J. E. and Bengtson, V. L. (eds), Emergent Theories of Aging. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp. 333355.Google Scholar
Preston, S. H. 1984. Children and the elderly: divergent paths for America's dependents. Demography, 21, 435457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, M. W. 1988. On the significance of age in sociology. In Riley, M. W. (ed.), Social Structures and Human Lives (Social Change and the Life Course, Vol. I, American Sociological Association presidential series). Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 2445.Google Scholar
Riley, M. W., Johnson, M. and Foner, A. 1972. Aging and Society III: A Sociology of Age Stratification. Sage, New York.Google Scholar
Rose, G. and Marmot, M. G. 1981. Social class and coronary heart disease. British Heart Journal, 45, 1319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenmayr, L. and Rosenmayr, H. 1978. Die Familie. In Rosenmayr, L. and Rosenmayr, H. (eds) 1978. Der alte Mensch in der Gesellschaft. Rowohlt, Reinbek, Hamburg, pp. 176230.Google Scholar
Rosow, I. 1976. Status and role change through the life span. In Binstock, R. H. and Shanas, E. (eds) 1976. Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 457482.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. S. and Rossi, P. H. 1990. Of Human Bonding. De Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
Schaie, K. W. 1989. The hazards of cognitive aging. The Gerontologist, 29 (4), 484493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schepers, J. 1989. Sozialgruppenspezifische Sterblichkeit in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin.Google Scholar
Schepers, J. and Wagner, G. 1989. Soziale Differenzen der Lebenserwartung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland - Neue empirische Analysen. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 35, 670682.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T. M. 1990. Economic status of the elderly. In Binstock, R. H. and George, L. K. (eds), Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences, third edition, Academic, San Diego, California, pp. 362381.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T., Torrey, B. B. and Rein, M. 1988. Patterns of Income and Poverty: The Economic Status of Children and the Elderly in Eight Countries. The Urban Institute Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Steinhagen-Thiessen, E. and Borchelt, M. 1993. Health differences in advanced old age. Ageing and Society, this issue.Google Scholar
Troll, L. E. 1971. The family of later life: a decade review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 263290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, M. and Settersten, R. A. 1993. Generational Structures and Intergenerational Ties of the Old and Very Old in Berlin: Possibilities and Realities. Paper presented at the XVth Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, Budapest.Google Scholar
Waltz, E. M. 1981. Soziale Faktoren bei der Entstehung und Bewältigung von Krankheit - ein Überblick über die empirische Literatur. In Badura, B. (ed.), Soziale Unterstützung und chronische Krankheit. Zum Stand sozialepidemiologischer Forschung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main, pp. 40119.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1976. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriβ der verstehenden Soziologie (ed. Johannes, Winckelmann), fifth edition, Mohr, Tübingen, Baden Wurttemberg.Google Scholar
Wegener, B. 1985. Gibt es Sozialprestige? Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14, 209235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G. (ed.) 1986. Class and Health. Research and Longitudinal Data. Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Wysong, J. and Abel, T. 1990. Universal health insurance and high-risk groups in West Germany: implications for U.S. health policy. Milbank Quarterly, 68 (4), 527560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Socio-Economic Resources and Differential Ageing
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Socio-Economic Resources and Differential Ageing
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Socio-Economic Resources and Differential Ageing
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *